Peritonitis

The immunologic consequences of using bactericidal versus bacteriostatic antibiotic treatments are unclear. We observed a bacteriostatic (growth halting) treatment was more protective than a bactericidal (bacteria killing) treatment in a murine peritonitis model. To understand this unexpected difference, we compared macrophage responses to bactericidal treated bacteria or bacteriostatic treated bacteria. We found that Gram-negative bacteria treated with bactericidal drugs induced more proinflammatory cytokines than those treated with bacteriostatic agents. Bacterial DNA - released only by bactericidal treatments - exacerbated inflammatory signaling through TLR9. Without TLR9 signaling, the in vivo efficacy of bactericidal drug treatment was rescued. This demonstrates that antibiotics can act in important ways distinct from bacterial inhibition: like causing treatment failure by releasing DNA that induces excessive inflammation. These data establish a novel link between how an antibiotic affects bacterial physiology and subsequent immune system engagement, which may be relevant for optimizing treatments to simultaneously clear bacteria and modulate inflammation.

BackgroundSpecialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs) promote resolution of inflammation, clear infections and stimulate tissue regeneration. These include resolvins, protectins, and maresins. During self-resolving acute inflammation, SPMs are produced and have key functions activating endogenous resolution response for returning to homeostasis. Herein, we addressed whether infections initiated with ongoing inflammation alter resolution programs, and if low-dose repetitive SPM regimen re-programs the resolution response.MethodsInflammation was initiated with zymosan (1 mg/mouse) followed by E. coli (105 CFU/mouse) infections carried out in murine peritonitis, and exudates collected at 4-72 h. Leukocytes were enumerated using light microscopy, percentages of PMN, monocytes and macrophages were determined using flow cytometry, and resolution indices calculated. Lipid mediators and SPM profiles were established using mass spectrometry-based metabololipidomics. Repetitive dosing with a SPM panel consisting of RvD1, RvD2, RvD5, MaR1 and RvE2 (0.1 ng/mouse each, i.p.) was given to mice, followed by zymosan challenge. Leukocyte composition, resolution indices and RNA-sequencing were carried out for the repetitive SPM treatments.ResultsE. coli infections initiated acute inflammation-resolution programs with temporal SPM production in the infectious exudates. Zymosan-induced inflammation prior to E. coli peritonitis shifted exudate resolution indices and delayed E. coli clearance. Lipid mediator metabololipidomics demonstrated that E. coli infection with ongoing zymosan-induced inflammation shifted the time course of exudate SPMs, activating a SPM cluster that included RvD1, RvD5 and MaR1 during the initiation phase of infectious inflammation (0-4 h); RvD5 and MaR1 were present also in the resolution phase (24-48 h). To emulate daily SPM regimens used in humans, a repetitive subthreshold dosing of the SPM panel RvD1, RvD2, RvD5, MaR1 and RvE2 each at 0.1 ng per mouse was administered. This low-dose SPM regimen accelerated exudate PMN clearance following zymosan-induced inflammation, and shortened the resolution interval by > 70%. These low-dose SPMs regulated genes and pathways related to immune response, chemokine clearance and tissue repair, as demonstrated by using RNA-sequencing.ConclusionsInfections encountered during ongoing inflammation in mice reset the resolution mechanisms of inflammation via SPM clusters. Low-dose SPMs activate innate immune responses and pathways towards the resolution response that can be reprogrammed.

The present study aimed to explore the pathogenic spectrum and risk factors of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis (Peritoneal dialysis associated peritonitis, PDAP) in Yongzhou, Hunan, China. The clinical and epidemiological data on regular peritoneal dialysis (Peritoneal dialysis, PD) between January 2016 and December 2020 in Yongzhou were collected for retrospective analysis. The related factors of peritonitis were evaluated by single-factor analysis, while risk factors of refractory PDAP were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression analysis.172/331 172 (51.9%) patients developed peritonitis. The risk factors of PDAP in PD patients included high C-reactive protein (C-reactive protein, CRP), low albumin(Albumin, ALB), low hemoglobin (Hemoglobin, Hb), low educational level (junior high school or lower), preference of spicy food, irregular diet, low annual household income, unfavorable fluid exchange conditions, unstable employment (including working as a farmer), and unfavorable humidity conditions (P < 0.05). 63/172 (36.6%) PDAP patients were intractable cases with a pathogenic bacteria positive rate of 74.60% in the peritoneal dialysate cultures, and 109/172 patients were non-intractable cases with a pathogenic bacteria positive rate of 53.21%. Gram-positive bacteria (G+) were detected in most of the dialysate cultures, with Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) as the most common type, while Escherichia coli (E. coli) was the most common Gram-negative bacteria (G-). Gram-positive bacteria were sensitive to vancomycin and linezolid, while G- bacteria were sensitive to imipenem and amikacin. Lifestyle, educational level, and environmental factors are the major contributors to PDAP in PD patients. Fungal and multi-bacterial infections are the major causes of death; PD is stopped for such patients.

BackgroundProton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment leads to significant changes in the gut microbiota composition. We hypothesized that these alterations may transfer into distinct changes in the causative agents of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) in patients with cirrhosis.AimsTo investigate the impact of PPI treatment on the pathogen spectrum of SBP.MethodsA total of 227 cirrhosis patients with culture-positive SBP from two German tertiary care centers were included and the pathogen spectrum of SBP was analysed with respect to PPI treatment.ResultsIn the PPI-group, gram-positive bacteria were significantly more common compared to the non-PPI-group (62.1% vs. 34.0%, p ConclusionsPPI treatment is associated with increased abundances of gram-positive pathogens, including Enterococcus spp., in culture-positive SBP. This result can help guide empiric antibiotic therapy of SBP.