Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (767 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
An opioid analgesic made from morphine and used mainly as an analgesic. It has a shorter duration of action than morphine.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Dihydromorphinone; Hydromorphon; Dilaudid; Hydromorphone Hydrochloride; Laudacon; Palladone.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Morphine Derivatives
Related concepts
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 1,610 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Hydromorphone” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 318 of them (19.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 523 records.
Reviews account for 109 records (6.8%) and meta-analyses for 11. Randomized controlled trials number 303 (18.8%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 523 |
| 2000-2009 | 315 |
| 2010-2019 | 454 |
| 2020 onward | 318 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 109 | 6.8% |
| Meta-analyses | 11 | 0.7% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 303 | 18.8% |
Method: PubMed query "Hydromorphone"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals
Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identification of Circulating miRNAs Differentially Regulated by Opioid Treatment | 2017 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 43 | cc by PMID 28926935 · DOI · PMC5618640 |
| Once-daily OROS hydromorphone for the management of chronic nonmalignant pain: a dose-conversion and titration study | 2007 | Clinical trial Design not recorded in structured metadata | 28 | cc by PMID 17877652 · DOI · PMC2040191 |
| A chance to stop and breathe: participants' experiences in the North American Opiate Medication Initiative clinical trial | 2014 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 27 | cc by PMID 25262567 · DOI · PMC4181618 |
| Safer Opioid Supply programs: Hydromorphone prescribing in Ontario as a harm reduction intervention to combat the drug poisoning crisis | 2025 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 11 | cc by PMID 39658780 · DOI · PMC12381310 |
Identification of Circulating miRNAs Differentially Regulated by Opioid Treatment [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Emerging evidence demonstrates functional contributions of microRNAs (miRNAs) to μ-opioid receptor (MOR) signaling, but the information so far has been mostly limited to their intracellular regulatory mechanisms.
- Closing excerpt
- These differentially expressed miRNAs are circulating biomarker candidates that can be used to evaluate MOR stimulation and serve as novel clinical diagnostic tools for improving clinical outcomes.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (163 words)
Emerging evidence demonstrates functional contributions of microRNAs (miRNAs) to μ-opioid receptor (MOR) signaling, but the information so far has been mostly limited to their intracellular regulatory mechanisms. The present study aimed to investigate changes in plasma miRNA profiles elicited by opioid treatment in blood samples collected from clinical studies. Healthy male subjects were orally administered with hydromorphone or oxycodone and blood samples were collected at a specified time after the drug treatment. A total of 179 plasma miRNAs were measured using multiplex qRT-PCR. Nine and seventeen miRNAs were commonly upregulated (let-7a-5p, miR-423-3p, miR-199a-3p, miR-146a-5p, miR-23b-3p, miR-24-3p, miR-221-3p, miR-223-3p, and miR-146b-5p) and downregulated (miR-144-3p, miR-215, miR-363-3p, etc.), respectively, following opioid treatment. The MOR signaling-associated miRNAs, namely let-7 family miRNAs (i.e., let-7d-5p, let-7f-5p, let-7c, let-7e-5p), miR-103a-3p, miR-339-3p, miR-146a-5p, miR-23b-3p, miR-23a-3p, and miR-181a-5p, were differentially expressed following drug treatment. These differentially expressed miRNAs are circulating biomarker candidates that can be used to evaluate MOR stimulation and serve as novel clinical diagnostic tools for improving clinical outcomes.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28926935 · DOI · PMC5618640
Once-daily OROS hydromorphone for the management of chronic nonmalignant pain: a dose-conversion and titration study [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundThe use of opioid analgesics for patients with chronic nonmalignant pain is becoming more widely accepted, and long-acting formulations are an important treatment option.
- Closing excerpt
- Mean pain intensity scores, as determined by the Brief Pain Inventory, decreased during OROS hydromorphone treatment (p ConclusionPatients with chronic nonmalignant pain who had been receiving opioid therapy easily underwent conversion to OROS hydromorphone, with no loss of efficacy or increase in adverse events.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (173 words)
BackgroundThe use of opioid analgesics for patients with chronic nonmalignant pain is becoming more widely accepted, and long-acting formulations are an important treatment option.AimTo assess conversion to extended-release OROS hydromorphone from previous stable opioid agonist therapy in patients with chronic nonmalignant pain of moderate-to-severe intensity.MethodsIn this open-label multicentre trial, patients were stabilised on their previous opioid therapy before being switched to OROS hydromorphone at a ratio of 5 : 1 (morphine sulphate equivalent to hydromorphone hydrochloride). The OROS hydromorphone dose was titrated over 3-16 days to achieve effective analgesia, and maintenance treatment continued for 14 days.ResultsStudy medication was received by 336 patients; 66% completed all study phases. Stabilisation of OROS hydromorphone was achieved by 94.6% of patients, the majority in two or fewer titration steps (mean time, 4.2 days). Mean pain intensity scores, as determined by the Brief Pain Inventory, decreased during OROS hydromorphone treatment (p ConclusionPatients with chronic nonmalignant pain who had been receiving opioid therapy easily underwent conversion to OROS hydromorphone, with no loss of efficacy or increase in adverse events.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 17877652 · DOI · PMC2040191
A chance to stop and breathe: participants' experiences in the North American Opiate Medication Initiative clinical trial [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundThe North American Opiate Medication Initiative (NAOMI) clinical trial compared the effectiveness of injectable diacetylmorphine (DAM) or hydromorphone (HDM) to oral methadone maintenance treatment (MMT).
- Closing excerpt
- Clinical trial registrationNCT00175357.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (196 words)
BackgroundThe North American Opiate Medication Initiative (NAOMI) clinical trial compared the effectiveness of injectable diacetylmorphine (DAM) or hydromorphone (HDM) to oral methadone maintenance treatment (MMT). This study aimed to determine participants' perceptions of treatment delivered in NAOMI.MethodsA qualitative sub-study was conducted with 29 participants (12 female): 18 (62.1%) received injectable DAM or HDM and 11 (37.9%) received MMT. A phenomenological theoretical framework was used. Semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis was used over successive phases and was driven by the semantic meanings of the data.ResultsParticipants receiving injectable medications suggested that the supervised delivery model was stringent but provided valuable stability to their lives. Females discussed the adjustment required for the clinical setting, while males focused on the challenging clinic schedule and its impact on employment abilities. Participants receiving MMT described disappointment with being randomized to this treatment; however, positive aspects, including the quick titration time and availability of auxiliary services, were also discussed.ConclusionTreatment with injectable DAM (or HDM) is preferred by participants and considered effective in reducing the burden of opioid dependency. Engaging patients in research regarding their perceptions of treatment provides a comprehensive assessment of treatment needs and barriers.Clinical trial registrationNCT00175357.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 25262567 · DOI · PMC4181618
Safer Opioid Supply programs: Hydromorphone prescribing in Ontario as a harm reduction intervention to combat the drug poisoning crisis [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- SettingThe crisis of unregulated fentanyl-related overdose deaths presents a significant public health challenge.
- Closing excerpt
- SSPs have the potential to meaningfully reduce overdose rates, address the ongoing overdose crisis, and if scaled up, influence population-level outcomes.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (235 words)
SettingThe crisis of unregulated fentanyl-related overdose deaths presents a significant public health challenge. This article describes the implementation and evaluation of four Safer Opioid Supply programs (SSPs) in Ontario, one in London and three in Toronto.Intervention and implementationSSPs aim to curtail overdose fatalities while connecting individuals using drugs to healthcare services. The programs involve a daily dispensed prescription of immediate-release hydromorphone tablets for take-home dosing alongside an observed dose of long-acting opioids like slow-release oral morphine. Implemented within a multidisciplinary primary care framework, these programs emphasize patient-centred approaches and comprehensive health and social support.OutcomesIn our study conducted in 2020/2021, clients and service providers reported that receiving pharmaceutical opioids through these programs improved the clients' health and well-being. The regulated supply was reported to lead to decreases in overdose incidents, use of unregulated substances, and criminalized activities. Increased engagement with healthcare and harm reduction services and improvements in social determinants of health, such as food security, were also reported. Despite these positive outcomes, some implementation challenges, including capacity issues and provider burnout, were described by service providers.ImplicationsOur findings suggest that the combination of safer supply, wrap-around support, and harm reduction within primary care settings can lead to increased healthcare engagement, HIV/HCV prevention, testing, and treatment uptake, reducing the burden of infectious diseases and overdose risk. SSPs have the potential to meaningfully reduce overdose rates, address the ongoing overdose crisis, and if scaled up, influence population-level outcomes.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39658780 · DOI · PMC12381310
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Neuroexcitatory effects of morphine and hydromorphone: evidence implicating the 3-glucuronide metabolites [5]
- Research article Hydromorphone [6]
- Research article Hydromorphone: pharmacology and clinical applications in cancer patients [7]
- Research article Ketamine added to morphine or hydromorphone patient-controlled analgesia for acute postoperative pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials [8]
- Research article Injectable opioid agonist treatment for opioid use disorder: a national clinical guideline [9]
- Research article Comparative clinical effects of hydromorphone and morphine: a meta-analysis [10]
References
- Toyama K, Kiyosawa N, Watanabe K, Ishizuka H. Identification of Circulating miRNAs Differentially Regulated by Opioid Treatment. . 2017. PMID 28926935 · DOI · PMC5618640
- Wallace M, Rauck RL, Moulin D, Thipphawong J, Khanna S, Tudor IC. Once-daily OROS hydromorphone for the management of chronic nonmalignant pain: a dose-conversion and titration study. . 2007. PMID 17877652 · DOI · PMC2040191
- Oviedo-Joekes E, Marchand K, Lock K, Chettiar J, Marsh DC, Brissette S, et al.. A chance to stop and breathe: participants' experiences in the North American Opiate Medication Initiative clinical trial. . 2014. PMID 25262567 · DOI · PMC4181618
- Schmidt RA, Guta A, Rai N, Sereda A, O'Reilly E, Hales J, et al.. Safer Opioid Supply programs: Hydromorphone prescribing in Ontario as a harm reduction intervention to combat the drug poisoning crisis. . 2025. PMID 39658780 · DOI · PMC12381310
- Smith MT. Neuroexcitatory effects of morphine and hydromorphone: evidence implicating the 3-glucuronide metabolites. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2000. PMID 10874511 · DOI
- Murray A, Hagen NA. Hydromorphone. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005. PMID 15907647 · DOI
- Sarhill N, Walsh D, Nelson KA. Hydromorphone: pharmacology and clinical applications in cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2001. PMID 11305075 · DOI
- Wang L, Johnston B, Kaushal A, Cheng D, Zhu F, Martin J. Ketamine added to morphine or hydromorphone patient-controlled analgesia for acute postoperative pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Can J Anaesth. 2016. PMID 26659198 · DOI
- Fairbairn N, Ross J, Trew M, Meador K, Turnbull J, MacDonald S, et al.. Injectable opioid agonist treatment for opioid use disorder: a national clinical guideline. CMAJ. 2019. PMID 31548191 · DOI · PMC6763328
- Felden L, Walter C, Harder S, Treede RD, Kayser H, Drover D, et al.. Comparative clinical effects of hydromorphone and morphine: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2011. PMID 21841049 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.