Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Genetics and Genomics›Centromere
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Centromere

Genetics and Genomics · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

The clear constricted portion of the chromosome at which the chromatids are joined and by which the chromosome is attached to the spindle during cell division.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (861 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The clear constricted portion of the chromosome at which the chromatids are joined and by which the chromosome is attached to the spindle during cell division.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Centromeres.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Chromosome Structures
Narrower topics
Kinetochores
See also
DNA, Satellite

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 11,341 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Centromere” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 1,761 of them (15.5%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 3,487 records.

Reviews account for 1,372 records (12.1%) and meta-analyses for 4. Randomized controlled trials number 4 (0.0%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 2,808 records; 2000-2009: 3,285 records; 2010-2019: 3,487 records; 2020 onward: 1,761 records2,808through 19993,2852000-20093,4872010-20191,7612020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19992,808
2000-20093,285
2010-20193,487
2020 onward1,761
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 12.1 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.0 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.0 percentReviews12.1% (1,372)Meta-analyses0.0% (4)Randomized controlled trials0.0% (4)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 11,341 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1,37212.1%
Meta-analyses40.0%
Randomized controlled trials40.0%

Method: PubMed query "Centromere"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in genetics and genomics

Genetic findings vary widely in strength. A variant linked to a condition in one study may not replicate in other ancestries, and most common variants have small effects that are meaningful only in aggregate. Studies of rare, high-impact variants can support strong causal claims about a gene, while association studies describe statistical links that need functional and independent replication. Check the sample size, the ancestry of participants, whether results were replicated, and whether a laboratory or clinical outcome was actually measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
The variation and evolution of complete human centromeres
Logsdon GA, Rozanski AN, Ryabov F, Potapova T, Shepelev VA, Catacchio CR, et al.
2024Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
246cc by
PMID 38570684 · DOI · PMC11062924
Recombination between heterologous human acrocentric chromosomes
Guarracino A, Buonaiuto S, de Lima LG, Potapova T, Rhie A, Koren S, et al.
2023Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
146cc by
PMID 37165241 · DOI · PMC10172130
Evolutionary analysis of a complete chicken genome
Huang Z, Xu Z, Bai H, Huang Y, Kang N, Ding X, et al.
2023Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
133cc by
PMID 36780517 · DOI · PMC9974502
Heterochromatin boundaries maintain centromere position, size and number
Carty BL, Dubocanin D, Murillo-Pineda M, Dumont M, Volpe E, Mikulski P, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
19cc by
PMID 41291334 · DOI · PMC7618434

The variation and evolution of complete human centromeres [1]

Research article Logsdon GA, Rozanski AN, Ryabov F, Potapova T, Shepelev VA, Catacchio CR, et al. · · 2024 · cited 246 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Human centromeres have been traditionally very difficult to sequence and assemble owing to their repetitive nature and large size1.
Closing excerpt
Phylogenetic reconstruction of human haplotypes supports limited to no recombination between the short (p) and long (q) arms across centromeres and reveals that novel α-satellite HORs share a monophyletic origin, providing a strategy to estimate the rate of saltatory amplification and mutation of human centromeric DNA.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (234 words)

Human centromeres have been traditionally very difficult to sequence and assemble owing to their repetitive nature and large size1. As a result, patterns of human centromeric variation and models for their evolution and function remain incomplete, despite centromeres being among the most rapidly mutating regions2,3. Here, using long-read sequencing, we completely sequenced and assembled all centromeres from a second human genome and compared it to the finished reference genome4,5. We find that the two sets of centromeres show at least a 4.1-fold increase in single-nucleotide variation when compared with their unique flanks and vary up to 3-fold in size. Moreover, we find that 45.8% of centromeric sequence cannot be reliably aligned using standard methods owing to the emergence of new α-satellite higher-order repeats (HORs). DNA methylation and CENP-A chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments show that 26% of the centromeres differ in their kinetochore position by >500 kb. To understand evolutionary change, we selected six chromosomes and sequenced and assembled 31 orthologous centromeres from the common chimpanzee, orangutan and macaque genomes. Comparative analyses reveal a nearly complete turnover of α-satellite HORs, with characteristic idiosyncratic changes in α-satellite HORs for each species. Phylogenetic reconstruction of human haplotypes supports limited to no recombination between the short (p) and long (q) arms across centromeres and reveals that novel α-satellite HORs share a monophyletic origin, providing a strategy to estimate the rate of saltatory amplification and mutation of human centromeric DNA.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38570684 · DOI · PMC11062924

Recombination between heterologous human acrocentric chromosomes [2]

Research article Guarracino A, Buonaiuto S, de Lima LG, Potapova T, Rhie A, Koren S, et al. · · 2023 · cited 146 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The short arms of the human acrocentric chromosomes 13, 14, 15, 21 and 22 (SAACs) share large homologous regions, including ribosomal DNA repeats and extended segmental duplications1,2.
Closing excerpt
The ubiquity of signals of recombination between heterologous acrocentric chromosomes seen in the HPRC draft pangenome suggests that these shared sequences form the basis for recurrent Robertsonian translocations, providing sequence and population-based confirmation of hypotheses first developed from cytogenetic studies 50 years ago9.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (240 words)

The short arms of the human acrocentric chromosomes 13, 14, 15, 21 and 22 (SAACs) share large homologous regions, including ribosomal DNA repeats and extended segmental duplications1,2. Although the resolution of these regions in the first complete assembly of a human genome-the Telomere-to-Telomere Consortium's CHM13 assembly (T2T-CHM13)-provided a model of their homology3, it remained unclear whether these patterns were ancestral or maintained by ongoing recombination exchange. Here we show that acrocentric chromosomes contain pseudo-homologous regions (PHRs) indicative of recombination between non-homologous sequences. Utilizing an all-to-all comparison of the human pangenome from the Human Pangenome Reference Consortium4 (HPRC), we find that contigs from all of the SAACs form a community. A variation graph5 constructed from centromere-spanning acrocentric contigs indicates the presence of regions in which most contigs appear nearly identical between heterologous acrocentric chromosomes in T2T-CHM13. Except on chromosome 15, we observe faster decay of linkage disequilibrium in the pseudo-homologous regions than in the corresponding short and long arms, indicating higher rates of recombination6,7. The pseudo-homologous regions include sequences that have previously been shown to lie at the breakpoint of Robertsonian translocations8, and their arrangement is compatible with crossover in inverted duplications on chromosomes 13, 14 and 21. The ubiquity of signals of recombination between heterologous acrocentric chromosomes seen in the HPRC draft pangenome suggests that these shared sequences form the basis for recurrent Robertsonian translocations, providing sequence and population-based confirmation of hypotheses first developed from cytogenetic studies 50 years ago9.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37165241 · DOI · PMC10172130

Evolutionary analysis of a complete chicken genome [3]

Research article Huang Z, Xu Z, Bai H, Huang Y, Kang N, Ding X, et al. · · 2023 · cited 133 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Microchromosomes are prevalent in nonmammalian vertebrates [P.
Closing excerpt
Our sequence and epigenetic characterization of chicken chromosomes shed insights into the understanding of vertebrate genome evolution and chromosome biology.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (232 words)

Microchromosomes are prevalent in nonmammalian vertebrates [P. D. Waters et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118 (2021)], but a few of them are missing in bird genome assemblies. Here, we present a new chicken reference genome containing all autosomes, a Z and a W chromosome, with all gaps closed except for the W. We identified ten small microchromosomes (termed dot chromosomes) with distinct sequence and epigenetic features, among which six were newly assembled. Those dot chromosomes exhibit extremely high GC content and a high level of DNA methylation and are enriched for housekeeping genes. The pericentromeric heterochromatin of dot chromosomes is disproportionately large and continues to expand with the proliferation of satellite DNA and testis-expressed genes. Our analyses revealed that the 41-bp CNM repeat frequently forms higher-order repeats (HORs) at the centromeres of acrocentric chromosomes. The centromere core regions where the kinetochore attaches often encompass telomeric sequence (TTAGGG)n, and in a one of the dot chromosomes, the centromere core recruits an endogenous retrovirus (ERV). We further demonstrate that the W chromosome shares some common features with dot chromosomes, having large arrays of hypermethylated tandem repeats. Finally, using the complete chicken chromosome models, we reconstructed a fine picture of chordate karyotype evolution, revealing frequent chromosomal fusions before and after vertebrate whole-genome duplications. Our sequence and epigenetic characterization of chicken chromosomes shed insights into the understanding of vertebrate genome evolution and chromosome biology.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 36780517 · DOI · PMC9974502

Heterochromatin boundaries maintain centromere position, size and number [4]

Research article Carty BL, Dubocanin D, Murillo-Pineda M, Dumont M, Volpe E, Mikulski P, et al. · · 2026 · cited 19 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Centromeres are defined by a unique single chromatin domain featuring the histone H3 variant, centromere protein A (CENP-A), and ensure proper chromosome segregation.
Closing excerpt
Our study identifies the functional importance and specialization of different H3K9 methyltransferases across centromeric and pericentric domains, crucial for maintaining centromere domain size and suppressing ectopic centromere nucleation events.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (155 words)

Centromeres are defined by a unique single chromatin domain featuring the histone H3 variant, centromere protein A (CENP-A), and ensure proper chromosome segregation. Centromeric chromatin typically occupies a small subregion of low DNA methylation within multimegabase arrays of hypermethylated alpha-satellite repeats and constitutive pericentric heterochromatin. Here, we define the molecular basis of how heterochromatin serves as a primary driver of centromere and neocentromere position, size and number. Using single-molecule epigenomics, we uncover roles for H3K9me3 methyltransferases SUV39H1/H2 and SETDB1, in addition to noncanonical roles for SUZ12, in maintaining H3K9me3 boundaries at centromeres. Loss of these heterochromatin boundaries leads to the progressive expansion and/or repositioning of the primary CENP-A domain, erosion of surrounding DNA methylation and nucleation of additional functional CENP-A domains across the same alpha-satellite sequences. Our study identifies the functional importance and specialization of different H3K9 methyltransferases across centromeric and pericentric domains, crucial for maintaining centromere domain size and suppressing ectopic centromere nucleation events.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41291334 · DOI · PMC7618434

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Molecular architecture of the kinetochore-microtubule interface [5]
    Cheeseman IM, Desai A · Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol · 2008 · cited 769 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The life and miracles of kinetochores [6]
    Santaguida S, Musacchio A · EMBO J · 2009 · cited 404 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The kinetochore [7]
    Cheeseman IM · Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol · 2014 · cited 283 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Spindle assembly checkpoint activation and silencing at kinetochores [8]
    Lara-Gonzalez P, Pines J, Desai A · Semin Cell Dev Biol · 2021 · cited 238 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Merotelic kinetochore attachment: causes and effects [9]
    Gregan J, Polakova S, Zhang L, Tolić-Nørrelykke IM, Cimini D · Trends Cell Biol · 2011 · cited 208 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Sequence, Chromatin and Evolution of Satellite DNA [10]
    Thakur J, Packiaraj J, Henikoff S · Int J Mol Sci · 2021 · cited 203 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Logsdon GA, Rozanski AN, Ryabov F, Potapova T, Shepelev VA, Catacchio CR, et al.. The variation and evolution of complete human centromeres. . 2024. PMID 38570684 · DOI · PMC11062924
  2. Guarracino A, Buonaiuto S, de Lima LG, Potapova T, Rhie A, Koren S, et al.. Recombination between heterologous human acrocentric chromosomes. . 2023. PMID 37165241 · DOI · PMC10172130
  3. Huang Z, Xu Z, Bai H, Huang Y, Kang N, Ding X, et al.. Evolutionary analysis of a complete chicken genome. . 2023. PMID 36780517 · DOI · PMC9974502
  4. Carty BL, Dubocanin D, Murillo-Pineda M, Dumont M, Volpe E, Mikulski P, et al.. Heterochromatin boundaries maintain centromere position, size and number. . 2026. PMID 41291334 · DOI · PMC7618434
  5. Cheeseman IM, Desai A. Molecular architecture of the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008. PMID 18097444 · DOI
  6. Santaguida S, Musacchio A. The life and miracles of kinetochores. EMBO J. 2009. PMID 19629042 · DOI · PMC2722247
  7. Cheeseman IM. The kinetochore. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014. PMID 24984773 · DOI · PMC4067989
  8. Lara-Gonzalez P, Pines J, Desai A. Spindle assembly checkpoint activation and silencing at kinetochores. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2021. PMID 34210579 · DOI · PMC8406419
  9. Gregan J, Polakova S, Zhang L, Tolić-Nørrelykke IM, Cimini D. Merotelic kinetochore attachment: causes and effects. Trends Cell Biol. 2011. PMID 21306900 · DOI · PMC3117139
  10. Thakur J, Packiaraj J, Henikoff S. Sequence, Chromatin and Evolution of Satellite DNA. Int J Mol Sci. 2021. PMID 33919233 · DOI · PMC8122249

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • ChromatidsGenetics and Genomics
  • ChromatinGenetics and Genomics
  • EuchromatinGenetics and Genomics
  • KinetochoresGenetics and Genomics
  • NucleosomesGenetics and Genomics
  • TelomereGenetics and Genomics

All 95 articles in Genetics and Genomics →

At a glance

11,341
PubMed records on this heading
16%
published since 2020
1,372
review articles
4
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • ChromatidsGenetics and Genomics
  • ChromatinGenetics and Genomics
  • EuchromatinGenetics and Genomics
  • KinetochoresGenetics and Genomics
  • NucleosomesGenetics and Genomics

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support