Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Genetics and Genomics›CRISPR-Cas Systems
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

CRISPR-Cas Systems

Genetics and Genomics · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed9 referencesApproximately 3 min read

Adaptive antiviral defense mechanisms, in archaea and bacteria, based on DNA repeat arrays called clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (crispr elements) that function in conjunction with crispr-associated prot

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 3 complete abstracts (421 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Adaptive antiviral defense mechanisms, in archaea and bacteria, based on DNA repeat arrays called clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (crispr elements) that function in conjunction with crispr-associated proteins (Cas proteins). Several types have been distinguished, including Type I, Type II, and Type III, based on signature motifs of crispr-associated proteins.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: CRISPR-Cas System; CRISPR Cas Systems; System, CRISPR-Cas; Systems, CRISPR-Cas.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Gene Silencing
See also
Gene Editing; CRISPR-Associated Protein 9

Related concepts

  • Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats
  • Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats
  • Crispr-Associated Proteins

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 27,687 records tagged with the MeSH heading “CRISPR-Cas Systems” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 19,434 of them (70.2%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2020 onward with 19,434 records.

Reviews account for 4,466 records (16.1%) and meta-analyses for 25. Randomized controlled trials number 2 (0.0%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 0 records; 2000-2009: 0 records; 2010-2019: 8,501 records; 2020 onward: 19,434 records0through 199902000-20098,5012010-201919,4342020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19990
2000-20090
2010-20198,501
2020 onward19,434
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 16.1 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.1 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.0 percentReviews16.1% (4,466)Meta-analyses0.1% (25)Randomized controlled trials0.0% (2)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 27,687 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews4,46616.1%
Meta-analyses250.1%
Randomized controlled trials20.0%

Method: PubMed query "CRISPR-Cas Systems"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in genetics and genomics

Genetic findings vary widely in strength. A variant linked to a condition in one study may not replicate in other ancestries, and most common variants have small effects that are meaningful only in aggregate. Studies of rare, high-impact variants can support strong causal claims about a gene, while association studies describe statistical links that need functional and independent replication. Check the sample size, the ancestry of participants, whether results were replicated, and whether a laboratory or clinical outcome was actually measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Structural basis of supercoiling-induced CRISPR-Cas9 off-target activity
Smith QM, Whittle S, Aramayo RJ, Rollins DE, Jalal ASB, Egharevba DI, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
7cc by
PMID 41882360 · DOI · PMC13171457
A massively parallel CRISPR-based screening platform for modifiers of neuronal depolarization
Boggess SC, Gandhi V, Tsai MC, Marzette E, Teyssier N, Chou JY, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
4cc by
PMID 42669708 · DOI · PMC13526836
Optimised genome editing for precise DNA insertion and substitution using prime editors in zebrafish
Ono Y, Peterka M, Love M, Khan A, Bowers F, Bhandari A, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
4cc by
PMID 42411453 · DOI · PMC13341114

Structural basis of supercoiling-induced CRISPR-Cas9 off-target activity [1]

Research article Smith QM, Whittle S, Aramayo RJ, Rollins DE, Jalal ASB, Egharevba DI, et al. · · 2026 · cited 7 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
CRISPR-Cas9 is a powerful genome-editing tool1, but genome-wide off-target activity can hinder therapeutic applications.
Closing excerpt
Together, our study reveals the molecular basis for (-)SC-induced Cas9 targeting and provides a framework for the design of next-generation high-fidelity CRISPR effectors with topological context.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (126 words)

CRISPR-Cas9 is a powerful genome-editing tool1, but genome-wide off-target activity can hinder therapeutic applications. Negative supercoiling ((-)SC) has been implicated in off-target activity, but a molecular-level understanding is lacking. Here, using (-)SC DNA minicircles, we observe supercoiling-driven structural defects in the DNA that are resolved by Cas9 binding. Cryo-electron microscopy structures of Cas9 bound in both the on-target and off-target configurations highlight that the Cas9 HNH domain is poised in a more catalytically competent conformation. New DNA-RNA mismatch geometries are accommodated across the protospacer and structural plasticity in the protospacer adjacent motif distal region of the protospacer is topology dependent. Together, our study reveals the molecular basis for (-)SC-induced Cas9 targeting and provides a framework for the design of next-generation high-fidelity CRISPR effectors with topological context.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41882360 · DOI · PMC13171457

A massively parallel CRISPR-based screening platform for modifiers of neuronal depolarization [2]

Research article Boggess SC, Gandhi V, Tsai MC, Marzette E, Teyssier N, Chou JY, et al. · · 2026 · cited 4 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Understanding the complex interplay between gene expression and neuronal activity is crucial for unraveling the molecular mechanisms underlying cognitive function and neurological disorders.
Closing excerpt
This CRISPRi-based screening platform offers a versatile tool to uncover molecular mechanisms controlling neuronal function in health and disease.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (124 words)

Understanding the complex interplay between gene expression and neuronal activity is crucial for unraveling the molecular mechanisms underlying cognitive function and neurological disorders. Here, we developed pooled screens using CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) and the fluorescent calcium integrator CaMPARI2 to evaluate genetic modifiers of neuronal depolarization. Using this screening method, we evaluated 1343 genes for their effect on depolarization in a human iPSC-derived neuron model, revealing potential links to neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental disorders. These genes include known regulators of neuronal excitability, such as TARPs and ion channels, as well as genes associated with autism spectrum disorder and Alzheimer's disease not previously described to affect neuronal depolarization. This CRISPRi-based screening platform offers a versatile tool to uncover molecular mechanisms controlling neuronal function in health and disease.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42669708 · DOI · PMC13526836

Optimised genome editing for precise DNA insertion and substitution using prime editors in zebrafish [3]

Research article Ono Y, Peterka M, Love M, Khan A, Bowers F, Bhandari A, et al. · · 2026 · cited 4 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing has rapidly become a popular tool for studying gene functions and generating genetically modified organisms.
Closing excerpt
We show that PE-mediated prime editing can efficiently manipulate genome information in zebrafish without using exogenous donor DNA.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (171 words)

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing has rapidly become a popular tool for studying gene functions and generating genetically modified organisms. However, using this system, stochastic integration of random insertions and deletions restricts precise genome manipulation. Advanced CRISPR/Cas9 technologies using Prime Editors (PEs), Cas9 proteins fused with reverse transcriptase, enable programmed integration of short DNA modifications into the genome. However, its application in precise genome editing in animal models is challenging. Here, we utilise a nickase- and a nuclease-based PE to perform programmed short DNA substitutions and insertions at various loci in the zebrafish genome. Whereas nickase-based PE2 mediated a higher ratio of precise prime edits to the total edits, nuclease-based PEn was more efficient for short DNA modifications, achieving up to 27.3% precise insertion. To further evaluate our approach, we inserted a nuclear localisation signal into a reporter transgene to incorporate longer fragments by prime editing. These gene modifications were transmitted to the next generation. We show that PE-mediated prime editing can efficiently manipulate genome information in zebrafish without using exogenous donor DNA.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42411453 · DOI · PMC13341114

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Inhibition of long non-coding RNA UCA1 by CRISPR/Cas9 attenuated malignant phenotypes of bladder cancer [4]
    Zhen S, Hua L, Liu YH, Sun XM, Jiang MM, Chen W, et al. · Oncotarget · 2017 · cited 83 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article An overview and metanalysis of machine and deep learning-based CRISPR gRNA design tools [5]
    Wang J, Zhang X, Cheng L, Luo Y · RNA Biol · 2020 · cited 61 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The hidden risks of CRISPR/Cas: structural variations and genome integrity [6]
    Aussel C, Cathomen T, Fuster-García C · Nat Commun · 2025 · cited 46 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Revolutionizing CRISPR technology with artificial intelligence [7]
    Kim MG, Go MJ, Kang SH, Jeong SH, Lim K · Exp Mol Med · 2025 · cited 27 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article CRISPR-driven diagnostics: Molecular mechanisms, clinical efficacy and translational challenges [8]
    Wang Z, Wang Q, Zhang J, Li B, Li Y, Chen Z, et al. · Clin Transl Med · 2025 · cited 25 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article One-Pot Isothermal Nucleic Acid Amplification Assisted CRISPR/Cas Detection Technology: Challenges, Strategies, and Perspectives [9]
    Liu H, Yin H, Xiu L, Wu W, Hu Q, Xia Y, et al. · Adv Sci (Weinh) · 2025 · cited 24 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Smith QM, Whittle S, Aramayo RJ, Rollins DE, Jalal ASB, Egharevba DI, et al.. Structural basis of supercoiling-induced CRISPR-Cas9 off-target activity. . 2026. PMID 41882360 · DOI · PMC13171457
  2. Boggess SC, Gandhi V, Tsai MC, Marzette E, Teyssier N, Chou JY, et al.. A massively parallel CRISPR-based screening platform for modifiers of neuronal depolarization. . 2026. PMID 42669708 · DOI · PMC13526836
  3. Ono Y, Peterka M, Love M, Khan A, Bowers F, Bhandari A, et al.. Optimised genome editing for precise DNA insertion and substitution using prime editors in zebrafish. . 2026. PMID 42411453 · DOI · PMC13341114
  4. Zhen S, Hua L, Liu YH, Sun XM, Jiang MM, Chen W, et al.. Inhibition of long non-coding RNA UCA1 by CRISPR/Cas9 attenuated malignant phenotypes of bladder cancer. Oncotarget. 2017. PMID 28038452 · DOI · PMC5354759
  5. Wang J, Zhang X, Cheng L, Luo Y. An overview and metanalysis of machine and deep learning-based CRISPR gRNA design tools. RNA Biol. 2020. PMID 31533522 · DOI · PMC6948960
  6. Aussel C, Cathomen T, Fuster-García C. The hidden risks of CRISPR/Cas: structural variations and genome integrity. Nat Commun. 2025. PMID 40764301 · DOI · PMC12325979
  7. Kim MG, Go MJ, Kang SH, Jeong SH, Lim K. Revolutionizing CRISPR technology with artificial intelligence. Exp Mol Med. 2025. PMID 40745000 · DOI · PMC12322281
  8. Wang Z, Wang Q, Zhang J, Li B, Li Y, Chen Z, et al.. CRISPR-driven diagnostics: Molecular mechanisms, clinical efficacy and translational challenges. Clin Transl Med. 2025. PMID 41000010 · DOI · PMC12464570
  9. Liu H, Yin H, Xiu L, Wu W, Hu Q, Xia Y, et al.. One-Pot Isothermal Nucleic Acid Amplification Assisted CRISPR/Cas Detection Technology: Challenges, Strategies, and Perspectives. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025. PMID 40884263 · DOI · PMC12499467

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsMolecular Biology
  • Genomic ImprintingGenetics and Genomics
  • RNA InterferenceGenetics and Genomics
  • X Chromosome InactivationGenetics and Genomics
  • Immune SystemAnatomy and Physiology
  • Nervous SystemNeuroscience

All 95 articles in Genetics and Genomics →

At a glance

27,687
PubMed records on this heading
70%
published since 2020
4,466
review articles
2
randomized trials
9
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsMolecular Biology
  • Genomic ImprintingGenetics and Genomics
  • RNA InterferenceGenetics and Genomics
  • X Chromosome InactivationGenetics and Genomics
  • Immune SystemAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support