Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Clinical Research›Cost of Illness
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Cost of Illness

Clinical Research · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed9 referencesApproximately 5 min read

The personal cost of disease which may be economic, social, or psychological.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 3 complete abstracts (996 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The personal cost of disease which may be economic, social, or psychological. The cost of illness may be reflected in absenteeism, productivity, response to treatment, peace of mind, or quality OF LIFE. It differs from health care costs, the societal cost of providing services related to the delivery of health care.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Illness Cost; Illness Costs; Burden Of Disease; Burden Of Diseases; Cost of Sickness; Sickness Costs; Sickness Cost; Burden of Illness.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Costs and Cost Analysis; Health Status Indicators
Narrower topics
Global Burden of Disease
See also
Quality of Life

Related concepts

  • Quality
  • Health Care Costs

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 42,341 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Cost of Illness” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 14,485 of them (34.2%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 15,598 records.

Reviews account for 6,743 records (15.9%) and meta-analyses for 459. Randomized controlled trials number 897 (2.1%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 2,480 records; 2000-2009: 9,778 records; 2010-2019: 15,598 records; 2020 onward: 14,485 records2,480through 19999,7782000-200915,5982010-201914,4852020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19992,480
2000-20099,778
2010-201915,598
2020 onward14,485
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 15.9 percent; Meta-analyses: 1.1 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 2.1 percentReviews15.9% (6,743)Meta-analyses1.1% (459)Randomized controlled trials2.1% (897)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 42,341 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews6,74315.9%
Meta-analyses4591.1%
Randomized controlled trials8972.1%

Method: PubMed query "Cost of Illness"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in clinical research

Research methods determine how much a result can be trusted. Randomized trials guard against confounding, systematic reviews and meta-analyses combine many studies, and observational designs are valuable but can show only association. Reporting standards, trial registration and pre-specified outcomes reduce bias. When reading about a method, ask what problem it is designed to solve and which problems it does not solve.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Global, regional, and national burden of road injuries 1990-2023: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023
GBD 2023 Road Injuries Collaborators
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 42476159 · DOI · PMC13487794
Global and regional progress towards reduced burden of oral conditions between 2019 and 2023: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023
GBD 2023 Oral Disorders Collaborators
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 42612648 · DOI · PMC13501145
Global economic burden of depression in 154 countries from 2025 to 2050
Cao Z, Luo Y, Jiao L, Chen W, Prettner K, Kuhn M, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 42521818 · DOI · PMC13577905

Global, regional, and national burden of road injuries 1990-2023: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023 [1]

Research article GBD 2023 Road Injuries Collaborators · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundRoad injuries are a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide.
Closing excerpt
FundingGates Foundation.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (414 words)

BackgroundRoad injuries are a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Years of international efforts have aimed to strengthen policy engagement, including the 2020 UN General Assembly's proclamation of the Second Decade of Action for Road Safety (2021-30), targeting a 50% reduction in road traffic deaths and serious injuries by 2030. The aim of this study is to provide estimates to monitor progress and identify intervention gaps.MethodsAs part of the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2023, we estimated incidence, mortality, and morbidity of road injuries for 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2023. Four road injury types and 47 nature-of-injury categories were examined. Morbidity and mortality data from clinical records, vital registration, and police reports were harmonised using meta-analytic techniques to ensure consistency and correct for systematic bias. Incidence was modelled with the meta-regression tool Disease Modelling-Meta-Regression version 2.1 and cause-specific mortality with the Cause of Death Ensemble model, both incorporating location-specific covariates to support interpolation. Years of life lived with disability (YLDs) were estimated from the prevalence and severity of the nature of road injury, and years of life lost (YLLs) from the number of cause-specific deaths multiplied by the standard life expectancy at the age of death. Disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) were the sum of YLLs and YLDs. All metrics were calculated with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs).FindingsIn 2023, there were 50·9 million (95% UI 46·1-56·1) road injury incident cases, 1·34 million (1·04-1·58) deaths, and 75·3 million (59·8-89·2) DALYs globally. Road injuries were the leading global cause of death among males aged 10-39 years. Between 1990 and 2023, age-standardised incidence decreased by 38·3% (95% UI 36·9-39·7) and mortality decreased by 32·3% (6·1-49·0), but progress varied widely by World Bank income group. Mortality in low-income countries (43·8 [95% UI 31·7-56·0] deaths per 100 000 population) was approximately six times higher than in high-income countries (7·5 [7·1-7·9] deaths per 100 000), despite the high-income countries showing the highest age-standardised incidence rates (858·1 [95% UI 781·9-947·1] cases per 100 000). In the past decade, many countries achieved notable reductions in road injuries, but others, including Ghana and the USA, saw increases. More severe injuries tended to occur in low-income and middle-income countries.InterpretationAlthough global incidence, mortality, and DALY rates from road injuries have declined, progress remains uneven, with pronounced disparities across income groups reflecting systemic inadequacies in infrastructure, vehicle standards, enforcement, and post-crash care. Strengthening emergency response, improving road design, enforcing safety measures, and adapting policies to the evolving demographics remain essential.FundingGates Foundation.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42476159 · DOI · PMC13487794

Global and regional progress towards reduced burden of oral conditions between 2019 and 2023: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023 [2]

Research article GBD 2023 Oral Disorders Collaborators · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundWHO's Global Oral Health Action Plan (GOHAP) targets include a 10% relative reduction in the combined prevalence of main oral conditions by 2030.
Closing excerpt
FundingThe Gates Foundation.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (380 words)

BackgroundWHO's Global Oral Health Action Plan (GOHAP) targets include a 10% relative reduction in the combined prevalence of main oral conditions by 2030. The first GOHAP evaluation was planned for 2023, with subsequent evaluations scheduled for 2026 and 2030. The aim of this systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2023 was to evaluate global and regional progress (2019-23) towards this target and related complementary indicators.MethodsUsing modelled estimates from epidemiological surveys and registries in 204 countries and territories, we estimated the age-standardised prevalence of untreated caries in deciduous and permanent teeth, severe periodontitis, edentulism, other oral disorders and orofacial clefts, and the age-standardised incidence of lip and oral cavity cancer. Progress towards GOHAP targets was measured by comparing the percentage change from 2019 to 2023 in the above indicators against the stated GOHAP target of a 10% relative reduction.FindingsGlobally, the age-standardised prevalence of main oral conditions declined (-1·55% [95% uncertainty interval -2·32 to -0·82]) between 2019 and 2023, but global cases increased by 3·07% (2·32 to 3·75), from 3·62 billion (3·35 to 3·95) to 3·73 billion (3·45 to 4·06). Among complementary indicators, reductions in age-standardised prevalence were observed for untreated caries in permanent teeth (-1·99% [-2·49 to -1·40]) whereas the age-standardised incidence of lip and oral cavity cancer increased (8·35% [0·13 to 16·32]), as did the age-standardised prevalence of orofacial clefts (2·25% [0·77 to 3·83]). Progress was heterogeneous across GBD super-regions, with south Asia having the largest reductions in the age-standardised prevalence of main oral conditions (-3·34% [-4·95 to -1·80]) and untreated caries in deciduous teeth (-9·09% [-17·62 to -0·08]). Sub-Saharan Africa showed the largest increase in prevalent cases of main oral conditions (9·51% [8·09-10·94]) and age-standardised incidence of lip and oral cavity cancer (14·86% [1·19-32·45]). The high-income super-region had an increase in the age-standardised prevalence of main oral conditions (1·24% [0·56-1·96]) and untreated caries in deciduous teeth (9·21% [6·60-11·89]).InterpretationOur modelled estimates of global trends in the prevalence of oral conditions from 2019 to 2023 suggest that early progress is modest and, at the current pace, insufficient to meet the 2030 GOHAP targets. Accelerated, equity-focused prevention and integration of essential oral health-care services within primary care and universal health coverage are needed, alongside strengthened oral cancer control and congenital anomaly care.FundingThe Gates Foundation.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42612648 · DOI · PMC13501145

Global economic burden of depression in 154 countries from 2025 to 2050 [3]

Research article Cao Z, Luo Y, Jiao L, Chen W, Prettner K, Kuhn M, et al. · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Depression is a major contributor to the global burden of diseases with substantial socioeconomic consequences.
Closing excerpt
Reducing the health burden of depression could yield economic returns by supporting productivity and capital accumulation.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (202 words)

Depression is a major contributor to the global burden of diseases with substantial socioeconomic consequences. Here, to estimate the economic effects of depression, we developed a macroeconomic model using data from the World Bank and Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. The model estimated the impact of depression on labor force participation, educational attainment and work experience, adjusted for age and sex. The projected global economic burden from 2025 to 2050 is estimated at US$12 trillion (2024 US dollars), representing 0.460% of annual global gross domestic product. When suicide-related deaths attributable to depression are accounted for, based on an assumed 60% attribution rate representing the upper bound of estimates in the literature, the overall economic burden increases to US$14 trillion. The highest economic burdens are observed in the United States and China. Relative to regional gross domestic product, the impact is greatest in North America. Reduced labor force participation and productivity were identified as the predominant drivers of this cost. The macroeconomic burden of depression is substantial and inequitably distributed globally. These findings underscore the importance of addressing depression as a public health and economic concern. Reducing the health burden of depression could yield economic returns by supporting productivity and capital accumulation.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42521818 · DOI · PMC13577905

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis [4]
    Wong WL, Su X, Li X, Cheung CM, Klein R, Cheng CY, et al. · Lancet Glob Health · 2014 · cited 4,002 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study [5]
    Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, Nolte S, Ackerman I, Fransen M, et al. · Ann Rheum Dis · 2014 · cited 2,428 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 [6]
    GBD 2016 Alcohol Collaborators · Lancet · 2018 · cited 2,414 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study [7]
    GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators, Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study · Lancet Glob Health · 2021 · cited 2,250 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The long-term health consequences of child physical abuse, emotional abuse, and neglect: a systematic review and meta-analysis [8]
    Norman RE, Byambaa M, De R, Butchart A, Scott J, Vos T · PLoS Med · 2012 · cited 2,005 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Global Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy and Projection of Burden through 2045: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [9]
    Teo ZL, Tham YC, Yu M, Chee ML, Rim TH, Cheung N, et al. · Ophthalmology · 2021 · cited 1,690 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. GBD 2023 Road Injuries Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of road injuries 1990-2023: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023. . 2026. PMID 42476159 · DOI · PMC13487794
  2. GBD 2023 Oral Disorders Collaborators. Global and regional progress towards reduced burden of oral conditions between 2019 and 2023: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023. . 2026. PMID 42612648 · DOI · PMC13501145
  3. Cao Z, Luo Y, Jiao L, Chen W, Prettner K, Kuhn M, et al.. Global economic burden of depression in 154 countries from 2025 to 2050. . 2026. PMID 42521818 · DOI · PMC13577905
  4. Wong WL, Su X, Li X, Cheung CM, Klein R, Cheng CY, et al.. Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014. PMID 25104651 · DOI
  5. Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, Nolte S, Ackerman I, Fransen M, et al.. The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014. PMID 24553908 · DOI
  6. GBD 2016 Alcohol Collaborators. Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2018. PMID 30146330 · DOI · PMC6148333
  7. GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators, Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021. PMID 33275949 · DOI · PMC7820391
  8. Norman RE, Byambaa M, De R, Butchart A, Scott J, Vos T. The long-term health consequences of child physical abuse, emotional abuse, and neglect: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2012. PMID 23209385 · DOI · PMC3507962
  9. Teo ZL, Tham YC, Yu M, Chee ML, Rim TH, Cheung N, et al.. Global Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy and Projection of Burden through 2045: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2021. PMID 33940045 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Global Burden of DiseaseClinical Research
  • Symptom BurdenClinical Research
  • Public Health SurveillanceClinical Research
  • Health SurveysClinical Research
  • Risk AssessmentClinical Research
  • Patient Health QuestionnaireClinical Research

All 98 articles in Clinical Research →

At a glance

42,341
PubMed records on this heading
34%
published since 2020
6,743
review articles
897
randomized trials
9
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Global Burden of DiseaseClinical Research
  • Symptom BurdenClinical Research
  • Public Health SurveillanceClinical Research
  • Health SurveysClinical Research
  • Risk AssessmentClinical Research

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support