Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,114 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
A disease of humans and animals that resembles glanders. It is caused by burkholderia pseudomallei and may range from a dormant infection to a condition that causes multiple abscesses, pneumonia and bacteremia.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Melioidoses; Burkholderia pseudomallei Infection; Burkholderia pseudomallei Infections; Infection, Burkholderia pseudomallei; Whitmore's Disease; Disease, Whitmore's; Whitmore Disease.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Burkholderia Infections
Related concepts
- Glanders
- Burkholderia Pseudomallei
- Pneumonia
- Bacteremia
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 2,859 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Melioidosis” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 625 of them (21.9%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 937 records.
Reviews account for 262 records (9.2%) and meta-analyses for 8. Randomized controlled trials number 19 (0.7%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 683 |
| 2000-2009 | 614 |
| 2010-2019 | 937 |
| 2020 onward | 625 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 262 | 9.2% |
| Meta-analyses | 8 | 0.3% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 19 | 0.7% |
Method: PubMed query "Melioidosis"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in infectious diseases
Infectious disease evidence combines microbiology, epidemiology and clinical trials. Laboratory studies identify pathogens and how they cause harm; surveillance and outbreak investigations describe who is affected and how infection spreads; trials establish whether treatments and vaccines work. Results depend on place and time, because pathogens evolve and resistance patterns and population immunity change. Check when and where the data were collected, how cases were defined and how up to date the evidence is.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Review and revision of the 2015 Darwin melioidosis treatment guideline; paradigm drift not shift | 2020 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 114 | cc by PMID 32986699 · DOI · PMC7544138 |
| Extracellular DNA facilitates bacterial adhesion during Burkholderia pseudomallei biofilm formation | 2019 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 64 | cc by PMID 30856240 · DOI · PMC6411153 |
| Diabetes alters immune response patterns to acute melioidosis in humans | 2019 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 52 | cc by PMID 31032897 · DOI · PMC6618312 |
| Evaluation of culture- and PCR-based methods for detecting Burkholderia pseudomallei in soil samples in Thailand | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 1 | cc by PMID 41481582 · DOI · PMC12758721 |
2020 Review and revision of the 2015 Darwin melioidosis treatment guideline; paradigm drift not shift [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundMelioidosis therapy is divided into an intravenous intensive phase and an oral eradication phase.
- Closing excerpt
- We also extend to a minimum of 4 weeks intravenous therapy for those with concurrent bacteraemia and bilateral or unilateral multi-lobar pneumonia.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (343 words)
BackgroundMelioidosis therapy is divided into an intravenous intensive phase and an oral eradication phase. The Darwin melioidosis treatment guideline has evolved over two decades, with over 1150 consecutive patients with culture-confirmed melioidosis managed under the Darwin Prospective Melioidosis Study. The current guideline, published in 2015, has been associated with low rates of recrudescence, relapse and mortality, and together with the treatment trials in Thailand, forms the basis for consensus global guidelines. We aimed to reassess the Darwin guideline and determine if any adjustments to the recommendations better reflect current practice in melioidosis therapy at Royal Darwin Hospital.Methodology/principal findingsThis retrospective cohort study reviews the characteristics, admission duration, duration of intravenous antibiotics, recrudescence, recurrence and mortality in all patients presenting with first episode culture-confirmed melioidosis in the tropical north of Australia's Northern Territory from 1st October 2012 until 1st January 2017. 234 patients were available for analysis. 16 (6.8%) died during the intensive phase treatment and 6 (2.6%) did not have complete treatment at Royal Darwin Hospital, leaving 212 patients for analysis. Six (2.8%) patients had recrudescence during therapy and 10 (4.7%) had recurrent melioidosis (relapse or new infection) after completion of therapy. Persisting osteomyelitis requiring surgery was an important reason for recrudescence as was unrecognized osteomyelitis for relapse. For patients presenting with an antibiotic duration determining focus of pneumonia, durations of intravenous antibiotics were often prolonged beyond the current 2-week minimum treatment recommendation. Prolongation of therapy in pneumonia mostly occurred in patients presenting with multi-lobar disease or with concurrent blood culture positivity.Conclusions/significanceThe 2015 Darwin melioidosis guideline is working well with low rates of recrudescence, relapse and mortality. Based on the practice of the treating clinicians, the 2020 revision of the guideline has been adjusted to include a duration of a minimum of 3 weeks of intravenous antibiotics for those with concurrent bacteraemia and pneumonia involving only a single lobe and those with bilateral and unilateral multi-lobar pneumonias who do not have bacteraemia. We also extend to a minimum of 4 weeks intravenous therapy for those with concurrent bacteraemia and bilateral or unilateral multi-lobar pneumonia.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32986699 · DOI · PMC7544138
Extracellular DNA facilitates bacterial adhesion during Burkholderia pseudomallei biofilm formation [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The biofilm-forming ability of Burkholderia pseudomallei is crucial for its survival in unsuitable environments and is correlated with antibiotic resistance and relapsing cases of melioidosis.
- Closing excerpt
- pseudomallei biofilm.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (256 words)
The biofilm-forming ability of Burkholderia pseudomallei is crucial for its survival in unsuitable environments and is correlated with antibiotic resistance and relapsing cases of melioidosis. Extracellular DNA (eDNA) is an essential component for biofilm development and maturation in many bacteria. The aim of this study was to investigate the eDNA released by B. pseudomallei during biofilm formation using DNase treatment. The extent of biofilm formation and quantity of eDNA were assessed by crystal-violet staining and fluorescent dye-based quantification, respectively, and visualized by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Variation in B. pseudomallei biofilm formation and eDNA quantity was demonstrated among isolates. CLSM images of biofilms stained with FITC-ConA (biofilm) and TOTO-3 (eDNA) revealed the localization of eDNA in the biofilm matrix. A positive correlation of biofilm biomass with quantity of eDNA during the 2-day biofilm-formation observation period was found. The increasing eDNA quantity over time, despite constant living/dead ratios of bacterial cells during the experiment suggests that eDNA is delivered from living bacterial cells. CLSM images demonstrated that depletion of eDNA by DNase I significantly lessened bacterial attachment (if DNase added at 0 h) and biofilm developing stages (if added at 24 h) but had no effect on mature biofilm (if added at 45 h). Collectively, our results reveal that eDNA is released from living B. pseudomallei and is correlated with biofilm formation. It was also apparent that eDNA is essential during bacterial cell attachment and biofilm-forming steps. The depletion of eDNA by DNase may provide an option for the prevention or dispersal of B. pseudomallei biofilm.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30856240 · DOI · PMC6411153
Diabetes alters immune response patterns to acute melioidosis in humans [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a serious global health problem currently affecting over 450 million people worldwide.
- Closing excerpt
- Defining the hallmarks of protection in people with DM is crucial for the design of new therapies and vaccines targeting this rapidly expanding risk group.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (199 words)
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a serious global health problem currently affecting over 450 million people worldwide. Defining its interaction with major global infections is an international public health priority. Melioidosis is caused by Burkholderia pseudomallei, an exemplar pathogen for studying intracellular bacterial infection in the context of DM due to the 12-fold increased risk in this group. We characterized immune correlates of survival in peripheral blood of acute melioidosis patients with and without DM and highlight different immune response patterns. We demonstrate the importance of circulating NK cells and show that CX3CR1 expression on lymphocytes is a novel correlate of survival from acute melioidosis. Furthermore, excessive serum levels of IL-15 and IL-18BP contribute to poor outcome independent of DM comorbidity. CD8+ T cells and granzyme B expression in NK cells are important for survival of non-DM patients, whereas high antibody titers against B. pseudomallei and double-negative T cells are linked to survival of DM patients. Recall responses support a role of γδ T-cell-derived IFN-γ in the establishment of protective immunity in the DM group. Defining the hallmarks of protection in people with DM is crucial for the design of new therapies and vaccines targeting this rapidly expanding risk group.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31032897 · DOI · PMC6618312
Evaluation of culture- and PCR-based methods for detecting Burkholderia pseudomallei in soil samples in Thailand [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundBurkholderia pseudomallei is an environmental bacterium that causes melioidosis, a life-threatening disease prevalent in tropical regions.
- Closing excerpt
- These findings highlight the need for integrated, multi-dimensional surveillance approaches.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (316 words)
BackgroundBurkholderia pseudomallei is an environmental bacterium that causes melioidosis, a life-threatening disease prevalent in tropical regions. Accurate detection of B. pseudomallei in the environment is essential for identifying areas that pose an infection risk. This study aimed to evaluate culture- and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods for detecting B. pseudomallei directly in soil samples, and to assess its environmental prevalence in relation to antibody levels in healthy individuals from Amnat Charoen, Northeast Thailand.Methodology/principal findingsInitial studies used spiked soil samples to evaluate culture-based methods including Ashdown agar, phosphate-buffered acidic erythritol (ACER) agar, Threonine-basal salt solution with colistin 50 (TBSS-C50) broth, TBSS-C50 based erythritol broth, and ACER broth, and real-time PCR assays targeting BPSS1187 and TTS1-orf2. Hemolysin coregulated protein 1 (Hcp1)-specific antibodies were measured in 398 plasma samples using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Based on these antibody titers, 238 soil samples were collected from the households of individuals that were strongly positive (N = 6) and negative (N = 6) for Hcp1-specific antibodies. B. pseudomallei was isolated from 3.36% (8/238) of soil samples by direct culture on Ashdown agar and from 5.46% (13/238) after enrichment in ACER broth followed by culture on Ashdown agar. Real-time PCR assays confirmed the presence of B. pseudomallei in 2 out of 20 culture-positive soil samples. Overall, B. pseudomallei was detected in 14 of 129 samples (10.9%) from households of seropositive individuals and in 6 of 108 samples (5.5%) from households of seronegative individuals (P = 0.165).Conclusions/significanceThis study demonstrates the importance of using effective methods for detection of B. pseudomallei in environmental samples. For culture-based approaches, enrichment in ACER broth followed by subculture on Ashdown agar demonstrated enhanced bacterial recovery compared to direct culture on Ashdown agar alone. There was limited detection of B. pseudomallei in soil by real-time PCR, and lack of an association between environmental detection methods and human seroprevalence. These findings highlight the need for integrated, multi-dimensional surveillance approaches.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41481582 · DOI · PMC12758721
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Melioidosis: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management [5]
- Research article Melioidosis [6]
- Research article Melioidosis [7]
- Research article Melioidosis [8]
- Research article Melioidosis: insights into the pathogenicity of Burkholderia pseudomallei [9]
- Research article Endemic melioidosis in tropical northern Australia: a 10-year prospective study and review of the literature [10]
References
- Sullivan RP, Marshall CS, Anstey NM, Ward L, Currie BJ. 2020 Review and revision of the 2015 Darwin melioidosis treatment guideline; paradigm drift not shift. . 2020. PMID 32986699 · DOI · PMC7544138
- Pakkulnan R, Anutrakunchai C, Kanthawong S, Taweechaisupapong S, Chareonsudjai P, Chareonsudjai S. Extracellular DNA facilitates bacterial adhesion during Burkholderia pseudomallei biofilm formation. . 2019. PMID 30856240 · DOI · PMC6411153
- Kronsteiner B, Chaichana P, Sumonwiriya M, Jenjaroen K, Chowdhury FR, Chumseng S, et al.. Diabetes alters immune response patterns to acute melioidosis in humans. . 2019. PMID 31032897 · DOI · PMC6618312
- Suttisak D, Cagape CMS, Seng R, Saiprom N, Boonyanugomol W, Rukseree K, et al.. Evaluation of culture- and PCR-based methods for detecting Burkholderia pseudomallei in soil samples in Thailand. . 2026. PMID 41481582 · DOI · PMC12758721
- Cheng AC, Currie BJ. Melioidosis: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005. PMID 15831829 · DOI · PMC1082802
- White NJ. Melioidosis. Lancet. 2003. PMID 12767750 · DOI
- Wiersinga WJ, Currie BJ, Peacock SJ. Melioidosis. N Engl J Med. 2012. PMID 22970946 · DOI
- Wiersinga WJ, Virk HS, Torres AG, Currie BJ, Peacock SJ, Dance DAB, et al.. Melioidosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018. PMID 29388572 · DOI · PMC6456913
- Wiersinga WJ, van der Poll T, White NJ, Day NP, Peacock SJ. Melioidosis: insights into the pathogenicity of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006. PMID 16541135 · DOI
- Currie BJ, Fisher DA, Howard DM, Burrow JN, Lo D, Selva-Nayagam S, et al.. Endemic melioidosis in tropical northern Australia: a 10-year prospective study and review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis. 2000. PMID 11049780 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.