Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (884 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
An orally administered anthracycline antineoplastic. The compound has shown activity against breast neoplasms; lymphoma; and leukemia.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: 4-Demethoxydaunorubicin; 4 Demethoxydaunorubicin; 4-Desmethoxydaunorubicin; 4 Desmethoxydaunorubicin; IMI-30; IMI30; IMI 30; Idarubicin Hydrochloride.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Daunorubicin
Related concepts
- Breast Neoplasms
- Lymphoma
- Leukemia
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 1,876 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Idarubicin” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 199 of them (10.6%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 648 records.
Reviews account for 147 records (7.8%) and meta-analyses for 11. Randomized controlled trials number 151 (8.0%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 648 |
| 2000-2009 | 569 |
| 2010-2019 | 460 |
| 2020 onward | 199 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 147 | 7.8% |
| Meta-analyses | 11 | 0.6% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 151 | 8.0% |
Method: PubMed query "Idarubicin"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals
Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
Insights into idarubicin antimicrobial activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundMRSA is a major concern in community settings and in health care.
- Closing excerpt
- ConclusionsIdarubicin and its analogs have the potential to become a new class of antimicrobials for the treatment of MRSA-related infections.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (228 words)
BackgroundMRSA is a major concern in community settings and in health care. The emergence of biofilms and persister cells substantially increases its antimicrobial resistance. It is very urgent to develop new antimicrobials to solve this problem.ObjectiveIdarubicin was profiled to assess its antimicrobial effects in vitro and in vivo, and the underlying mechanisms.MethodsWe investigated the antimicrobial effects of idarubicin against MRSA by time-kill analysis. The antibiofilm efficacy of idarubicin was assessed by crystal violet and XTT staining, followed by laser confocal microscopy observation. The mechanisms underlying the antimicrobial effects were studied by transmission electron microscopy, all-atom molecular dynamic simulations, SYTOX staining, surface plasma resonance, and DNA gyrase inhibition assay. Further, we addressed the antimicrobial efficacy in wound and subcutaneous abscess infection in vivo.ResultsIdarubicin kills MRSA cells by disrupting the lipid bilayers and interrupting the DNA topoisomerase IIA subunits, and idarubicin shows synergistic antimicrobial effects with fosfomycin. Through synergy with a single dose treatment fosfomycin and the addition of the cell protector amifostine, the cytotoxicity and cardiotoxicity of idarubicin were significantly reduced without affecting its antimicrobial effects. Idarubicin alone or in combination with fosfomycin exhibited considerable efficacy in a subcutaneous abscess mouse model of MRSA infection. In addition, idarubicin also showed a low probability of causing resistance and good postantibiotic effects.ConclusionsIdarubicin and its analogs have the potential to become a new class of antimicrobials for the treatment of MRSA-related infections.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32423280 · DOI · PMC7549941
Anthracyclines suppress pheochromocytoma cell characteristics, including metastasis, through inhibition of the hypoxia signaling pathway [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Pheochromocytomas (PHEOs) and paragangliomas (PGLs) are rare, neuroendocrine tumors derived from adrenal or extra-adrenal chromaffin cells, respectively.
- Closing excerpt
- Our results indicate that anthracyclines are prospective candidates for inclusion in metastatic PHEO/PGL therapy, especially in patients with gene mutations involved in the hypoxia signaling pathway.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (208 words)
Pheochromocytomas (PHEOs) and paragangliomas (PGLs) are rare, neuroendocrine tumors derived from adrenal or extra-adrenal chromaffin cells, respectively. Metastases are discovered in 3-36% of patients at the time of diagnosis. Currently, only suboptimal treatment options exist. Therefore, new therapeutic compounds targeting metastatic PHEOs/PGLs are urgently needed. Here, we investigated if anthracyclines were able to suppress the progression of metastatic PHEO. We explored their effects on experimental mouse PHEO tumor cells using in vitro and in vivo models, and demonstrated that anthracyclines, particularly idarubicin (IDA), suppressed hypoxia signaling by preventing the binding of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 and 2 (HIF-1 and HIF-2) to the hypoxia response element (HRE) sites on DNA. This resulted in reduced transcriptional activation of HIF target genes, including erythropoietin (EPO), phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGK1), endothelin 1 (EDN1), glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1), lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGFA), which consequently inhibited the growth of metastatic PHEO. Additionally, IDA downregulated hypoxia signaling by interfering with the transcriptional activation of HIF1A and HIF2A. Furthermore, our animal model demonstrated the dose-dependent suppressive effect of IDA on metastatic PHEO growth in vivo. Our results indicate that anthracyclines are prospective candidates for inclusion in metastatic PHEO/PGL therapy, especially in patients with gene mutations involved in the hypoxia signaling pathway.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28423608 · DOI · PMC5410225
Do AML patients with DNMT3A exon 23 mutations benefit from idarubicin as compared to daunorubicin? A single center experience [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Mutations in DNMT3A encoding DNA methyltransferase 3A were recently described in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
- Closing excerpt
- This study shows that DNMT3A mutations have no impact on outcome but could be a predictive factor for response to idarubicin and thus, could have a direct influence in the way AML patients should be managed.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (201 words)
Mutations in DNMT3A encoding DNA methyltransferase 3A were recently described in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. To assess their prognostic significance, we determined the mutational status of DNMT3A exon 23 in 288 patients with AML excluding acute promyelocytic leukemia, aged from 18 to 65 years and treated in Toulouse University Hospital. A mutation was detected in 39 patients (13.5%). All DNMT3A exon 23+ patients had intermediate-risk cytogenetics. Mutations significantly correlated with a higher WBC count (p less than 0.001), NPM1 and FLT3-ITD mutations (p=0.027). DNMT3A mutations were conserved through xenotransplantation in immunodeficient mice. No difference in outcome between DNMT3A exon 23+ and DNMT3A exon 23- patients was found even if the results were stratified by NPM1 or FLT3-ITD status. However, DNMT3A exon 23+ patients had better median DFS (not reached vs 11.6 months, p=0.009) and OS (not reached vs 14.3 months, p=0.005) as compared to DNMT3A exon 23- patients when treated with idarubicin, whereas patients treated with daunorubicin had similar outcome regardless the DNMT3A status. This study shows that DNMT3A mutations have no impact on outcome but could be a predictive factor for response to idarubicin and thus, could have a direct influence in the way AML patients should be managed.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 22081665 · DOI · PMC3260002
One-month physicochemical stability study of idarubicin prepared in polyolefin-type bags for the treatment of hematological diseases [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Idarubicine is a mainstay of the treatment strategy for hematological cancer.
- Closing excerpt
- 9% NaCl and 5% Dex, stored at 5 ± 3 °C or 22 ± 3 °C for 30 days.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (247 words)
Idarubicine is a mainstay of the treatment strategy for hematological cancer. The literature lacks stability data that comply with current preparation practices and recommendations for conducting stability studies. The aim of the present work is to establish the stability of idarubicin preparations diluted in polyolefin-type bags (Freeflex + ®) for intravenous administration in hematological clinical settings. Preparations were produced by diluting Zavedos® idarubicin in Freeflex + ® bags containing 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl) or 5% dextrose (Dex) at concentrations of 0.04 mg/mL and 0.2 mg/mL. These preparations were stored at 5 ± 3 °C or 22 ± 3 °C. Three bags were prepared to evaluate each condition, for a total of 24 bags. To assess chemical stability, a stability-indicating high pressure liquid chromatography-ultraviolet/visible diode array detector assay was used. Samples were assayed on days D0, D1, D2, D7, D15, D22 and D30. A physical stability study was carried out on days D0, D15 and D30, looking for visible and sub-visible particles, measuring pH and osmolality. During the study, sample concentrations remained above 95% of the initial concentration, and no degradation products were detected. No color change or precipitation were observed with the naked eye. Sub-visible particles count remained below recommended limits. The pH and osmolality values remained unchanged from D0. This study demonstrates the stability of idarubicin, diluted to concentrations between 0.04 and 0.2 mg/mL in solutions of 0.9% NaCl and 5% Dex, stored at 5 ± 3 °C or 22 ± 3 °C for 30 days.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42664269 · DOI · PMC13524237
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Anthracycline cardiotoxicity: prevalence, pathogenesis and treatment [5]
- Research article Idarubicin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in the chemotherapy of cancer [6]
- Research article Anthracyclines during induction therapy in acute myeloid leukaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis [7]
- Research article A systematic collaborative overview of randomized trials comparing idarubicin with daunorubicin (or other anthracyclines) as induction therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia. AML Collaborative Group [8]
- Research article Idarubicin: a brief overview on pharmacology and clinical use [9]
- Research article Clinical pharmacokinetics of idarubicin [10]
References
- She P, Li S, Zhou L, Luo Z, Liao J, Xu L, et al.. Insights into idarubicin antimicrobial activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. . 2020. PMID 32423280 · DOI · PMC7549941
- Pang Y, Yang C, Schovanek J, Wang H, Bullova P, Caisova V, et al.. Anthracyclines suppress pheochromocytoma cell characteristics, including metastasis, through inhibition of the hypoxia signaling pathway. . 2017. PMID 28423608 · DOI · PMC5410225
- LaRochelle O, Bertoli S, Vergez F, Sarry JE, Mansat-De Mas V, Dobbelstein S, et al.. Do AML patients with DNMT3A exon 23 mutations benefit from idarubicin as compared to daunorubicin? A single center experience. . 2011. PMID 22081665 · DOI · PMC3260002
- Bouguéon G, Jouvien A, Bernadou JM, Venet A, Berroneau A, Mora P, et al.. One-month physicochemical stability study of idarubicin prepared in polyolefin-type bags for the treatment of hematological diseases. . 2026. PMID 42664269 · DOI · PMC13524237
- Volkova M, Russell R. Anthracycline cardiotoxicity: prevalence, pathogenesis and treatment. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2011. PMID 22758622 · DOI · PMC3322439
- Hollingshead LM, Faulds D. Idarubicin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in the chemotherapy of cancer. Drugs. 1991. PMID 1723369 · DOI
- Teuffel O, Leibundgut K, Lehrnbecher T, Alonzo TA, Beyene J, Sung L. Anthracyclines during induction therapy in acute myeloid leukaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Haematol. 2013. PMID 23398482 · DOI
- . A systematic collaborative overview of randomized trials comparing idarubicin with daunorubicin (or other anthracyclines) as induction therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia. AML Collaborative Group. Br J Haematol. 1998. PMID 9792296
- Borchmann P, Hübel K, Schnell R, Engert A. Idarubicin: a brief overview on pharmacology and clinical use. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997. PMID 9147715
- Robert J. Clinical pharmacokinetics of idarubicin. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1993. PMID 8491056 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.