Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Descemet Membrane
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Descemet Membrane

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

A layer of the cornea.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (805 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A layer of the cornea. It is the basal lamina of the corneal endothelium (from which it is secreted) separating it from the corneal stroma. It is a homogeneous structure composed of fine collagenous filaments, and slowly increases in thickness with age.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Descemet Membranes; Membrane, Descemet; Membranes, Descemet; Descemet's Membrane; Descemets Membrane; Membrane, Descemet's; Lamina Elastica Posterior; Elastica Posterior, Lamina.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Cornea; Basement Membrane

Related concepts

  • Corneal Endothelium
  • Corneal Stroma

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 2,641 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Descemet Membrane” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 578 of them (21.9%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 837 records.

Reviews account for 145 records (5.5%) and meta-analyses for 18. Randomized controlled trials number 40 (1.5%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 755 records; 2000-2009: 471 records; 2010-2019: 837 records; 2020 onward: 578 records755through 19994712000-20098372010-20195782020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 1999755
2000-2009471
2010-2019837
2020 onward578
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 5.5 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.7 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 1.5 percentReviews5.5% (145)Meta-analyses0.7% (18)Randomized controlled trials1.5% (40)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 2,641 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1455.5%
Meta-analyses180.7%
Randomized controlled trials401.5%

Method: PubMed query "Descemet Membrane"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and calcium overload in human lamina cribrosa cells from glaucoma donors
McElnea EM, Quill B, Docherty NG, Irnaten M, Siah WF, Clark AF, et al.
2011Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
131cc by
PMID 21617752 · PMC3102025
Efficacy and safety of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Li S, Liu L, Wang W, Huang T, Zhong X, Yuan J, et al.
2017Meta-analysis
Design not recorded in structured metadata
52cc by
PMID 29252983 · DOI · PMC5734733
The Ultrastructures and Mechanical Properties of the Descement's Membrane in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy
Xia D, Zhang S, Nielsen E, Ivarsen AR, Liang C, Li Q, et al.
2016Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
42cc by
PMID 26980551 · DOI · PMC4793225
The evolution of pre-descemet endothelial keratoplasty (PDEK)
Ripa M, Gayle K, Said DG, Dua HS
2026Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 42521758 · DOI · PMC13601598

Oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and calcium overload in human lamina cribrosa cells from glaucoma donors [1]

Research article McElnea EM, Quill B, Docherty NG, Irnaten M, Siah WF, Clark AF, et al. · · 2011 · cited 131 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
PurposeOxidative stress is implicit in the pathological changes associated with glaucoma.
Closing excerpt
Future therapies may target reducing oxidative stress and / or [Ca(2+)](i).
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (217 words)

PurposeOxidative stress is implicit in the pathological changes associated with glaucoma. The purpose of this study was to compare levels of oxidative stress in glial fibrillary acid-negative protein (GFAP) lamina cribrosa (LC) cells obtained from the optic nerve head (ONH) region of 5 normal (NLC) and 4 glaucomatous (GLC) human donor eyes and to also examine mitochondrial function and calcium homeostasis in this region of the ONH.MethodsIntracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production was examined by a thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) assay which measures malondialdehyde (MDA), a naturally occurring product of lipid peroxidation and is used as an indicator of oxidative stress. Mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) and intracellular calcium ([Ca(2+)](i)) levels were evaluated by flow cytometry using the JC-1 (5,5',6,6'-tetrachloro-1,1',3,3'-tetrabenzimidazolecarbocyanine iodide) and fluo-4/AM probes respectively. Anti-oxidant and Ca(2+) transport system gene and protein expression were determined by real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using gene-specific primer/probe sets and western immunoblotting, respectively.ResultsIntracellular ROS production was increased in GLC compared to NLC (27.19 ± 7.05 µM MDA versus 14.59 ± 0.82 µM MDA, p ConclusionsOur data finds evidence of oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and impaired calcium extrusion in GLC cells compared to NLC cells and suggests their importance in the pathological changes occurring at the ONH in glaucoma. Future therapies may target reducing oxidative stress and / or [Ca(2+)](i).

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 21617752 · PMC3102025

Efficacy and safety of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis [2]

Meta-analysis Li S, Liu L, Wang W, Huang T, Zhong X, Yuan J, et al. · · 2017 · cited 52 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
PurposeBased on current evidence, the efficiency and safety of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) was compared with that of Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK).
Closing excerpt
11, PConclusionAlthough DMEK is a more technically difficult and challenging procedure, it may represent a safe and more efficient alternative to DSEK for the treatment of corneal endothelial diseases, even during its learning curve.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (215 words)

PurposeBased on current evidence, the efficiency and safety of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) was compared with that of Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK).MethodsPubmed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Database and conference abstracts were comprehensively searched for studies that compared the efficacy and safety of DMEK and DSEK. The efficacy outcome was the postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The safety outcomes included the postoperative endothelial cell density (ECD) and complications such as graft detachment, graft rejection, graft failure, postoperative elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), tissue loss, etc. The outcomes were pooled using random-effects models with Stata 13.0 software. Heterogeneity was qualified with Q statistic and I2/H2 statistic. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plot, Begg rank correlation test, and Egger or Horbard linear regression.Results19 articles were eligible, and 1124 eyes and 1254 eyes were included in the DMEK and DSEK groups, respectively. The overall pooled estimates showed a significantly better postoperative BCVA, a comparable ECD and an increased graft detachment rate in the DMEK group compared with the DSEK group (BCVA: mean difference (MD) = -0.15, 95% CI = -0.19 to -0.11, PConclusionAlthough DMEK is a more technically difficult and challenging procedure, it may represent a safe and more efficient alternative to DSEK for the treatment of corneal endothelial diseases, even during its learning curve.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29252983 · DOI · PMC5734733

The Ultrastructures and Mechanical Properties of the Descement's Membrane in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy [3]

Research article Xia D, Zhang S, Nielsen E, Ivarsen AR, Liang C, Li Q, et al. · · 2016 · cited 42 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD), is the most common corneal endothelial dystrophy, and contributes up to 50% of all corneal transplantations performed in developed countries.
Closing excerpt
These findings could help to further understand the structural changes in FECD, and possibly be useful for further characterization of the disease, the diagnosis and assessment or even pathologic analysis.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (140 words)

Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD), is the most common corneal endothelial dystrophy, and contributes up to 50% of all corneal transplantations performed in developed countries. FECD develops in Descemet's membrane (DM) and possibly alters the mechanical properties and internal structures in this basal lamina. In this work, the morphology and mechanical properties of FECD-DMs are studied by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and quantitative dynamic atomic force microscopy (QD-AFM) at nano scale. Pathological wide-space collagens that are typical of FECD display different mechanical properties in that they are softer than the remaining tissue both for dehydrated- and fully hydrated samples. Additionally, the hydration level has major influence on the mechanical properties. These findings could help to further understand the structural changes in FECD, and possibly be useful for further characterization of the disease, the diagnosis and assessment or even pathologic analysis.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 26980551 · DOI · PMC4793225

The evolution of pre-descemet endothelial keratoplasty (PDEK) [4]

Review article Ripa M, Gayle K, Said DG, Dua HS · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Pre-Descemet's endothelial keratoplasty (PDEK) is an evolving endothelial keratoplasty (EK) procedure that merges the advantages of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and ultrathin EK methods.
Closing excerpt
Finally, PDEK merges the optical advantages of DMEK with enhanced intraoperative control and expanded donor options with the inclusion of young donor eyes, and is likely to gain wider adoption when integrated into training programs and eye bank protocols.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (233 words)

Pre-Descemet's endothelial keratoplasty (PDEK) is an evolving endothelial keratoplasty (EK) procedure that merges the advantages of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and ultrathin EK methods. This review reports the latest anatomical, surgical, and clinical research on PDEK and discusses its potential future role in current EK practices. Anatomical data show that the Pre-Descemet/Dua's Layer (PDL/DL) acts as a biomechanical support, or "splint," for Descemet's Membrane (DM). This support facilitates the creation of grafts that are less tight and easier to handle compared to DMEK tissue. Notably, PDEK leads to rapid visual recovery and improvements in best-corrected visual acuity after surgery. Since PDEK results in an acceptable level of endothelial cell loss and has demonstrated reasonable detachment and rebubbling rates in published series, particularly in experienced hands, it is regarded as a reliable method for effectively utilising young and paediatric corneas, thereby optimising tissue use in eye bank procedures. Furthermore, advancements in surgical techniques, such as specialised PDEK clamps, an air-pump-assisted method, consistent 360-degree scoring, and the integration of optical coherence tomography into the surgical microscope, have resulted in higher success rates in creating Type 1 big-bubble, decreased overall tissue loss, and enhanced procedural consistency. Finally, PDEK merges the optical advantages of DMEK with enhanced intraoperative control and expanded donor options with the inclusion of young donor eyes, and is likely to gain wider adoption when integrated into training programs and eye bank protocols.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42521758 · DOI · PMC13601598

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: safety and outcomes: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology [5]
    Lee WB, Jacobs DS, Musch DC, Kaufman SC, Reinhart WJ, Shtein RM · Ophthalmology · 2009 · cited 483 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty [6]
    Price MO, Price FW · Curr Opin Ophthalmol · 2007 · cited 182 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) versus Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) for corneal endothelial failure [7]
    Stuart AJ, Romano V, Virgili G, Shortt AJ · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2018 · cited 111 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty [8]
    Shimmura S, Tsubota K · Curr Opin Ophthalmol · 2006 · cited 104 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Descemet's membrane development, structure, function and regeneration [9]
    de Oliveira RC, Wilson SE · Exp Eye Res · 2020 · cited 80 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Evolution of endothelial keratoplasty [10]
    Price FW, Price MO · Cornea · 2013 · cited 80 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. McElnea EM, Quill B, Docherty NG, Irnaten M, Siah WF, Clark AF, et al.. Oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and calcium overload in human lamina cribrosa cells from glaucoma donors. . 2011. PMID 21617752 · PMC3102025
  2. Li S, Liu L, Wang W, Huang T, Zhong X, Yuan J, et al.. Efficacy and safety of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. . 2017. PMID 29252983 · DOI · PMC5734733
  3. Xia D, Zhang S, Nielsen E, Ivarsen AR, Liang C, Li Q, et al.. The Ultrastructures and Mechanical Properties of the Descement's Membrane in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy. . 2016. PMID 26980551 · DOI · PMC4793225
  4. Ripa M, Gayle K, Said DG, Dua HS. The evolution of pre-descemet endothelial keratoplasty (PDEK). . 2026. PMID 42521758 · DOI · PMC13601598
  5. Lee WB, Jacobs DS, Musch DC, Kaufman SC, Reinhart WJ, Shtein RM. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: safety and outcomes: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2009. PMID 19643492 · DOI
  6. Price MO, Price FW. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007. PMID 17568204 · DOI
  7. Stuart AJ, Romano V, Virgili G, Shortt AJ. Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) versus Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) for corneal endothelial failure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID 29940078 · DOI · PMC6513431
  8. Shimmura S, Tsubota K. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006. PMID 16900026 · DOI
  9. de Oliveira RC, Wilson SE. Descemet's membrane development, structure, function and regeneration. Exp Eye Res. 2020. PMID 32522478 · DOI
  10. Price FW, Price MO. Evolution of endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2013. PMID 24104929 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • CorneaAnatomy and Physiology
  • Corneal StromaAnatomy and Physiology
  • Basilar MembraneAnatomy and Physiology
  • Glomerular Basement MembraneAnatomy and Physiology
  • Basement MembraneAnatomy and Physiology
  • Anterior ChamberAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

2,641
PubMed records on this heading
22%
published since 2020
145
review articles
40
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • CorneaAnatomy and Physiology
  • Corneal StromaAnatomy and Physiology
  • Basilar MembraneAnatomy and Physiology
  • Glomerular Basement MembraneAnatomy and Physiology
  • Basement MembraneAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support