Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 3 complete abstracts (1,039 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Evaluation of the level of physical, physiological, or mental functioning in the older population group.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Assessment, Geriatric; Assessments, Geriatric; Geriatric Assessments.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Data Collection; Health Status
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 38,167 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Geriatric Assessment” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 10,553 of them (27.6%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 14,393 records.
Reviews account for 5,136 records (13.5%) and meta-analyses for 371. Randomized controlled trials number 1,605 (4.2%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 3,962 |
| 2000-2009 | 9,259 |
| 2010-2019 | 14,393 |
| 2020 onward | 10,553 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 5,136 | 13.5% |
| Meta-analyses | 371 | 1.0% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 1,605 | 4.2% |
Method: PubMed query "Geriatric Assessment"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in clinical research
Research methods determine how much a result can be trusted. Randomized trials guard against confounding, systematic reviews and meta-analyses combine many studies, and observational designs are valuable but can show only association. Reporting standards, trial registration and pre-specified outcomes reduce bias. When reading about a method, ask what problem it is designed to solve and which problems it does not solve.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vocal biomarkers for geriatric health assessment: a scoping review protocol | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 6 | cc by PMID 41730560 · DOI · PMC12931537 |
| Development and internal validation of a risk prediction model for oral frailty in hospitalized older adults with chronic diseases | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 4 | cc by PMID 41635562 · DOI · PMC12862930 |
| Wearable Devices in Elderly Chronic Disease Management: A Qualitative Study of Barriers and Facilitators | 2025 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 4 | cc by PMID 41355850 · DOI · PMC12680462 |
Vocal biomarkers for geriatric health assessment: a scoping review protocol [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- IntroductionGlobal ageing populations require accessible, non-invasive tools for early detection and monitoring of neurological chronic and neurodegenerative diseases.
- Closing excerpt
- Prospero registration numberNot registered.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (364 words)
IntroductionGlobal ageing populations require accessible, non-invasive tools for early detection and monitoring of neurological chronic and neurodegenerative diseases. Current diagnostic methods face limitations including invasiveness, high costs and infrequent clinical assessments. The human voice has emerged as a promising digital biomarker, with vocal characteristics reflecting physiological and cognitive changes associated with conditions like dementia and Parkinson's disease. While artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning have enabled sophisticated vocal analysis, the literature remains fragmented without comprehensive synthesis. This scoping review protocol delineates a systematic approach to collate and synthesise existing research on the application of AI-driven audio biomarkers for the detection and management of neurological diseases (eg, cognitive decline, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's, dementia and depression) in older adults aged 65 years and above.Methods and analysisThis scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines and the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley, incorporating recent methodological advancements. The eligibility criteria for study selection will be formulated using the PCC (Population, Concept, Context) framework. A comprehensive literature search will be performed across several electronic databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, Embase, Compendex, CINAHL, Scientific Information Database (SID), Magiran, IranMedex and Barakat Knowledge Network System (BKNS). The search will encompass peer-reviewed articles published in Persian and English from 1 January 2012 to 31 March 2026. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts and full texts and extract data according to the predefined PCC-based eligibility criteria. Discrepancies will be resolved through discussion or, if necessary, by consultation with a third reviewer. The results will be synthesised and presented narratively, accompanied by summary tables, charts and figures to address each research question.Ethics and disseminationThe Research Ethics Committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences approved the protocol for this scoping review (approval number: IR.TBZMED.VCR.REC.1404.223). They concluded that since the review involves only analysis of existing literature without direct patient involvement or clinical procedures, it meets the relevant ethical standards. Results from the review will be shared through peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations to provide valuable insights for researchers, clinicians and policymakers on the use of audio-based biomarkers in older adults.Prospero registration numberNot registered.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41730560 · DOI · PMC12931537
Development and internal validation of a risk prediction model for oral frailty in hospitalized older adults with chronic diseases [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate the prevalence and influencing factors of oral frailty, a significant geriatric syndrome, among hospitalized older adults with chronic diseases, and to develop a corresponding risk prediction model to facilitate early screening and intervention.
- Closing excerpt
- The developed risk prediction model demonstrates good calibration and discriminative ability, supporting its potential use in early screening and targeted intervention of oral frailty in this population.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (293 words)
BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate the prevalence and influencing factors of oral frailty, a significant geriatric syndrome, among hospitalized older adults with chronic diseases, and to develop a corresponding risk prediction model to facilitate early screening and intervention.MethodsFrom September 2024 to May 2025, we recruited 443 older adult patients with chronic diseases from two tertiary grade A hospitals in Wuhu City, Anhui Province, using a convenience sampling method. Data were collected using a general information questionnaire, the Oral Frailty Index-8 (OFI-8), the FRAIL scale, the Appetite Scale, and the Clinical Physiological Resilience Scale. Binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with oral frailty.ResultsThe prevalence of oral frailty among hospitalized older adult patients with chronic diseases was 69.3%(307/443). Appetite, employment status, age, Clinical physiological resilience, and frailty were the best predictors of oral frailty in hospitalized older adult patients with chronic diseases. These influencing factors were utilized to construct a nomogram model, which demonstrated excellent consistency and accuracy. The area under the curve (AUC) in the training set was 0.805 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.753-0.857). In the validation set, the AUC was 0.900 (95% CI = 0.843-0.957). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test values were p = 0.465 and p = 0.161 (both > 0.05). The calibration curve indicated a significant agreement between the nomogram model and the actual observations. Both the ROC curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated that the nomogram possesses outstanding risk predictive performance.ConclusionThe prevalence of oral frailty is notably high among hospitalized older adult patients with chronic diseases, with key influencing factors including age, employment status, appetite, and clinical physiological resilience. The developed risk prediction model demonstrates good calibration and discriminative ability, supporting its potential use in early screening and targeted intervention of oral frailty in this population.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41635562 · DOI · PMC12862930
Wearable Devices in Elderly Chronic Disease Management: A Qualitative Study of Barriers and Facilitators [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- AimTo explore the perceptions of elderly patients with chronic diseases and their healthcare providers on the use of wearable devices for home health monitoring, identifying barriers and facilitators to their effective adoption in China's rapidly aging population.
- Closing excerpt
- Patient or public contributionElderly patients with chronic diseases and their healthcare providers contributed valuable insights by sharing their experiences with wearable health monitoring devices, shaping the study's findings.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (382 words)
AimTo explore the perceptions of elderly patients with chronic diseases and their healthcare providers on the use of wearable devices for home health monitoring, identifying barriers and facilitators to their effective adoption in China's rapidly aging population.BackgroundAs China's population ages, managing chronic diseases among elderly patients has become increasingly complex. Wearable health monitoring devices offer a promising solution, enabling remote and continuous health tracking. However, the adoption of these devices remains limited, particularly among elderly patients. Understanding the perspectives of both patients and healthcare providers is crucial for optimizing wearable device use in chronic disease management.DesignA qualitative descriptive study.MethodFrom May 2023 to March 2024, semistructured interviews were conducted with 16 elderly patients and 11 healthcare providers in Nanjing, China. Participants were selected through purposive sampling. Data were analyzed using Colaizzi's 7-step method, generating key themes that address both the challenges and opportunities in adopting wearable health technologies.FindingsSeven major themes emerged: (1) Technology Acceptance and Motivation, (2) Changes in Social Support and Interaction, (3) Adjustments in Healthcare Work Modes, (4) Barriers and Risks in Technology Application, (5) Device Compliance and Knowledge Gaps, (6) Identifying Key Features for Quality Assessment of Wearable Devices, and (7) The Role of Customization and Adaptability. While the potential benefits of wearable devices for chronic disease management were widely recognized, concerns about complexity, cost, and data security were key obstacles.ConclusionWearable devices hold significant potential for improving the management of chronic diseases among elderly patients, yet multiple barriers hinder their widespread adoption. Addressing issues related to usability, privacy, and affordability, alongside providing education and policy support, will be critical to enhancing their integration into healthcare settings.Implications for the profession and patient careThis study underscores the importance of creating targeted strategies to overcome the challenges in using wearable health devices among elderly patients. Healthcare providers and policymakers should focus on simplifying technology, enhancing patient education, and addressing privacy concerns to foster broader acceptance and use of these devices in chronic disease care.ImpactBy promoting the adoption of wearable health technologies, healthcare systems can improve chronic disease management outcomes for elderly patients, reduce the burden on healthcare services, and support a more patient-centered approach to care.Patient or public contributionElderly patients with chronic diseases and their healthcare providers contributed valuable insights by sharing their experiences with wearable health monitoring devices, shaping the study's findings.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41355850 · DOI · PMC12680462
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials [4]
- Research article Frailty index as a predictor of mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis [5]
- Research article Frailty in Older Adults [6]
- Research article Definitions and predictors of successful aging: a comprehensive review of larger quantitative studies [7]
- Research article Reference values for the timed up and go test: a descriptive meta-analysis [8]
- Research article Is the Timed Up and Go test a useful predictor of risk of falls in community dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis [9]
References
- Amir-Behghadami M, Gholipour K, Mohammadzadeh Z. Vocal biomarkers for geriatric health assessment: a scoping review protocol. . 2026. PMID 41730560 · DOI · PMC12931537
- Liu H, Hu X, Liu Q, Shao M, Huang X, Gu J, et al.. Development and internal validation of a risk prediction model for oral frailty in hospitalized older adults with chronic diseases. . 2026. PMID 41635562 · DOI · PMC12862930
- Zhang H, Xu J, Lu X, Xu M. Wearable Devices in Elderly Chronic Disease Management: A Qualitative Study of Barriers and Facilitators. . 2025. PMID 41355850 · DOI · PMC12680462
- Stuck AE, Siu AL, Wieland GD, Adams J, Rubenstein LZ. Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Lancet. 1993. PMID 8105269 · DOI
- Kojima G, Iliffe S, Walters K. Frailty index as a predictor of mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2018. PMID 29040347 · DOI
- Kim DH, Rockwood K. Frailty in Older Adults. N Engl J Med. 2024. PMID 39115063 · DOI · PMC11634188
- Depp CA, Jeste DV. Definitions and predictors of successful aging: a comprehensive review of larger quantitative studies. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006. PMID 16407577 · DOI
- Bohannon RW. Reference values for the timed up and go test: a descriptive meta-analysis. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2006. PMID 16914068 · DOI
- Barry E, Galvin R, Keogh C, Horgan F, Fahey T. Is the Timed Up and Go test a useful predictor of risk of falls in community dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2014. PMID 24484314 · DOI · PMC3924230
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.