Epidermolysis Bullosa

Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is a lifelong genodermatosis associated with blistering, wounding, and scarring caused by mutations in COL7A1, the gene encoding the anchoring fibril component, collagen VII (C7). Here, we evaluated beremagene geperpavec (B-VEC), an engineered, non-replicating COL7A1 containing herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) vector, to treat RDEB skin. B-VEC restored C7 expression in RDEB keratinocytes, fibroblasts, RDEB mice and human RDEB xenografts. Subsequently, a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 1 and 2 clinical trial (NCT03536143) evaluated matched wounds from nine RDEB patients receiving topical B-VEC or placebo repeatedly over 12 weeks. No grade 2 or above B-VEC-related adverse events or vector shedding or tissue-bound skin immunoreactants were noted. HSV-1 and C7 antibodies sometimes presented at baseline or increased after B-VEC treatment without an apparent impact on safety or efficacy. Primary and secondary objectives of C7 expression, anchoring fibril assembly, wound surface area reduction, duration of wound closure, and time to wound closure following B-VEC treatment were met. A patient-reported pain-severity secondary outcome was not assessed given the small proportion of wounds treated. A global assessment secondary endpoint was not pursued due to redundancy with regard to other endpoints. These studies show that B-VEC is an easily administered, safely tolerated, topical molecular corrective therapy promoting wound healing in patients with RDEB.

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a heterogeneous group of inherited skin disorders determined by mutations in genes encoding for structural components of the cutaneous basement membrane zone. Disease hallmarks are skin fragility and unremitting blistering. The most disabling EB (sub)types show defective wound healing, fibrosis and inflammation at lesional skin. These features expose patients to serious disease complications, including the development of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). Almost all subjects affected with the severe recessive dystrophic EB (RDEB) subtype suffer from early and extremely aggressive SCCs (RDEB-SCC), which represent the first cause of death in these patients. The genetic determinants of RDEB-SCC do not exhaustively explain its unique behavior as compared to low-risk, ultraviolet-induced SCCs in the general population. On the other hand, a growing body of evidence points to the key role of tumor microenvironment in initiation, progression and spreading of RDEB-SCC, as well as of other, less-investigated, EB-related SCCs (EB-SCCs). Here, we discuss the recent advances in understanding the complex series of molecular events (i.e., fibrotic, inflammatory, and immune processes) contributing to SCC development in EB patients, cross-compare tumor features in the different EB subtypes and report the most promising therapeutic approaches to counteract or delay EB-SCCs.

Inherited epidermolysis bullosa is a group of genetic diseases characterized by skin fragility and blistering on the skin and mucous membranes in response to minimal trauma. Epidermolysis bullosa is clinically and genetically very heterogeneous, being classified into four main types according to the layer of skin in which blistering occurs: epidermolysis bullosa simplex (intraepidermal), junctional epidermolysis bullosa (within the lamina lucida of the basement membrane), dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (below the basement membrane), and Kindler epidermolysis bullosa (mixed skin cleavage pattern). Furthermore, epidermolysis bullosa is stratified into several subtypes, which consider the clinical characteristics, the distribution of the blisters, and the severity of cutaneous and extracutaneous signs. Pathogenic variants in at least 16 genes that encode proteins essential for the integrity and adhesion of skin layers have already been associated with different subtypes of epidermolysis bullosa. The marked heterogeneity of the disease, which includes phenotypes with a broad spectrum of severity and many causal genes, hinders its classification and diagnosis. For this reason, dermatologists and geneticists regularly review and update the classification criteria. This review aimed to update the state of the art on inherited epidermolysis bullosa, with a special focus on the associated clinical and genetic aspects, presenting data from the most recent reclassification consensus, published in 2020.

OBJECTIVES: Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB) is a rare genetic disorder characterised by extreme skin fragility, chronic wounds, and high morbidity. Current management is largely supportive, highlighting an urgent need for innovative therapeutic strategies. This review synthesises recent advances in topical therapies, including wound dressings, tissue-engineered skin, and molecular therapies, and evaluates the potential of these approaches to improve clinical outcomes and bridge the gap toward disease-modifying interventions. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Key developments in EB pathophysiology, advanced wound-care technologies, topical molecular therapies, and cell- or tissue-based interventions were examined through critical appraisal of relevant preclinical and clinical studies, with emphasis on translational potential and practical application. RESULTS: Next-generation dressings incorporating hydrogels, extracellular matrix-mimetic scaffolds, nanoparticles, and smart-responsive systems demonstrate enhanced protection, moisture balance, and localised therapeutic delivery, supporting wound healing while minimising trauma. Topical molecular therapies—including gene therapy, repurposed drugs, and bioactive natural compounds—show proof-of-concept for symptomatic relief and potential disease modification. Cell- and tissue-based approaches, such as ex vivo gene-corrected keratinocyte grafts and cultured skin substitutes, offer durable regeneration but remain limited by cost and accessibility. Integration of these strategies, combined with patient-centred design and co-development, holds promise for improving functional outcomes and quality of life in EB. CONCLUSION: Advanced wound dressings, bioactive topical therapies, and tissue-engineered constructs represent complementary and translationally relevant approaches to EB care. Optimising the synergy between material-based and molecular strategies, alongside standardised clinical endpoints and long-term safety evaluation, is essential for bridging supportive care and future disease-modifying therapies, ultimately improving outcomes for patients with EB.