Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,053 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Substances that possess antiestrogenic actions but can also produce estrogenic effects as well. They act as complete or partial agonist or as antagonist. They can be either steroidal or nonsteroidal in structure.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Modulators, Estrogen Receptor; Receptor Modulators, Estrogen; Estrogen Receptor Modulator; Modulator, Estrogen Receptor; Receptor Modulator, Estrogen; Antiestrogen; Antiestrogens.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Hormone Antagonists
- Narrower topics
- Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators
- See also
- Estrogen Antagonists; Estrogens
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 6,478 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Estrogen Receptor Modulators” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 544 of them (8.4%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2000-2009 with 3,807 records.
Reviews account for 1,988 records (30.7%) and meta-analyses for 69. Randomized controlled trials number 546 (8.4%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 67 |
| 2000-2009 | 3,807 |
| 2010-2019 | 2,060 |
| 2020 onward | 544 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 1,988 | 30.7% |
| Meta-analyses | 69 | 1.1% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 546 | 8.4% |
Method: PubMed query "Estrogen Receptor Modulators"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in pharmacology
Drug evidence builds in layers: laboratory pharmacology describes how a compound acts, pharmacokinetic studies describe how the body handles it, and randomized trials test whether it helps and what harms it causes. Post-marketing surveillance and observational studies reveal rarer adverse effects but cannot prove causation. This page is educational and is not a recommendation to start, stop or change any medicine; decisions about treatment belong with a qualified clinician.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The discovery and development of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) for clinical practice | 2013 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 261 | cc by PMID 23062036 · DOI · PMC3624793 |
| Molecular-Based Treatment Strategies for Osteoporosis: A Literature Review | 2019 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 84 | cc by PMID 31137666 · DOI · PMC6567245 |
| Autocrine IGF-I/insulin receptor axis compensates for inhibition of AKT in ER-positive breast cancer cells with resistance to estrogen deprivation | 2013 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 78 | cc by PMID 23844554 · DOI · PMC3979036 |
| Selective oestrogen receptor modulators and Alzheimer´s disease: a real-world pharmacovigilance study | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 0 | cc by PMID 41703146 · DOI · PMC12913319 |
The discovery and development of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) for clinical practice [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are structurally different compounds that interact with intracellular estrogen receptors in target organs as estrogen receptor agonists or antagonists.
- Closing excerpt
- The newer SERMs in late development: ospemifene, lasofoxifene, bazedoxifene, are arzoxifene are described in detail.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (329 words)
Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are structurally different compounds that interact with intracellular estrogen receptors in target organs as estrogen receptor agonists or antagonists. These drugs have been intensively studied over the past decade and have proven to be a highly versatile group for the treatment of different conditions associated with postmenopausal women's health, including hormone responsive cancer and osteoporosis. Tamoxifen, a failed contraceptive is currently used to treat all stages of breast cancer, chemoprevention in women at high risk for breast cancer and also has beneficial effects on bone mineral density and serum lipids in postmenopausal women. Raloxifene, a failed breast cancer drug, is the only SERM approved internationally for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and vertebral fractures. However, although these SERMs have many benefits, they also have some potentially serious adverse effects, such as thromboembolic disorders and, in the case of tamoxifen, uterine cancer. These adverse effects represent a major concern given that long-term therapy is required to prevent osteoporosis or prevent and treat breast cancer. The search for the 'ideal' SERM, which would have estrogenic effects on bone and serum lipids, neutral effects on the uterus, and antiestrogenic effects on breast tissue, but none of the adverse effects associated with current therapies, is currently under way. Ospemifene, lasofoxifene, bazedoxifene and arzoxifene, which are new SERM molecules with potentially greater efficacy and potency than previous SERMs, have been investigated for use in the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. These drugs have been shown to be comparably effective to conventional hormone replacement therapy in animal models, with potential indications for an improved safety profile. Clinical efficacy data from ongoing phase III trials are available or are awaited for each SERM so that a true understanding of the therapeutic potential of these compounds can be obtained. In this article, we describe the discovery and development of the group of medicines called SERMs. The newer SERMs in late development: ospemifene, lasofoxifene, bazedoxifene, are arzoxifene are described in detail.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 23062036 · DOI · PMC3624793
Molecular-Based Treatment Strategies for Osteoporosis: A Literature Review [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Osteoporosis is an unavoidable public health problem in an aging or aged society.
- Closing excerpt
- This review provides an overview of the molecular mechanisms, clinical evidence, and potential adverse effects of drugs that are currently used or under development for the treatment of osteoporosis to aid clinicians in deciding how to select the best treatment option.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (138 words)
Osteoporosis is an unavoidable public health problem in an aging or aged society. Anti-resorptive agents (calcitonin, estrogen, and selective estrogen-receptor modulators, bisphosphonates, anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand antibody along with calcium and vitamin D supplementations) and anabolic agents (parathyroid hormone and related peptide analogs, sclerostin inhibitors) have major roles in current treatment regimens and are used alone or in combination based on the pathological condition. Recent advancements in the molecular understanding of bone metabolism and in bioengineering will open the door to future treatment paradigms for osteoporosis, including antibody agents, stem cells, and gene therapies. This review provides an overview of the molecular mechanisms, clinical evidence, and potential adverse effects of drugs that are currently used or under development for the treatment of osteoporosis to aid clinicians in deciding how to select the best treatment option.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31137666 · DOI · PMC6567245
Autocrine IGF-I/insulin receptor axis compensates for inhibition of AKT in ER-positive breast cancer cells with resistance to estrogen deprivation [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- IntroductionEstrogen receptor α-positive (ER+) breast cancers adapt to hormone deprivation and acquire resistance to antiestrogen therapies.
- Closing excerpt
- ConclusionsThese data suggest combinations of AKT and IGF-IR/InsR inhibitors would be an effective treatment strategy against hormone-independent ER+ breast cancer.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (344 words)
IntroductionEstrogen receptor α-positive (ER+) breast cancers adapt to hormone deprivation and acquire resistance to antiestrogen therapies. Upon acquisition of hormone independence, ER+ breast cancer cells increase their dependence on the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway. We examined the effects of AKT inhibition and its compensatory upregulation of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I/InsR signaling in ER+ breast cancer cells with acquired resistance to estrogen deprivation.MethodsInhibition of AKT using the catalytic inhibitor AZD5363 was examined in four ER+ breast cancer cell lines resistant to long-term estrogen deprivation (LTED) by western blotting and proliferation assays. Feedback upregulation and activation of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) was examined by western blotting, real-time qPCR, ELISAs, membrane localization of AKT PH-GFP by immunofluorescence and phospho-RTK arrays. For studies in vivo, athymic mice with MCF-7 xenografts were treated with AZD5363 and fulvestrant with either the ATP-competitive IGF-IR/InsR inhibitor AZD9362 or the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor AZD4547.ResultsTreatment with AZD5363 reduced phosphorylation of the AKT/mTOR substrates PRAS40, GSK3α/β and S6K while inducing hyperphosphorylation of AKT at T308 and S473. Inhibition of AKT with AZD5363 suppressed growth of three of four ER+ LTED lines and prevented emergence of hormone-independent MCF-7, ZR75-1 and MDA-361 cells. AZD5363 suppressed growth of MCF-7 xenografts in ovariectomized mice and a patient-derived luminal B xenograft unresponsive to tamoxifen or fulvestrant. Combined treatment with AZD5363 and fulvestrant suppressed MCF-7 xenograft growth better than either drug alone. Inhibition of AKT with AZD5363 resulted in upregulation and activation of RTKs, including IGF-IR and InsR, upregulation of FoxO3a and ERα mRNAs as well as FoxO- and ER-dependent transcription of IGF-I and IGF-II ligands. Inhibition of IGF-IR/InsR or PI3K abrogated AKT PH-GFP membrane localization and T308 P-AKT following treatment with AZD5363. Treatment with IGFBP-3 blocked AZD5363-induced P-IGF-IR/InsR and T308 P-AKT, suggesting that receptor phosphorylation was dependent on increased autocrine ligands. Finally, treatment with the dual IGF-IR/InsR inhibitor AZD9362 enhanced the anti-tumor effect of AZD5363 in MCF-7/LTED cells and MCF-7 xenografts in ovariectomized mice devoid of estrogen supplementation.ConclusionsThese data suggest combinations of AKT and IGF-IR/InsR inhibitors would be an effective treatment strategy against hormone-independent ER+ breast cancer.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 23844554 · DOI · PMC3979036
Selective oestrogen receptor modulators and Alzheimer´s disease: a real-world pharmacovigilance study [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- PURPOSE: Selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are a standard treatment for breast cancer and osteoporosis.
- Closing excerpt
- More research is needed to find out what factors determine the risk of cognitive impairment associated with SERMs.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (242 words)
PURPOSE: Selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are a standard treatment for breast cancer and osteoporosis. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that is a serious public health concern. This study aimed to identify potential pharmacovigilance signals related to dementia and AD for SERMs in menopausal and postmenopausal women. METHODS: To investigate this possible association, a disproportionality analysis was performed in VigiBase, the World Health Organization’s (WHO) global database of individual case safety reports (ICSRs). Disproportionality was quantified using the reporting odds ratio (ROR). RESULTS: We found risk of reporting dementia for tamoxifen [ROR = 1.74 (1.23–2.45)] and raloxifene [ROR = 1.63 (1.05–2.53)] and AD for raloxifene [ROR = 5.12 (3.26–8.05)]. No statistically significant association was detected for fulvestrant and bazedoxifene with dementia or AD. Most of the reports were severe and affected women over the age of 75. The latency of the reactions was predominantly long, suggesting that dementia is a late-onset reaction. The duration of treatment varied from a few months to more than three years, which may indicate that long-term exposure to SERMs is not necessary to develop dementia associated with these drugs. CONCLUSION: Signals of disproportionate reporting have been observed between the incidence of dementia and AD with SERMs. There are conflicting results from the different studies that have been conducted on the relationship between these drugs and AD. More research is needed to find out what factors determine the risk of cognitive impairment associated with SERMs.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41703146 · DOI · PMC12913319
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials [5]
- Research article Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) in cancer treatment [6]
- Research article Estrogen receptors: therapies targeted to receptor subtypes [7]
- Research article Systemic Therapy for Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer [8]
- Research article Efficacy of Pharmacological Therapies for the Prevention of Fractures in Postmenopausal Women: A Network Meta-Analysis [9]
- Research article Selective estrogen-receptor modulators and antihormonal resistance in breast cancer [10]
References
- Maximov PY, Lee TM, Jordan VC. The discovery and development of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) for clinical practice. . 2013. PMID 23062036 · DOI · PMC3624793
- Ukon Y, Makino T, Kodama J, Tsukazaki H, Tateiwa D, Yoshikawa H, et al.. Molecular-Based Treatment Strategies for Osteoporosis: A Literature Review. . 2019. PMID 31137666 · DOI · PMC6567245
- Fox EM, Kuba MG, Miller TW, Davies BR, Arteaga CL. Autocrine IGF-I/insulin receptor axis compensates for inhibition of AKT in ER-positive breast cancer cells with resistance to estrogen deprivation. . 2013. PMID 23844554 · DOI · PMC3979036
- Yuste MT, Badillo E, Galecio JS, Marín P. Selective oestrogen receptor modulators and Alzheimer´s disease: a real-world pharmacovigilance study. . 2026. PMID 41703146 · DOI · PMC12913319
- Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG), Davies C, Godwin J, Gray R, Clarke M, Cutter D, et al.. Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2011. PMID 21802721 · DOI · PMC3163848
- Patel HK, Bihani T. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) in cancer treatment. Pharmacol Ther. 2018. PMID 29289555 · DOI
- Nilsson S, Gustafsson JÅ. Estrogen receptors: therapies targeted to receptor subtypes. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011. PMID 21124311 · DOI
- Burstein HJ. Systemic Therapy for Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020. PMID 33369357 · DOI
- Barrionuevo P, Kapoor E, Asi N, Alahdab F, Mohammed K, Benkhadra K, et al.. Efficacy of Pharmacological Therapies for the Prevention of Fractures in Postmenopausal Women: A Network Meta-Analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019. PMID 30907957 · DOI
- Jordan VC, O'Malley BW. Selective estrogen-receptor modulators and antihormonal resistance in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007. PMID 17893378 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.