Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 3 complete abstracts (884 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
A carcinoma that originates in the epithelium of the nasopharynx and includes four subtypes: keratinizing squamous cell, non-keratinizing, basaloid squamous cell, and papillary adenocarcinoma. It is most prevalent in Southeast Asian populations and is associated with epstein-barr virus infections. Somatic mutations associated with this cancer have been identified in NPCR, BAP1, ubap1, erbb2, erbb3, MLL2, pik3ca, KRAS, NRAS, and arid1a genes.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Carcinoma, Nasopharyngeal; Carcinomas, Nasopharyngeal; Nasopharyngeal Carcinomas.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Carcinoma; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms
Related concepts
- Epithelium
- Nasopharynx
- Papillary Adenocarcinoma
- Epstein-Barr Virus Infections
- Ubap1
- Erbb2
- Erbb3
- Pik3Ca
- Arid1A
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 8,258 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 4,293 of them (52.0%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2020 onward with 4,293 records.
Reviews account for 660 records (8.0%) and meta-analyses for 238. Randomized controlled trials number 233 (2.8%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 0 |
| 2000-2009 | 19 |
| 2010-2019 | 3,994 |
| 2020 onward | 4,293 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 660 | 8.0% |
| Meta-analyses | 238 | 2.9% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 233 | 2.8% |
Method: PubMed query "Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in cancer and oncology
Cancer research spans very different kinds of evidence. Laboratory studies in cell lines and animal models reveal mechanisms but often do not translate to patients. Early-phase trials mainly test safety and dosing, while phase 3 randomized trials and their meta-analyses are the usual basis for treatment conclusions. Outcomes also differ in meaning: tumour shrinkage, progression-free survival and overall survival are not interchangeable, and screening studies can be distorted by lead-time and overdiagnosis. When reading a result, check the cancer type and stage studied, the comparison treatment, and which outcome was measured.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Nonendemic Regions | 2025 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 21 | cc by PMID 40136303 · DOI · PMC11947841 |
| Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Southeast Asia: Current Landscape and Future Priorities | 2025 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 9 | cc by PMID 41459134 · DOI · PMC12742401 |
| Five-Year Outcome of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Secondary Analysis of the CAPTAIN-1st Randomized Clinical Trial | 2026 | Randomized controlled trial Design not recorded in structured metadata | 8 | cc by PMID 41609753 · DOI · PMC12856745 |
Patient Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Nonendemic Regions [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- ImportanceNasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) presents unique challenges in nonendemic regions, with varying patient characteristics and outcomes compared with endemic populations.
- Closing excerpt
- Notably, WHO type I tumors demonstrated particularly poor outcomes, highlighting the need for more intensive follow-up in this subgroup.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (301 words)
ImportanceNasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) presents unique challenges in nonendemic regions, with varying patient characteristics and outcomes compared with endemic populations.ObjectiveTo fill gaps in the current understanding of NPC by focusing on a US population, comparing patient characteristics and treatment outcomes with endemic populations, and identifying key factors to inform management and follow-up protocols in Western health care settings.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cohort study included patients with NPC treated at a single large US tertiary academic medical center from 2000 to 2023. The study analyzed patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes. Data were analyzed from January to July 2024.Main outcomes and measuresOverall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and recurrence-free survival, stratified by patient characteristics, tumor types, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status, and p16 expression.ResultsThe sample included 159 adult patients with NPC (median [range] age, 53.5 [18-90] years; 117 [73.6%] male), with 23 African American patients (15.3%), 21 Asian patients (14.0%), and 106 White patients (70.7%). World Health Organization type III tumors predominated (88 patients [68.8%]), followed by type II (25 patients [19.5%]) and type I (15 patients [11.7%]). EBV positivity rates varied significantly by race (Asian: 13 patients [81.3%]; African American: 17 patients [63.0%]; White: 40 patients [47.0%]; P = .03) and WHO type (type III: 50 patients [72.5%]; type II: 10 patients [48.0%]; type I: 0 patients; P Conclusions and relevanceThis cohort study contributes to the evolving body of knowledge on NPC in nonendemic regions, finding a shift toward WHO type III tumors and underscoring the association of EBV status with survival outcomes, while highlighting the lack of association between human papillomavirus status and outcomes. Smoking history, advanced stage at diagnosis, male sex, and increasing age emerged as adverse factors. Notably, WHO type I tumors demonstrated particularly poor outcomes, highlighting the need for more intensive follow-up in this subgroup.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40136303 · DOI · PMC11947841
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Southeast Asia: Current Landscape and Future Priorities [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remains a major public health concern with a geographically skewed distribution.
- Closing excerpt
- We emphasize the urgent need for regionally tailored strategies to mitigate the growing burden of NPC throughout SEA.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (169 words)
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remains a major public health concern with a geographically skewed distribution. The disease is endemic in East Asia (particularly China), Southeast Asia (SEA) and South-Central Asia. Although China contributes the largest share of global NPC cases, several SEA countries consistently report high incidence rates. Despite this substantial burden, NPC remains a neglected disease across much of the region. This review synthesizes and appraises the available evidence on the epidemiology, incidence trends and disease burden of NPC in SEA. High-incidence hotspots persist in Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Vietnam, the Philippines, and Thailand, with particularly striking rates among indigenous populations of East Malaysia. Late-stage presentation is common and survival outcomes in many SEA countries lag behind those observed in better-resourced endemic regions. Socioeconomic disparities in many SEA communities also amplify exposure to key NPC risk factors. This review outlines key region-specific challenges and identifies priority areas for coordinated health system strengthening. We emphasize the urgent need for regionally tailored strategies to mitigate the growing burden of NPC throughout SEA.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41459134 · DOI · PMC12742401
Five-Year Outcome of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Secondary Analysis of the CAPTAIN-1st Randomized Clinical Trial [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- ImportanceProgrammed cell death 1 protein (PD-1) or programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy is the current standard first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RM-NPC).
- Closing excerpt
- gov Identifier: NCT03707509.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (414 words)
ImportanceProgrammed cell death 1 protein (PD-1) or programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy is the current standard first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RM-NPC). However, the long-term survival benefits at the 5-year benchmark remain uncertain.ObjectiveTo determine whether adding camrelizumab to chemotherapy significantly improved 5-year overall survival (OS) as first-line treatment for RM-NPC, compared with chemotherapy alone.Design, setting, and participantsThe CAPTAIN-1st trial was a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial conducted at 28 hospitals in China. Between November 13, 2018, and November 29, 2019, patients with treatment-naive RM-NPC were enrolled. This secondary analysis of the CAPTAIN-1st trial was prespecified. Data analysis was conducted on June 1, 2025.InterventionsPatients were randomized (1:1) to receive camrelizumab or placebo in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin for 4 to 6 cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with camrelizumab or placebo until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or completion of 2 years of treatment.Main outcomeThe primary end point, progression-free survival per independent review committee, has been reported previously. Herein, the secondary end point of OS is reported as prespecified in the protocol.ResultsAmong 263 randomized patients (134 in randomized to camrelizumab, 129 to placebo), baseline characteristics were generally balanced between groups, except for age. The mean (SD) age was 49 (11.25) years, and 218 patients (82.9%) were male individuals, 45 (17.1%) were female individuals. With a median survival follow-up of 63.5 (95% CI, 61.2-64.6) months for the camrelizumab group and 63.0 (95% CI, 60.8-64.6) months for the placebo group, 85 (63.4%) and 95 (73.6%) deaths occurred, respectively. Median OS was 34.5 months (95% CI, 29.4-45.7) with camrelizumab vs 26.6 months (95% CI, 19.8-33.5) with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.55-0.99; 2-sided P = .047). After adjusting for age imbalance, the HR was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.48-0.89; P = .01). The 5-year OS rates were 37.8% vs 24.2%, reflecting an absolute difference of 13.6% (95% CI, 2.4%-24.8%; P = .02) in favor of camrelizumab. The OS benefits were generally consistent across subgroups. In the camrelizumab group, patients who achieved rapid clearance of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA had significantly longer OS compared with those without EBV DNA clearance (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18-0.58; P Conclusions and relevanceIn this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, the addition of camrelizumab to chemotherapy produced statistically significant and clinically meaningful 5-year OS benefits compared with chemotherapy alone in the first-line treatment of RM-NPC. These findings provided the first 5-year evidence supporting the benefit of PD-1-based chemoimmunotherapy in this setting.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03707509.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41609753 · DOI · PMC12856745
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Nasopharyngeal carcinoma [4]
- Research article Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an evolving paradigm [5]
- Research article Chemotherapy in Combination With Radiotherapy for Definitive-Intent Treatment of Stage II-IVA Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: CSCO and ASCO Guideline [6]
- Research article The Evolving Epidemiology of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma [7]
- Research article Management of locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma [8]
- Research article Epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: current insights and future outlook [9]
References
- Alsavaf MB, Marquardt M, Abouammo MD, Xu M, Elguindy A, Grecula J, et al.. Patient Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Nonendemic Regions. . 2025. PMID 40136303 · DOI · PMC11947841
- Chan SM, Paterson IC, Yap LF. Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Southeast Asia: Current Landscape and Future Priorities. . 2025. PMID 41459134 · DOI · PMC12742401
- Huang Y, Sun D, Zhou H, Zhou T, Qu S, Li J, et al.. Five-Year Outcome of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Secondary Analysis of the CAPTAIN-1st Randomized Clinical Trial. . 2026. PMID 41609753 · DOI · PMC12856745
- Chen YP, Chan ATC, Le QT, Blanchard P, Sun Y, Ma J. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet. 2019. PMID 31178151 · DOI
- Wong KCW, Hui EP, Lo KW, Lam WKJ, Johnson D, Li L, et al.. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an evolving paradigm. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021. PMID 34194007 · DOI
- Chen YP, Ismaila N, Chua MLK, Colevas AD, Haddad R, Huang SH, et al.. Chemotherapy in Combination With Radiotherapy for Definitive-Intent Treatment of Stage II-IVA Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: CSCO and ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2021. PMID 33405943 · DOI
- Chang ET, Ye W, Zeng YX, Adami HO. The Evolving Epidemiology of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021. PMID 33849968 · DOI
- Lee AWM, Ng WT, Chan JYW, Corry J, Mäkitie A, Mendenhall WM, et al.. Management of locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev. 2019. PMID 31470314 · DOI
- Su ZY, Siak PY, Lwin YY, Cheah SC. Epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: current insights and future outlook. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2024. PMID 38430391 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.