Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (899 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Derivative of 7-dehydroxycholesterol formed by ultraviolet rays breaking of the c9-c10 bond. It differs from ergocalciferol in having a single bond between C22 and C23 and lacking a methyl group at C24.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Vitamin D 3; Vitamin D3; (3 beta,5Z,7E)-9,10-Secocholesta-5,7,10(19)-trien-3-ol; Calciol; Cholecalciferols.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Cholestenes; Sterols; Vitamin D
- Narrower topics
- Hydroxycholecalciferols
- See also
- Receptors, Calcitriol
Related concepts
- Ultraviolet Rays
- C9-C10
- Ergocalciferol
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 30,521 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Cholecalciferol” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 3,939 of them (12.9%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 13,797 records.
Reviews account for 2,885 records (9.5%) and meta-analyses for 157. Randomized controlled trials number 2,469 (8.1%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 13,797 |
| 2000-2009 | 5,495 |
| 2010-2019 | 7,290 |
| 2020 onward | 3,939 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 2,885 | 9.5% |
| Meta-analyses | 157 | 0.5% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 2,469 | 8.1% |
Method: PubMed query "Cholecalciferol"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals
Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
Comparison of the Effect of Daily Vitamin D2 and Vitamin D3 Supplementation on Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentration (Total 25(OH)D, 25(OH)D2, and 25(OH)D3) and Importance of Body Mass Index: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundTwo previous meta-analyses showed smaller differences between vitamin D3 and vitamin D2 in raising serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and a consistently high heterogeneity when only including daily dosing studies.
- Closing excerpt
- This study was registered in PROSPERO as CRD42021272674.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (300 words)
BackgroundTwo previous meta-analyses showed smaller differences between vitamin D3 and vitamin D2 in raising serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and a consistently high heterogeneity when only including daily dosing studies.ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare more frequently dosed vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 in improving total 25(OH)D and determine the concomitant effect of response modifiers on heterogeneity, and secondly, to compare the vitamin D2-associated change in 25(OH)D2 with the vitamin D3-associated change in 25(OH)D3.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and the Web of Science Core collection were searched for randomized controlled trials of vitamin D2 compared with vitamin D3, daily or once/twice weekly dosed. After screening for eligibility, relevant data were extracted for meta-analyses to determine the standardized mean difference when different methods of 25(OH)D analyses were used. Otherwise, the weighted mean difference (WMD) was determined.ResultsOverall, the results based on 20 comparative studies showed vitamin D3 to be superior to vitamin D2 in raising total 25(OH)D concentrations, but vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 had a similar positive impact on their corresponding 25(OH)D hydroxylated forms. The WMD in change in total 25(OH)D based on 12 daily dosed vitamin D2-vitamin D3 comparisons, analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, was 10.39 nmol/L (40%) lower for the vitamin D2 group compared with the vitamin D3 group (95% confidence interval: -14.62, -6.16; I2 = 64%; P 25 kg/m2 (P = 0.99). However, information on BMI was only available in 13/17 daily dosed comparisons.ConclusionsVitamin D3 leads to a greater increase of 25(OH)D than vitamin D2, even if limited to daily dose studies, but vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 had similar positive impacts on their corresponding 25(OH)D hydroxylated forms. Next to baseline 25(OH)D concentration, BMI should be considered when comparing the effect of daily vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 supplementation on total 25(OH)D concentration. This study was registered in PROSPERO as CRD42021272674.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37865222 · DOI · PMC10831883
Vitamin D3 inhibits p38 MAPK and senescence-associated inflammatory mediator secretion by senescent fibroblasts that impacts immune responses during ageing [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Vitamin D3 replacement in older insufficient adults significantly improves their antigen-specific varicella zoster virus (VZV) cutaneous immunity.
- Closing excerpt
- Vitamin D3 supplementation therefore may enhance immunity during ageing in part by blocking p38 MAPK signalling and in turn inhibit SASP production from senescent cells in vivo.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (126 words)
Vitamin D3 replacement in older insufficient adults significantly improves their antigen-specific varicella zoster virus (VZV) cutaneous immunity. However, the mechanisms involved in this enhancement of cutaneous immunity are not known. Here, we show for the first time that vitamin D3 blocks the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) production by senescent fibroblasts by partially inhibiting the p38 MAPK pathway. Furthermore, transcriptomic analysis of skin biopsies from older subjects after vitamin D3 supplementation shows that vitamin D3 inhibits the same inflammatory pathways in response to saline as the specific p38 inhibitor, losmapimod, which also enhances immunity in the skin of older subjects. Vitamin D3 supplementation therefore may enhance immunity during ageing in part by blocking p38 MAPK signalling and in turn inhibit SASP production from senescent cells in vivo.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38287646 · DOI · PMC11019144
Role of Calcitriol and Vitamin D Receptor (VDR) Gene Polymorphisms in Alzheimer's Disease [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by amyloid beta (Aβ) buildup and neuronal degeneration.
- Closing excerpt
- This review summarizes the neuroprotective mechanism of calcitriol and the role of VDR polymorphisms in AD, and might help develop potential therapeutic strategies and markers for AD in the future.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (230 words)
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by amyloid beta (Aβ) buildup and neuronal degeneration. An association between low serum vitamin D levels and an increased risk of AD has been reported in several epidemiological studies. Calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol) is the active form of vitamin D, and is generated in the kidney and many other tissues/organs, including the brain. It is a steroid hormone that regulates important functions like calcium/phosphorous levels, bone mineralization, and immunomodulation, indicating its broader systemic significance. In addition, calcitriol confers neuroprotection by mitigating oxidative stress and neuroinflammation, promoting the clearance of Aβ, myelin formation, neurogenesis, neurotransmission, and autophagy. The receptors to which calcitriol binds (vitamin D receptors; VDRs) to exert its effects are distributed over many organs and tissues, representing other significant roles of calcitriol beyond sustaining bone health. The biological effects of calcitriol are manifested through genomic (classical) and non-genomic actions through different pathways. The first is a slow genomic effect involving nuclear VDR directly affecting gene transcription. The association of AD with VDR gene polymorphisms relies on the changes in vitamin D consumption, which lowers VDR expression, protein stability, and binding affinity. It leads to the altered expression of genes involved in the neuroprotective effects of calcitriol. This review summarizes the neuroprotective mechanism of calcitriol and the role of VDR polymorphisms in AD, and might help develop potential therapeutic strategies and markers for AD in the future.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38732025 · DOI · PMC11084202
Eight-Week Vitamin D3 Supplementation at 4000 IU/Day Was Not Associated with Further Improvements in Speed or Power Performance in Professional Female Soccer Players: A Randomized Controlled Trial [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Background: Vitamin D is involved in musculoskeletal function, but evidence that supplementation improves athletic performance remains inconsistent, particularly in athletes with sufficient baseline vitamin D status.
- Closing excerpt
- gov (NCT07641075) on 8 June 2026.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (243 words)
Background: Vitamin D is involved in musculoskeletal function, but evidence that supplementation improves athletic performance remains inconsistent, particularly in athletes with sufficient baseline vitamin D status. Methods: In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, 18 professional female soccer players were randomized during the autumn preparatory period (August-September) to receive vitamin D3 (4000 IU/day; n = 9) or placebo (n = 9) for eight weeks. Outcomes included total serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D] concentrations, hematological variables, RAST total sprint time, 5- and 30-m sprint performance, and countermovement-jump outcomes. Results: At baseline, after summer exposure, 25% of participants had insufficient or deficient 25(OH)D concentrations (≤30 ng/mL). The remaining cohort (75%) had sufficient 25(OH)D concentrations (>30 ng/mL). After eight weeks, no statistically significant between-group differences were observed in vitamin D metabolites, hematological variables, or performance outcomes (Δ25(OH)D: SG +12.4 ± 8.2 ng/mL vs. PG +3.1 ± 6.5 ng/mL; p = 0.12). RAST total sprint time (p = 0.001) and 30-m sprint performance (p = 0.005) improved over time. Conclusions: Vitamin D3 supplementation at 4000 IU/day for eight weeks was not associated with additional improvements in muscle strength, sprint performance, or countermovement-jump outcomes compared with placebo. Because most participants had sufficient baseline 25(OH)D concentrations, larger trials in female athletes with confirmed vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency are needed to determine whether individualized supplementation or longer intervention periods provide additional physiological or performance-related benefits. The trial was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07641075) on 8 June 2026.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42588083 · DOI · PMC13467743
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article The role of vitamin D in reducing cancer risk and progression [5]
- Research article From vitamin D to hormone D: fundamentals of the vitamin D endocrine system essential for good health [6]
- Research article Comparison of vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 supplementation in raising serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status: a systematic review and meta-analysis [7]
- Research article Vitamin D receptor (VDR)-mediated actions of 1α,25(OH)₂vitamin D₃: genomic and non-genomic mechanisms [8]
- Research article Regulation of phosphate homeostasis by PTH, vitamin D, and FGF23 [9]
- Research article Mechanisms of the anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory actions of vitamin D [10]
References
- van den Heuvel EG, Lips P, Schoonmade LJ, Lanham-New SA, van Schoor NM. Comparison of the Effect of Daily Vitamin D2 and Vitamin D3 Supplementation on Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentration (Total 25(OH)D, 25(OH)D2, and 25(OH)D3) and Importance of Body Mass Index: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. . 2024. PMID 37865222 · DOI · PMC10831883
- Sayegh S, Fantecelle CH, Laphanuwat P, Subramanian P, Rustin MHA, Gomes DCO, et al.. Vitamin D3 inhibits p38 MAPK and senescence-associated inflammatory mediator secretion by senescent fibroblasts that impacts immune responses during ageing. . 2024. PMID 38287646 · DOI · PMC11019144
- Jeong SP, Sharma N, An SSA. Role of Calcitriol and Vitamin D Receptor (VDR) Gene Polymorphisms in Alzheimer's Disease. . 2024. PMID 38732025 · DOI · PMC11084202
- Michalczyk MM, Gepfert M, Roczniok R, Zydek G. Eight-Week Vitamin D3 Supplementation at 4000 IU/Day Was Not Associated with Further Improvements in Speed or Power Performance in Professional Female Soccer Players: A Randomized Controlled Trial. . 2026. PMID 42588083 · DOI · PMC13467743
- Feldman D, Krishnan AV, Swami S, Giovannucci E, Feldman BJ. The role of vitamin D in reducing cancer risk and progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014. PMID 24705652 · DOI
- Norman AW. From vitamin D to hormone D: fundamentals of the vitamin D endocrine system essential for good health. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008. PMID 18689389 · DOI
- Tripkovic L, Lambert H, Hart K, Smith CP, Bucca G, Penson S, et al.. Comparison of vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 supplementation in raising serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012. PMID 22552031 · DOI · PMC3349454
- Haussler MR, Jurutka PW, Mizwicki M, Norman AW. Vitamin D receptor (VDR)-mediated actions of 1α,25(OH)₂vitamin D₃: genomic and non-genomic mechanisms. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011. PMID 21872797 · DOI
- Bergwitz C, Jüppner H. Regulation of phosphate homeostasis by PTH, vitamin D, and FGF23. Annu Rev Med. 2010. PMID 20059333 · DOI · PMC4777331
- Krishnan AV, Feldman D. Mechanisms of the anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory actions of vitamin D. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2011. PMID 20936945 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.