Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,121 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Infections resulting from the use of catheters. Proper aseptic technique, site of catheter placement, material composition, and virulence of the organism are all factors that can influence possible infection.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Catheter-Related Infection; Catheter Related Infections; Infection, Catheter-Related; Infections, Catheter-Related; Catheter-Associated Infections; Catheter-Associated Infection; Catheter Associated Infections; Infection, Catheter-Associated.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Infections
- See also
- Cross Infection; Catheter Obstruction
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 7,508 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Catheter-Related Infections” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 2,463 of them (32.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 4,818 records.
Reviews account for 1,068 records (14.2%) and meta-analyses for 210. Randomized controlled trials number 367 (4.9%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 0 |
| 2000-2009 | 353 |
| 2010-2019 | 4,818 |
| 2020 onward | 2,463 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 1,068 | 14.2% |
| Meta-analyses | 210 | 2.8% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 367 | 4.9% |
Method: PubMed query "Catheter-Related Infections"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in infectious diseases
Infectious disease evidence combines microbiology, epidemiology and clinical trials. Laboratory studies identify pathogens and how they cause harm; surveillance and outbreak investigations describe who is affected and how infection spreads; trials establish whether treatments and vaccines work. Results depend on place and time, because pathogens evolve and resistance patterns and population immunity change. Check when and where the data were collected, how cases were defined and how up to date the evidence is.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical Device-Associated Biofilm Infections and Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens | 2024 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 93 | cc by PMID 38787246 · DOI · PMC11124157 |
| Risk factors of central catheter bloodstream infections in intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis | 2024 | Meta-analysis Design not recorded in structured metadata | 26 | cc by PMID 38652718 · DOI · PMC11037535 |
| 7295 elderly hospitalized patients with catheter-associated urinary tract infection: a case-control study | 2023 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 24 | cc by PMID 38001413 · DOI · PMC10668367 |
| Chlorhexidine vs Povidone-Iodine and Incidence of Catheter-Related Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis | 2026 | Meta-analysis Design not recorded in structured metadata | 2 | cc by PMID 41678192 · DOI · PMC12902894 |
Medical Device-Associated Biofilm Infections and Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Medical devices such as venous catheters (VCs) and urinary catheters (UCs) are widely used in the hospital setting.
- Closing excerpt
- Furthermore, we draw attention toseveral useful prevention strategies, and advanced antimicrobial and antifouling approaches developed to reduce bacterial colonization on catheter surfaces and the incidence of the catheter-related infections.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (219 words)
Medical devices such as venous catheters (VCs) and urinary catheters (UCs) are widely used in the hospital setting. However, the implantation of these devices is often accompanied by complications. About 60 to 70% of nosocomial infections (NIs) are linked to biofilms. The main complication is the ability of microorganisms to adhere to surfaces and form biofilms which protect them and help them to persist in the host. Indeed, by crossing the skin barrier, the insertion of VC inevitably allows skin flora or accidental environmental contaminants to access the underlying tissues and cause fatal complications like bloodstream infections (BSIs). In fact, 80,000 central venous catheters-BSIs (CVC-BSIs)-mainly occur in intensive care units (ICUs) with a death rate of 12 to 25%. Similarly, catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CA-UTIs) are the most commonlyhospital-acquired infections (HAIs) worldwide.These infections represent up to 40% of NIs.In this review, we present a summary of biofilm formation steps. We provide an overview of two main and important infections in clinical settings linked to medical devices, namely the catheter-asociated bloodstream infections (CA-BSIs) and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CA-UTIs), and highlight also the most multidrug resistant bacteria implicated in these infections. Furthermore, we draw attention toseveral useful prevention strategies, and advanced antimicrobial and antifouling approaches developed to reduce bacterial colonization on catheter surfaces and the incidence of the catheter-related infections.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38787246 · DOI · PMC11124157
Risk factors of central catheter bloodstream infections in intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundCentral catheter bloodstream infections (CRBSI) is a major cause of healthcare-associated infections.
- Closing excerpt
- Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (316 words)
BackgroundCentral catheter bloodstream infections (CRBSI) is a major cause of healthcare-associated infections. However, few factors are generally accepted and some studies have conflicting finding about some factors, possibly caused by limitation associated with an individual study. This study was to identify risk factors for CRBSI in intensive care units.MethodsWe searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of science and EMBASE databases and the 4 top Chinese-language databases, including WanFang data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), China Biology Medicine disc (CBM) as of July 2023. Case control and cohort studies were included. Two authors independently screened the literature and evaluated the quality of the studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). The pooled effect size was estimated using the odds ratio (OR), and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. The Cochrane Q (χ2) and I2 tests were used to assess heterogeneity among studies, and each risk factor was tested for its robustness using fixed- or random-effects models.FindingsA total of 32 studies enrolled, among which eleven factors were identified, they were divided into two categories: modifiable and unmodifiable factors. Modifiable factors: duration of catheterization (≥ 5d) (OR: 2.07, 95%CI: 1.41-3.03), duration of catheterization (≥ 7d) (OR: 3.62, 95%CI: 2.65-4.97), duration of catheterization (≥ 14d)(OR: 4.85, 95%CI: 3.35-7.01), total parenteral nutrition (OR: 2.27,95%CI: 1.56-3.29), use of multiple-lumen catheters(OR: 3.41, 95%CI: 2.27-5.11), times of tube indwelling (OR: 3.50, 95%CI: 2.93-4.17), length of ICU stay (OR: 4.05, 95%CI: 2.41-6.80), the position of indwelling(OR: 2.41, 95%CI: 2.03-2.85); Unmodifiable factors: APACHEII scores (OR: 1.84, 95%CI: 1.54-2.20), Age≥ 60 years old (OR: 2.19, 95%CI: 1.76-2.73), the extensive use of antibiotic (OR: 3.54, 95%CI: 1.65-7.61), Diabetes mellitus (OR: 3.06, 95%CI: 2.56-3.66), Immunosuppression (OR: 2.87, 95%CI: 2.08-3.95).ConclusionsEffective interventions targeting the above modifiable factors may reduce the risk of developing CRBSI in ICU and improve the clinical outcome of patients. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38652718 · DOI · PMC11037535
7295 elderly hospitalized patients with catheter-associated urinary tract infection: a case-control study [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundCatheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) ranks second among nosocomial infections in elderly patients after lung infections.
- Closing excerpt
- Our study analysed the clinical characteristics of CAUTI in the elderly through a large sample size, which provided a reliable basis for its diagnosis and identified the adverse outcome of CAUTI.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (232 words)
BackgroundCatheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) ranks second among nosocomial infections in elderly patients after lung infections. Improper treatment can lead to death. This study analysed the risk factors, pathogen distribution, clinical characteristics and outcomes of CAUTI in elderly inpatients with a large sample size to provide evidence for clinical prevention and control.MethodsBased on the HIS and LIS, a case‒control study was conducted on all hospitalized patients with indwelling urinary catheters ≥ 60 years old from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2022, and the patients were divided into the CAUTI group and the non-CAUTI group.ResultsCAUTI occurred in 182 of 7295 patients, and the infection rate was 3.4/per 1000 catheter days. Urine pH ≥ 6.5, moderate dependence or severe dependence in the classification of self-care ability, age ≥ 74 years, male sex, hospitalization ≥ 14 days, indwelling urinary catheter ≥ 10 days, diabetes and malnutrition were independent risk factors for CAUTI (P ConclusionThe situation of CAUTI in the elderly is not optimistic, it is easy to have a one-person multi-pathogen infection, and the proportion of fungi infection is not low. Urine pH ≥ 6.5, moderate or severe dependence on others and malnutrition were rare risk factors for elderly CAUTI in previous studies. Our study analysed the clinical characteristics of CAUTI in the elderly through a large sample size, which provided a reliable basis for its diagnosis and identified the adverse outcome of CAUTI.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38001413 · DOI · PMC10668367
Chlorhexidine vs Povidone-Iodine and Incidence of Catheter-Related Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- ImportanceIntravascular catheters are essential in health care but remain a major source of health care-associated infections.
- Closing excerpt
- These results suggest that alcoholic PVI and aqueous formulations should be reserved for situations in which CHG or alcohol cannot be used.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (354 words)
ImportanceIntravascular catheters are essential in health care but remain a major source of health care-associated infections. Optimal skin antisepsis before insertion is key, yet the most effective antiseptic agent, concentration, and formulation remain uncertain.ObjectiveTo determine the concentration and formulation of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) or povidone-iodine (PVI) associated with the lowest incidence of catheter-related infections (CRIs).Data sourcesPubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL were searched through January 7, 2025, without restrictions. Trial registries and reference lists of relevant studies and guidelines were reviewed.Study selectionRandomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing CHG- or PVI-based skin antisepsis before insertion of intravascular catheters were eligible if they reported at least 1 CRI outcome (catheter-related bloodstream infection [CRBSI], catheter tip colonization, or local infection). Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts.Data extraction and synthesisData were extracted independently by 2 reviewers following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool. A random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to estimate relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcomes were incidence of CRBSIs, catheter tip colonization, and local infections associated with CHG or PVI formulations.ResultsSixteen RCTs (7803 patients; 11 985 catheters) met inclusion criteria. When compared with aqueous formulations, alcohol-based formulations were consistently associated with lower infections rates, with isopropyl alcohol being superior to ethanol. Compared with alcoholic PVI, alcoholic CHG was associated with lower CRBSIs (RR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.45 to 1.08]), catheter tip colonizations (RR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.37 to 0.48]), and local infections (RR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.23 to 0.70]). High concentration CHG (1% or higher) further lowered CRBSIs (RR, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.19 to 0.52]) and colonization (RR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.30 to 0.42]) compared with lower concentrations. Local adverse events were uncommon, slightly more frequent with alcohol-based formulations, and similar between CHG and PVI.Conclusions and relevanceIn this NMA of RCTs, high concentration CHG in isopropyl alcohol was associated with the lowest incidence of CRIs. These results suggest that alcoholic PVI and aqueous formulations should be reserved for situations in which CHG or alcohol cannot be used.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41678192 · DOI · PMC12902894
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Reducing unnecessary urinary catheter use and other strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection: an integrative review [5]
- Research article ISPD Catheter-Related Infection Recommendations: 2017 Update [6]
- Research article Effectiveness of insertion and maintenance bundles to prevent central-line-associated bloodstream infections in critically ill patients of all ages: a systematic review and meta-analysis [7]
- Research article Pathophysiology, Treatment, and Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection [8]
- Research article Ethanol locks to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections in parenteral nutrition: a meta-analysis [9]
- Research article Central venous catheter-related infections in hematology and oncology: 2020 updated guidelines on diagnosis, management, and prevention by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO) [10]
References
- Bouhrour N, Nibbering PH, Bendali F. Medical Device-Associated Biofilm Infections and Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens. . 2024. PMID 38787246 · DOI · PMC11124157
- Huang H, Chang Q, Zhou Y, Liao L. Risk factors of central catheter bloodstream infections in intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis. . 2024. PMID 38652718 · DOI · PMC11037535
- Shen L, Fu T, Huang L, Sun H, Wang Y, Sun L, et al.. 7295 elderly hospitalized patients with catheter-associated urinary tract infection: a case-control study. . 2023. PMID 38001413 · DOI · PMC10668367
- Drugeon B, Mihala G, Schults J, Bigaud B, Guenezan J, Batiot G, et al.. Chlorhexidine vs Povidone-Iodine and Incidence of Catheter-Related Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. . 2026. PMID 41678192 · DOI · PMC12902894
- Meddings J, Rogers MA, Krein SL, Fakih MG, Olmsted RN, Saint S. Reducing unnecessary urinary catheter use and other strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection: an integrative review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014. PMID 24077850 · DOI · PMC3960353
- Szeto CC, Li PK, Johnson DW, Bernardini J, Dong J, Figueiredo AE, et al.. ISPD Catheter-Related Infection Recommendations: 2017 Update. Perit Dial Int. 2017. PMID 28360365 · DOI
- Ista E, van der Hoven B, Kornelisse RF, van der Starre C, Vos MC, Boersma E, et al.. Effectiveness of insertion and maintenance bundles to prevent central-line-associated bloodstream infections in critically ill patients of all ages: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016. PMID 26907734 · DOI
- Flores-Mireles A, Hreha TN, Hunstad DA. Pathophysiology, Treatment, and Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2019. PMID 31548790 · DOI · PMC6743745
- Oliveira C, Nasr A, Brindle M, Wales PW. Ethanol locks to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections in parenteral nutrition: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2012. PMID 22232307 · DOI
- Böll B, Schalk E, Buchheidt D, Hasenkamp J, Kiehl M, Kiderlen TR, et al.. Central venous catheter-related infections in hematology and oncology: 2020 updated guidelines on diagnosis, management, and prevention by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO). Ann Hematol. 2021. PMID 32997191 · DOI · PMC7782365
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.