Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Dietary Fiber
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Dietary Fiber

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed9 referencesApproximately 3 min read

The remnants of plant cell walls that are resistant to digestion by the alimentary enzymes of man.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 3 complete abstracts (609 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The remnants of plant cell walls that are resistant to digestion by the alimentary enzymes of man. It comprises various polysaccharides and lignins.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Dietary Fibers; Fibers, Dietary; Fiber, Dietary; Wheat Bran; Brans, Wheat; Bran, Wheat; Wheat Brans; Roughage.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Dietary Carbohydrates; Food
Narrower topics
Prebiotics; Resistant Starch

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 28,393 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Dietary Fiber” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 8,969 of them (31.6%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2020 onward with 8,969 records.

Reviews account for 5,847 records (20.6%) and meta-analyses for 469. Randomized controlled trials number 2,529 (8.9%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 6,661 records; 2000-2009: 3,978 records; 2010-2019: 8,785 records; 2020 onward: 8,969 records6,661through 19993,9782000-20098,7852010-20198,9692020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19996,661
2000-20093,978
2010-20198,785
2020 onward8,969
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 20.6 percent; Meta-analyses: 1.7 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 8.9 percentReviews20.6% (5,847)Meta-analyses1.7% (469)Randomized controlled trials8.9% (2,529)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 28,393 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews5,84720.6%
Meta-analyses4691.7%
Randomized controlled trials2,5298.9%

Method: PubMed query "Dietary Fiber"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Supplementation with short-chain fatty acids and a prebiotic improves clinical outcome in Parkinson's disease: a randomized double-blind prospective study
Hegelmaier T, Duscha A, Desel C, Fuchs S, Shapira M, Amidror S, et al.
2025Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
19cc by
PMID 41350593 · DOI · PMC12770440
The gut microbiota in menopause: Is there a role for prebiotic and probiotic solutions?
Liaquat M, Minihane AM, Vauzour D, Pontifex MG
2025Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
16cc by
PMID 40335047 · DOI · PMC12209548
Gut microbiota: A key player for soluble dietary fiber in regulating inflammatory disease
Qu L, Zhang R, Chu Z, Cai J, He Y, Zhang X, et al.
2026Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
13cc by
PMID 40972715 · DOI · PMC13227257

Supplementation with short-chain fatty acids and a prebiotic improves clinical outcome in Parkinson's disease: a randomized double-blind prospective study [1]

Randomized controlled trial Hegelmaier T, Duscha A, Desel C, Fuchs S, Shapira M, Amidror S, et al. · · 2025 · cited 19 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundParkinson's disease is associated with a dysbiotic, proinflammatory gut microbiome, disruptions to intestinal barrier functions, and immunological imbalance.
Closing excerpt
RegistrationThis clinical trial was retrospectively registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), registration number DRKS00027061 on 11/19/2021.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (225 words)

BackgroundParkinson's disease is associated with a dysbiotic, proinflammatory gut microbiome, disruptions to intestinal barrier functions, and immunological imbalance. Microbiota-produced short-chain fatty acids, such as propionic and butyric acid promote gut barrier integrity and immune regulation, but their impact on Parkinson's disease pathology remains mostly unknown.MethodsIn a randomized double-blind prospective study, 72 people with Parkinson's disease received propionic and butyric acid and/or the prebiotic fiber 2'-fucosyllactose supplementation over 6 months in combination with existing Parkinson's disease-specific therapy. Patients underwent complete neurological assessment and provided blood and stool samples before as well as 3 and 6 months after supplementation.ResultsWe observed a robust improvement in motor symptoms, with all intervention groups achieving clinically meaningful reductions. These motor benefits were paralleled by clinically relevant reductions in levodopa medication. In contrast, effects on nonmotor symptoms were more heterogeneous. Notably, the interventions also modulated peripheral immune responses and enhanced mitochondrial respiration in immunocytes. Postintervention microbiota remodeled inflammatory and barrier-related gene sets in gut organ cultures and improved in vitro barrier functions. Treatment response was associated with microbiome composition, distinct patterns of colonic transcription and permeability ex vivo. Multiobjective analysis revealed immune parameters associated with an optimal response to supplementation.ConclusionShort-chain fatty acids ameliorate clinical symptoms in Parkinson's disease patients and modulate intestinal and peripheral immunity.RegistrationThis clinical trial was retrospectively registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), registration number DRKS00027061 on 11/19/2021.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41350593 · DOI · PMC12770440

The gut microbiota in menopause: Is there a role for prebiotic and probiotic solutions? [2]

Review article Liaquat M, Minihane AM, Vauzour D, Pontifex MG · · 2025 · cited 16 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The gut microbiota, comprising a diverse array of microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract, has emerged as a key player in human health.
Closing excerpt
Further research into gut microbiota modulation may enable more effective, personalised treatments for menopause-associated health challenges, and supporting women's health into older ages.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (248 words)

The gut microbiota, comprising a diverse array of microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract, has emerged as a key player in human health. Emerging research indicates that this gut microbial composition is influenced by sex. These sex differences are not necessarily static and likely alter across the life course in response to several factors including changing hormone profile. As such, the menopause transition-a pivotal phase in female ageing in which the hormone profile changes dramatically is receiving increasing attention. Declining estrogen which occurs during menopause appears to influence the microbiota, which may in turn contribute to menopause-related conditions such as weight gain, bone health, cancer risk and cognitive health. The modulation of estrogen through the gut's 'estrobolome', a collection of bacterial genes involved in estrogen metabolism, may offer explanation for some of the interindividual differences observed during menopause (e.g. length, symptoms and disease risk). Therapeutic modulation of the gut microbiota therefore represents a potential approach towards managing menopausal symptoms. Indeed, prebiotics and probiotics such as Lactobacillus have been shown to increase bacterial diversity and improve metabolic and overall health in menopausal women. However, evidence remains limited regarding the specific underlying mechanisms, highlighting an urgent need for a research focus in the area. This review summarizes the current understanding of the gut microbiota's role in menopausal health and the potential of prebiotics and probiotics as therapeutic interventions. Further research into gut microbiota modulation may enable more effective, personalised treatments for menopause-associated health challenges, and supporting women's health into older ages.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40335047 · DOI · PMC12209548

Gut microbiota: A key player for soluble dietary fiber in regulating inflammatory disease [3]

Review article Qu L, Zhang R, Chu Z, Cai J, He Y, Zhang X, et al. · · 2026 · cited 13 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Soluble dietary fiber (SDF) plays a significant role in modulating immune responses, particularly in the context of inflammatory diseases.
Closing excerpt
This review explores the mechanistic pathways by which SDF modulates immune regulation and highlights the current challenges and future strategies for optimizing its clinical application in treating inflammatory diseases.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (136 words)

Soluble dietary fiber (SDF) plays a significant role in modulating immune responses, particularly in the context of inflammatory diseases. SDF enhances intestinal barrier integrity and regulates immune function by modulating the composition of the gut microbiota and increasing the production of beneficial microbial metabolites, such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), 3-hydroxyoctadecaenoic acid, pentadecanoic acid, and bile acids. Current evidence suggests that SDF holds therapeutic potential in managing chronic inflammatory diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Despite these promising findings, the mechanisms by which SDF exerts its effects, particularly in distal organs and neuroinflammatory conditions, remain poorly understood. This review explores the mechanistic pathways by which SDF modulates immune regulation and highlights the current challenges and future strategies for optimizing its clinical application in treating inflammatory diseases.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40972715 · DOI · PMC13227257

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Cholesterol-lowering effects of dietary fiber: a meta-analysis [4]
    Brown L, Rosner B, Willett WW, Sacks FM · Am J Clin Nutr · 1999 · cited 972 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Dietary fibre, whole grains, and risk of colorectal cancer: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies [5]
    Aune D, Chan DS, Lau R, Vieira R, Greenwood DC, Kampman E, et al. · BMJ · 2011 · cited 719 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Dietary fiber intervention on gut microbiota composition in healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis [6]
    So D, Whelan K, Rossi M, Morrison M, Holtmann G, Kelly JT, et al. · Am J Clin Nutr · 2018 · cited 519 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Dietary fibre intake and risk of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis [7]
    Threapleton DE, Greenwood DC, Evans CE, Cleghorn CL, Nykjaer C, Woodhead C, et al. · BMJ · 2013 · cited 484 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Prebiotics and probiotics for depression and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials [8]
    Liu RT, Walsh RFL, Sheehan AE · Neurosci Biobehav Rev · 2019 · cited 377 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics and antibiotics in irritable bowel syndrome [9]
    Ford AC, Harris LA, Lacy BE, Quigley EMM, Moayyedi P · Aliment Pharmacol Ther · 2018 · cited 368 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Hegelmaier T, Duscha A, Desel C, Fuchs S, Shapira M, Amidror S, et al.. Supplementation with short-chain fatty acids and a prebiotic improves clinical outcome in Parkinson's disease: a randomized double-blind prospective study. . 2025. PMID 41350593 · DOI · PMC12770440
  2. Liaquat M, Minihane AM, Vauzour D, Pontifex MG. The gut microbiota in menopause: Is there a role for prebiotic and probiotic solutions?. . 2025. PMID 40335047 · DOI · PMC12209548
  3. Qu L, Zhang R, Chu Z, Cai J, He Y, Zhang X, et al.. Gut microbiota: A key player for soluble dietary fiber in regulating inflammatory disease. . 2026. PMID 40972715 · DOI · PMC13227257
  4. Brown L, Rosner B, Willett WW, Sacks FM. Cholesterol-lowering effects of dietary fiber: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999. PMID 9925120 · DOI
  5. Aune D, Chan DS, Lau R, Vieira R, Greenwood DC, Kampman E, et al.. Dietary fibre, whole grains, and risk of colorectal cancer: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMJ. 2011. PMID 22074852 · DOI · PMC3213242
  6. So D, Whelan K, Rossi M, Morrison M, Holtmann G, Kelly JT, et al.. Dietary fiber intervention on gut microbiota composition in healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018. PMID 29757343 · DOI
  7. Threapleton DE, Greenwood DC, Evans CE, Cleghorn CL, Nykjaer C, Woodhead C, et al.. Dietary fibre intake and risk of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013. PMID 24355537 · DOI · PMC3898422
  8. Liu RT, Walsh RFL, Sheehan AE. Prebiotics and probiotics for depression and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019. PMID 31004628 · DOI · PMC6584030
  9. Ford AC, Harris LA, Lacy BE, Quigley EMM, Moayyedi P. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics and antibiotics in irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018. PMID 30294792 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • PrebioticsAnatomy and Physiology
  • Resistant StarchAnatomy and Physiology
  • ProbioticsAnatomy and Physiology
  • FlourAnatomy and Physiology
  • Dietary SupplementsAnatomy and Physiology
  • BreadAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

28,393
PubMed records on this heading
32%
published since 2020
5,847
review articles
2,529
randomized trials
9
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • PrebioticsAnatomy and Physiology
  • Resistant StarchAnatomy and Physiology
  • ProbioticsAnatomy and Physiology
  • FlourAnatomy and Physiology
  • Dietary SupplementsAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support