Nicotine

IntroductionOral nicotine pouches (ONPs) are a new class of nicotine products. This scoping review summarizes evidence on ONPs and explores their potential public health impact.Aims and methodsWe conducted a structured literature search for empirical studies across three electronic databases through January 10, 2024. Outcomes included ONP product characteristics, use patterns, beliefs and perceptions, toxicity, and marketing and sales.ResultsSixty-two studies were included, 17 were industry-funded. Most studies were from the United States. While large variations across studies were observed in ONP youth prevalence estimates, nationally representative U.S. studies find current use at 1.5% and lifetime use below 2.5% through 2023. Between 35% and 42% of U.S. adolescents and young adults have heard of ONPs, and 9-21% of tobacco-naïve youth were susceptible to trying them. U.S. adult-use estimates varied widely (0.8%-3% current; 3%-16% lifetime use) and were limited to populations with a history of tobacco use. The chemical composition of ONPs suggests fewer harmful/potentially harmful compounds at lower levels than cigarettes and smokeless tobacco (SLT), except formaldehyde. Industry-funded studies find substantially less cytotoxicity compared to cigarettes and suggest that higher nicotine-strength ONPs can deliver nicotine at levels comparable to or higher than SLT or cigarettes, although with slower nicotine release than cigarettes. Evidence on the cytotoxicity of ONPs relative to SLT is mixed.ConclusionsONPs appear to be less toxic than cigarettes and deliver comparable nicotine, presenting an alternative for combustible product users, although key data are mainly available from industry-funded studies. Data from independent research is critically needed. Industry marketing of ONPs may encourage initiation in youth and situational and dual use in adults.ImplicationsThe review provides an initial assessment of the potential role of ONPs in harm reduction and aims to determine unintended consequences of their use (youth uptake and dual-use) and identify populations that disproportionately use the product. This information is essential for tobacco regulatory bodies in determining the net public health impact of nicotine pouches.

ImportanceConcerns have been raised about the abuse liability of modern e-cigarettes that use acidic additives to form nicotine salts, making the inhalation of nicotine smoother than freebase nicotine.ObjectiveTo examine the effects of nicotine form and concentration and e-liquid flavor on subjective effects ratings, vaping behavior, and nicotine uptake among young adults who use e-cigarettes.Design, setting, and participantsIn this single-blind, within-participant, crossover randomized clinical trial, a convenience sample of young adults aged 21 to 25 years who currently used e-cigarettes was recruited from December 2021 to August 2023, for in-person research laboratory visits in Columbus, Ohio.InterventionsParticipants completed up to 9 vaping sessions, starting with their usual e-cigarette brand in the first session followed by 1 of 8 laboratory-prepared e-liquids in a randomly assigned order in each subsequent session. Prepared e-liquids varied by nicotine form (salt-based vs freebase), nicotine concentration (5% vs 1% weight per weight), and flavor (menthol vs tobacco). Each session included a 5-minute, 10-puff standardized vaping period followed by 30 minutes of ad libitum vaping.Main outcomes and measuresAt 4 time points (0, 5, 10, and 35 minutes) during each vaping session, plasma samples were collected for assessing nicotine uptake, and self-reports of urges, craving, and withdrawal were collected via questionnaires. Positive subjective effects were self-reported after 35 minutes of vaping using a visual analog scale; urges and cravings were reported using the Questionnaire of Smoking Urges (QSU). Puff topography data were collected throughout each vaping session.ResultsSeventy-two participants (mean [SD] age, 22.4 [1.4] years; 42 [58.3%] female) who sampled at least 1 laboratory-prepared e-liquid composed the analytic sample. Salt-based (vs freebase) nicotine e-liquids increased nicotine intake, with 5% salt-based e-liquids delivering the highest mean plasma levels of nicotine (11.2 ng/mL [95% CI, 9.3-13.2 ng/mL] at 5 minutes; 17.2 ng/mL [95% CI, 14.3-20.1 ng/mL] at 35 minutes) irrespective of flavors. Higher positive subjective effect ratings (eg, for liking) were received by salt-based (42.8; 95% CI, 39.4-46.1) vs freebase (32.0; 95% CI, 28.6-35.3) nicotine, 1% (43.4; 95% CI, 40.2-46.6) vs 5% (31.2; 95% CI, 27.7-34.6) nicotine, and menthol-flavored (43.2; 95% CI, 39.7-46.7) vs tobacco-flavored (31.5; 95% CI, 28.4-34.7) e-liquids. Salt-based and 1% but not menthol-flavored nicotine elicited more intense puffing (eg, 25% [95% CI, 12%-40%] more total puffs for nicotine salts vs freebase). All study e-liquids reduced urges and cravings, with 5% vs 1% nicotine being more effective (mean [SE] QSU-Desire score at 35 minutes, 15.4 [0.5] vs 16.7 [0.5]).Conclusions and relevanceIn this crossover randomized clinical trial among young adult e-cigarette users, salt-based (vs freebase) nicotine e-liquids increased nicotine intake and yielded more positive subjective effects ratings and intense puffing behaviors, suggesting higher abuse potential. Restricting the level of acidic additives and menthol flavoring may reduce the addictiveness of e-cigarettes.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05458895.

The mucosal epithelium of the head and neck region (including the oral cavity, nasal cavity, pharynx, nasopharynx, and larynx) is the primary site exposed to tobacco smoke, and its presence of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) has been observed in the mucosal epithelial cells of this area. It remains unclear whether HNSC cells can migrate and invade through nAChR signaling. A model of HNSC cells exposed to nicotine is established. Cell proliferation following nicotine exposure is assessed using the CCK-8 assay, while migration and invasion are evaluated through wound healing and Transwell assays. The effects of CHRNA5 knockdown and overexpression are also investigated. Immunofluorescence staining is used to analyze CHRNA5 expression and localization, and clonogenic assays are performed to measure colony proliferation after CHRNA5 knockdown and overexpression. The interaction between CHRNA5 and CES1 is examined using molecular docking, co-immunoprecipitation, and immunofluorescence. Differentially expressed genes are subjected to pathway enrichment analysis, and MEK/ERK protein expression and phosphorylation are validated via western blot. Tumor formation assays are performed in nude mice using sh-CHRNA5 Cal27 cells, followed by western blot and immunohistochemical staining. Additionally, laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer tissues are analyzed through immunohistochemistry. Nicotine significantly enhanced the proliferation, migration, and invasion capabilities of head and neck tumor cells, including Cal27, Fadu, HN6, and Tu686 cells, through the expression of CHRNA5. Knockdown of CHRNA5 can reduce cell migration, invasion, and proliferation, whereas nicotine exposure can reverse this trend. Additionally, the mRNA and protein expression of CES1 decreases with the knockdown of CHRNA5, indicating a regulatory relationship between the two. Transcriptomics revealed that the knockdown of CHRNA5 is associated with the MEK/ERK signaling pathway. Further cellular- and tissue-level evidence confirmed that the levels of p-MEK/MEK, p-ERK/ERK, and CES1 decreased following knockdown of CHRNA5, a trend that nicotine can reverse. Nicotine promotes the proliferation, migration, and invasion of HNSC by upregulating CHRNA5 expression. Knockdown of CHRNA5 reduces these effects, which can be reversed by nicotine. Nicotine exposure activates CHRNA5, regulating CES1 expression via the MEK/ERK pathway, contributing to the recurrence and metastasis of head and neck squamous carcinoma.

Neuroimmune signals can regulate neuronal function and affect behavior through mechanisms that are not yet fully understood. Here we investigated the action of interleukin 13 (IL-13), a cytokine that can be produced in the brain by both microglia and neurons. We show that dopamine-containing neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) predominantly express the IL-13 receptor alpha 1 (IL-13Rα1) and exhibit presynaptic vesicular localization of neuronal IL-13. Exogenous application of IL-13, or its endogenous mobilization by optogenetics, reduced the activity of VTA dopaminergic neurons and opposed the stimulatory effects of nicotine on these neurons in rodents. These actions required IL-13Rα1, activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway, and functional hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels. Consistently, local infusion of IL-13 into the VTA markedly reduced nicotine self-administration in rodents. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that IL-13 acts in a neuromodulator-like fashion on mesolimbic dopamine neurons expressing IL-13Rα1. Our data also indicate that IL-13Rα1 signaling regulates the stimulatory actions of nicotine, suggesting a potential role for this neuronal immune signaling in reward processing and the addictive properties of nicotine.