Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Genetics and Genomics›Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction

Genetics and Genomics · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

Methods for using more than one primer set in a polymerase chain reaction to amplify more than one segment of the target DNA sequence in a single reaction.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,041 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Methods for using more than one primer set in a polymerase chain reaction to amplify more than one segment of the target DNA sequence in a single reaction.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Multiplex PCR; PCR, Multiplex; Triplex Polymerase Chain Reaction; Triplex PCR; PCR, Triplex; Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification; Multiplex Ligation Dependent Probe Amplification.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Polymerase Chain Reaction

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 7,684 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 2,703 of them (35.2%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 5,044 records.

Reviews account for 155 records (2.0%) and meta-analyses for 15. Randomized controlled trials number 33 (0.4%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 0 records; 2000-2009: 5 records; 2010-2019: 5,044 records; 2020 onward: 2,703 records0through 199952000-20095,0442010-20192,7032020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19990
2000-20095
2010-20195,044
2020 onward2,703
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 2.0 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.2 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.4 percentReviews2.0% (155)Meta-analyses0.2% (15)Randomized controlled trials0.4% (33)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 7,684 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1552.0%
Meta-analyses150.2%
Randomized controlled trials330.4%

Method: PubMed query "Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in genetics and genomics

Genetic findings vary widely in strength. A variant linked to a condition in one study may not replicate in other ancestries, and most common variants have small effects that are meaningful only in aggregate. Studies of rare, high-impact variants can support strong causal claims about a gene, while association studies describe statistical links that need functional and independent replication. Check the sample size, the ancestry of participants, whether results were replicated, and whether a laboratory or clinical outcome was actually measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Prospective Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes Using a Multiplex Liquid Biopsy Targeting Diverse Resistance Mechanisms in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Sperger JM, Emamekhoo H, McKay RR, Stahlfeld CN, Singh A, Chen XE, et al.
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
56cc by
PMID 34197212 · DOI · PMC8425833
SARS-CoV-2 detection in wastewater using multiplex quantitative PCR
Navarro A, Gómez L, Sanseverino I, Niegowska M, Roka E, Pedraccini R, et al.
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
28cc by
PMID 34298359 · DOI · PMC8278834
Advancing quantitative PCR with color cycle multiplex amplification
Chen W, Zhang K, Huang F, Zhao L, Waldren GC, Jiang Q, et al.
2024Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
16cc by
PMID 39119904 · DOI · PMC11417387
Impact of multiplex PCR point-of-care platform implementation for respiratory pathogen detection in an emergency department with high daily patient volume
Bigaud B, Marjanovic N, Deroche L, Drugeon B, Piot M, Leveque N, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
4cc by
PMID 41324513 · DOI · PMC12802140

Prospective Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes Using a Multiplex Liquid Biopsy Targeting Diverse Resistance Mechanisms in Metastatic Prostate Cancer [1]

Research article Sperger JM, Emamekhoo H, McKay RR, Stahlfeld CN, Singh A, Chen XE, et al. · · 2021 · cited 56 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
PurposeNearly all men with prostate cancer treated with androgen receptor (AR) signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) develop resistance via diverse mechanisms including constitutive activation of the AR pathway, driven by AR genomic structural alterations, expression of AR splice variants (AR-Vs), or loss of AR dependence and lineage plasticity termed neuroendocrine prostate cancer.
Closing excerpt
This is currently being investigated in additional prospective trials.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (234 words)

PurposeNearly all men with prostate cancer treated with androgen receptor (AR) signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) develop resistance via diverse mechanisms including constitutive activation of the AR pathway, driven by AR genomic structural alterations, expression of AR splice variants (AR-Vs), or loss of AR dependence and lineage plasticity termed neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Understanding these de novo acquired ARSI resistance mechanisms is critical for optimizing therapy.Materials and methodsA novel liquid biopsy technology was used to collect mRNA from circulating tumor cells (CTCs) to measure expression of AR-Vs, AR targets, and neuroendocrine prostate cancer markers. An institutional review board-approved prospective cohort (N = 99) was used to identify patterns of gene expression. Two prospective multicenter phase II clinical trials of ARSIs for men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01942837 [enzalutamide, N = 21] and NCT02025010 [abiraterone, N = 27]) were used to further validate these findings.ResultsHierarchical clustering of CTC transcripts identified two distinct clusters. Cluster 2 (C2) exhibited increased expression of AR-regulated genes and was associated with worse overall survival (median 8.6 v 22.4 months; P v not reached; P v 12 months; P v 40.6 months; P ConclusionWe demonstrate that a transcriptional profile detectable in CTCs obtained from liquid biopsies can serve as an independent prognostic marker beyond AR-V7 in patients with metastatic prostate cancer and can be used to identify the emergence of multiple ARSI resistance mechanisms. This is currently being investigated in additional prospective trials.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34197212 · DOI · PMC8425833

SARS-CoV-2 detection in wastewater using multiplex quantitative PCR [2]

Research article Navarro A, Gómez L, Sanseverino I, Niegowska M, Roka E, Pedraccini R, et al. · · 2021 · cited 28 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
A multiplex reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)-based method was designed for the simultaneous detection of different SARS-CoV-2 genes.
Closing excerpt
Overall, both the laboratory and field work results demonstrated that the multiplex PCR assay developed in this study could provide a method for SARS-CoV-2 detection as robust as the single qPCR, but faster and cost-effective, reducing by three times the number of reactions, and consequently the handling time and reagents.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (221 words)

A multiplex reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)-based method was designed for the simultaneous detection of different SARS-CoV-2 genes. In this study, we used three target genes encoding for the nucleocapsid 1 and 3 (N1, N3), and the spike (S) proteins, all commonly used in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in human and environmental samples. The performance of the multiplex assay, compared to the single assay was assessed for the standard calibration curve, required for absolute quantification, and then, for the real environmental samples to detect SARS-CoV-2. For this latter, four environmental samples were collected at a local wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). The results showed that the cycle threshold (Ct) values of the multiplex were comparable to the values obtained by the singleplex PCR. The amplification of the three target genes indicated the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the four water samples with an increasing trend in February and these results were confirmed in the multiplex approach, showing the robustness of this method and its applicability for the relative abundance analysis among the samples. Overall, both the laboratory and field work results demonstrated that the multiplex PCR assay developed in this study could provide a method for SARS-CoV-2 detection as robust as the single qPCR, but faster and cost-effective, reducing by three times the number of reactions, and consequently the handling time and reagents.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34298359 · DOI · PMC8278834

Advancing quantitative PCR with color cycle multiplex amplification [3]

Research article Chen W, Zhang K, Huang F, Zhao L, Waldren GC, Jiang Q, et al. · · 2024 · cited 16 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is the gold standard for detection and quantitation of known DNA targets, but the scarcity of spectrally distinct fluorophores and filter sets limits the number of detectable targets.
Closing excerpt
Experimentally, we demonstrated a single-tube qPCR assay screening 21 sepsis-related bacterial DNA targets in samples of blood, sputum, pleural effusion and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, with 89% clinical sensitivity and 100% clinical specificity, showing its potential as a powerful tool for advanced quantitative screening in molecular diagnostics.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (194 words)

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is the gold standard for detection and quantitation of known DNA targets, but the scarcity of spectrally distinct fluorophores and filter sets limits the number of detectable targets. Here, we introduce color cycle multiplex amplification (CCMA) to significantly increase the number of detectable DNA targets in a single qPCR reaction using standard instrumentation. In CCMA, presence of one DNA target species results in a pre-programmed pattern of fluorescence increases. This pattern is distinguished by cycle thresholds (Cts) through rationally designed delays in amplification. For example, we design an assay wherein Staphylococcus aureus sequentially induces FAM, then Cy5.5, then ROX fluorescence increases with more than 3 cycles between each signal. CCMA offers notably higher potential for multiplexing because it uses fluorescence permutation rather than combination. With 4 distinct fluorescence colors, CCMA theoretically allows the detection of up to 136 distinct DNA target sequences using fluorescence permutation. Experimentally, we demonstrated a single-tube qPCR assay screening 21 sepsis-related bacterial DNA targets in samples of blood, sputum, pleural effusion and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, with 89% clinical sensitivity and 100% clinical specificity, showing its potential as a powerful tool for advanced quantitative screening in molecular diagnostics.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39119904 · DOI · PMC11417387

Impact of multiplex PCR point-of-care platform implementation for respiratory pathogen detection in an emergency department with high daily patient volume [4]

Research article Bigaud B, Marjanovic N, Deroche L, Drugeon B, Piot M, Leveque N, et al. · · 2026 · cited 4 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) place a substantial burden on emergency departments (EDs) during winter outbreaks.
Closing excerpt
These findings are of interest to both clinicians and microbiologists, as they provide pragmatic evidence to guide the integration of advanced molecular diagnostics into acute-care workflows and to optimize patient management during respiratory infection surges.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (392 words)

Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) place a substantial burden on emergency departments (EDs) during winter outbreaks. Their microbiological diagnosis is currently based on either broad-spectrum molecular techniques performed in laboratory, with turnaround times incompatible with ED workflows, or point-of-care systems, restricted to SARS-CoV-2, influenza A/B, and RSV (quadriplex panel). The Spotfire combines rapid result and syndromic approach (10 respiratory viruses and 4 atypical bacteria), but its added value in EDs remains unassessed. During the 2023 winter, trained nurses collected nasopharyngeal swabs from adult patients with LRTI symptoms and operated the Spotfire in the ED of the Poitiers University Hospital. We described the viral epidemiology and evaluated the impact and efficacy of this rapid broad-spectrum diagnosis by comparing the management of patients with or without respiratory pathogen detected. From 15 December 2023 to 15 March 2024, 1,320 samples were analyzed with Spotfire, with a median turnaround time of 37 min and 10 uninterpretable results. A total of 540 (41%) were positive. Influenza A (30.9%), rhinovirus/enterovirus (21.1%), and SARS-CoV-2 (18.7%) were the main viruses detected, while atypical bacteria represented 8% of all pathogens. Overall, a pathogen not represented on the quadriplex panel was detected in 43% samples. Positive test results were associated with faster medical decision (380 ± 234 vs 431 ± 238 min; P P P = 0.006) than negative test results. Antibiotic therapy was administered to 42 of 43 of Mycoplasma pneumoniae-positive patients (98%) compared with 110 of 1,265 (9%) negative patients. This study validated the feasibility of this new diagnostic tool in high-volume EDs improving patient flow, antimicrobial decisions, and isolation strategies.IMPORTANCEThis study provides the first real-world evidence supporting the use of a broad multiplex PCR platform for respiratory pathogens directly at the point of care in a high-volume emergency department. By enabling the simultaneous detection of 14 viruses and atypical bacteria within 20 min, this system bridges a critical gap between laboratory diagnostics and bedside clinical decision-making. Its implementation proved feasible and reliable, improving patient flow, antimicrobial stewardship, and infection control measures. Nearly half of the pathogens identified would have been missed by conventional quadriplex assays, highlighting the added diagnostic value of broader syndromic coverage. These findings are of interest to both clinicians and microbiologists, as they provide pragmatic evidence to guide the integration of advanced molecular diagnostics into acute-care workflows and to optimize patient management during respiratory infection surges.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41324513 · DOI · PMC12802140

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Use of the MLPA assay in the molecular diagnosis of gene copy number alterations in human genetic diseases [5]
    Stuppia L, Antonucci I, Palka G, Gatta V · Int J Mol Sci · 2012 · cited 194 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Multiplex PCR system for the rapid diagnosis of respiratory virus infection: systematic review and meta-analysis [6]
    Huang HS, Tsai CL, Chang J, Hsu TC, Lin S, Lee CC · Clin Microbiol Infect · 2018 · cited 193 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The clinical utilization of circulating cell free DNA (CCFDNA) in blood of cancer patients [7]
    Elshimali YI, Khaddour H, Sarkissyan M, Wu Y, Vadgama JV · Int J Mol Sci · 2013 · cited 181 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Diagnostic test accuracy of the BioFire® FilmArray® meningitis/encephalitis panel: a systematic review and meta-analysis [8]
    Tansarli GS, Chapin KC · Clin Microbiol Infect · 2020 · cited 170 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Multiplex PCR system for rapid detection of pathogens in patients with presumed sepsis - a systemic review and meta-analysis [9]
    Chang SS, Hsieh WH, Liu TS, Lee SH, Wang CH, Chou HC, et al. · PLoS One · 2013 · cited 161 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Genotyping and interpretation of STR-DNA: Low-template, mixtures and database matches-Twenty years of research and development [10]
    Gill P, Haned H, Bleka O, Hansson O, Dørum G, Egeland T · Forensic Sci Int Genet · 2015 · cited 112 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Sperger JM, Emamekhoo H, McKay RR, Stahlfeld CN, Singh A, Chen XE, et al.. Prospective Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes Using a Multiplex Liquid Biopsy Targeting Diverse Resistance Mechanisms in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. . 2021. PMID 34197212 · DOI · PMC8425833
  2. Navarro A, Gómez L, Sanseverino I, Niegowska M, Roka E, Pedraccini R, et al.. SARS-CoV-2 detection in wastewater using multiplex quantitative PCR. . 2021. PMID 34298359 · DOI · PMC8278834
  3. Chen W, Zhang K, Huang F, Zhao L, Waldren GC, Jiang Q, et al.. Advancing quantitative PCR with color cycle multiplex amplification. . 2024. PMID 39119904 · DOI · PMC11417387
  4. Bigaud B, Marjanovic N, Deroche L, Drugeon B, Piot M, Leveque N, et al.. Impact of multiplex PCR point-of-care platform implementation for respiratory pathogen detection in an emergency department with high daily patient volume. . 2026. PMID 41324513 · DOI · PMC12802140
  5. Stuppia L, Antonucci I, Palka G, Gatta V. Use of the MLPA assay in the molecular diagnosis of gene copy number alterations in human genetic diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2012. PMID 22489151 · DOI · PMC3317712
  6. Huang HS, Tsai CL, Chang J, Hsu TC, Lin S, Lee CC. Multiplex PCR system for the rapid diagnosis of respiratory virus infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018. PMID 29208560 · DOI · PMC7128951
  7. Elshimali YI, Khaddour H, Sarkissyan M, Wu Y, Vadgama JV. The clinical utilization of circulating cell free DNA (CCFDNA) in blood of cancer patients. Int J Mol Sci. 2013. PMID 24065096 · DOI · PMC3794814
  8. Tansarli GS, Chapin KC. Diagnostic test accuracy of the BioFire® FilmArray® meningitis/encephalitis panel: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020. PMID 31760115 · DOI
  9. Chang SS, Hsieh WH, Liu TS, Lee SH, Wang CH, Chou HC, et al.. Multiplex PCR system for rapid detection of pathogens in patients with presumed sepsis - a systemic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013. PMID 23734173 · DOI · PMC3667030
  10. Gill P, Haned H, Bleka O, Hansson O, Dørum G, Egeland T. Genotyping and interpretation of STR-DNA: Low-template, mixtures and database matches-Twenty years of research and development. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015. PMID 25866376 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionGenetics and Genomics
  • Polymerase Chain ReactionGenetics and Genomics
  • Real-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionGenetics and Genomics
  • Gene AmplificationGenetics and Genomics
  • Transcription Initiation SiteGenetics and Genomics
  • Cross ReactionsImmunology

All 95 articles in Genetics and Genomics →

At a glance

7,684
PubMed records on this heading
35%
published since 2020
155
review articles
33
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionGenetics and Genomics
  • Polymerase Chain ReactionGenetics and Genomics
  • Real-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionGenetics and Genomics
  • Gene AmplificationGenetics and Genomics
  • Transcription Initiation SiteGenetics and Genomics

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support