Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Drugs and Chemicals›Excipients
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Excipients

Drugs and Chemicals · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 3 min read

Usually inert substances added to a prescription in order to provide suitable consistency to the dosage form.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (580 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Usually inert substances added to a prescription in order to provide suitable consistency to the dosage form. These include binders, matrix, base or diluent in pills, tablets, creams, salves, etc.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Excipient; Stabilizing Agents; Agents, Stabilizing; Stabilizing Agent; Agent, Stabilizing; Suspending Agents; Agents, Suspending; Suspending Agent.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Pharmaceutical Vehicles
Narrower topics
Vaccine Excipients

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 15,905 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Excipients” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 3,769 of them (23.7%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 5,927 records.

Reviews account for 1,358 records (8.5%) and meta-analyses for 5. Randomized controlled trials number 200 (1.3%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 2,278 records; 2000-2009: 3,931 records; 2010-2019: 5,927 records; 2020 onward: 3,769 records2,278through 19993,9312000-20095,9272010-20193,7692020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19992,278
2000-20093,931
2010-20195,927
2020 onward3,769
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 8.5 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.0 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 1.3 percentReviews8.5% (1,358)Meta-analyses0.0% (5)Randomized controlled trials1.3% (200)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 15,905 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1,3588.5%
Meta-analyses50.0%
Randomized controlled trials2001.3%

Method: PubMed query "Excipients"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals

Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Mechanisms of increased bioavailability through amorphous solid dispersions: a review
Schittny A, Huwyler J, Puchkov M
2020Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
207cc by
PMID 31885288 · DOI · PMC6968646
Research Advances on the Stability of mRNA Vaccines
Cheng F, Wang Y, Bai Y, Liang Z, Mao Q, Liu D, et al.
2023Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
119cc by
PMID 36992377 · DOI · PMC10051489
Progress in the development of stabilization strategies for nanocrystal preparations
Li J, Wang Z, Zhang H, Gao J, Zheng A
2021Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
107cc by
PMID 33336609 · DOI · PMC8725885
Excipients for Cerium Dioxide Nanoparticle Stabilization in the Perspective of Biomedical Applications
Titova SA, Kruglova MP, Stupin VA, Manturova NE, Achar RR, Deshpande G, et al.
2025Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
8cc by
PMID 40141988 · DOI · PMC11944302

Mechanisms of increased bioavailability through amorphous solid dispersions: a review [1]

Review article Schittny A, Huwyler J, Puchkov M · · 2020 · cited 207 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs) can increase the oral bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs.
Closing excerpt
This improved overall understanding of these mechanisms will facilitate a rational ASD formulation development and will serve as a basis for further mechanistic research on drug delivery by ASDs.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (137 words)

Amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs) can increase the oral bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs. However, their use in drug development is comparably rare due to a lack of basic understanding of mechanisms governing drug liberation and absorption in vivo. Furthermore, the lack of a unified nomenclature hampers the interpretation and classification of research data. In this review, we therefore summarize and conceptualize mechanisms covering the dissolution of ASDs, formation of supersaturated ASD solutions, factors responsible for solution stabilization, drug uptake from ASD solutions, and drug distribution within these complex systems as well as effects of excipients. Furthermore, we discuss the importance of these findings on the development of ASDs. This improved overall understanding of these mechanisms will facilitate a rational ASD formulation development and will serve as a basis for further mechanistic research on drug delivery by ASDs.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31885288 · DOI · PMC6968646

Research Advances on the Stability of mRNA Vaccines [2]

Review article Cheng F, Wang Y, Bai Y, Liang Z, Mao Q, Liu D, et al. · · 2023 · cited 119 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Compared to other vaccines, the inherent properties of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines and their interaction with lipid nanoparticles make them considerably unstable throughout their life cycles, impacting their effectiveness and global accessibility.
Closing excerpt
Here, we review the regulatory guidance associated with mRNA vaccine stability, summarize key factors affecting mRNA vaccine stability, and propose a possible research path to improve mRNA vaccine stability.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (122 words)

Compared to other vaccines, the inherent properties of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines and their interaction with lipid nanoparticles make them considerably unstable throughout their life cycles, impacting their effectiveness and global accessibility. It is imperative to improve mRNA vaccine stability and investigate the factors influencing stability. Since mRNA structure, excipients, lipid nanoparticle (LNP) delivery systems, and manufacturing processes are the primary factors affecting mRNA vaccine stability, optimizing mRNA structure and screening excipients can effectively improve mRNA vaccine stability. Moreover, improving manufacturing processes could also prepare thermally stable mRNA vaccines with safety and efficacy. Here, we review the regulatory guidance associated with mRNA vaccine stability, summarize key factors affecting mRNA vaccine stability, and propose a possible research path to improve mRNA vaccine stability.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 36992377 · DOI · PMC10051489

Progress in the development of stabilization strategies for nanocrystal preparations [3]

Review article Li J, Wang Z, Zhang H, Gao J, Zheng A · · 2021 · cited 107 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
In recent years, nanocrystal technology has been extensively investigated.
Closing excerpt
In this paper, the factors that affect the stability of drug nanocrystal preparations are discussed, and related methods for solving the stability problem are put forward.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (122 words)

In recent years, nanocrystal technology has been extensively investigated. Due to the submicron particle size and unique physicochemical properties of nanocrystals, they overcome the problems of low drug solubility and poor bioavailability. Although the structures of nanocrystals are simple, the further development of these materials is hindered by their stability. Drug nanocrystals with particle sizes of 1∼1000 nm usually require the addition of stabilizers such as polymers or surfactants to enhance their stability. The stability of nanocrystal suspensions and the redispersibility of solid nanocrystal drugs are the key factors for the large-scale production of nanocrystal preparations. In this paper, the factors that affect the stability of drug nanocrystal preparations are discussed, and related methods for solving the stability problem are put forward.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33336609 · DOI · PMC8725885

Excipients for Cerium Dioxide Nanoparticle Stabilization in the Perspective of Biomedical Applications [4]

Review article Titova SA, Kruglova MP, Stupin VA, Manturova NE, Achar RR, Deshpande G, et al. · · 2025 · cited 8 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Rare earth metal nanoparticles, some of which are already widely used in medicine, are of growing interest in the modern scientific community.
Closing excerpt
In this review, we considered the possibilities of using a number of excipients (polyacrylate, polyvinylpyrrolidone, dextran, hyaluronic acid, chitosan, polycarboxylic acids, lecithin, phosphatidylcholine) in the context of preserving the biological effects of cerium dioxide and its physicochemical properties, as well as the degree of study of these combinations from the point of view of the prospect of creating drugs based on it for biomedical applications.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (199 words)

Rare earth metal nanoparticles, some of which are already widely used in medicine, are of growing interest in the modern scientific community. One of the promising rare earth metals for biomedical applications is cerium, specifically its oxide form, which is characterized by a higher level of stability and safety. According to a number of studies, cerium dioxide has a wide range of biological effects (regenerative, antimicrobial, antioxidant, antitumor), which justifies the interest of its potential application in medicine. However, these effects and their intensity vary significantly across a number of studies. Since cerium dioxide was used in these studies, it can be assumed that not only is the chemical formula important, but also the physicochemical parameters of the nanoparticles obtained, and consequently the methods of their synthesis and modification with the use of excipients. In this review, we considered the possibilities of using a number of excipients (polyacrylate, polyvinylpyrrolidone, dextran, hyaluronic acid, chitosan, polycarboxylic acids, lecithin, phosphatidylcholine) in the context of preserving the biological effects of cerium dioxide and its physicochemical properties, as well as the degree of study of these combinations from the point of view of the prospect of creating drugs based on it for biomedical applications.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40141988 · DOI · PMC11944302

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Solid lipid nanoparticles: production, characterization and applications [5]
    Mehnert W, Mäder K · Adv Drug Deliv Rev · 2001 · cited 1,591 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article A review of poloxamer 407 pharmaceutical and pharmacological characteristics [6]
    Dumortier G, Grossiord JL, Agnely F, Chaumeil JC · Pharm Res · 2006 · cited 787 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Solubilizing excipients in oral and injectable formulations [7]
    Strickley RG · Pharm Res · 2004 · cited 728 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Cyclodextrins [8]
    Kurkov SV, Loftsson T · Int J Pharm · 2013 · cited 471 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Cyclodextrins: structure, physicochemical properties and pharmaceutical applications [9]
    Jansook P, Ogawa N, Loftsson T · Int J Pharm · 2018 · cited 451 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Overcoming the stratum corneum: the modulation of skin penetration. A review [10]
    Trommer H, Neubert RH · Skin Pharmacol Physiol · 2006 · cited 317 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Schittny A, Huwyler J, Puchkov M. Mechanisms of increased bioavailability through amorphous solid dispersions: a review. . 2020. PMID 31885288 · DOI · PMC6968646
  2. Cheng F, Wang Y, Bai Y, Liang Z, Mao Q, Liu D, et al.. Research Advances on the Stability of mRNA Vaccines. . 2023. PMID 36992377 · DOI · PMC10051489
  3. Li J, Wang Z, Zhang H, Gao J, Zheng A. Progress in the development of stabilization strategies for nanocrystal preparations. . 2021. PMID 33336609 · DOI · PMC8725885
  4. Titova SA, Kruglova MP, Stupin VA, Manturova NE, Achar RR, Deshpande G, et al.. Excipients for Cerium Dioxide Nanoparticle Stabilization in the Perspective of Biomedical Applications. . 2025. PMID 40141988 · DOI · PMC11944302
  5. Mehnert W, Mäder K. Solid lipid nanoparticles: production, characterization and applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001. PMID 11311991 · DOI
  6. Dumortier G, Grossiord JL, Agnely F, Chaumeil JC. A review of poloxamer 407 pharmaceutical and pharmacological characteristics. Pharm Res. 2006. PMID 17096184 · DOI
  7. Strickley RG. Solubilizing excipients in oral and injectable formulations. Pharm Res. 2004. PMID 15032302 · DOI
  8. Kurkov SV, Loftsson T. Cyclodextrins. Int J Pharm. 2013. PMID 22771733 · DOI
  9. Jansook P, Ogawa N, Loftsson T. Cyclodextrins: structure, physicochemical properties and pharmaceutical applications. Int J Pharm. 2018. PMID 29138045 · DOI
  10. Trommer H, Neubert RH. Overcoming the stratum corneum: the modulation of skin penetration. A review. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2006. PMID 16685150 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Alkylating AgentsPharmacology
  • Protective AgentsPharmacology
  • ThioureaDrugs and Chemicals
  • Neuromuscular Blocking AgentsPharmacology
  • Cholinesterase InhibitorsPharmacology
  • Immunosuppressive AgentsPharmacology

All 546 articles in Drugs and Chemicals →

At a glance

15,905
PubMed records on this heading
24%
published since 2020
1,358
review articles
200
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Alkylating AgentsPharmacology
  • Protective AgentsPharmacology
  • ThioureaDrugs and Chemicals
  • Neuromuscular Blocking AgentsPharmacology
  • Cholinesterase InhibitorsPharmacology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support