Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (999 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
A group of antibiotics that contain 6-aminopenicillanic acid with a side chain attached to the 6-amino group. The penicillin nucleus is the chief structural requirement for biological activity. The side-chain structure determines many of the antibacterial and pharmacological characteristics. (Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 8th ed, p1065)
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Antibiotics, Penicillin; Penicillin Antibiotics; Penicillin.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- beta-Lactams
- Narrower topics
- Amdinocillin; Cyclacillin; Methicillin; Nafcillin; Oxacillin; Penicillanic Acid; Penicillin G; Penicillin V; Sulbactam; Ticarcillin
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 88,517 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Penicillins” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 7,942 of them (9.0%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 59,053 records.
Reviews account for 4,756 records (5.4%) and meta-analyses for 429. Randomized controlled trials number 4,675 (5.3%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 59,053 |
| 2000-2009 | 10,198 |
| 2010-2019 | 11,324 |
| 2020 onward | 7,942 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 4,756 | 5.4% |
| Meta-analyses | 429 | 0.5% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 4,675 | 5.3% |
Method: PubMed query "Penicillins"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals
Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revisiting mutational resistance to ampicillin and cefotaxime in Haemophilus influenzae | 2024 | Meta-analysis Design not recorded in structured metadata | 17 | cc by PMID 39633433 · DOI · PMC11616347 |
| Valine potentiates cefoperazone-sulbactam to kill methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus | 2025 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 14 | cc by PMID 39692510 · DOI · PMC11748551 |
| Safety and Tolerability of Pivmecillinam During More Than Four Decades of Clinical Experience: A Systematic Review | 2025 | Systematic review Design not recorded in structured metadata | 13 | cc by PMID 39835818 · DOI · PMC11848268 |
| Cefazolin for Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia | 2026 | Randomized controlled trial Design not recorded in structured metadata | 10 | cc by PMID 42308484 · DOI · PMC7619232 |
Revisiting mutational resistance to ampicillin and cefotaxime in Haemophilus influenzae [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundHaemophilus influenzae is an opportunistic bacterial pathogen that can cause severe respiratory tract and invasive infections.
- Closing excerpt
- The implications on treatment outcome and bacterial fitness of other extended PBP3 substitution patterns and novel candidate genes need to be determined.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (222 words)
BackgroundHaemophilus influenzae is an opportunistic bacterial pathogen that can cause severe respiratory tract and invasive infections. The emergence of β-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant (BLNAR) strains and unclear correlations between genotypic (i.e., gBLNAR) and phenotypic resistance are challenging empirical treatments and patient management. Thus, we sought to revisit molecular resistance mechanisms and to identify new resistance determinants of H. influenzae.MethodsWe performed a systematic meta-analysis of H. influenzae isolates (n = 291) to quantify the association of phenotypic ampicillin and cefotaxime resistance with previously defined resistance groups, i.e., specific substitution patterns of the penicillin binding protein PBP3, encoded by ftsI. Using phylogenomics and a genome-wide association study (GWAS), we investigated evolutionary trajectories and novel resistance determinants in a public global cohort (n = 555) and a new clinical cohort from three European centers (n = 298), respectively.ResultsOur meta-analysis confirmed that PBP3 group II- and group III-related isolates were significantly associated with phenotypic resistance to ampicillin (p ConclusionsGradient agar diffusion strips and broth microdilution assays do not consistently classify isolates from PBP3 groups as phenotypically resistant. Consequently, when the minimum inhibitory concentration is close to the clinical breakpoints, and genotypic data is available, PBP3 resistance groups should be prioritized over susceptible phenotypic results for ampicillin. The implications on treatment outcome and bacterial fitness of other extended PBP3 substitution patterns and novel candidate genes need to be determined.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39633433 · DOI · PMC11616347
Valine potentiates cefoperazone-sulbactam to kill methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Metabolic state-reprogramming approach was extended from Gram-negative bacteria to Gram-positive bacterium methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) for identifying desired reprogramming metabolites to synergize existing antibiotic killing to MRSA.
- Closing excerpt
- Therefore, the combination of valine and SCF is a new drug candidate effective against MRSA.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (362 words)
Metabolic state-reprogramming approach was extended from Gram-negative bacteria to Gram-positive bacterium methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) for identifying desired reprogramming metabolites to synergize existing antibiotic killing to MRSA. Metabolomics comparison between MRSA and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus showed a depressed metabolic state in MRSA. Valine was identified as the most depressed metabolite/biomarker, and valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis as the most enriched metabolic pathway. Thus, valine was used as a reprogramming metabolite to potentiate existing antibiotic killing to MRSA. Among the tested antibiotics, valine synergized cefoperazone-sulbactam (SCF) to produce the greatest killing effect. The combined effect of SCF and valine was demonstrated in clinical MRSA isolates and in mouse systemic and thigh infection models. Underlying mechanisms were attributed to valine-induced the activation of the pyruvate cycle/the TCA cycle and fatty acid biosynthesis. The activated pyruvate cycle/the TCA cycle elevated proton motive force by NADH and the activated fatty acid biosynthesis promoted membrane permeability by lauric acid. Both together increased cefoperazone uptake, which outpaces efflux action and thereby intracellular drug is elevated to effectively kill MRSA. These results provide the combination of valine and SCF to produce a new drug candidate effective against MRSA.ImportanceMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is possibly the most infamous example of antibiotic resistance and new antibiotics are urgently needed to control it. The present study used metabolic state-reprogramming approach to identify an ideal biomarker as an antibiotic adjuvant for reversing the metabolic state of MRSA. The most repressed valine was identified as the adjuvant. Exogenous valine most effectively potentiated cefoperazone-sulbactam (SCF) to kill MRSA in vitro and in vivo. Viability of 18 clinical MRSA isolates was reduced by the top 276.64-fold in the presence of valine and SCF. In mouse models, lower bacterial load in liver, spleen, kidney, thigh, and higher survival were determined in the SCF + valine than valine or SCF alone. Valine promoted MRSA to increase SCF uptake that overcomes the efflux and enzymatic hydrolysis. It also extended the PAE of SCF. These occur because valine activates the pyruvate cycle to elevate proton motive force by NADH and increases membrane permeability by lauric acid. Therefore, the combination of valine and SCF is a new drug candidate effective against MRSA.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39692510 · DOI · PMC11748551
Safety and Tolerability of Pivmecillinam During More Than Four Decades of Clinical Experience: A Systematic Review [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The recent US Food and Drug Administration approval of pivmecillinam-an oral prodrug of the amidinopenicillin antibiotic mecillinam-presents a valuable opportunity to address the need for new treatments for uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI).
- Closing excerpt
- Together with the evidence for efficacy of, and minimal resistance to, pivmecillinam, the findings of this review support the position of pivmecillinam as a first-line treatment for uUTI.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (147 words)
The recent US Food and Drug Administration approval of pivmecillinam-an oral prodrug of the amidinopenicillin antibiotic mecillinam-presents a valuable opportunity to address the need for new treatments for uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI). We report findings of a systematic literature review of the safety profile of pivmecillinam/mecillinam based on more than 40 years' experience, mainly in Europe and Canada, to describe its tolerability profile and identify any important safety signals. In total, 110 eligible publications were identified describing use of pivmecillinam/mecillinam as monotherapy or in combination, for treatment of uUTI or other infectious conditions. These studies revealed a benign safety and tolerability profile, awareness of which will inform treatment decisions as pivmecillinam is made available in the United States. Together with the evidence for efficacy of, and minimal resistance to, pivmecillinam, the findings of this review support the position of pivmecillinam as a first-line treatment for uUTI.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39835818 · DOI · PMC11848268
Cefazolin for Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundStaphylococcus aureus bacteremia is associated with high mortality.
- Closing excerpt
- ).
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (268 words)
BackgroundStaphylococcus aureus bacteremia is associated with high mortality. Whether cefazolin or an antistaphylococcal penicillin should be preferred for the treatment of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus bacteremia is unclear.MethodsIn an ongoing international Bayesian adaptive platform trial, we conducted an open-label, randomized comparison of cefazolin with an antistaphylococcal penicillin (flucloxacillin or cloxacillin) in adult patients with penicillin-resistant, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus bacteremia. The primary outcome, which was evaluated with a hierarchical Bayesian logistic-regression model, was death from any cause within 90 days after enrollment in the platform. We assessed the posterior probability of the noninferiority of cefazolin to flucloxacillin or cloxacillin (with the criterion for noninferiority prespecified as an adjusted odds ratio of ResultsThis domain of the ongoing trial was conducted between February 17, 2022, and August 7, 2024, by which time the criterion for noninferiority had been met. Mortality at 90 days among adults who could be evaluated was 15.0% (97 deaths among 645 patients) in the cefazolin group and 17.0% (109 deaths among 642 patients) in the antistaphylococcal-penicillin group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.81; 95% credible interval, 0.59 to 1.12; probability of noninferiority, 99.2%; probability of superiority, 89.8%). Acute kidney injury occurred in 92 of 660 patients (13.9%) in the cefazolin group, as compared with 127 of 648 (19.6%) in the antistaphylococcal-penicillin group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.67; 95% credible interval, 0.50 to 0.89; probability of superiority, 99.7%).ConclusionsIn patients with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus bacteremia, cefazolin was noninferior to flucloxacillin or cloxacillin with respect to 90-day mortality and was associated with a lower incidence of acute kidney injury. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council and others; SNAP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05137119.).
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42308484 · DOI · PMC7619232
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an overview of basic and clinical research [5]
- Research article Overview of Changes to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, M100, 31st Edition [6]
- Research article Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [7]
- Research article β-Lactams and β-Lactamase Inhibitors: An Overview [8]
- Research article Evaluation and Management of Penicillin Allergy: A Review [9]
- Research article Antibiotic allergy [10]
References
- Diricks M, Petersen S, Bartels L, Lâm TT, Claus H, Bajanca-Lavado MP, et al.. Revisiting mutational resistance to ampicillin and cefotaxime in Haemophilus influenzae. . 2024. PMID 39633433 · DOI · PMC11616347
- Li S-h, Tao Y, Yang Z-c, Fu H-z, Lin H-y, Peng X-x, et al.. Valine potentiates cefoperazone-sulbactam to kill methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. . 2025. PMID 39692510 · DOI · PMC11748551
- Kaye KS, Santerre Henriksen A, Sommer M, Frimodt-Møller N. Safety and Tolerability of Pivmecillinam During More Than Four Decades of Clinical Experience: A Systematic Review. . 2025. PMID 39835818 · DOI · PMC11848268
- Staphylococcus aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) Trial Group, Lee TC, Barina LA, Walls G, Goodman AL, Yahav D, et al.. Cefazolin for Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. . 2026. PMID 42308484 · DOI · PMC7619232
- Turner NA, Sharma-Kuinkel BK, Maskarinec SA, Eichenberger EM, Shah PP, Carugati M, et al.. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an overview of basic and clinical research. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019. PMID 30737488 · DOI · PMC6939889
- Humphries R, Bobenchik AM, Hindler JA, Schuetz AN. Overview of Changes to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, M100, 31st Edition. J Clin Microbiol. 2021. PMID 34550809 · DOI · PMC8601225
- Lee AS, de Lencastre H, Garau J, Kluytmans J, Malhotra-Kumar S, Peschel A, et al.. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018. PMID 29849094 · DOI
- Bush K, Bradford PA. β-Lactams and β-Lactamase Inhibitors: An Overview. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2016. PMID 27329032 · DOI · PMC4968164
- Shenoy ES, Macy E, Rowe T, Blumenthal KG. Evaluation and Management of Penicillin Allergy: A Review. JAMA. 2019. PMID 30644987 · DOI
- Blumenthal KG, Peter JG, Trubiano JA, Phillips EJ. Antibiotic allergy. Lancet. 2019. PMID 30558872 · DOI · PMC6563335
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.