Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (966 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
A fungal metabolite isolated from cultures of Aspergillus terreus. The compound is a potent anticholesteremic agent. It inhibits 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (hydroxymethylglutaryl coa reductases), which is the rate-limiting enzyme in cholesterol biosynthesis. It also stimulates the production of low-density lipoprotein receptors in the liver.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: 6-Methylcompactin; 6 Methylcompactin; Mevinolin; Monacolin K; Lovastatin, 1 alpha-Isomer; 1 alpha-Isomer Lovastatin; alpha-Isomer Lovastatin, 1; Lovastatin, 1 alpha Isomer.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Naphthalenes
- Narrower topics
- Simvastatin
Related concepts
- Hydroxymethylglutaryl Coa Reductases
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 12,551 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Lovastatin” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 1,445 of them (11.5%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 4,221 records.
Reviews account for 797 records (6.4%) and meta-analyses for 114. Randomized controlled trials number 1,661 (13.2%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 2,697 |
| 2000-2009 | 4,188 |
| 2010-2019 | 4,221 |
| 2020 onward | 1,445 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 797 | 6.4% |
| Meta-analyses | 114 | 0.9% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 1,661 | 13.2% |
Method: PubMed query "Lovastatin"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals
Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
Characterization of chitosan/alginate/lovastatin nanoparticles and investigation of their toxic effects in vitro and in vivo [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- In this study, chitosan and alginate were selected to prepare alginate/chitosan nanoparticles to load the drug lovastatin by the ionic gelation method.
- Closing excerpt
- The results show that the ACL nanoparticles are safe in mice and that these composite nanoparticles might be useful as a new drug carrier.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (379 words)
In this study, chitosan and alginate were selected to prepare alginate/chitosan nanoparticles to load the drug lovastatin by the ionic gelation method. The synthesized nanoparticles loaded with drug were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), laser scattering and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) methods. The FTIR spectrum of the alginate/chitosan/lovastatin nanoparticles showed that chitosan and alginate interacted with lovastatin through hydrogen bonding and dipolar-dipolar interactions between the C-O, C=O, and OH groups in lovastatin, the C-O, NH, and OH groups in chitosan and the C-O, C=O, and OH groups in alginate. The laser scattering results and SEM images indicated that the alginate/chitosan/lovastatin nanoparticles have a spherical shape with a particle size in the range of 50-80 nm. The DSC diagrams displayed that the melting temperature of the alginate/chitosan/lovastatin nanoparticles was higher than that of chitosan and lower than that of alginate. This result means that the alginate and chitosan interact together, so that the nanoparticles have a larger crystal degree when compared with alginate and chitosan individually. Investigations of the in vitro lovastatin release from the alginate/chitosan/lovastatin nanoparticles under different conditions, including different alginate/chitosan ratios, different solution pH values and different lovastatin contents, were carried out by ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy. The rate of drug release from the nanoparticles is proportional to the increase in the solution pH and inversely proportional to the content of the loaded lovastatin. The drug release process is divided into two stages: a rapid stage over the first 10 hr, then the release becomes gradual and stable. The Korsmeyer-Peppas model is most suitable for the lovastatin release process from the alginate/chitosan/lovastatin nanoparticles in the first stage, and then the drug release complies with other models depending on solution pH in the slow release stage. In addition, the toxicity of alginate/chitosan/lovastatin (abbreviated ACL) nanoparticles was sufficiently low in mice in the acute toxicity test. The LD50 of the drug was higher than 5000 mg/kg, while in the subchronic toxicity test with treatments of 100 mg/kg and 300 mg/kg ACL nanoparticles, there were no abnormal signs, mortality, or toxicity in general to the function or structure of the crucial organs. The results show that the ACL nanoparticles are safe in mice and that these composite nanoparticles might be useful as a new drug carrier.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31969608 · DOI · PMC6976711
Simvastatin Induces Unfolded Protein Response and Enhances Temozolomide-Induced Cell Death in Glioblastoma Cells [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most prevalent malignant primary brain tumor with a very poor survival rate.
- Closing excerpt
- More specifically, our results imply that the IRE1 and PERK signaling arms of the UPR regulate Simva-TMZ-mediated autophagy flux inhibition in U251 and U87 GBM cells.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (265 words)
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most prevalent malignant primary brain tumor with a very poor survival rate. Temozolomide (TMZ) is the common chemotherapeutic agent used for GBM treatment. We recently demonstrated that simvastatin (Simva) increases TMZ-induced apoptosis via the inhibition of autophagic flux in GBM cells. Considering the role of the unfolded protein response (UPR) pathway in the regulation of autophagy, we investigated the involvement of UPR in Simva-TMZ-induced cell death by utilizing highly selective IRE1 RNase activity inhibitor MKC8866, PERK inhibitor GSK-2606414 (PERKi), and eIF2α inhibitor salubrinal. Simva-TMZ treatment decreased the viability of GBM cells and significantly increased apoptotic cell death when compared to TMZ or Simva alone. Simva-TMZ induced both UPR, as determined by an increase in GRP78, XBP splicing, eukaryote initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) phosphorylation, and inhibited autophagic flux (accumulation of LC3β-II and inhibition of p62 degradation). IRE1 RNase inhibition did not affect Simva-TMZ-induced cell death, but it significantly induced p62 degradation and increased the microtubule-associated proteins light chain 3 (LC3)β-II/LC3β-I ratio in U87 cells, while salubrinal did not affect the Simva-TMZ induced cytotoxicity of GBM cells. In contrast, protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) inhibition significantly increased Simva-TMZ-induced cell death in U87 cells. Interestingly, whereas PERK inhibition induced p62 accumulation in both GBM cell lines, it differentially affected the LC3β-II/LC3β-I ratio in U87 (decrease) and U251 (increase) cells. Simvastatin sensitizes GBM cells to TMZ-induced cell death via a mechanism that involves autophagy and UPR pathways. More specifically, our results imply that the IRE1 and PERK signaling arms of the UPR regulate Simva-TMZ-mediated autophagy flux inhibition in U251 and U87 GBM cells.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33105603 · DOI · PMC7690447
Simvastatin mediates inhibition of exosome synthesis, localization and secretion via multicomponent interventions [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Discovery of exosomes as modulator of cellular communication has added a new dimension to our understanding of biological processes.
- Closing excerpt
- We believe that the knowledge acquired in this study holds potential for extension to other exosome dominated pathologies and model systems.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (174 words)
Discovery of exosomes as modulator of cellular communication has added a new dimension to our understanding of biological processes. Exosomes influence the biological systems by mediating trans-communication across tissues and cells, which has important implication for health and disease. In absence of well-characterized modulators of exosome biogenesis, an alternative option is to target pathways generating important exosomal components. Cholesterol represents one such essential component required for exosomal biogenesis. We initiated this study to test the hypothesis that owing to its cholesterol lowering effect, simvastatin, a HMG CoA inhibitor, might be able to alter exosome formation and secretion. Simvastatin was tested for its effect on exosome secretion under various in-vitro and in-vivo settings and was found to reduce the secretion of exosome from various cell-types. It was also found to alter the levels of various proteins important for exosome production. Murine model of Acute Airway Inflammation was used for further validation of our findings. We believe that the knowledge acquired in this study holds potential for extension to other exosome dominated pathologies and model systems.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31704996 · DOI · PMC6841733
Statin-induced lipid carrier stress reveals a conserved vulnerability in β-lactam-resistant Gram-positive bacteria [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus resists β-lactam antibiotics through the allosteric transpeptidase penicillin-binding protein 2a, which operates within staphyloxanthin-rich membrane microdomains.
- Closing excerpt
- Importantly, this vulnerability extends to Streptococcus pneumoniae, revealing a conserved strategy to overcome β-lactam resistance in Gram-positive pathogens.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (148 words)
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus resists β-lactam antibiotics through the allosteric transpeptidase penicillin-binding protein 2a, which operates within staphyloxanthin-rich membrane microdomains. Statins restore susceptibility by disrupting these microdomains and impairing penicillin-binding protein 2a oligomerization, but the mechanisms enabling resistance to this resensitization remain unclear. Here we show, using evolution experiments in strains lacking a functional staphyloxanthin pathway, that mutations in gdpP, a regulator of cyclic di-adenosine monophosphate signaling, are the predominant route for restoring oxacillin resistance during membrane microdomain disruption. This adaptation is blocked by simvastatin, revealing a synthetic lethal interaction. Mechanistically, simvastatin inhibits the mevalonate pathway, depleting the essential lipid carrier undecaprenyl phosphate and exacerbating peptidoglycan precursor imbalance, an effect phenocopied by lipid carrier-targeting antibiotics such as bacitracin. Although compensatory mutations can restore resistance, they impose a fitness cost in vivo. Importantly, this vulnerability extends to Streptococcus pneumoniae, revealing a conserved strategy to overcome β-lactam resistance in Gram-positive pathogens.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42477355 · DOI · PMC13385884
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Interpretation of the evidence for the efficacy and safety of statin therapy [5]
- Research article Multivalent feedback regulation of HMG CoA reductase, a control mechanism coordinating isoprenoid synthesis and cell growth [6]
- Research article Lovastatin and beyond: the history of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors [7]
- Research article Statins do more than just lower cholesterol [8]
- Research article The clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium guideline for SLCO1B1 and simvastatin-induced myopathy: 2014 update [9]
- Research article Triple-negative breast cancer: is there a treatment on the horizon? [10]
References
- Thai H, Thuy Nguyen C, Thi Thach L, Thi Tran M, Duc Mai H, Thi Thu Nguyen T, et al.. Characterization of chitosan/alginate/lovastatin nanoparticles and investigation of their toxic effects in vitro and in vivo. . 2020. PMID 31969608 · DOI · PMC6976711
- Dastghaib S, Shojaei S, Mostafavi-Pour Z, Sharma P, Patterson JB, Samali A, et al.. Simvastatin Induces Unfolded Protein Response and Enhances Temozolomide-Induced Cell Death in Glioblastoma Cells. . 2020. PMID 33105603 · DOI · PMC7690447
- Kulshreshtha A, Singh S, Ahmad M, Khanna K, Ahmad T, Agrawal A, et al.. Simvastatin mediates inhibition of exosome synthesis, localization and secretion via multicomponent interventions. . 2019. PMID 31704996 · DOI · PMC6841733
- Torrens G, Bisset SW, López-Bravo M, Johansson AF, Lopez D, Cava F. Statin-induced lipid carrier stress reveals a conserved vulnerability in β-lactam-resistant Gram-positive bacteria. . 2026. PMID 42477355 · DOI · PMC13385884
- Collins R, Reith C, Emberson J, Armitage J, Baigent C, Blackwell L, et al.. Interpretation of the evidence for the efficacy and safety of statin therapy. Lancet. 2016. PMID 27616593 · DOI
- Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Multivalent feedback regulation of HMG CoA reductase, a control mechanism coordinating isoprenoid synthesis and cell growth. J Lipid Res. 1980. PMID 6995544 · DOI
- Tobert JA. Lovastatin and beyond: the history of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003. PMID 12815379 · DOI
- Vaughan CJ, Murphy MB, Buckley BM. Statins do more than just lower cholesterol. Lancet. 1996. PMID 8874463 · DOI
- Ramsey LB, Johnson SG, Caudle KE, Haidar CE, Voora D, Wilke RA, et al.. The clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium guideline for SLCO1B1 and simvastatin-induced myopathy: 2014 update. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014. PMID 24918167 · DOI · PMC4169720
- Yao H, He G, Yan S, Chen C, Song L, Rosol TJ, et al.. Triple-negative breast cancer: is there a treatment on the horizon?. Oncotarget. 2017. PMID 27765921 · DOI · PMC5352107
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.