Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Drugs and Chemicals›Famotidine
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Famotidine

Drugs and Chemicals · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

A competitive histamine H2-receptor antagonist.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (864 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A competitive histamine H2-receptor antagonist. Its main pharmacodynamic effect is the inhibition of gastric secretion.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Pepcid; Famotidine Hydrochloride; YM-11170; YM11170; YM 11170; MK-208; MK208; MK 208.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Thiazoles

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 1,763 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Famotidine” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 167 of them (9.5%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 927 records.

Reviews account for 90 records (5.1%) and meta-analyses for 15. Randomized controlled trials number 358 (20.3%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 927 records; 2000-2009: 408 records; 2010-2019: 261 records; 2020 onward: 167 records927through 19994082000-20092612010-20191672020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 1999927
2000-2009408
2010-2019261
2020 onward167
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 5.1 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.9 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 20.3 percentReviews5.1% (90)Meta-analyses0.9% (15)Randomized controlled trials20.3% (358)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 1,763 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews905.1%
Meta-analyses150.9%
Randomized controlled trials35820.3%

Method: PubMed query "Famotidine"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals

Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Famotidine inhibits toll-like receptor 3-mediated inflammatory signaling in SARS-CoV-2 infection
Mukherjee R, Bhattacharya A, Bojkova D, Mehdipour AR, Shin D, Khan KS, et al.
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
46cc by
PMID 34214498 · DOI · PMC8241579
Inhibition of α-, β-, γ-, δ-, ζ- and η-class carbonic anhydrases from bacteria, fungi, algae, diatoms and protozoans with famotidine
Angeli A, Pinteala M, Maier SS, Del Prete S, Capasso C, Simionescu BC, et al.
2019Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
46cc by
PMID 30727781 · DOI · PMC6366436
Class A G Protein-Coupled Receptor Antagonist Famotidine as a Therapeutic Alternative Against SARS-CoV2: An In Silico Analysis
Ortega JT, Serrano ML, Jastrzebska B
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
38cc by
PMID 32599963 · DOI · PMC7355875
Development of a hybrid tablet-integrated superporous hydrogel for gastro-retentive delivery of famotidine
Thombre N, Chandramore K, Tajanpure A, Al Fatease A, Hani U, Alamri AH, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 42102138 · DOI · PMC13155634

Famotidine inhibits toll-like receptor 3-mediated inflammatory signaling in SARS-CoV-2 infection [1]

Research article Mukherjee R, Bhattacharya A, Bojkova D, Mehdipour AR, Shin D, Khan KS, et al. · · 2021 · cited 46 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Apart from prevention using vaccinations, the management options for COVID-19 remain limited.
Closing excerpt
Given that pharmacokinetic studies indicate that famotidine can reach concentrations in blood that suffice to antagonize histamine H2 receptors expressed in mast cells, neutrophils, and eosinophils, these observations explain how famotidine may contribute to the reduced histamine-induced inflammation and cytokine release, thereby improving the outcome for patients with COVID-19.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (213 words)

Apart from prevention using vaccinations, the management options for COVID-19 remain limited. In retrospective cohort studies, use of famotidine, a specific oral H2 receptor antagonist (antihistamine), has been associated with reduced risk of intubation and death in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. In a case series, nonhospitalized patients with COVID-19 experienced rapid symptom resolution after taking famotidine, but the molecular basis of these observations remains elusive. Here we show using biochemical, cellular, and functional assays that famotidine has no effect on viral replication or viral protease activity. However, famotidine can affect histamine-induced signaling processes in infected Caco2 cells. Specifically, famotidine treatment inhibits histamine-induced expression of Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) in SARS-CoV-2 infected cells and can reduce TLR3-dependent signaling processes that culminate in activation of IRF3 and the NF-κB pathway, subsequently controlling antiviral and inflammatory responses. SARS-CoV-2-infected cells treated with famotidine demonstrate reduced expression levels of the inflammatory mediators CCL-2 and IL6, drivers of the cytokine release syndrome that precipitates poor outcome for patients with COVID-19. Given that pharmacokinetic studies indicate that famotidine can reach concentrations in blood that suffice to antagonize histamine H2 receptors expressed in mast cells, neutrophils, and eosinophils, these observations explain how famotidine may contribute to the reduced histamine-induced inflammation and cytokine release, thereby improving the outcome for patients with COVID-19.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34214498 · DOI · PMC8241579

Inhibition of α-, β-, γ-, δ-, ζ- and η-class carbonic anhydrases from bacteria, fungi, algae, diatoms and protozoans with famotidine [2]

Research article Angeli A, Pinteala M, Maier SS, Del Prete S, Capasso C, Simionescu BC, et al. · · 2019 · cited 46 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Famotidine, an antiulcer drug belonging to the H2 antagonists class of pharmacological agents, was recently shown to potently inhibit human (h) and bacterial carbonic anhydrases (CAs, EC 4.
Closing excerpt
1 nM.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (151 words)

Famotidine, an antiulcer drug belonging to the H2 antagonists class of pharmacological agents, was recently shown to potently inhibit human (h) and bacterial carbonic anhydrases (CAs, EC 4.2.1.1). We investigated the inhibitory effects of famotidine against all classes of CAs from the pathogenic bacteria Vibrio cholerae, Burkholderia pseudomallei and Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rv3273 β-CA, as well as the CAs from the nonpathogenic bacteria/cyanobacteria Sulfurihydrogenibium yellowstonensis, S. azorense, Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis, Colwellia psychrerythraea and Nostoc commune. The δ- and ζ-CAs from the diatom Thalassiosira weissflogii, the fungal enzymes from Cryptococcus neoformans, Candida glabrata and Malassezia globosa, as well as the protozoan enzymes from Trypanosoma cruzi and Plasmodium falciparum, were also investigated. Anopheles gambiae β-CA was also investigated. All these enzymes were effectively inhibited by famotidine, with affinities between the low nanomolar to the micromolar range. The best inhibition was observed against C. glabrata β-CA and TweCAζ, with KIs ranging between 13.6 and 22.1 nM.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30727781 · DOI · PMC6366436

Class A G Protein-Coupled Receptor Antagonist Famotidine as a Therapeutic Alternative Against SARS-CoV2: An In Silico Analysis [3]

Research article Ortega JT, Serrano ML, Jastrzebska B · · 2020 · cited 38 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The pandemic associated with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV2) and its disease named COVID-19 challenged the scientific community to discover effective therapeutic solutions in a short period.
Closing excerpt
This work will contribute to the pharmacological knowledge of famotidine as an antiviral agent against SARS-CoV2.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (255 words)

The pandemic associated with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV2) and its disease named COVID-19 challenged the scientific community to discover effective therapeutic solutions in a short period. Repurposing existing drugs is one viable approach that emphasizes speed during these urgent times. Famotidine, a class A G protein-coupled receptor antagonist used for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux was recently identified in an in silico screening. Additionally, a recent retrospective clinical report showed that the treatment with famotidine provided a good outcome in patients infected with SARS-CoV2. A clinical trial testing effectiveness of famotidine in combination with hydroxychloroquine is currently ongoing in the United States (US). In the 1990s, famotidine was described as an antiviral agent against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Interestingly, some HIV protease inhibitors are presently being used against SARS-CoV2. However, it is not clear if famotidine could be effective against SARS-CoV2. Thus, by using a computational analysis, we aimed to examine if the antiviral effect of famotidine could be related to the inhibition of proteases involved in the virus replication. Our results showed that famotidine could interact within the catalytic site of the three proteases associated with SARS-CoV2 replication. However, weak binding affinity of famotidine to these proteases suggests that a successful famotidine therapy could likely be achieved only in combination with other antiviral drugs. Finally, analysis of famotidine's pharmacokinetic parameters indicated that its effect against SARS-CoV2 infection could be reached only upon intravenous administration. This work will contribute to the pharmacological knowledge of famotidine as an antiviral agent against SARS-CoV2.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32599963 · DOI · PMC7355875

Development of a hybrid tablet-integrated superporous hydrogel for gastro-retentive delivery of famotidine [4]

Research article Thombre N, Chandramore K, Tajanpure A, Al Fatease A, Hani U, Alamri AH, et al. · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
A gastro-retentive drug delivery system based on a tablet-integrated superporous hydrogel (SPH) was developed using Famotidine as a model drug for ulcer treatment.
Closing excerpt
Overall, the tablet-integrated SPH system represents an effective gastro-retentive approach for enhancing the therapeutic performance of Famotidine.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (245 words)

A gastro-retentive drug delivery system based on a tablet-integrated superporous hydrogel (SPH) was developed using Famotidine as a model drug for ulcer treatment. The objective of this study was to enhance gastric retention and sustained drug release, thereby improving the bioavailability of Famotidine, a BCS Class III drug with limited permeability and incomplete absorption. The SPH system was designed to retain the formulation in the upper gastrointestinal tract, the primary site of drug absorption, and was prepared using a gas-blowing (foaming) technique. A 3² full factorial design was employed to optimize the formulation by varying the concentrations of Crosspovidone and Cassia tora as independent variables. The developed SPH formulations were evaluated for porosity, swelling index, void fraction, water retention capacity, morphology, drug-excipient compatibility, and in vitro and in vivo drug release behaviour. The optimized formulation (F1) exhibited a high cumulative drug release of 98.2191 ± 0.06%, a swelling ratio of 297.2 ± 0.11%, void fraction of 0.4366 ± 0.015, porosity of 0.171 ± 0.07, and water retention time of 0.9552 ± 0.07 min. FTIR analysis confirmed the compatibility between Famotidine and excipients, while DSC studies indicated that the drug remained in its stable form without alteration during formulation. In vivo radiographic studies demonstrated that the optimized SPH formulation remained buoyant and retained in the stomach for up to 12 h, providing prolonged gastric residence and sustained drug release. Overall, the tablet-integrated SPH system represents an effective gastro-retentive approach for enhancing the therapeutic performance of Famotidine.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42102138 · DOI · PMC13155634

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Famotidine. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in peptic ulcer disease and other allied diseases [5]
    Langtry HD, Grant SM, Goa KL · Drugs · 1989 · cited 60 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Clinical pharmacokinetics of famotidine [6]
    Echizen H, Ishizaki T · Clin Pharmacokinet · 1991 · cited 57 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing lansoprazole with ranitidine or famotidine in the treatment of acute duodenal ulcer [7]
    Poynard T, Lemaire M, Agostini H · Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol · 1995 · cited 42 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The tolerability and safety profile of famotidine [8]
    Howden CW, Tytgat GN · Clin Ther · 1996 · cited 28 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article An overview of famotidine polymorphs: solid-state characteristics, thermodynamics, polymorphic transformation and quality control [9]
    Lin SY · Pharm Res · 2014 · cited 22 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Does Famotidine Reduce the Risk of Progression to Severe Disease, Death, and Intubation for COVID-19 Patients? A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis [10]
    Sun C, Chen Y, Hu L, Wu Y, Liang M, Ayaz Ahmed M, et al. · Dig Dis Sci · 2021 · cited 19 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Mukherjee R, Bhattacharya A, Bojkova D, Mehdipour AR, Shin D, Khan KS, et al.. Famotidine inhibits toll-like receptor 3-mediated inflammatory signaling in SARS-CoV-2 infection. . 2021. PMID 34214498 · DOI · PMC8241579
  2. Angeli A, Pinteala M, Maier SS, Del Prete S, Capasso C, Simionescu BC, et al.. Inhibition of α-, β-, γ-, δ-, ζ- and η-class carbonic anhydrases from bacteria, fungi, algae, diatoms and protozoans with famotidine. . 2019. PMID 30727781 · DOI · PMC6366436
  3. Ortega JT, Serrano ML, Jastrzebska B. Class A G Protein-Coupled Receptor Antagonist Famotidine as a Therapeutic Alternative Against SARS-CoV2: An In Silico Analysis. . 2020. PMID 32599963 · DOI · PMC7355875
  4. Thombre N, Chandramore K, Tajanpure A, Al Fatease A, Hani U, Alamri AH, et al.. Development of a hybrid tablet-integrated superporous hydrogel for gastro-retentive delivery of famotidine. . 2026. PMID 42102138 · DOI · PMC13155634
  5. Langtry HD, Grant SM, Goa KL. Famotidine. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in peptic ulcer disease and other allied diseases. Drugs. 1989. PMID 2573505 · DOI
  6. Echizen H, Ishizaki T. Clinical pharmacokinetics of famotidine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1991. PMID 1764869 · DOI
  7. Poynard T, Lemaire M, Agostini H. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing lansoprazole with ranitidine or famotidine in the treatment of acute duodenal ulcer. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995. PMID 8590162
  8. Howden CW, Tytgat GN. The tolerability and safety profile of famotidine. Clin Ther. 1996. PMID 8851452 · DOI
  9. Lin SY. An overview of famotidine polymorphs: solid-state characteristics, thermodynamics, polymorphic transformation and quality control. Pharm Res. 2014. PMID 24577998 · DOI
  10. Sun C, Chen Y, Hu L, Wu Y, Liang M, Ayaz Ahmed M, et al.. Does Famotidine Reduce the Risk of Progression to Severe Disease, Death, and Intubation for COVID-19 Patients? A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2021. PMID 33625613 · DOI · PMC7903022

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • LevamisoleDrugs and Chemicals
  • PioglitazoneDrugs and Chemicals
  • AcetazolamideDrugs and Chemicals
  • DasatinibDrugs and Chemicals
  • MeloxicamDrugs and Chemicals
  • RitonavirDrugs and Chemicals

All 546 articles in Drugs and Chemicals →

At a glance

1,763
PubMed records on this heading
9%
published since 2020
90
review articles
358
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • LevamisoleDrugs and Chemicals
  • PioglitazoneDrugs and Chemicals
  • AcetazolamideDrugs and Chemicals
  • DasatinibDrugs and Chemicals
  • MeloxicamDrugs and Chemicals

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support