Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (792 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Splitting the DNA into shorter pieces by endonucleolytic dna cleavage at multiple sites. It includes the internucleosomal DNA fragmentation, which along with chromatin condensation, are considered to be the hallmarks of apoptosis.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Fragmentation, DNA; DNA Degradation, Apoptotic; Apoptotic DNA Degradation.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- DNA Damage
- See also
- DNA Degradation, Necrotic
Related concepts
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 16,187 records tagged with the MeSH heading “DNA Fragmentation” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 1,253 of them (7.7%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2000-2009 with 7,386 records.
Reviews account for 600 records (3.7%) and meta-analyses for 59. Randomized controlled trials number 51 (0.3%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 2,892 |
| 2000-2009 | 7,386 |
| 2010-2019 | 4,656 |
| 2020 onward | 1,253 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 600 | 3.7% |
| Meta-analyses | 59 | 0.4% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 51 | 0.3% |
Method: PubMed query "DNA Fragmentation"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in genetics and genomics
Genetic findings vary widely in strength. A variant linked to a condition in one study may not replicate in other ancestries, and most common variants have small effects that are meaningful only in aggregate. Studies of rare, high-impact variants can support strong causal claims about a gene, while association studies describe statistical links that need functional and independent replication. Check the sample size, the ancestry of participants, whether results were replicated, and whether a laboratory or clinical outcome was actually measured.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High fragmentation characterizes tumour-derived circulating DNA | 2011 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 444 | cc by PMID 21909401 · DOI · PMC3167805 |
| Detection and characterization of lung cancer using cell-free DNA fragmentomes | 2021 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 393 | cc by PMID 34417454 · DOI · PMC8379179 |
| Temporal patterns of nucleotide misincorporations and DNA fragmentation in ancient DNA | 2012 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 361 | cc by PMID 22479540 · DOI · PMC3316601 |
| Cell-Free DNA Release Kinetics and Fragmentation Reflect Treatment Response and Resistance In Vitro | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 0 | cc by PMID 42738856 · DOI · PMC13565368 |
High fragmentation characterizes tumour-derived circulating DNA [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundCirculating DNA (ctDNA) is acknowledged as a potential diagnostic tool for various cancers including colorectal cancer, especially when considering the detection of mutations.
- Closing excerpt
- Metastatic colorectal patients (n = 12) showed nearly 5-fold higher mean ctDNA fragmentation than healthy individuals (n = 16).
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (177 words)
BackgroundCirculating DNA (ctDNA) is acknowledged as a potential diagnostic tool for various cancers including colorectal cancer, especially when considering the detection of mutations. Certainly due to lack of normalization of the experimental conditions, previous reports present many discrepancies and contradictory data on the analysis of the concentration of total ctDNA and on the proportion of tumour-derived ctDNA fragments.MethodologyIn order to rigorously analyse ctDNA, we thoroughly investigated ctDNA size distribution. We used a highly specific Q-PCR assay and athymic nude mice xenografted with SW620 or HT29 human colon cancer cells, and we correlated our results by examining plasma from metastatic CRC patients.Conclusion/significanceFragmentation and concentration of tumour-derived ctDNA is positively correlated with tumour weight. CtDNA quantification by Q-PCR depends on the amplified target length and is optimal for 60-100 bp fragments. Q-PCR analysis of plasma samples from xenografted mice and cancer patients showed that tumour-derived ctDNA exhibits a specific amount profile based on ctDNA size and significant higher ctDNA fragmentation. Metastatic colorectal patients (n = 12) showed nearly 5-fold higher mean ctDNA fragmentation than healthy individuals (n = 16).
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 21909401 · DOI · PMC3167805
Detection and characterization of lung cancer using cell-free DNA fragmentomes [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Non-invasive approaches for cell-free DNA (cfDNA) assessment provide an opportunity for cancer detection and intervention.
- Closing excerpt
- This approach provides a facile avenue for non-invasive detection of lung cancer.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (152 words)
Non-invasive approaches for cell-free DNA (cfDNA) assessment provide an opportunity for cancer detection and intervention. Here, we use a machine learning model for detecting tumor-derived cfDNA through genome-wide analyses of cfDNA fragmentation in a prospective study of 365 individuals at risk for lung cancer. We validate the cancer detection model using an independent cohort of 385 non-cancer individuals and 46 lung cancer patients. Combining fragmentation features, clinical risk factors, and CEA levels, followed by CT imaging, detected 94% of patients with cancer across stages and subtypes, including 91% of stage I/II and 96% of stage III/IV, at 80% specificity. Genome-wide fragmentation profiles across ~13,000 ASCL1 transcription factor binding sites distinguished individuals with small cell lung cancer from those with non-small cell lung cancer with high accuracy (AUC = 0.98). A higher fragmentation score represented an independent prognostic indicator of survival. This approach provides a facile avenue for non-invasive detection of lung cancer.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34417454 · DOI · PMC8379179
Temporal patterns of nucleotide misincorporations and DNA fragmentation in ancient DNA [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- DNA that survives in museum specimens, bones and other tissues recovered by archaeologists is invariably fragmented and chemically modified.
- Closing excerpt
- These nucleotide misincorporations are thus a useful tool to distinguish recent from ancient DNA sources in specimens that have not been subjected to unusual or harsh treatments.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (168 words)
DNA that survives in museum specimens, bones and other tissues recovered by archaeologists is invariably fragmented and chemically modified. The extent to which such modifications accumulate over time is largely unknown but could potentially be used to differentiate between endogenous old DNA and present-day DNA contaminating specimens and experiments. Here we examine mitochondrial DNA sequences from tissue remains that vary in age between 18 and 60,000 years with respect to three molecular features: fragment length, base composition at strand breaks, and apparent C to T substitutions. We find that fragment length does not decrease consistently over time and that strand breaks occur preferentially before purine residues by what may be at least two different molecular mechanisms that are not yet understood. In contrast, the frequency of apparent C to T substitutions towards the 5'-ends of molecules tends to increase over time. These nucleotide misincorporations are thus a useful tool to distinguish recent from ancient DNA sources in specimens that have not been subjected to unusual or harsh treatments.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 22479540 · DOI · PMC3316601
Cell-Free DNA Release Kinetics and Fragmentation Reflect Treatment Response and Resistance In Vitro [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a clinically valuable biomarker for cancer detection, treatment monitoring, and minimal residual disease assessment.
- Closing excerpt
- Furthermore, they establish in vitro cancer models as a valuable platform for studying cfDNA dynamics and informing preclinical therapeutic development.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (295 words)
BackgroundCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a clinically valuable biomarker for cancer detection, treatment monitoring, and minimal residual disease assessment. Despite its growing clinical utility, the biological mechanisms governing ctDNA release remain incompletely understood. The objective of this study was to investigate how chemotherapy-induced cytotoxicity and chemoresistance influence the kinetics and fragmentation patterns of cfDNA released by cancer cells in vitro.MethodsHuman lung adenocarcinoma (A549) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (FLO-1, OE19) cell lines were used to investigate cell-free DNA (cfDNA) release and fragmentation in vitro. Cancer cells were treated with chemotherapy (cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil), and cfDNA released into the culture medium was quantified as total cfDNA by Qubit fluorometry and mutation-specific cfDNA by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). A cisplatin-resistant OE19 model was generated to directly compare cfDNA release kinetics between chemosensitive and chemoresistant cells. Fragment size distributions were determined and evaluated alongside cell death mechanisms assessed by flow cytometry.ResultscfDNA release correlated positively with viable tumor cell number across all cell lines. Chemotherapy increased per-cell cfDNA release in all cell lines. Chemosensitive OE19 cells exhibited significantly higher cfDNA release compared to chemoresistant OE19 cells following cisplatin exposure, with distinct temporal release kinetics. Additionally, chemotherapy treatment induced a shift toward the release of larger DNA fragments in both chemosensitive and resistant cells. This was accompanied by changes in PI-positive and Annexin V/PI double-positive cell populations, suggesting altered cell death processes following cisplatin treatment.ConclusionsChemotherapy-induced cytotoxicity significantly influences cfDNA release kinetics and fragmentation patterns, with distinct effects in chemosensitive and chemoresistant cancer cells. These findings provide mechanistic insight into tumor-derived DNA release biology and may have important implications for the interpretation, timing, and standardization of liquid biopsy testing during treatment. Furthermore, they establish in vitro cancer models as a valuable platform for studying cfDNA dynamics and informing preclinical therapeutic development.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42738856 · DOI · PMC13565368
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Sperm chromatin structure assay: its clinical use for detecting sperm DNA fragmentation in male infertility and comparisons with other techniques [5]
- Research article Apoptotic DNA fragmentation [6]
- Research article Epigenetics, fragmentomics, and topology of cell-free DNA in liquid biopsies [7]
- Research article Sperm DNA fragmentation: mechanisms of origin, impact on reproductive outcome, and analysis [8]
- Research article The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on miscarriage rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis [9]
- Research article Degradation of chromosomal DNA during apoptosis [10]
References
- Mouliere F, Robert B, Arnau Peyrotte E, Del Rio M, Ychou M, Molina F, et al.. High fragmentation characterizes tumour-derived circulating DNA. . 2011. PMID 21909401 · DOI · PMC3167805
- Mathios D, Johansen JS, Cristiano S, Medina JE, Phallen J, Larsen KR, et al.. Detection and characterization of lung cancer using cell-free DNA fragmentomes. . 2021. PMID 34417454 · DOI · PMC8379179
- Sawyer S, Krause J, Guschanski K, Savolainen V, Pääbo S. Temporal patterns of nucleotide misincorporations and DNA fragmentation in ancient DNA. . 2012. PMID 22479540 · DOI · PMC3316601
- Bartolomucci A, Kienzle L, Ferrier ST, Forgie B, Tsering T, Dickinson K, et al.. Cell-Free DNA Release Kinetics and Fragmentation Reflect Treatment Response and Resistance In Vitro. . 2026. PMID 42738856 · DOI · PMC13565368
- Evenson DP, Larson KL, Jost LK. Sperm chromatin structure assay: its clinical use for detecting sperm DNA fragmentation in male infertility and comparisons with other techniques. J Androl. 2002. PMID 11780920 · DOI
- Nagata S. Apoptotic DNA fragmentation. Exp Cell Res. 2000. PMID 10739646 · DOI
- Lo YMD, Han DSC, Jiang P, Chiu RWK. Epigenetics, fragmentomics, and topology of cell-free DNA in liquid biopsies. Science. 2021. PMID 33833097 · DOI
- Sakkas D, Alvarez JG. Sperm DNA fragmentation: mechanisms of origin, impact on reproductive outcome, and analysis. Fertil Steril. 2010. PMID 20080235 · DOI
- Robinson L, Gallos ID, Conner SJ, Rajkhowa M, Miller D, Lewis S, et al.. The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on miscarriage rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2012. PMID 22791753 · DOI
- Nagata S, Nagase H, Kawane K, Mukae N, Fukuyama H. Degradation of chromosomal DNA during apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2003. PMID 12655299 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.