Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Immunology›Chronic Urticaria
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Chronic Urticaria

Immunology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

Wheals (urticaria) and/or angioedema presented with daily symptoms lasting for more than 6 weeks.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (905 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Wheals (urticaria) and/or angioedema presented with daily symptoms lasting for more than 6 weeks. It may be classified into chronic spontaneous and chronic inducible urticaria depending on whether a specific trigger can be linked to the development of vascular reaction.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Chronic Urticarias; Urticaria, Chronic; Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria; Chronic Spontaneous Urticarias; Spontaneous Urticaria, Chronic; Urticaria, Chronic Spontaneous; Idiopathic Chronic Urticaria; Chronic Urticaria, Idiopathic.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Urticaria; Chronic Disease
Narrower topics
Chronic Inducible Urticaria

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 2,038 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Chronic Urticaria” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 1,457 of them (71.5%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2020 onward with 1,457 records.

Reviews account for 435 records (21.3%) and meta-analyses for 62. Randomized controlled trials number 63 (3.1%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 0 records; 2000-2009: 14 records; 2010-2019: 610 records; 2020 onward: 1,457 records0through 1999142000-20096102010-20191,4572020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19990
2000-200914
2010-2019610
2020 onward1,457
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 21.3 percent; Meta-analyses: 3.0 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 3.1 percentReviews21.3% (435)Meta-analyses3.0% (62)Randomized controlled trials3.1% (63)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 2,038 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews43521.3%
Meta-analyses623.0%
Randomized controlled trials633.1%

Method: PubMed query "Chronic Urticaria"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in immunology

Immune responses are studied in model organisms, in cells from donors and in patients, and the same pathway can behave differently across these settings. Mouse immune systems differ from human ones in important ways, and blood measurements may not reflect what happens in tissues. Clinical conclusions about immune-mediated disease or immunotherapy come mainly from controlled trials and long-term cohorts. Check the species and tissue studied, whether markers were linked to outcomes patients notice, and the follow-up time.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
The mechanism of NLRP3 inflammasome activation and its pharmacological inhibitors
Zhan X, Li Q, Xu G, Xiao X, Bai Z
2022Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
138cc by
PMID 36741414 · DOI · PMC9889537
Systematic Review of Safety and Efficacy of IL-1-Targeted Biologics in Treating Immune-Mediated Disorders
Arnold DD, Yalamanoglu A, Boyman O
2022Systematic review
Design not recorded in structured metadata
112cc by
PMID 35874710 · DOI · PMC9296857
Mechanisms of NLRP3 activation and inhibition elucidated by functional analysis of disease-associated variants
Feng S, Wierzbowski MC, Hrovat-Schaale K, Dumortier A, Zhang Y, Zyulina M, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
84cc by
PMID 39930093 · DOI · PMC11876074
Unmet Needs in Treatment Escalation for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Findings From the CURE Registry
Kolkhir P, Salameh P, Zajac M, Kasperska-Zajac A, Giménez-Arnau A, Puertolas M, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
6cc by
PMID 41532642 · DOI · PMC13466147

The mechanism of NLRP3 inflammasome activation and its pharmacological inhibitors [1]

Review article Zhan X, Li Q, Xu G, Xiao X, Bai Z · · 2022 · cited 138 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
NLRP3 (NOD-, LRR-, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3) is a cytosolic pattern recognition receptor (PRR) that recognizes multiple pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs).
Closing excerpt
The review summarizes the latest advances in the mechanism of NLRP3 inflammasome activation and its pharmacological inhibitors.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (117 words)

NLRP3 (NOD-, LRR-, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3) is a cytosolic pattern recognition receptor (PRR) that recognizes multiple pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). Once activated, NLRP3 initiates the inflammasome assembly together with the adaptor ASC and the effector caspase-1, leading to caspase-1 activation and subsequent cleavage of IL-1β and IL-18. Aberrant NLRP3 inflammasome activation is linked with the pathogenesis of multiple inflammatory diseases, such as cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes, type 2 diabetes, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, gout, and neurodegenerative diseases. Thus, NLRP3 is an important therapeutic target, and researchers are putting a lot of effort into developing its inhibitors. The review summarizes the latest advances in the mechanism of NLRP3 inflammasome activation and its pharmacological inhibitors.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 36741414 · DOI · PMC9889537

Systematic Review of Safety and Efficacy of IL-1-Targeted Biologics in Treating Immune-Mediated Disorders [2]

Systematic review Arnold DD, Yalamanoglu A, Boyman O · · 2022 · cited 112 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundThe cytokine interleukin (IL)-1 plays a pivotal role in immune-mediated disorders, particularly in autoinflammatory diseases.
Closing excerpt
uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42021228547.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (316 words)

BackgroundThe cytokine interleukin (IL)-1 plays a pivotal role in immune-mediated disorders, particularly in autoinflammatory diseases. Targeting this cytokine proved to be efficacious in treating numerous IL-1-mediated pathologies. Currently, three IL-1 blockers are approved, namely anakinra, canakinumab and rilonacept, and two additional ones are expected to receive approval, namely gevokizumab and bermekimab. However, there is no systematic review on the safety and efficacy of these biologics in treating immune-mediated diseases.ObjectiveTo evaluate safety and efficacy of anakinra, canakinumab, rilonacept, gevokizumab, and bermekimab for the treatment of immune-mediated disorders compared to placebo, standard-of-care treatment or other biologics.MethodsThe PRISMA checklist guided the reporting of the data. We searched the PubMed database between 1 January 1984 and 31 December 2020 focusing on immune-mediated disorders. Our PubMed literature search identified 7363 articles. After screening titles and abstracts for the inclusion and exclusion criteria and assessing full texts, 75 articles were included in a narrative synthesis.ResultsAnakinra was both efficacious and safe in treating cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes (CAPS), familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), gout, macrophage activation syndrome, recurrent pericarditis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA). Conversely, anakinra failed to show efficacy in graft-versus-host disease, Sjögren's syndrome, and type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Canakinumab showed efficacy in treating CAPS, FMF, gout, hyper-IgD syndrome, RA, Schnitzler's syndrome, sJIA, and TNF receptor-associated periodic syndrome. However, use of canakinumab in the treatment of adult-onset Still's disease and T1DM revealed negative results. Rilonacept was efficacious and safe for the treatment of CAPS, FMF, recurrent pericarditis, and sJIA. Contrarily, Rilonacept did not reach superiority compared to placebo in the treatment of T1DM. Gevokizumab showed mixed results in treating Behçet's disease-associated uveitis and no benefit when assessed in T1DM. Bermekimab achieved promising results in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa.ConclusionsThis systematic review of IL-1-targeting biologics summarizes the current state of research, safety, and clinical efficacy of anakinra, bermekimab, canakinumab, gevokizumab, and rilonacept in treating immune-mediated disorders.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42021228547.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35874710 · DOI · PMC9296857

Mechanisms of NLRP3 activation and inhibition elucidated by functional analysis of disease-associated variants [3]

Research article Feng S, Wierzbowski MC, Hrovat-Schaale K, Dumortier A, Zhang Y, Zyulina M, et al. · · 2025 · cited 84 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The NLRP3 inflammasome is a multiprotein complex that mediates caspase-1 activation and the release of proinflammatory cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18.
Closing excerpt
Overall, our study provides improved diagnosis for patients with CAPS, mechanistic insight into the activation of NLRP3 and stratification of patients for the future application of targeted therapeutics.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (280 words)

The NLRP3 inflammasome is a multiprotein complex that mediates caspase-1 activation and the release of proinflammatory cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18. Gain-of-function variants in the gene encoding NLRP3 (also called cryopyrin) lead to constitutive inflammasome activation and excessive IL-1β production in cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes (CAPS). Here we present functional screening and automated analysis of 534 NLRP3 variants from the international INFEVERS registry and the ClinVar database. This resource captures the effect of NLRP3 variants on ASC speck formation spontaneously, at low temperature, after inflammasome stimulation and with the specific NLRP3 inhibitor MCC950. Most notably, our analysis facilitated the updated classification of NLRP3 variants in INFEVERS. Structural analysis suggested multiple mechanisms by which CAPS variants activate NLRP3, including enhanced ATP binding, stabilizing the active NLRP3 conformation, destabilizing the inactive NLRP3 complex and promoting oligomerization of the pyrin domain. Furthermore, we identified pathogenic variants that can hypersensitize the activation of NLRP3 in response to nigericin and cold temperature exposure. We also found that most CAPS-related NLRP3 variants can be inhibited by MCC950; however, NLRP3 variants with changes to proline affecting helices near the inhibitor binding site are resistant to MCC950, as are variants in the pyrin domain, which likely trigger activation directly with the pyrin domain of ASC. Our findings could help stratify the CAPS population for NLRP3 inhibitor clinical trials and our automated methodologies can be implemented for molecules with a different mechanism of activation and in laboratories worldwide that are interested in adding new functionally validated NLRP3 variants to the resource. Overall, our study provides improved diagnosis for patients with CAPS, mechanistic insight into the activation of NLRP3 and stratification of patients for the future application of targeted therapeutics.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39930093 · DOI · PMC11876074

Unmet Needs in Treatment Escalation for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Findings From the CURE Registry [4]

Research article Kolkhir P, Salameh P, Zajac M, Kasperska-Zajac A, Giménez-Arnau A, Puertolas M, et al. · · 2026 · cited 6 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundMany patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) remain symptomatic despite receiving second-generation H1-antihistamines (sgH1-AH).
Closing excerpt
Many patients with poorly controlled CSU do not receive guideline-recommended treatment escalation and remain symptomatic on their current treatments, which deserves further attention.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (192 words)

BackgroundMany patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) remain symptomatic despite receiving second-generation H1-antihistamines (sgH1-AH). This data analysis from the Chronic Urticaria Registry (CURE) aimed to describe treatment patterns and identify unmet needs in real-world practice.MethodsCURE is an international, prospective registry of patients with chronic urticaria. Treatment responses were categorized as Urticaria Control Test (UCT) changes from baseline (BL) to 6-month follow-up (FU). Complete response was defined as UCT = 16 with a ≥ 3-point increase.ResultsData were available from 3995 adult patients with CSU at BL and 1288 at FU with evaluable UCT. After treatment escalation from BL to FU, 5.3% (no treatment to licensed-dose sgH1-AH), 6.0% (licensed-dose sgH1-AH to up-dosed sgH1-AH), and 28.4% (any dose sgH1-AH to omalizumab) achieved complete response. Factors associated with a lower probability of treatment escalation at FU were UCT ≥ 12 and omalizumab treatment at BL (both p 1-AH (p = 0.031).ConclusionAppropriate treatment escalation improves CSU control, although only about a quarter of patients achieve a complete response, indicating the need for novel treatments. Many patients with poorly controlled CSU do not receive guideline-recommended treatment escalation and remain symptomatic on their current treatments, which deserves further attention.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41532642 · DOI · PMC13466147

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Prevalence of chronic urticaria in children and adults across the globe: Systematic review with meta-analysis [5]
    Fricke J, Ávila G, Keller T, Weller K, Lau S, Maurer M, et al. · Allergy · 2020 · cited 305 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Urticaria [6]
    Kolkhir P, Giménez-Arnau AM, Kulthanan K, Peter J, Metz M, Maurer M · Nat Rev Dis Primers · 2022 · cited 278 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The global burden of chronic urticaria for the patient and society [7]
    Gonçalo M, Gimenéz-Arnau A, Al-Ahmad M, Ben-Shoshan M, Bernstein JA, Ensina LF, et al. · Br J Dermatol · 2021 · cited 274 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria [8]
    Kolkhir P, Muñoz M, Asero R, Ferrer M, Kocatürk E, Metz M, et al. · J Allergy Clin Immunol · 2022 · cited 221 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Canakinumab [9]
    Dhimolea E · MAbs · 2010 · cited 221 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article CAPS and NLRP3 [10]
    Booshehri LM, Hoffman HM · J Clin Immunol · 2019 · cited 193 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Zhan X, Li Q, Xu G, Xiao X, Bai Z. The mechanism of NLRP3 inflammasome activation and its pharmacological inhibitors. . 2022. PMID 36741414 · DOI · PMC9889537
  2. Arnold DD, Yalamanoglu A, Boyman O. Systematic Review of Safety and Efficacy of IL-1-Targeted Biologics in Treating Immune-Mediated Disorders. . 2022. PMID 35874710 · DOI · PMC9296857
  3. Feng S, Wierzbowski MC, Hrovat-Schaale K, Dumortier A, Zhang Y, Zyulina M, et al.. Mechanisms of NLRP3 activation and inhibition elucidated by functional analysis of disease-associated variants. . 2025. PMID 39930093 · DOI · PMC11876074
  4. Kolkhir P, Salameh P, Zajac M, Kasperska-Zajac A, Giménez-Arnau A, Puertolas M, et al.. Unmet Needs in Treatment Escalation for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Findings From the CURE Registry. . 2026. PMID 41532642 · DOI · PMC13466147
  5. Fricke J, Ávila G, Keller T, Weller K, Lau S, Maurer M, et al.. Prevalence of chronic urticaria in children and adults across the globe: Systematic review with meta-analysis. Allergy. 2020. PMID 31494963 · DOI
  6. Kolkhir P, Giménez-Arnau AM, Kulthanan K, Peter J, Metz M, Maurer M. Urticaria. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022. PMID 36109590 · DOI
  7. Gonçalo M, Gimenéz-Arnau A, Al-Ahmad M, Ben-Shoshan M, Bernstein JA, Ensina LF, et al.. The global burden of chronic urticaria for the patient and society. Br J Dermatol. 2021. PMID 32956489 · DOI
  8. Kolkhir P, Muñoz M, Asero R, Ferrer M, Kocatürk E, Metz M, et al.. Autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022. PMID 35667749 · DOI
  9. Dhimolea E. Canakinumab. MAbs. 2010. PMID 20065636 · DOI · PMC2828573
  10. Booshehri LM, Hoffman HM. CAPS and NLRP3. J Clin Immunol. 2019. PMID 31077002 · DOI · PMC8575304

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Cold UrticariaImmunology
  • UrticariaImmunology
  • AngioedemaCardiovascular Medicine
  • AnaphylaxisImmunology
  • Eosinophilic EsophagitisImmunology
  • AsthmaImmunology

All 90 articles in Immunology →

At a glance

2,038
PubMed records on this heading
71%
published since 2020
435
review articles
63
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Cold UrticariaImmunology
  • UrticariaImmunology
  • AngioedemaCardiovascular Medicine
  • AnaphylaxisImmunology
  • Eosinophilic EsophagitisImmunology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support