Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Neuroscience›Cerebellum
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Cerebellum

Neuroscience · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed9 referencesApproximately 3 min read

The part of brain that lies behind the brain stem in the posterior base of skull (cranial fossa, posterior).

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 3 complete abstracts (434 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The part of brain that lies behind the brain stem in the posterior base of skull (cranial fossa, posterior). It is also known as the little brain with convolutions similar to those of cerebral cortex, inner white matter, and deep cerebellar nuclei. Its function is to coordinate voluntary movements, maintain balance, and learn motor skills.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Cerebellums; Parencephalon; Parencephalons; Corpus Cerebelli; Cerebella.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Metencephalon
Narrower topics
Cerebellar Cortex; Cerebellar Nuclei; Cerebellopontine Angle

Related concepts

  • Brain Stem
  • Cranial Fossa
  • Posterior
  • Cerebral Cortex

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 63,973 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Cerebellum” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 6,549 of them (10.2%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 31,912 records.

Reviews account for 4,291 records (6.7%) and meta-analyses for 124. Randomized controlled trials number 295 (0.5%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 31,912 records; 2000-2009: 13,230 records; 2010-2019: 12,282 records; 2020 onward: 6,549 records31,912through 199913,2302000-200912,2822010-20196,5492020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199931,912
2000-200913,230
2010-201912,282
2020 onward6,549
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 6.7 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.2 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.5 percentReviews6.7% (4,291)Meta-analyses0.2% (124)Randomized controlled trials0.5% (295)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 63,973 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews4,2916.7%
Meta-analyses1240.2%
Randomized controlled trials2950.5%

Method: PubMed query "Cerebellum"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in neuroscience

Neuroscience draws on tools with different strengths: cellular and animal work can manipulate circuits directly, while human imaging and electrophysiology observe the living brain at lower resolution. Small imaging studies are prone to false positives, and findings in animals do not always carry over to people. Clinical neurology and psychiatry rely on trials and cohort studies whose outcomes are often symptom scales. Check the species, the sample size, how the outcome was measured and whether results were replicated.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Stage-dependent cerebrocerebellar communication during sensorimotor processing
Romano V, van Driessche M, van Wingerden N, Bauer S, Boeser B, Mejias JF, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
11cc by
PMID 41044080 · DOI · PMC12494962
Functional development of the human cerebellum from birth to age five
Lyu W, Thung KH, Huynh KM, Wang L, Lin W, Ahmad S, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
11cc by
PMID 40640148 · DOI · PMC12246265
Structure and organization of AMPA receptor-TARP complexes in the mammalian cerebellum
Scrutton AM, Sengupta N, Ivica J, Stockwell I, Peak-Chew S, Singh B, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
10cc by
PMID 41379938 · DOI · PMC7619101

Stage-dependent cerebrocerebellar communication during sensorimotor processing [1]

Research article Romano V, van Driessche M, van Wingerden N, Bauer S, Boeser B, Mejias JF, et al. · · 2025 · cited 11 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Cerebral cortex and cerebellum are essential for sensorimotor control, but the dynamics of their interactions remain unclear.
Closing excerpt
Together our data point towards a swap in direction of information flow between cerebrum and cerebellum when motor preparation switches to execution.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (150 words)

Cerebral cortex and cerebellum are essential for sensorimotor control, but the dynamics of their interactions remain unclear. Here, we investigated which pathways prevail during preparation and execution of spontaneous whisker movements in mice. During preparation, neuronal activity of primary motor (M1) and somatosensory (S1) cortex precede that of cerebellar crus regions, with a lead that is consistent with relaying a copy of motor commands. After movement onset, the phase of the signal inverts, indicating a dominant vector signaling from cerebellum to cerebrum. At this stage, Purkinje cell activity correlates more with S1 than M1, generating a prediction of sensory consequences during motor actions. A computational cerebello-cortical model could replicate the changes in dynamics and directionality. Optogenetic manipulations of pons and thalamus confirm the modeled predictions on stage-dependent dynamics. Together our data point towards a swap in direction of information flow between cerebrum and cerebellum when motor preparation switches to execution.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41044080 · DOI · PMC12494962

Functional development of the human cerebellum from birth to age five [2]

Research article Lyu W, Thung KH, Huynh KM, Wang L, Lin W, Ahmad S, et al. · · 2025 · cited 11 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Despite the cerebellum's crucial role in brain function, its early development, particularly in relation to the cerebrum, remains poorly understood.
Closing excerpt
Our study provides insights into early cerebellocortical interactions, reveals functional asymmetry and sex-specific patterns in cerebellar development, and lays the groundwork for future research on cerebellum-related disorders in children.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (154 words)

Despite the cerebellum's crucial role in brain function, its early development, particularly in relation to the cerebrum, remains poorly understood. Here, we examine cerebellocortical connectivity using over 1000 high-quality resting-state functional MRI scans from children between birth and five years of age. By mapping cerebellar topography with fine temporal granularity, we unveil the hierarchical organization of cerebellocortical functional connectivity from infancy. We observe dynamic shifts in cerebellar functional topography, which become more focal with age while largely maintaining stable anchor regions similar to adults, highlighting the cerebellum's evolving yet organized role in functional integration during early development. Our findings demonstrate cerebellar connectivity to higher-order networks at birth, which generally strengthen with age, emphasizing the cerebellum's early role in cognitive processing beyond sensory and motor functions. Our study provides insights into early cerebellocortical interactions, reveals functional asymmetry and sex-specific patterns in cerebellar development, and lays the groundwork for future research on cerebellum-related disorders in children.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40640148 · DOI · PMC12246265

Structure and organization of AMPA receptor-TARP complexes in the mammalian cerebellum [3]

Research article Scrutton AM, Sengupta N, Ivica J, Stockwell I, Peak-Chew S, Singh B, et al. · · 2026 · cited 10 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
AMPA receptors (AMPARs) are multimodal transducers of glutamatergic signals throughout the brain.
Closing excerpt
Our study defines the organizational principles of mammalian cerebellar AMPAR complexes and reveals how different receptor subtypes support cell type-specific functions.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (130 words)

AMPA receptors (AMPARs) are multimodal transducers of glutamatergic signals throughout the brain. Their diversity is exemplified in the cerebellum: At afferent synapses, AMPARs mediate high-frequency excitation, whereas in Bergmann glia (BG) they support calcium transients that modulate synaptic transmission. This spectrum arises from different combinations of core subunits (GluA1-4), auxiliary proteins, and posttranscriptional modifications. Using mass spectrometry, cryo-electron microscopy, and electrophysiology, we characterize major cerebellar AMPARs in pigs: calcium-impermeable GluA2/A4 heteromers with four transmembrane AMPAR regulatory protein (TARP) subunits, mainly neuronal in origin, and BG-specific, calcium-permeable GluA1/A4 heteromers containing two type II TARPs. We also showed that GluA4 receptors frequently exhibit compact N-terminal domains that promote their synaptic delivery. Our study defines the organizational principles of mammalian cerebellar AMPAR complexes and reveals how different receptor subtypes support cell type-specific functions.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41379938 · DOI · PMC7619101

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Functional topography in the human cerebellum: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies [4]
    Stoodley CJ, Schmahmann JD · Neuroimage · 2009 · cited 1,743 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The cerebellum and cognition [5]
    Schmahmann JD · Neurosci Lett · 2019 · cited 915 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Consensus Paper: Cerebellum and Social Cognition [6]
    Van Overwalle F, Manto M, Cattaneo Z, Clausi S, Ferrari C, Gabrieli JDE, et al. · Cerebellum · 2020 · cited 369 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Social cognition and the cerebellum: a meta-analysis of over 350 fMRI studies [7]
    Van Overwalle F, Baetens K, Mariën P, Vandekerckhove M · Neuroimage · 2014 · cited 366 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Emerging connections between cerebellar development, behaviour and complex brain disorders [8]
    Sathyanesan A, Zhou J, Scafidi J, Heck DH, Sillitoe RV, Gallo V · Nat Rev Neurosci · 2019 · cited 263 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Universal Transform or Multiple Functionality? Understanding the Contribution of the Human Cerebellum across Task Domains [9]
    Diedrichsen J, King M, Hernandez-Castillo C, Sereno M, Ivry RB · Neuron · 2019 · cited 234 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Romano V, van Driessche M, van Wingerden N, Bauer S, Boeser B, Mejias JF, et al.. Stage-dependent cerebrocerebellar communication during sensorimotor processing. . 2025. PMID 41044080 · DOI · PMC12494962
  2. Lyu W, Thung KH, Huynh KM, Wang L, Lin W, Ahmad S, et al.. Functional development of the human cerebellum from birth to age five. . 2025. PMID 40640148 · DOI · PMC12246265
  3. Scrutton AM, Sengupta N, Ivica J, Stockwell I, Peak-Chew S, Singh B, et al.. Structure and organization of AMPA receptor-TARP complexes in the mammalian cerebellum. . 2026. PMID 41379938 · DOI · PMC7619101
  4. Stoodley CJ, Schmahmann JD. Functional topography in the human cerebellum: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuroimage. 2009. PMID 18835452 · DOI
  5. Schmahmann JD. The cerebellum and cognition. Neurosci Lett. 2019. PMID 29997061 · DOI
  6. Van Overwalle F, Manto M, Cattaneo Z, Clausi S, Ferrari C, Gabrieli JDE, et al.. Consensus Paper: Cerebellum and Social Cognition. Cerebellum. 2020. PMID 32632709 · DOI · PMC7588399
  7. Van Overwalle F, Baetens K, Mariën P, Vandekerckhove M. Social cognition and the cerebellum: a meta-analysis of over 350 fMRI studies. Neuroimage. 2014. PMID 24076206 · DOI
  8. Sathyanesan A, Zhou J, Scafidi J, Heck DH, Sillitoe RV, Gallo V. Emerging connections between cerebellar development, behaviour and complex brain disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019. PMID 30923348 · DOI · PMC7236620
  9. Diedrichsen J, King M, Hernandez-Castillo C, Sereno M, Ivry RB. Universal Transform or Multiple Functionality? Understanding the Contribution of the Human Cerebellum across Task Domains. Neuron. 2019. PMID 31170400 · DOI · PMC6686189

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • BrainNeuroscience
  • Brain StemNeuroscience
  • NeocortexNeuroscience
  • Cerebral CortexNeuroscience
  • Corpus CallosumNeuroscience
  • Choroid PlexusNeuroscience

All 110 articles in Neuroscience →

At a glance

63,973
PubMed records on this heading
10%
published since 2020
4,291
review articles
295
randomized trials
9
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • BrainNeuroscience
  • Brain StemNeuroscience
  • NeocortexNeuroscience
  • Cerebral CortexNeuroscience
  • Corpus CallosumNeuroscience

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support