Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Drugs and Chemicals›Lidocaine
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Lidocaine

Drugs and Chemicals · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

A local anesthetic and cardiac depressant used as an antiarrhythmia agent.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (837 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A local anesthetic and cardiac depressant used as an antiarrhythmia agent. Its actions are more intense and its effects more prolonged than those of procaine but its duration of action is shorter than that of bupivacaine or prilocaine.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Lignocaine; 2-(Diethylamino)-N-(2,6-Dimethylphenyl)Acetamide; 2-2EtN-2MePhAcN; Lidocaine Hydrocarbonate; Xyloneural; Dalcaine; Lidocaine Hydrochloride; Lidocaine Monohydrochloride.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Acetanilides
Narrower topics
Lidocaine, Prilocaine Drug Combination

Related concepts

  • Procaine
  • Bupivacaine
  • Prilocaine

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 27,340 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Lidocaine” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 2,961 of them (10.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 14,110 records.

Reviews account for 1,471 records (5.4%) and meta-analyses for 270. Randomized controlled trials number 5,122 (18.7%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 14,110 records; 2000-2009: 5,271 records; 2010-2019: 4,998 records; 2020 onward: 2,961 records14,110through 19995,2712000-20094,9982010-20192,9612020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199914,110
2000-20095,271
2010-20194,998
2020 onward2,961
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 5.4 percent; Meta-analyses: 1.0 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 18.7 percentReviews5.4% (1,471)Meta-analyses1.0% (270)Randomized controlled trials18.7% (5,122)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 27,340 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1,4715.4%
Meta-analyses2701.0%
Randomized controlled trials5,12218.7%

Method: PubMed query "Lidocaine"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals

Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Hard polymeric porous microneedles on stretchable substrate for transdermal drug delivery
Sadeqi A, Kiaee G, Zeng W, Rezaei Nejad H, Sonkusale S
2022Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
50cc by
PMID 35115643 · DOI · PMC8813900
Lidocaine and bupivacaine as part of multimodal pain management in a C57BL/6J laparotomy mouse model
Durst MS, Arras M, Palme R, Talbot SR, Jirkof P
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
24cc by
PMID 34035397 · DOI · PMC8149411
Lidocaine Alleviates Sepsis-Induced Acute Lung Injury in Mice by Suppressing Tissue Factor and Matrix Metalloproteinase-2/9
Zheng B, Yang H, Zhang J, Wang X, Sun H, Hu F, et al.
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
20cc by
PMID 34804364 · DOI · PMC8604580
Enhanced Pain Management With Combined EMLA Patch and Local Anesthetic Infiltration in Transradial Angiography
Nashtar MA, Azizy O, Trippe J, Canbay A, Patsalis PC, Steinmetz M
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 42635295 · DOI · PMC13501893

Hard polymeric porous microneedles on stretchable substrate for transdermal drug delivery [1]

Research article Sadeqi A, Kiaee G, Zeng W, Rezaei Nejad H, Sonkusale S · · 2022 · cited 50 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Microneedles offer a convenient transdermal delivery route with potential for long term sustained release of drugs.
Closing excerpt
Results show promise for large area transdermal delivery of solid drug formulations using these porous microneedles.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (205 words)

Microneedles offer a convenient transdermal delivery route with potential for long term sustained release of drugs. However current microneedle technologies may not have the mechanical properties for reliable and stable penetration (e.g. hydrogel microneedles). Moreover, it is also challenging to realize microneedle arrays with large size and high flexibility. There is also an inherent upper limit to the amount and kind of drugs that can be loaded in the microneedles. In this paper, we present a new class of polymeric porous microneedles made from biocompatible and photo-curable resin that address these challenges. The microneedles are unique in their ability to load solid drug formulation in concentrated form. We demonstrate the loading and release of solid formulation of anesthetic and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, namely Lidocaine and Ibuprofen. Paper also demonstrates realization of large area (6 × 20 cm2) flexible and stretchable microneedle patches capable of drug delivery on any body part. Penetration studies were performed in an ex vivo porcine model supplemented through rigorous compression tests to ensure the robustness and rigidity of the microneedles. Detailed release profiles of the microneedle patches were shown in an in vitro skin model. Results show promise for large area transdermal delivery of solid drug formulations using these porous microneedles.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35115643 · DOI · PMC8813900

Lidocaine and bupivacaine as part of multimodal pain management in a C57BL/6J laparotomy mouse model [2]

Research article Durst MS, Arras M, Palme R, Talbot SR, Jirkof P · · 2021 · cited 24 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
While the use of local anesthesia as part of multimodal pain management is common practice in human and veterinarian surgery, these drugs are not applied routinely in rodent surgery.
Closing excerpt
Taken together, mice treated with a combination of local anesthesia and systemic analgesia did not show fewer signs of post-surgical pain or improved recovery compared to animals treated with either local anesthesia or Paracetamol.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (216 words)

While the use of local anesthesia as part of multimodal pain management is common practice in human and veterinarian surgery, these drugs are not applied routinely in rodent surgery. Several recommendations on the use of local anesthesia exist, but systematic studies on their efficacy and side effects are lacking. In the present study, male and female C57BL/6J mice were subjected to a sham vasectomy or a sham embryo transfer, respectively. We tested whether a mixture of subcutaneously injected Lidocaine and Bupivacaine in combination with systemic Paracetamol applied via drinking water results in superior pain relief when compared to treatment with local anesthesia or Paracetamol alone. We applied a combination of methods to assess behavioral, emotional, and physiological changes indicative of pain. Voluntary Paracetamol intake via drinking water reached the target dosage of 200 mg/kg in most animals. Local anesthesia did not lead to obvious side effects such as irregular wound healing or systemic disorders. No relevant sex differences were detected in our study. Sevoflurane anesthesia and surgery affected physiological and behavioral measurements. Surprisingly, Paracetamol treatment alone significantly increased the Mouse Grimace Scale. Taken together, mice treated with a combination of local anesthesia and systemic analgesia did not show fewer signs of post-surgical pain or improved recovery compared to animals treated with either local anesthesia or Paracetamol.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34035397 · DOI · PMC8149411

Lidocaine Alleviates Sepsis-Induced Acute Lung Injury in Mice by Suppressing Tissue Factor and Matrix Metalloproteinase-2/9 [3]

Research article Zheng B, Yang H, Zhang J, Wang X, Sun H, Hu F, et al. · · 2021 · cited 20 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Acute lung injury (ALI) is one of the fatal symptoms of sepsis.
Closing excerpt
Taken together, our study demonstrated that lidocaine could inhibit the TLR4/ASK1/TF pathway to alleviate ALI via activating AMPK-SOCS3 axis.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (191 words)

Acute lung injury (ALI) is one of the fatal symptoms of sepsis. However, there were no effective clinical treatments. TF accumulation-induced fibrin deposit formations and coagulation abnormalities in pulmonary vessels contribute to the lethality of ALI. Suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3) acts as an endogenous negative regulator of the TLR4/TF pathway. We hypothesized that inducing SOCS3 expression using lidocaine to suppress the TLR4/TF pathway may alleviate ALI. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), B-mode ultrasound, and flow cytometry were used to measure the pathological damage of mice. Gelatin zymography was used to measure matrix metalloproteinase-2/9 (MMP-2/9) activities. Western blot was used to assay the expression of protein levels. Here, we show that lidocaine could increase the survival rate of ALI mice and ameliorate the lung injury of ALI mice including reducing the edema, neutrophil infiltration, and pulmonary thrombosis formation and increasing blood flow velocity. Moreover, in vitro and in vivo, lidocaine could increase the expression of p-AMPK and SOCS3 and subsequently decrease the expression of p-ASK1, p-p38, TF, and the activity of MMP-2/9. Taken together, our study demonstrated that lidocaine could inhibit the TLR4/ASK1/TF pathway to alleviate ALI via activating AMPK-SOCS3 axis.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34804364 · DOI · PMC8604580

Enhanced Pain Management With Combined EMLA Patch and Local Anesthetic Infiltration in Transradial Angiography [4]

Research article Nashtar MA, Azizy O, Trippe J, Canbay A, Patsalis PC, Steinmetz M · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Background/objectivesPain at the radial access site remains common during coronary angiography.
Closing excerpt
An EMLA application time of 100-300 min may optimize analgesic effectiveness, while patients with obesity may benefit from tailored pain-management strategies.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (225 words)

Background/objectivesPain at the radial access site remains common during coronary angiography. Evidence on topical anesthesia with EMLA patches is inconsistent, and the added value of combining EMLA with local lidocaine infiltration has not been fully clarified. This study compared the analgesic effectiveness of three strategies: EMLA patch, local lidocaine infiltration, and their combination.MethodsIn this retrospective study, 275 patients undergoing elective transradial coronary angiography received either EMLA patch (n = 88), local infiltration (n = 96), or combined EMLA + infiltration (n = 91). Inclusion required the availability of complete data on pain assessments and access-site complications. Pain intensity during the procedure and over 24 h was assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale at five time points. Group comparisons used the Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, one-way ANOVA, or chi-square test. Linear regression was applied to identify predictors of pain.ResultsPain during angiography was lowest with combined anesthesia (median 0 [0-1]), compared with EMLA (1 [0-2]) or infiltration (3 [1-5]) (p 2) independently predicted higher procedural pain (B = 0.96; p = 0.020) and higher 24 h cumulative pain (B = 2.70; p = 0.002).ConclusionsCombined EMLA patch plus local lidocaine infiltration was associated with superior analgesia during and after transradial coronary angiography compared with either method alone. An EMLA application time of 100-300 min may optimize analgesic effectiveness, while patients with obesity may benefit from tailored pain-management strategies.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42635295 · DOI · PMC13501893

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Clinical practice. Postherpetic neuralgia [5]
    Johnson RW, Rice AS · N Engl J Med · 2014 · cited 388 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Molecular mechanisms of action of systemic lidocaine in acute and chronic pain: a narrative review [6]
    Hermanns H, Hollmann MW, Stevens MF, Lirk P, Brandenburger T, Piegeler T, et al. · Br J Anaesth · 2019 · cited 240 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Meta-analysis of intravenous lidocaine and postoperative recovery after abdominal surgery [7]
    Marret E, Rolin M, Beaussier M, Bonnet F · Br J Surg · 2008 · cited 222 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Perioperative Use of Intravenous Lidocaine [8]
    Dunn LK, Durieux ME · Anesthesiology · 2017 · cited 214 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Continuous intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain and recovery in adults [9]
    Weibel S, Jelting Y, Pace NL, Helf A, Eberhart LH, Hahnenkamp K, et al. · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2018 · cited 203 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Trigger points: diagnosis and management [10]
    Alvarez DJ, Rockwell PG · Am Fam Physician · 2002 · cited 194 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Sadeqi A, Kiaee G, Zeng W, Rezaei Nejad H, Sonkusale S. Hard polymeric porous microneedles on stretchable substrate for transdermal drug delivery. . 2022. PMID 35115643 · DOI · PMC8813900
  2. Durst MS, Arras M, Palme R, Talbot SR, Jirkof P. Lidocaine and bupivacaine as part of multimodal pain management in a C57BL/6J laparotomy mouse model. . 2021. PMID 34035397 · DOI · PMC8149411
  3. Zheng B, Yang H, Zhang J, Wang X, Sun H, Hu F, et al.. Lidocaine Alleviates Sepsis-Induced Acute Lung Injury in Mice by Suppressing Tissue Factor and Matrix Metalloproteinase-2/9. . 2021. PMID 34804364 · DOI · PMC8604580
  4. Nashtar MA, Azizy O, Trippe J, Canbay A, Patsalis PC, Steinmetz M. Enhanced Pain Management With Combined EMLA Patch and Local Anesthetic Infiltration in Transradial Angiography. . 2026. PMID 42635295 · DOI · PMC13501893
  5. Johnson RW, Rice AS. Clinical practice. Postherpetic neuralgia. N Engl J Med. 2014. PMID 25317872 · DOI
  6. Hermanns H, Hollmann MW, Stevens MF, Lirk P, Brandenburger T, Piegeler T, et al.. Molecular mechanisms of action of systemic lidocaine in acute and chronic pain: a narrative review. Br J Anaesth. 2019. PMID 31303268 · DOI
  7. Marret E, Rolin M, Beaussier M, Bonnet F. Meta-analysis of intravenous lidocaine and postoperative recovery after abdominal surgery. Br J Surg. 2008. PMID 18844267 · DOI
  8. Dunn LK, Durieux ME. Perioperative Use of Intravenous Lidocaine. Anesthesiology. 2017. PMID 28114177 · DOI
  9. Weibel S, Jelting Y, Pace NL, Helf A, Eberhart LH, Hahnenkamp K, et al.. Continuous intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain and recovery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID 29864216 · DOI · PMC6513586
  10. Alvarez DJ, Rockwell PG. Trigger points: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 2002. PMID 11871683

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • RopivacaineDrugs and Chemicals
  • AcetaminophenDrugs and Chemicals
  • PhenacetinDrugs and Chemicals
  • VorinostatDrugs and Chemicals
  • FurosemideDrugs and Chemicals
  • SulfadiazineDrugs and Chemicals

All 546 articles in Drugs and Chemicals →

At a glance

27,340
PubMed records on this heading
11%
published since 2020
1,471
review articles
5,122
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • RopivacaineDrugs and Chemicals
  • AcetaminophenDrugs and Chemicals
  • PhenacetinDrugs and Chemicals
  • VorinostatDrugs and Chemicals
  • FurosemideDrugs and Chemicals

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support