Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Colon
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Colon

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

The segment of large intestine between the cecum and the rectum.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (714 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The segment of large intestine between the cecum and the rectum. It includes the ascending colon; the transverse colon; the descending colon; and the sigmoid colon.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Appendix Epiploica; Omental Appendices; Appendices, Omental; Omental Appendix; Appendix, Omental; Taenia Coli.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Intestine, Large
Narrower topics
Colon, Ascending; Colon, Descending; Colon, Sigmoid; Colon, Transverse
See also
Colectomy; Colonoscopy; Colostomy

Related concepts

  • Large Intestine
  • Cecum
  • Rectum
  • Ascending Colon
  • Transverse Colon
  • Descending Colon
  • Sigmoid Colon

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 80,268 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Colon” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 11,696 of them (14.6%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 35,436 records.

Reviews account for 4,826 records (6.0%) and meta-analyses for 346. Randomized controlled trials number 1,582 (2.0%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 35,436 records; 2000-2009: 13,790 records; 2010-2019: 19,346 records; 2020 onward: 11,696 records35,436through 199913,7902000-200919,3462010-201911,6962020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199935,436
2000-200913,790
2010-201919,346
2020 onward11,696
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 6.0 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.4 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 2.0 percentReviews6.0% (4,826)Meta-analyses0.4% (346)Randomized controlled trials2.0% (1,582)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 80,268 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews4,8266.0%
Meta-analyses3460.4%
Randomized controlled trials1,5822.0%

Method: PubMed query "Colon"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
ATF6 activation alters colonic lipid metabolism causing tumour-associated microbial adaptation
Coleman OI, Sorbie A, Riva A, von Stern M, Kuhls S, Selegato DM, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
13cc by
PMID 40890536 · DOI · PMC12460170
Gut microbiota dysbiosis affects intestinal sensitivity through epithelium-to-neuron signaling: novel insights from a colon organoid-based model to improve visceral pain therapy
Margiotta F, Lucarini E, Toti A, Curti L, Masi A, Mello T, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
10cc by
PMID 40903878 · DOI · PMC12413070
Intrinsic chicory root fibers modulate colonic microbial butyrate-producing pathways and improve insulin sensitivity in individuals with obesity
Omary L, Canfora EE, Puhlmann ML, Gavriilidou A, Rijnaarts I, Holst JJ, et al.
2025Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
10cc by
PMID 40669445 · DOI · PMC12281436
Tissue and cellular spatiotemporal dynamics in colon aging
Daly AC, Cambuli F, Äijö T, Lötstedt B, Marjanovic ND, Fernandez S, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
9cc by
PMID 41125832 · DOI · PMC13461361

ATF6 activation alters colonic lipid metabolism causing tumour-associated microbial adaptation [1]

Research article Coleman OI, Sorbie A, Riva A, von Stern M, Kuhls S, Selegato DM, et al. · · 2025 · cited 13 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein responses contribute to cancer development, with activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) involved in microbiota-dependent tumorigenesis.
Closing excerpt
We postulate chronic ATF6 signalling to select for tumour-promoting microbiota by altering lipid metabolism.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (152 words)

Endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein responses contribute to cancer development, with activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) involved in microbiota-dependent tumorigenesis. Here we show the clinical relevance of ATF6 in individuals with early-onset and late colorectal cancer, and link ATF6 signalling to changes in lipid metabolism and intestinal microbiota. Transcriptional analysis in intestinal epithelial cells of ATF6 transgenic mice (nATF6IEC) identifies bacteria-specific changes in cellular metabolism enriched for fatty acid biosynthesis. Untargeted metabolomics and isotype labelling confirm ATF6-related enrichment of long-chain fatty acids in colonic tissue of humans, mice and organoids. FASN inhibition and microbiota transfer in germ-free nATF6IEC mice confirm the causal involvement of ATF6-induced lipid alterations in tumorigenesis. The selective expansion of tumour-relevant microbial taxa, including Desulfovibrio fairfieldensis, is mechanistically linked to long-chain fatty acid exposure using bioorthogonal non-canonical amino acid tagging, and growth analysis of Desulfovibrio isolates. We postulate chronic ATF6 signalling to select for tumour-promoting microbiota by altering lipid metabolism.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40890536 · DOI · PMC12460170

Gut microbiota dysbiosis affects intestinal sensitivity through epithelium-to-neuron signaling: novel insights from a colon organoid-based model to improve visceral pain therapy [2]

Research article Margiotta F, Lucarini E, Toti A, Curti L, Masi A, Mello T, et al. · · 2025 · cited 10 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Chronic gastrointestinal pain is a hallmark of most intestinal pathologies, yet effective treatments remain elusive given the complexity of the underlying mechanisms.
Closing excerpt
These findings provide novel insights into the role of gut epithelium in the modulation of sensory neuron excitability under dysbiosis conditions, emphasizing that targeting epithelial-neuronal signaling might represent a promising therapeutic strategy for visceral pain management.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (242 words)

Chronic gastrointestinal pain is a hallmark of most intestinal pathologies, yet effective treatments remain elusive given the complexity of the underlying mechanisms. Aiming to investigate the intestinal epithelium contribution to visceral pain modulation in dysbiosis context, we first demonstrated that intracolonic instillation of microbe-free fecal supernatants from mice with post-inflammatory dysbiosis induced by dextran sodium sulfate (FSDSS) provokes visceral hypersensitivity in recipient mice. Epithelium involvement in the response to FSDSS was analyzed through a novel in vitro approach comprising murine epithelial colon organoids and primary dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons. FSDSS treatment induced growth and metabolic impairment in colon organoids, which revealed a dysbiosis-driven epithelial dysfunction. Notably, the combination of FSDSS and conditioned medium from FSDSS-treated colon organoids induced an increase in DRG neuron intrinsic excitability, along with greater immunoreactivity to c-Fos and calcitonin-gene related peptide, implicating an integrated role of both microbial and epithelial products in visceral sensitivity regulation. By investigating the underlying signaling, metabolomic analysis revealed reduced levels of short chain fatty acids in FSDSS, such as butyrate, acetate, valerate, and propionate. Moreover, transcriptomic analysis of FSDSS-treated colon organoids showed the dysregulated expression of several signaling factors by which intestinal epithelium may modulate sensory neuron excitability, including proteases, cytokines, neuromodulators, growth factors, and hormones. These findings provide novel insights into the role of gut epithelium in the modulation of sensory neuron excitability under dysbiosis conditions, emphasizing that targeting epithelial-neuronal signaling might represent a promising therapeutic strategy for visceral pain management.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40903878 · DOI · PMC12413070

Intrinsic chicory root fibers modulate colonic microbial butyrate-producing pathways and improve insulin sensitivity in individuals with obesity [3]

Randomized controlled trial Omary L, Canfora EE, Puhlmann ML, Gavriilidou A, Rijnaarts I, Holst JJ, et al. · · 2025 · cited 10 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Type 2 diabetes and obesity have become major public health concerns.
Closing excerpt
gov (NCT04714944).
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (172 words)

Type 2 diabetes and obesity have become major public health concerns. Growing evidence suggests that increased dietary fiber intake, through its interaction with the gut microbiota, may help prevent these diseases. Here, we demonstrate in a 12-week randomized, placebo-controlled trial in individuals at risk for type 2 diabetes that intake of an intrinsic fiber product, consisting of entire plant cells, tended to improve peripheral insulin sensitivity (p = 0.085), increased whole-body insulin sensitivity (p = 0.032), reduced circulating triglycerides (p = 0.049), and tended to reduce intrahepatic lipid content (p = 0.063), along with an increased proportion of small adipocytes (p = 0.008). Phylogenetic and metagenomic analysis revealed that these outcomes coincided with increased levels of fiber-degrading Bifidobacterium spp. and butyrate-producing Anaerostipes spp. and a functional shift toward a distal butyrogenic trophic chain while the best responding individuals had increased levels of pectin degraders that may produce propionate. Our findings demonstrate the pivotal role of slowly fermented, intrinsic plant cell fibers in improving cardiometabolic health. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04714944).

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40669445 · DOI · PMC12281436

Tissue and cellular spatiotemporal dynamics in colon aging [4]

Research article Daly AC, Cambuli F, Äijö T, Lötstedt B, Marjanovic ND, Fernandez S, et al. · · 2026 · cited 9 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Tissue structure and molecular circuitry in the colon can be profoundly impacted by systemic age-related effects but many of the underlying molecular cues remain unclear.
Closing excerpt
Our multimodal framework for the investigation of cell and tissue organization can aid in the understanding of cellular roles in tissue-level pathology.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (148 words)

Tissue structure and molecular circuitry in the colon can be profoundly impacted by systemic age-related effects but many of the underlying molecular cues remain unclear. Here, we build a cellular and spatial atlas of the colon across three anatomical regions and 11 age groups, encompassing ~1,500 mouse gut tissues profiled by spatial transcriptomics and ~400,000 single nucleus RNA-sequencing profiles. We develop a computational framework, cSplotch, which learns a hierarchical Bayesian model of spatially resolved cellular expression associated with age, tissue region and sex by leveraging histological features to share information across tissue samples and data modalities. Using this model, we identify cellular and molecular gradients along the adult colonic tract and across the main crypt axis and multicellular programs associated with aging in the large intestine. Our multimodal framework for the investigation of cell and tissue organization can aid in the understanding of cellular roles in tissue-level pathology.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41125832 · DOI · PMC13461361

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations: 2018 [5]
    Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M, Nygren J, Demartines N, Francis N, et al. · World J Surg · 2019 · cited 1,556 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Colonocyte metabolism shapes the gut microbiota [6]
    Litvak Y, Byndloss MX, Bäumler AJ · Science · 2018 · cited 589 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The microbiome and gut homeostasis [7]
    Lee JY, Tsolis RM, Bäumler AJ · Science · 2022 · cited 332 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Ulcerative Colitis [8]
    Feuerstein JD, Moss AC, Farraye FA · Mayo Clin Proc · 2019 · cited 327 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Polyphenols-Gut Microbiota Interrelationship: A Transition to a New Generation of Prebiotics [9]
    Plamada D, Vodnar DC · Nutrients · 2021 · cited 254 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps [10]
    ASGE Technology Committee, Abu Dayyeh BK, Thosani N, Konda V, Wallace MB, Rex DK, et al. · Gastrointest Endosc · 2015 · cited 249 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Coleman OI, Sorbie A, Riva A, von Stern M, Kuhls S, Selegato DM, et al.. ATF6 activation alters colonic lipid metabolism causing tumour-associated microbial adaptation. . 2025. PMID 40890536 · DOI · PMC12460170
  2. Margiotta F, Lucarini E, Toti A, Curti L, Masi A, Mello T, et al.. Gut microbiota dysbiosis affects intestinal sensitivity through epithelium-to-neuron signaling: novel insights from a colon organoid-based model to improve visceral pain therapy. . 2025. PMID 40903878 · DOI · PMC12413070
  3. Omary L, Canfora EE, Puhlmann ML, Gavriilidou A, Rijnaarts I, Holst JJ, et al.. Intrinsic chicory root fibers modulate colonic microbial butyrate-producing pathways and improve insulin sensitivity in individuals with obesity. . 2025. PMID 40669445 · DOI · PMC12281436
  4. Daly AC, Cambuli F, Äijö T, Lötstedt B, Marjanovic ND, Fernandez S, et al.. Tissue and cellular spatiotemporal dynamics in colon aging. . 2026. PMID 41125832 · DOI · PMC13461361
  5. Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M, Nygren J, Demartines N, Francis N, et al.. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations: 2018. World J Surg. 2019. PMID 30426190 · DOI
  6. Litvak Y, Byndloss MX, Bäumler AJ. Colonocyte metabolism shapes the gut microbiota. Science. 2018. PMID 30498100 · DOI · PMC6296223
  7. Lee JY, Tsolis RM, Bäumler AJ. The microbiome and gut homeostasis. Science. 2022. PMID 35771903 · DOI
  8. Feuerstein JD, Moss AC, Farraye FA. Ulcerative Colitis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019. PMID 31272578 · DOI
  9. Plamada D, Vodnar DC. Polyphenols-Gut Microbiota Interrelationship: A Transition to a New Generation of Prebiotics. Nutrients. 2021. PMID 35011012 · DOI · PMC8747136
  10. ASGE Technology Committee, Abu Dayyeh BK, Thosani N, Konda V, Wallace MB, Rex DK, et al.. ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015. PMID 25597420 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • RectumAnatomy and Physiology
  • CecumAnatomy and Physiology
  • Anal CanalAnatomy and Physiology
  • IleumAnatomy and Physiology
  • JejunumAnatomy and Physiology
  • IntestinesAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

80,268
PubMed records on this heading
15%
published since 2020
4,826
review articles
1,582
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • RectumAnatomy and Physiology
  • CecumAnatomy and Physiology
  • Anal CanalAnatomy and Physiology
  • IleumAnatomy and Physiology
  • JejunumAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support