Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,099 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
A salicylamide derivative that is a non-cardioselective blocker of beta-adrenergic receptors and alpha-1 adrenergic receptors.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Labetolol; Trandate; Normodyne; Albetol; AH-5158; AH5158; AH 5158; Dilevalol.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Ethanolamines; Salicylamides
Related concepts
- Beta-Adrenergic Receptors
- Alpha-1 Adrenergic Receptors
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 1,978 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Labetalol” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 149 of them (7.5%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 1,419 records.
Reviews account for 185 records (9.4%) and meta-analyses for 18. Randomized controlled trials number 308 (15.6%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 1,419 |
| 2000-2009 | 170 |
| 2010-2019 | 240 |
| 2020 onward | 149 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 185 | 9.4% |
| Meta-analyses | 18 | 0.9% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 308 | 15.6% |
Method: PubMed query "Labetalol"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals
Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
Oral antihypertensive regimens (nifedipine retard, labetalol, and methyldopa) for management of severe hypertension in pregnancy: an open-label, randomised controlled trial [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundHypertension is the most common medical disorder in pregnancy, complicating one in ten pregnancies.
- Closing excerpt
- FundingPREEMPT (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; grantee of Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation).
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (536 words)
BackgroundHypertension is the most common medical disorder in pregnancy, complicating one in ten pregnancies. Treatment of severely increased blood pressure is widely recommended to reduce the risk for maternal complications. Regimens for the acute treatment of severe hypertension typically include intravenous medications. Although effective, these drugs require venous access and careful fetal monitoring and might not be feasible in busy or low-resource environments. We therefore aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of three oral drugs, labetalol, nifedipine retard, and methyldopa for the management of severe hypertension in pregnancy.MethodsIn this multicentre, parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial, we compared these oral antihypertensives in two public hospitals in Nagpur, India. Pregnant women were eligible for the trial if they were aged at least 18 years; they were pregnant with fetuses that had reached a gestational age of at least 28 weeks; they required pharmacological blood pressure control for severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥110 mm Hg); and were able to swallow oral medications. Women were randomly assigned to receive 10 mg oral nifedipine, 200 mg oral labetalol (hourly, in both of which the dose could be escalated if hypertension was maintained), or 1000 mg methyldopa (a single dose, without dose escalation). Masking of participants, study investigators, and care providers to group allocation was not possible because of different escalation protocols in the study groups. The primary outcome was blood pressure control (defined as 120-150 mm Hg systolic blood pressure and 70-100 mm Hg diastolic blood pressure) within 6 h with no adverse outcomes. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01912677, and the Clinical Trial Registry, India, number ctri/2013/08/003866.FindingsBetween April 1, 2015, and Aug 21, 2017, we screened 2307 women for their inclusion in the study. We excluded 1413 (61%) women who were ineligible, declined to participate, had impending eclampsia, were in active labour, or had a combination of these factors. 11 (4%) women in the nifedipine group, ten (3%) women in the labetalol group, and 11 (4%) women in the methyldopa group were ineligible for treatment (because they had only one qualifying blood pressure measurement) or had treatment stopped (because of delivery or transfer elsewhere). 894 (39%) women were randomly assigned to a treatment group and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis: 298 (33%) women were assigned to receive nifedipine, 295 (33%) women were assigned to receive labetalol, and 301 (33%) women were assigned to receive methyldopa. The primary outcome was significantly more common in women in the nifedipine group than in those in the methyldopa group (249 [84%] women vs 230 [76%] women; p=0·03). However, the primary outcome did not differ between the nifedipine and labetalol groups (249 [84%] women vs 228 [77%] women; p=0·05) or the labetalol and methyldopa groups (p=0·80). Seven serious adverse events (1% of births) were reported during the study: one (InterpretationAll oral antihypertensives reduced blood pressure to the reference range in most women. As single drugs, nifedipine retard use resulted in a greater frequency of primary outcome attainment than labetalol or methyldopa use. All three oral drugs-methyldopa, nifedipine, and labetalol-are viable initial options for treating severe hypertension in low-resource settings.FundingPREEMPT (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; grantee of Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation).
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31378394 · DOI · PMC6857437
Pharmacokinetics of the most commonly used antihypertensive drugs throughout pregnancy methyldopa, labetalol, and nifedipine: a systematic review [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- PurposeAntihypertensive drugs are among the most prescribed drugs during pregnancy.
- Closing excerpt
- Aiming for evidence-based and personalized dosing of antihypertensive medication in the future, further studies on the relationship of both PK and pharmacodynamics (including the optimal blood pressure targeting) during pregnancy and pregnancy-related pathology are urgently needed to prevent undertreatment, overtreatment, and side effects.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (240 words)
PurposeAntihypertensive drugs are among the most prescribed drugs during pregnancy. Methyldopa, labetalol, and nifedipine have been perceived safe to use during pregnancy and are therefore recommended in international guidelines for treatment of hypertension. In this review, we provide a complete overview of what is known on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the antihypertensive drugs methyldopa, labetalol, and nifedipine throughout pregnancy.MethodsA systematic search was performed to retrieve studies on the PK of methyldopa, labetalol, and nifedipine used throughout pregnancy. The search was restricted to English and original studies. The systematic search was conducted on July 27, 2021, in Embase, Medline Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Keywords were methyldopa, labetalol, nifedipine, pharmacokinetics, pregnancy, and placenta.ResultsA total of 1459 unique references were identified of which title and abstract were screened. Based on this screening, 67 full-text papers were assessed, to retain 30 PK studies of which 2 described methyldopa, 12 labetalol, and 16 nifedipine. No fetal accumulation is found for any of the antihypertensive drugs studied.ConclusionWe conclude that despite decades of prescribing methyldopa, labetalol, and nifedipine throughout pregnancy, descriptions of their PK during pregnancy are hampered by a large heterogeneity in the low number of available studies. Aiming for evidence-based and personalized dosing of antihypertensive medication in the future, further studies on the relationship of both PK and pharmacodynamics (including the optimal blood pressure targeting) during pregnancy and pregnancy-related pathology are urgently needed to prevent undertreatment, overtreatment, and side effects.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 36104450 · DOI · PMC9474278
Evaluation and Management of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy complicate up to 10% of pregnancies and remain the major cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.
- Closing excerpt
- In this comprehensive review, we discuss the diagnostic criteria, evaluation, and management of pregnant women with hypertension.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (124 words)
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy complicate up to 10% of pregnancies and remain the major cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy can be classified into four groups depending on the onset of hypertension and the presence of target organ involvement: chronic hypertension, preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, and superimposed preeclampsia on chronic hypertension. Hypertension during pregnancy is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular disease and kidney failure. Early diagnosis and proper treatment for pregnant women with hypertension remain a priority since this leads to improved maternal and fetal outcomes. Labetalol, nifedipine, methyldopa, and hydralazine are the preferred medications to treat hypertension during pregnancy. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the diagnostic criteria, evaluation, and management of pregnant women with hypertension.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37526641 · DOI · PMC10617800
Lipid Emulsion Mitigates the Cardiotoxic Effects of Labetalol in Rat Cardiomyoblasts [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Lipid emulsion has recently emerged as an effective agent for improving the cardiotoxicity of highly lipophilic drugs.
- Closing excerpt
- Overall, lipid emulsion inhibited apoptotic cell death caused by labetalol toxicity via the inhibition of intrinsic apoptotic pathway and MPTP in rat cardiomyoblasts, which appears to involve PI3K, Akt, and GSK-3β signaling pathways.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (199 words)
Lipid emulsion has recently emerged as an effective agent for improving the cardiotoxicity of highly lipophilic drugs. However, its effect on cardiotoxicity induced by labetalol, a nonselective beta-blocker, remains unknown. In this study, we investigated the effects of lipid emulsion on the cardiotoxicity of labetalol in rat cardiomyoblasts and tried to decipher the underlying mechanisms. The effects of lipid emulsion on labetalol-induced changes in cell viability, expression of Bax/Bcl-2, cleaved caspase-3, and cleaved caspase-9, and phosphorylation of GSK-3β, Akt, and PI3K were examined. Lipid emulsion inhibited labetalol-induced decrease in cell viability, whereas LY294002, MK2206, and SB216763, the inhibitors of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), Akt, glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β), respectively, partially attenuated this restoration of cell viability. Lipid emulsion reversed the increase in expression of cleaved caspase-3, cleaved caspase-9, and Bax/Bcl-2 and decrease in the phosphorylation of GSK-3β, Akt, and PI3K by labetalol. Lipid emulsion and cyclosporin, a mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) inhibitor, reduced the labetalol-induced increase in the number of TUNEL-positive cells and promoted late-stage apoptosis. Overall, lipid emulsion inhibited apoptotic cell death caused by labetalol toxicity via the inhibition of intrinsic apoptotic pathway and MPTP in rat cardiomyoblasts, which appears to involve PI3K, Akt, and GSK-3β signaling pathways.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39936979 · DOI · PMC11816916
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Pathophysiology and Current Clinical Management of Preeclampsia [5]
- Research article Labetalol: a review of its pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical uses and adverse effects [6]
- Research article A review of the animal pharmacology of labetalol, a combined alpha- and beta-adrenoceptor-blocking drug [7]
- Research article Hypertension in Pregnancy: A Diagnostic and Therapeutic Overview [8]
- Research article Committee Opinion No. 692: Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset, Severe Hypertension During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period [9]
- Research article Labetalol: a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in hypertension [10]
References
- Easterling T, Mundle S, Bracken H, Parvekar S, Mool S, Magee LA, et al.. Oral antihypertensive regimens (nifedipine retard, labetalol, and methyldopa) for management of severe hypertension in pregnancy: an open-label, randomised controlled trial. . 2019. PMID 31378394 · DOI · PMC6857437
- van de Vusse D, Mian P, Schoenmakers S, Flint RB, Visser W, Allegaert K, et al.. Pharmacokinetics of the most commonly used antihypertensive drugs throughout pregnancy methyldopa, labetalol, and nifedipine: a systematic review. . 2022. PMID 36104450 · DOI · PMC9474278
- Bajpai D, Popa C, Popa C, Verma P, Dumanski S, Shah S. Evaluation and Management of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy. . 2023. PMID 37526641 · DOI · PMC10617800
- Sim G, Ok SH, Lee SH, Park KE, Park S, Sohn JT. Lipid Emulsion Mitigates the Cardiotoxic Effects of Labetalol in Rat Cardiomyoblasts. . 2025. PMID 39936979 · DOI · PMC11816916
- Amaral LM, Wallace K, Owens M, LaMarca B. Pathophysiology and Current Clinical Management of Preeclampsia. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2017. PMID 28689331 · DOI · PMC5916784
- MacCarthy EP, Bloomfield SS. Labetalol: a review of its pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical uses and adverse effects. Pharmacotherapy. 1983. PMID 6310529 · DOI
- Brittain RT, Levy GP. A review of the animal pharmacology of labetalol, a combined alpha- and beta-adrenoceptor-blocking drug. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1976. PMID 10948
- Cífková R. Hypertension in Pregnancy: A Diagnostic and Therapeutic Overview. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2023. PMID 37308715 · DOI · PMC10403432
- Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee Opinion No. 692: Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset, Severe Hypertension During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period. Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID 28333820 · DOI
- Brogden RN, Heel RC, Speight TM, Avery GS. Labetalol: a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in hypertension. Drugs. 1978. PMID 25757 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.