Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Masticatory Muscles
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Masticatory Muscles

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

Muscles arising in the zygomatic arch that close the jaw.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (861 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Muscles arising in the zygomatic arch that close the jaw. Their nerve supply is masseteric from the mandibular division of the trigeminal nerve. (From Stedman, 25th ed)

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Masticatory Muscle; Muscle, Masticatory; Muscles, Masticatory.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Muscle, Skeletal; Stomatognathic System
Narrower topics
Masseter Muscle; Pterygoid Muscles; Temporal Muscle

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 14,576 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Masticatory Muscles” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 1,618 of them (11.1%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 7,345 records.

Reviews account for 888 records (6.1%) and meta-analyses for 42. Randomized controlled trials number 463 (3.2%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 7,345 records; 2000-2009: 2,768 records; 2010-2019: 2,845 records; 2020 onward: 1,618 records7,345through 19992,7682000-20092,8452010-20191,6182020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19997,345
2000-20092,768
2010-20192,845
2020 onward1,618
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 6.1 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.3 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 3.2 percentReviews6.1% (888)Meta-analyses0.3% (42)Randomized controlled trials3.2% (463)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 14,576 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews8886.1%
Meta-analyses420.3%
Randomized controlled trials4633.2%

Method: PubMed query "Masticatory Muscles"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Temporal muscle thickness is an independent prognostic marker in melanoma patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases
Furtner J, Berghoff AS, Schöpf V, Reumann R, Pascher B, Woitek R, et al.
2018Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
80cc by
PMID 30008154 · DOI · PMC6182383
Ultrasound measurements of superficial and deep masticatory muscles in various postures: reliability and influencers
Chang PH, Chen YJ, Chang KV, Wu WT, Özçakar L
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
75cc by
PMID 32873849 · DOI · PMC7463001
Muscle-Bone Crosstalk in the Masticatory System: From Biomechanical to Molecular Interactions
Buvinic S, Balanta-Melo J, Kupczik K, Vásquez W, Beato C, Toro-Ibacache V
2020Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
51cc by
PMID 33732211 · DOI · PMC7959242
Atrophy Masseter Recovery by Electrical Stimulation Mediated M2-Like Macrophage Polarisation via JAK/PI3K/AKT Pathway
Wu C, Zheng X, Li Q, Chen Y, Liu W, Song X, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
11cc by
PMID 40817611 · DOI · PMC12356994

Temporal muscle thickness is an independent prognostic marker in melanoma patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases [1]

Research article Furtner J, Berghoff AS, Schöpf V, Reumann R, Pascher B, Woitek R, et al. · · 2018 · cited 80 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic relevance of temporal muscle thickness (TMT) in melanoma patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases.
Closing excerpt
This parameter may aid in patient selection for clinical trials or to the choice of different treatment options based on the determination of frail patient populations.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (118 words)

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic relevance of temporal muscle thickness (TMT) in melanoma patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases.MethodsTMT was retrospectively assessed in 146 melanoma patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases on cranial magnetic resonance images. Chart review was used to retrieve clinical parameters, including disease-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA) and survival times.ResultsPatients with a TMT > median showed a statistically significant increase in survival time (13 months) compared to patients with a TMT ConclusionTMT is an independent predictor of survival in melanoma patients with brain metastases. This parameter may aid in patient selection for clinical trials or to the choice of different treatment options based on the determination of frail patient populations.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30008154 · DOI · PMC6182383

Ultrasound measurements of superficial and deep masticatory muscles in various postures: reliability and influencers [2]

Research article Chang PH, Chen YJ, Chang KV, Wu WT, Özçakar L · · 2020 · cited 75 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Masticatory muscle thickness provides objective measurements of the oral motor function, which may change in patients with oral myofascial pain.
Closing excerpt
Future studies are warranted to validate the usefulness of US imaging in patients with oral myofascial pain syndrome.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (175 words)

Masticatory muscle thickness provides objective measurements of the oral motor function, which may change in patients with oral myofascial pain. In this study, we aimed to establish a reliable ultrasound (US) protocol for imaging the superficial and deep masticatory muscles and to identify the potential influencers of the measurements. Forty-eight healthy participants without orofacial pain were enrolled. The intra-and inter-rater reliabilities of US measurements for masseter, temporalis, and lateral pterygoid muscles were assessed. Intraclass correlation coefficients for all muscles were greater than 0.6. The generalised estimating equation was used to analyse the impact of age, gender, laterality, and body mass index on the measurements, whereby age and body mass index were likely to be associated with an increase in masticatory muscle thickness. The thickness tended to be lesser in females. Laterality seemed to exert minimal influence on masticatory muscle thickness. Our study shows acceptable reliability of US in the evaluation of superficial and deep masticatory muscle thickness. Future studies are warranted to validate the usefulness of US imaging in patients with oral myofascial pain syndrome.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32873849 · DOI · PMC7463001

Muscle-Bone Crosstalk in the Masticatory System: From Biomechanical to Molecular Interactions [3]

Review article Buvinic S, Balanta-Melo J, Kupczik K, Vásquez W, Beato C, Toro-Ibacache V · · 2020 · cited 51 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The masticatory system is a complex and highly organized group of structures, including craniofacial bones (maxillae and mandible), muscles, teeth, joints, and neurovascular elements.
Closing excerpt
Unveiling the mechanisms of muscle-bone crosstalk in the masticatory system opens broad possibilities for understanding and treating temporomandibular disorders, which severely impair the quality of life, with a high cost for diagnosis and management.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (350 words)

The masticatory system is a complex and highly organized group of structures, including craniofacial bones (maxillae and mandible), muscles, teeth, joints, and neurovascular elements. While the musculoskeletal structures of the head and neck are known to have a different embryonic origin, morphology, biomechanical demands, and biochemical characteristics than the trunk and limbs, their particular molecular basis and cell biology have been much less explored. In the last decade, the concept of muscle-bone crosstalk has emerged, comprising both the loads generated during muscle contraction and a biochemical component through soluble molecules. Bone cells embedded in the mineralized tissue respond to the biomechanical input by releasing molecular factors that impact the homeostasis of the attaching skeletal muscle. In the same way, muscle-derived factors act as soluble signals that modulate the remodeling process of the underlying bones. This concept of muscle-bone crosstalk at a molecular level is particularly interesting in the mandible, due to its tight anatomical relationship with one of the biggest and strongest masticatory muscles, the masseter. However, despite the close physical and physiological interaction of both tissues for proper functioning, this topic has been poorly addressed. Here we present one of the most detailed reviews of the literature to date regarding the biomechanical and biochemical interaction between muscles and bones of the masticatory system, both during development and in physiological or pathological remodeling processes. Evidence related to how masticatory function shapes the craniofacial bones is discussed, and a proposal presented that the masticatory muscles and craniofacial bones serve as secretory tissues. We furthermore discuss our current findings of myokines-release from masseter muscle in physiological conditions, during functional adaptation or pathology, and their putative role as bone-modulators in the craniofacial system. Finally, we address the physiological implications of the crosstalk between muscles and bones in the masticatory system, analyzing pathologies or clinical procedures in which the alteration of one of them affects the homeostasis of the other. Unveiling the mechanisms of muscle-bone crosstalk in the masticatory system opens broad possibilities for understanding and treating temporomandibular disorders, which severely impair the quality of life, with a high cost for diagnosis and management.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33732211 · DOI · PMC7959242

Atrophy Masseter Recovery by Electrical Stimulation Mediated M2-Like Macrophage Polarisation via JAK/PI3K/AKT Pathway [4]

Research article Wu C, Zheng X, Li Q, Chen Y, Liu W, Song X, et al. · · 2025 · cited 11 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundAtrophy of the masseter muscle can result in an aged facial appearance and diminished chewing function.
Closing excerpt
07, p + cell number, BTX: 30 ± 2; BTX + ES: 6 ± 2, p +cell, BTX: 10 ± 3; BTX + ES: 33 ± 8, p ConclusionsOur findings suggest that ES can enhance masseter muscle tissue repair by modulating macrophage polarisation, offering valuable insights into the potential of ES in noninvasive tissue regeneration strategies for treating masseter muscle atrophy.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (218 words)

BackgroundAtrophy of the masseter muscle can result in an aged facial appearance and diminished chewing function. Electrical stimulation (ES) is known for its ability to facilitate tissue healing and functional recovery, but its precise role in the repair of atrophic masseter muscles remains incompletely understood.MethodsWe induced masseter muscle atrophy in rats through botulinum toxin (BTX) injection and subsequently treated the animals with or without ES. Single-nucleus sequencing (sn-RNA seq) was conducted to analyse the changes in macrophages of masseter muscles between control, BTX and BTX + ES groups. The role and mechanism of macrophage phenotypic transformation in the process of ES promoting the recovery of atrophied masseter muscles were both verified through in vivo and in vitro experiments.ResultsOur results indicate that ES treatment within defined current parameters significantly ameliorated muscle condition by reducing atrophy-related gene expression (MuRF1: BTX: 10.15 ± 1.69; BTX + ES: 1.05 ± 0.06; Fbxo32: BTX: 8.62 ± 1.19, BTX + ES: 1.19 ± 0.07, p + cell number, BTX: 30 ± 2; BTX + ES: 6 ± 2, p +cell, BTX: 10 ± 3; BTX + ES: 33 ± 8, p ConclusionsOur findings suggest that ES can enhance masseter muscle tissue repair by modulating macrophage polarisation, offering valuable insights into the potential of ES in noninvasive tissue regeneration strategies for treating masseter muscle atrophy.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40817611 · DOI · PMC12356994

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: Report of a work in progress [5]
    Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Raphael KG, Wetselaar P, Glaros AG, Kato T, et al. · J Oral Rehabil · 2018 · cited 937 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Bruxism physiology and pathology: an overview for clinicians [6]
    Lavigne GJ, Khoury S, Abe S, Yamaguchi T, Raphael K · J Oral Rehabil · 2008 · cited 448 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Masticatory muscle influence on craniofacial growth [7]
    Kiliaridis S · Acta Odontol Scand · 1995 · cited 127 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Contemporary solutions for the treatment of facial nerve paralysis [8]
    Garcia RM, Hadlock TA, Klebuc MJ, Simpson RL, Zenn MR, Marcus JR · Plast Reconstr Surg · 2015 · cited 100 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Mandibular elevator muscles: physiology, action, and effect of dental occlusion [9]
    Bakke M · Scand J Dent Res · 1993 · cited 97 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Efficacy of stabilization splints for the management of patients with masticatory muscle pain: a qualitative systematic review [10]
    Türp JC, Komine F, Hugger A · Clin Oral Investig · 2004 · cited 86 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Furtner J, Berghoff AS, Schöpf V, Reumann R, Pascher B, Woitek R, et al.. Temporal muscle thickness is an independent prognostic marker in melanoma patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases. . 2018. PMID 30008154 · DOI · PMC6182383
  2. Chang PH, Chen YJ, Chang KV, Wu WT, Özçakar L. Ultrasound measurements of superficial and deep masticatory muscles in various postures: reliability and influencers. . 2020. PMID 32873849 · DOI · PMC7463001
  3. Buvinic S, Balanta-Melo J, Kupczik K, Vásquez W, Beato C, Toro-Ibacache V. Muscle-Bone Crosstalk in the Masticatory System: From Biomechanical to Molecular Interactions. . 2020. PMID 33732211 · DOI · PMC7959242
  4. Wu C, Zheng X, Li Q, Chen Y, Liu W, Song X, et al.. Atrophy Masseter Recovery by Electrical Stimulation Mediated M2-Like Macrophage Polarisation via JAK/PI3K/AKT Pathway. . 2025. PMID 40817611 · DOI · PMC12356994
  5. Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Raphael KG, Wetselaar P, Glaros AG, Kato T, et al.. International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: Report of a work in progress. J Oral Rehabil. 2018. PMID 29926505 · DOI · PMC6287494
  6. Lavigne GJ, Khoury S, Abe S, Yamaguchi T, Raphael K. Bruxism physiology and pathology: an overview for clinicians. J Oral Rehabil. 2008. PMID 18557915 · DOI
  7. Kiliaridis S. Masticatory muscle influence on craniofacial growth. Acta Odontol Scand. 1995. PMID 7572097 · DOI
  8. Garcia RM, Hadlock TA, Klebuc MJ, Simpson RL, Zenn MR, Marcus JR. Contemporary solutions for the treatment of facial nerve paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015. PMID 26017609 · DOI
  9. Bakke M. Mandibular elevator muscles: physiology, action, and effect of dental occlusion. Scand J Dent Res. 1993. PMID 8248735 · DOI
  10. Türp JC, Komine F, Hugger A. Efficacy of stabilization splints for the management of patients with masticatory muscle pain: a qualitative systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2004. PMID 15179561 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Quadriceps MuscleAnatomy and Physiology
  • Rectus AbdominisAnatomy and Physiology
  • Papillary MusclesAnatomy and Physiology
  • MyometriumAnatomy and Physiology
  • DiaphragmAnatomy and Physiology
  • Pelvic FloorAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

14,576
PubMed records on this heading
11%
published since 2020
888
review articles
463
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Quadriceps MuscleAnatomy and Physiology
  • Rectus AbdominisAnatomy and Physiology
  • Papillary MusclesAnatomy and Physiology
  • MyometriumAnatomy and Physiology
  • DiaphragmAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support