Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 3 complete abstracts (857 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Graphical representation of a statistical model containing scales for calculating the prognostic weight of a value for each individual variable. Nomograms are instruments that can be used to predict outcomes using specific clinical parameters. They use algorithms that incorporate several variables to calculate the predicted probability that a patient will achieve a particular clinical endpoint.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Nomogram; Partin Tables; Partin Table; Table, Partin; Tables, Partin; Partin Nomograms; Nomogram, Partin; Nomograms, Partin.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Prognosis; Models, Statistical; Mathematical Concepts
- See also
- Neoplasm Staging; Neoplasm Grading
Related concepts
- Algorithms
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 16,470 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Nomograms” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 13,024 of them (79.1%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2020 onward with 13,024 records.
Reviews account for 294 records (1.8%) and meta-analyses for 39. Randomized controlled trials number 489 (3.0%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 0 |
| 2000-2009 | 601 |
| 2010-2019 | 2,886 |
| 2020 onward | 13,024 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 294 | 1.8% |
| Meta-analyses | 39 | 0.2% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 489 | 3.0% |
Method: PubMed query "Nomograms"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in clinical research
Research methods determine how much a result can be trusted. Randomized trials guard against confounding, systematic reviews and meta-analyses combine many studies, and observational designs are valuable but can show only association. Reporting standards, trial registration and pre-specified outcomes reduce bias. When reading about a method, ask what problem it is designed to solve and which problems it does not solve.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Do conventional intracerebral hemorrhage functional scores apply to mild-to-moderate hemorrhage? | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 1 | cc by PMID 42656267 · DOI · PMC13506375 |
| A Cross-Nationally Validated Nomogram for Cardiometabolic Multimorbidity in Overweight/Obese Older Adults: CHARLS and HRS Cohorts | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 1 | cc by PMID 42410308 · DOI · PMC13538773 |
| Clinico-genomic nomograms for estimation of survival risk in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 1 | cc by PMID 42231792 · DOI · PMC13231001 |
Do conventional intracerebral hemorrhage functional scores apply to mild-to-moderate hemorrhage? [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundConventional intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) functional scores are typically developed based on clinical factors for assessing mortality risk, and their applicability in evaluating functional outcomes in patients with the specific hemorrhagic subtype of mild to moderate ICH(MTM-ICH) remains unclear.
- Closing excerpt
- In contrast, conventional ICH functional scores demonstrate certain limitations when assessing this specific hemorrhage subtype.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (350 words)
BackgroundConventional intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) functional scores are typically developed based on clinical factors for assessing mortality risk, and their applicability in evaluating functional outcomes in patients with the specific hemorrhagic subtype of mild to moderate ICH(MTM-ICH) remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to construct a nomogram model to predict early functional dependence in this patient population and to validate three previous general ICH functional scores.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 575 patients with MTM-ICH (GCS score ≥ 9) treated at our hospital between January 2018 and July 2025. The baseline demographic information, clinical characteristics, and clinical outcomes were collected. Early functional dependence was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (MRS) score ≥ 3 at discharge or 30 days after ICH. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and stepwise logistic regression analyses were used to screen for risk factors for early functional dependence and construct a predictive model. The model was visualized using a nomogram, and its predictive performance was compared with three existing ICH functional scores (FUNC, ICH-GS and ICH-FOS). Internal validation of the nomogram was performed using a 10-fold cross-validation combined with bootstrap resampling.ResultsAmong 575 patients with MTM-ICH, 198 (34.4%) developed early functional dependence. LASSO and stepwise logistic regression analyses identified six independent predictors: age, admission GCS score, hematoma volume, thalamic hemorrhage, basal ganglia hemorrhage, and mechanical ventilation. The nomogram based on these factors demonstrated good calibration and superior predictive performance compared to three existing ICH functional scores (AUC = 0.856 for our nomogram, 0.579 for FUNC, 0.601 for ICH-GS, and 0.714 for ICH-FOS, respectively). The decision curve analysis further demonstrated that the model had greater net benefit than the three previous general ICH functional scores. Internal validation confirmed the model's stability and generalizability (10-fold cross-validation mean: 0.846; bootstrap-corrected C-index: 0.844).ConclusionAmong patients with MTM-ICH, advanced age, lower admission GCS score, larger hematoma volume, thalamic or basal ganglia hemorrhage, and mechanical ventilation were associated with a higher risk of early functional dependence. The nomogram developed based on these factors demonstrated high predictive performance. In contrast, conventional ICH functional scores demonstrate certain limitations when assessing this specific hemorrhage subtype.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42656267 · DOI · PMC13506375
A Cross-Nationally Validated Nomogram for Cardiometabolic Multimorbidity in Overweight/Obese Older Adults: CHARLS and HRS Cohorts [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- AimsMiddle-aged and older adults with overweight or obesity are at increased risk of cardiometabolic multimorbidity (CMM), yet validated prediction tools tailored to this population remain limited.
- Closing excerpt
- The external HRS validation showed fair discrimination, suggesting that model recalibration may be necessary before broad cross-national implementation.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (292 words)
AimsMiddle-aged and older adults with overweight or obesity are at increased risk of cardiometabolic multimorbidity (CMM), yet validated prediction tools tailored to this population remain limited. This study aimed to develop and validate a multidimensional nomogram integrating metabolic, functional and psychological predictors.Materials and methodsUsing the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) data (2011 and 2015), 3965 overweight/obese adults with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 24.0 kg/m2 were randomly split into development (n = 2775) and validation (n = 1190) sets. Candidate predictors spanned socio-demographic, lifestyle, functional, psychological and biochemical factors. External validation included 8180 overweight/obese participants from the US Health and Retirement Study (HRS). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and multivariable logistic regression were applied to build a nomogram. Performance was assessed by area under the curve (AUC), calibration and decision curve analysis.ResultsCMM prevalence was 3.91%. Eight variables were retained: residence, Activities of daily living (ADL) score, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD-10) score, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), hypertension, arthritis, dyslipidaemia and memory disorder. AUCs were 0.871 (95% CI: 0.838-0.905) (development), 0.817 (95% CI: 0.768-0.867) (validation) and 0.733 (95% CI: 0.714-0.751) in HRS external validation, with acceptable calibration in CHARLS and evidence of underestimation in HRS that improved after intercept recalibration, and clear net benefit. Positive predictive values were additionally reported to support clinical interpretation under the low CMM prevalence.ConclusionsThis nomogram integrating metabolic, functional and psychological predictors demonstrated strong discrimination in the CHARLS cohort and maintained adequate discriminative performance in a cross-national external validation using the US HRS cohort despite differences in population characteristics and measurement instruments, supporting its potential utility for early CMM risk stratification in overweight/obese older adults. The external HRS validation showed fair discrimination, suggesting that model recalibration may be necessary before broad cross-national implementation.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42410308 · DOI · PMC13538773
Clinico-genomic nomograms for estimation of survival risk in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundTo enhance risk stratification in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), we developed clinical and integrated clinico-genomic prognostic nomograms combining clinical prognostic factors with copy number alteration-based risk scores (RSs) in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and metastatic tissue to predict 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival (OS) probabilities.
- Closing excerpt
- ConclusionsAn integrated clinico-genomic nomogram with ctDNA RSs achieved the highest t-AUC for 3-year survival in mCRPC and may enable precision in identification of poor-prognosis subgroups based on somatic alterations.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (215 words)
BackgroundTo enhance risk stratification in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), we developed clinical and integrated clinico-genomic prognostic nomograms combining clinical prognostic factors with copy number alteration-based risk scores (RSs) in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and metastatic tissue to predict 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival (OS) probabilities.MethodsA clinical prognostic nomogram was developed from publicly accessed Yale University Open Data Access (YODA) data-sciences project (N = 1088 patients). A second publicly available independent dataset (N = 82) with an 11-gene prognostic RS developed concurrently obtained ctDNA and matched metastatic tissue specimens (gains: AR, MYC, COL22A1, PIK3CA, PIK3CB, NOTCH1; losses: TMPRSS2, NCOR1, ZBTB18, TP53, NKX3-1) was used to develop an integrated clinico-genomic survival nomogram. Independent predictors for survival were identified in each dataset using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard. Multivariate regression coefficients with statistical significance (P ResultsThe YODA dataset t-AUCs for the prognostic nomogram for estimating OS at 1, 2, and 3 years were 0.74, 0.70, and 0.74. In the independent second dataset, the integrated clinico-genomic prognostic nomogram was observed to have higher t-AUCs for predicting 3-year mCRPC survival at 0.807 compared with 0.714 using clinical factors alone.ConclusionsAn integrated clinico-genomic nomogram with ctDNA RSs achieved the highest t-AUC for 3-year survival in mCRPC and may enable precision in identification of poor-prognosis subgroups based on somatic alterations.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42231792 · DOI · PMC13231001
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye [4]
- Research article How to build and interpret a nomogram for cancer prognosis [5]
- Research article Comparison of nomograms with other methods for predicting outcomes in prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature [6]
- Research article An updated catalog of prostate cancer predictive tools [7]
- Research article Individual Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of the Performance of the Decipher Genomic Classifier in High-Risk Men After Prostatectomy to Predict Development of Metastatic Disease [8]
- Research article Nomograms for staging, prognosis, and predicting treatment outcomes [9]
References
- Chen A, Peng J, Guo L, Zhou R. Do conventional intracerebral hemorrhage functional scores apply to mild-to-moderate hemorrhage?. . 2026. PMID 42656267 · DOI · PMC13506375
- Wei Y, He S, Chen H, Wang Y. A Cross-Nationally Validated Nomogram for Cardiometabolic Multimorbidity in Overweight/Obese Older Adults: CHARLS and HRS Cohorts. . 2026. PMID 42410308 · DOI · PMC13538773
- Kohli M, Shankar A, Lloyd J, Wang L, Huo X, Fadlullah MZ, et al.. Clinico-genomic nomograms for estimation of survival risk in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. . 2026. PMID 42231792 · DOI · PMC13231001
- Balachandran VP, Gonen M, Smith JJ, DeMatteo RP. Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye. Lancet Oncol. 2015. PMID 25846097 · DOI · PMC4465353
- Iasonos A, Schrag D, Raj GV, Panageas KS. How to build and interpret a nomogram for cancer prognosis. J Clin Oncol. 2008. PMID 18323559 · DOI
- Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, Suardi N, Kattan MW. Comparison of nomograms with other methods for predicting outcomes in prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature. Clin Cancer Res. 2008. PMID 18628454 · DOI
- Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, Roehrborn CG, Kattan MW. An updated catalog of prostate cancer predictive tools. Cancer. 2008. PMID 18823041 · DOI
- Spratt DE, Yousefi K, Deheshi S, Ross AE, Den RB, Schaeffer EM, et al.. Individual Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of the Performance of the Decipher Genomic Classifier in High-Risk Men After Prostatectomy to Predict Development of Metastatic Disease. J Clin Oncol. 2017. PMID 28358655 · DOI · PMC6530581
- Touijer K, Scardino PT. Nomograms for staging, prognosis, and predicting treatment outcomes. Cancer. 2009. PMID 19544538 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.