Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Hip Joint
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Hip Joint

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

The joint that is formed by the articulation of the head of femur and the acetabulum of the pelvis.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (900 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The joint that is formed by the articulation of the head of femur and the acetabulum of the pelvis.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Hip Joints; Joint, Hip; Joints, Hip; Acetabulofemoral Joint; Acetabulofemoral Joints; Joint, Acetabulofemoral; Joints, Acetabulofemoral.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Joints
Narrower topics
Round Ligament of Femur

Related concepts

  • Femur
  • Acetabulum
  • Pelvis

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 32,617 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Hip Joint” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 5,260 of them (16.1%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 12,155 records.

Reviews account for 2,391 records (7.3%) and meta-analyses for 237. Randomized controlled trials number 964 (3.0%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 12,155 records; 2000-2009: 5,230 records; 2010-2019: 9,972 records; 2020 onward: 5,260 records12,155through 19995,2302000-20099,9722010-20195,2602020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199912,155
2000-20095,230
2010-20199,972
2020 onward5,260
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 7.3 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.7 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 3.0 percentReviews7.3% (2,391)Meta-analyses0.7% (237)Randomized controlled trials3.0% (964)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 32,617 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews2,3917.3%
Meta-analyses2370.7%
Randomized controlled trials9643.0%

Method: PubMed query "Hip Joint"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Hip biomechanics in patients with low back pain, what do we know? A systematic review
Pizol GZ, Miyamoto GC, Cabral CMN
2024Systematic review
Design not recorded in structured metadata
12cc by
PMID 38807086 · DOI · PMC11131240
Performance and return to sport outcomes following hip arthroscopy in National Hockey League players
Slawaska-Eng D, Bouchard MD, Del Sordo L, Weber AE, Ayeni O
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
7cc by
PMID 40501178 · DOI · PMC12310084
Morphology of the dysplastic hip and the relationship with sex and acetabular version
Mechlenburg I, De Raedt S, Achterberg HC, Stilling M, Rømer L, Søballe K, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
5cc by
PMID 38715464 · DOI · PMC12163104
Mycobacterium fortuitum infection of the hip joint: a case report and literature review
Zhang W, Zhang C, Shan K, Liu S, Hao J, Song M, et al.
2026Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 41948335 · DOI · PMC13050715

Hip biomechanics in patients with low back pain, what do we know? A systematic review [1]

Systematic review Pizol GZ, Miyamoto GC, Cabral CMN · · 2024 · cited 12 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundBiomechanical alterations in patients with low back pain (LBP), as reduced range of motion or strength, do not appear to be exclusively related to the trunk.
Closing excerpt
Systematic review registrationInternational Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42020213599).
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (357 words)

BackgroundBiomechanical alterations in patients with low back pain (LBP), as reduced range of motion or strength, do not appear to be exclusively related to the trunk. Thus, studies have investigated biomechanical changes in the hip, due to the proximity of this joint to the low back region. However, the relationship between hip biomechanical changes in patients with LBP is still controversial and needs to be summarized. Therefore, the aim of this study was to systematically review observational studies that used biomechanical assessments in patients with non-specific LBP.MethodsThe search for observational studies that evaluated hip biomechanical variables (i.e., range of motion, kinematic, strength, and electromyography) in adults with non-specific acute, subacute, and chronic LBP was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Cinahl and Sportdiscus databases on February 22nd, 2024. Four blocks of descriptors were used: 1) type of study, 2) LBP, 3) hip and 4) biomechanical assessment. Two independent assessors selected eligible studies and extracted the following data: author, year of publication, country, study objective, participant characteristics, outcomes, and results. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Epidemiological Appraisal Instrument and classified as low, moderate, and high. Due to the heterogeneity of the biomechanical assessment and, consequently, of the results among eligible studies, a descriptive analysis was performed.ResultsThe search strategy returned 338 articles of which 54 were included: nine articles evaluating range of motion, 16 evaluating kinematic, four strength, seven electromyography and 18 evaluating more than one outcome. The studies presented moderate and high methodological quality. Patients with LBP, regardless of symptoms, showed a significant reduction in hip range of motion, especially hip internal rotation, reduction in the time to perform functional activities such as sit-to-stance-to-sit, sit-to-stand or walking, greater activation of the hamstrings and gluteus maximus muscles and weakness of the hip abductor and extensor muscles during specific tests and functional activities compared to healthy individuals.ConclusionPatients with LBP present changes in range of motion, task execution, activation, and hip muscle strength when compared to healthy individuals. Therefore, clinicians must pay greater attention to the assessment and management of the hip during the treatment of these patients.Systematic review registrationInternational Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42020213599).

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38807086 · DOI · PMC11131240

Performance and return to sport outcomes following hip arthroscopy in National Hockey League players [2]

Research article Slawaska-Eng D, Bouchard MD, Del Sordo L, Weber AE, Ayeni O · · 2025 · cited 7 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
PurposeIntra-articular hip disorders, such as femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS), labral tears and chondral damage are common in ice hockey players, particularly in the National Hockey League (NHL).
Closing excerpt
Level of evidenceLevel V.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (186 words)

PurposeIntra-articular hip disorders, such as femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS), labral tears and chondral damage are common in ice hockey players, particularly in the National Hockey League (NHL). However, evidence on return-to-sport (RTS) rates and performance outcomes post-hip arthroscopy remains limited. This study evaluates RTS rates, career longevity, and performance metrics, including games played, points per game (PPG), save percentage, and performance scores (PS), following hip arthroscopy.MethodsNHL players who underwent hip arthroscopy for intra-articular pathology between 2000 and 2024 were identified using public records. RTS rates, career duration, and performance metrics were analysed pre- and post-surgery. Paired t-tests and analyses of variance (ANOVA) were performed across positions (forwards, defensemen and goaltenders).ResultsA total of 92 NHL players (103 hips) met inclusion criteria. The overall RTS rate was 79.3%, increasing to 84.9% when excluding players still recovering. RTS was significantly higher in players ConclusionNHL players undergoing hip arthroscopy have high RTS rates and often resume multi-season careers. However, forwards experience greater declines in performance, while defensemen and goaltenders are less affected. These results underscore position-specific recovery trends and may inform rehabilitation strategies in elite hockey athletes.Level of evidenceLevel V.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40501178 · DOI · PMC12310084

Morphology of the dysplastic hip and the relationship with sex and acetabular version [3]

Research article Mechlenburg I, De Raedt S, Achterberg HC, Stilling M, Rømer L, Søballe K, et al. · · 2025 · cited 5 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The dysplastic hip is characterized by incomplete coverage of the femoral head, resulting in increased risk of early osteoarthritis.
Closing excerpt
This finding should be taken into account during the reorientation of the acetabulum in the surgical treatment of hip dysplasia.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (235 words)

The dysplastic hip is characterized by incomplete coverage of the femoral head, resulting in increased risk of early osteoarthritis. The morphological variation of the hip joint is diverse and clear differences exist between females and males. The aim of this observational study was therefore to investigate the relationship between the morphology of the hip, sex, and hip dysplasia using a three-dimensional model. Statistical shape models of the combined femur and pelvic bones were created from bilateral hips of 75 patients. Using manual angle measurements and regression analysis, the characteristic shape differences associated with sex and hip dysplasia were determined. The model showed clear differences associated with sex and hip dysplasia. We found that the acetabular anteversion in females was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) than in males while no significant difference in acetabular anteversion was found between normal and dysplastic hips (p = 0.11). The model showed that decreased acetabular anteversion resulted in the appearance of the cross-over sign and the prominent ischial spine sign commonly associated with retroversion. Sex could be predicted with an area under the curve of 0.99 and hip dysplasia could be predicted with an area under the curve of ≥0.73. Our findings suggest that retroversion is a result of decreased anteversion of the acetabulum and is primarily associated with sex. This finding should be taken into account during the reorientation of the acetabulum in the surgical treatment of hip dysplasia.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38715464 · DOI · PMC12163104

Mycobacterium fortuitum infection of the hip joint: a case report and literature review [4]

Review article Zhang W, Zhang C, Shan K, Liu S, Hao J, Song M, et al. · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Osteoarticular infections caused by Mycobacterium fortuitum are exceedingly rare and often result in delayed diagnosis due to nonspecific clinical manifestations.
Closing excerpt
This case highlights the critical role of 16S rRNA sequencing in diagnosing non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections and informs therapeutic strategies for similar rare infections.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (122 words)

Osteoarticular infections caused by Mycobacterium fortuitum are exceedingly rare and often result in delayed diagnosis due to nonspecific clinical manifestations. We report a case of septic arthritis of the hip in a 47-year-old man, in which M. fortuitum was identified from synovial fluid by 16S rRNA gene sequencing (99% identity to GenBank reference sequence CP011269.1). Upon definitive diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy was adjusted to intravenous azithromycin and levofloxacin combined with oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX). Following clinical improvement, treatment was transitioned to oral azithromycin, levofloxacin, and TMP-SMX for 12 months. At the 18-month follow-up, the patient remained in complete remission without recurrence. This case highlights the critical role of 16S rRNA sequencing in diagnosing non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections and informs therapeutic strategies for similar rare infections.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41948335 · DOI · PMC13050715

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Hip Osteoarthritis: Etiopathogenesis and Implications for Management [5]
    Murphy NJ, Eyles JP, Hunter DJ · Adv Ther · 2016 · cited 181 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Spine-Pelvis-Hip Relationship in the Functioning of a Total Hip Replacement [6]
    Ike H, Dorr LD, Trasolini N, Stefl M, McKnight B, Heckmann N · J Bone Joint Surg Am · 2018 · cited 158 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Microinstability of the Hip-Gaining Acceptance [7]
    Safran MR · J Am Acad Orthop Surg · 2019 · cited 136 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review [8]
    Kyin C, Maldonado DR, Go CC, Shapira J, Lall AC, Domb BG · Arthroscopy · 2021 · cited 124 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Hip Arthroscopy in Patients Age 40 or Older: A Systematic Review [9]
    Horner NS, Ekhtiari S, Simunovic N, Safran MR, Philippon MJ, Ayeni OR · Arthroscopy · 2017 · cited 100 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Complications following hip arthroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis [10]
    Kowalczuk M, Bhandari M, Farrokhyar F, Wong I, Chahal M, Neely S, et al. · Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc · 2013 · cited 99 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Pizol GZ, Miyamoto GC, Cabral CMN. Hip biomechanics in patients with low back pain, what do we know? A systematic review. . 2024. PMID 38807086 · DOI · PMC11131240
  2. Slawaska-Eng D, Bouchard MD, Del Sordo L, Weber AE, Ayeni O. Performance and return to sport outcomes following hip arthroscopy in National Hockey League players. . 2025. PMID 40501178 · DOI · PMC12310084
  3. Mechlenburg I, De Raedt S, Achterberg HC, Stilling M, Rømer L, Søballe K, et al.. Morphology of the dysplastic hip and the relationship with sex and acetabular version. . 2025. PMID 38715464 · DOI · PMC12163104
  4. Zhang W, Zhang C, Shan K, Liu S, Hao J, Song M, et al.. Mycobacterium fortuitum infection of the hip joint: a case report and literature review. . 2026. PMID 41948335 · DOI · PMC13050715
  5. Murphy NJ, Eyles JP, Hunter DJ. Hip Osteoarthritis: Etiopathogenesis and Implications for Management. Adv Ther. 2016. PMID 27671326 · DOI · PMC5083776
  6. Ike H, Dorr LD, Trasolini N, Stefl M, McKnight B, Heckmann N. Spine-Pelvis-Hip Relationship in the Functioning of a Total Hip Replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018. PMID 30234627 · DOI
  7. Safran MR. Microinstability of the Hip-Gaining Acceptance. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019. PMID 30475277 · DOI
  8. Kyin C, Maldonado DR, Go CC, Shapira J, Lall AC, Domb BG. Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2021. PMID 33220468 · DOI
  9. Horner NS, Ekhtiari S, Simunovic N, Safran MR, Philippon MJ, Ayeni OR. Hip Arthroscopy in Patients Age 40 or Older: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2017. PMID 27625005 · DOI
  10. Kowalczuk M, Bhandari M, Farrokhyar F, Wong I, Chahal M, Neely S, et al.. Complications following hip arthroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013. PMID 22940810 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • JointsAnatomy and Physiology
  • Temporomandibular JointAnatomy and Physiology
  • Patellofemoral JointAnatomy and Physiology
  • Shoulder JointAnatomy and Physiology
  • Wrist JointAnatomy and Physiology
  • Acromioclavicular JointAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

32,617
PubMed records on this heading
16%
published since 2020
2,391
review articles
964
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • JointsAnatomy and Physiology
  • Temporomandibular JointAnatomy and Physiology
  • Patellofemoral JointAnatomy and Physiology
  • Shoulder JointAnatomy and Physiology
  • Wrist JointAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support