Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Pharmacology›Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors

Pharmacology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

A class of compounds that reduces the secretion of H+ ions by the proximal kidney tubule through inhibition of carbonic anhydrases.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (866 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A class of compounds that reduces the secretion of H+ ions by the proximal kidney tubule through inhibition of carbonic anhydrases.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Inhibitors, Carbonic Anhydrase; Carboxyanhydrase Inhibitors; Inhibitors, Carboxyanhydrase; Carboxyanhydrase Inhibitor; Inhibitor, Carboxyanhydrase; Carbonate Dehydratase Inhibitor; Dehydratase Inhibitor, Carbonate; Inhibitor, Carbonate Dehydratase.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Enzyme Inhibitors

Related concepts

  • Carbonic Anhydrases

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 6,106 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 1,336 of them (21.9%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 1,898 records.

Reviews account for 702 records (11.5%) and meta-analyses for 29. Randomized controlled trials number 311 (5.1%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 1,701 records; 2000-2009: 1,171 records; 2010-2019: 1,898 records; 2020 onward: 1,336 records1,701through 19991,1712000-20091,8982010-20191,3362020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19991,701
2000-20091,171
2010-20191,898
2020 onward1,336
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 11.5 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.5 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 5.1 percentReviews11.5% (702)Meta-analyses0.5% (29)Randomized controlled trials5.1% (311)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 6,106 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews70211.5%
Meta-analyses290.5%
Randomized controlled trials3115.1%

Method: PubMed query "Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in pharmacology

Drug evidence builds in layers: laboratory pharmacology describes how a compound acts, pharmacokinetic studies describe how the body handles it, and randomized trials test whether it helps and what harms it causes. Post-marketing surveillance and observational studies reveal rarer adverse effects but cannot prove causation. This page is educational and is not a recommendation to start, stop or change any medicine; decisions about treatment belong with a qualified clinician.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Combination therapy in combating cancer
Bayat Mokhtari R, Homayouni TS, Baluch N, Morgatskaya E, Kumar S, Das B, et al.
2017Systematic review
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1,817cc by
PMID 28410237 · DOI · PMC5514969
Cancer Drug Development of Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors beyond the Active Site
Singh S, Lomelino CL, Mboge MY, Frost SC, McKenna R
2018Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
118cc by
PMID 29710858 · DOI · PMC6099549
Role of Carbonic Anhydrases and Inhibitors in Acid-Base Physiology: Insights from Mathematical Modeling
Occhipinti R, Boron WF
2019Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
92cc by
PMID 31390837 · DOI · PMC6695913
Acetazolamide inhibition of carbonic anhydrase 4 reverses opioid-induced synaptic rearrangements in nucleus accumbens and reduces drug-seeking behavior
Gupta SC, Taugher-Hebl RJ, Ghobbeh A, Jahnke MT, Fan R, LaLumiere RT, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 41565998 · DOI · PMC13291229

Combination therapy in combating cancer [1]

Systematic review Bayat Mokhtari R, Homayouni TS, Baluch N, Morgatskaya E, Kumar S, Das B, et al. · · 2017 · cited 1,817 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Combination therapy, a treatment modality that combines two or more therapeutic agents, is a cornerstone of cancer therapy.
Closing excerpt
Furthermore, we also review important repurposed or primary anti-cancer agents that have gained popularity in clinical trials and research since 2012.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (240 words)

Combination therapy, a treatment modality that combines two or more therapeutic agents, is a cornerstone of cancer therapy. The amalgamation of anti-cancer drugs enhances efficacy compared to the mono-therapy approach because it targets key pathways in a characteristically synergistic or an additive manner. This approach potentially reduces drug resistance, while simultaneously providing therapeutic anti-cancer benefits, such as reducing tumour growth and metastatic potential, arresting mitotically active cells, reducing cancer stem cell populations, and inducing apoptosis. The 5-year survival rates for most metastatic cancers are still quite low, and the process of developing a new anti-cancer drug is costly and extremely time-consuming. Therefore, new strategies that target the survival pathways that provide efficient and effective results at an affordable cost are being considered. One such approach incorporates repurposing therapeutic agents initially used for the treatment of different diseases other than cancer. This approach is effective primarily when the FDA-approved agent targets similar pathways found in cancer. Because one of the drugs used in combination therapy is already FDA-approved, overall costs of combination therapy research are reduced. This increases cost efficiency of therapy, thereby benefiting the "medically underserved". In addition, an approach that combines repurposed pharmaceutical agents with other therapeutics has shown promising results in mitigating tumour burden. In this systematic review, we discuss important pathways commonly targeted in cancer therapy. Furthermore, we also review important repurposed or primary anti-cancer agents that have gained popularity in clinical trials and research since 2012.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28410237 · DOI · PMC5514969

Cancer Drug Development of Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors beyond the Active Site [2]

Review article Singh S, Lomelino CL, Mboge MY, Frost SC, McKenna R · · 2018 · cited 118 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Carbonic anhydrases (CAs) catalyze the reversible hydration of carbon dioxide to produce bicarbonate and a proton.
Closing excerpt
Biologics, such as monoclonal antibodies, monoclonal-radionuclide conjugated chimeric antibodies, and antibody-small molecule conjugates are also discussed.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (184 words)

Carbonic anhydrases (CAs) catalyze the reversible hydration of carbon dioxide to produce bicarbonate and a proton. Multiple CA isoforms are implicated in a range of diseases, including cancer. In solid tumors, continuously dividing cells create hypoxic conditions that eventually lead to an acidic microenvironment. Hypoxic tumor cells have different mechanisms in place to regulate and adjust the surrounding microenvironment for survival. These mechanisms include expression of CA isoform IX (CA IX) and XII (CA XII). These enzymes help maintain a physiological intracellular pH while simultaneously contributing to an acidic extracellular pH, leading to tumor cell survival. Expression of CA IX and CA XII has also been shown to promote tumor cell invasion and metastasis. This review discusses the characteristics of CA IX and CA XII, their mechanism of action, and validates their prospective use as anticancer targets. We discuss the current status of small inhibitors that target these isoforms, both classical and non-classical, and their future design in order to obtain isoform-specificity for CA IX and CA XII. Biologics, such as monoclonal antibodies, monoclonal-radionuclide conjugated chimeric antibodies, and antibody-small molecule conjugates are also discussed.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29710858 · DOI · PMC6099549

Role of Carbonic Anhydrases and Inhibitors in Acid-Base Physiology: Insights from Mathematical Modeling [3]

Review article Occhipinti R, Boron WF · · 2019 · cited 92 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Carbonic anhydrases (CAs) catalyze a reaction fundamental for life: the bidirectional conversion of carbon dioxide (CO2) and water (H2O) into bicarbonate (HCO3-) and protons (H+).
Closing excerpt
Mathematical modeling can be a powerful tool for: (1) clarifying the complex interdependencies among reaction, diffusion, and protein-mediated components of physiological processes; (2) formulating hypotheses and making predictions to be tested in wet-lab experiments; and (3) inferring data that are impossible to measure.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (192 words)

Carbonic anhydrases (CAs) catalyze a reaction fundamental for life: the bidirectional conversion of carbon dioxide (CO2) and water (H2O) into bicarbonate (HCO3-) and protons (H+). These enzymes impact numerous physiological processes that occur within and across the many compartments in the body. Within compartments, CAs promote rapid H+ buffering and thus the stability of pH-sensitive processes. Between compartments, CAs promote movements of H+, CO2, HCO3-, and related species. This traffic is central to respiration, digestion, and whole-body/cellular pH regulation. Here, we focus on the role of mathematical modeling in understanding how CA enhances buffering as well as gradients that drive fluxes of CO2 and other solutes (facilitated diffusion). We also examine urinary acid secretion and the carriage of CO2 by the respiratory system. We propose that the broad physiological impact of CAs stem from three fundamental actions: promoting H+ buffering, enhancing H+ exchange between buffer systems, and facilitating diffusion. Mathematical modeling can be a powerful tool for: (1) clarifying the complex interdependencies among reaction, diffusion, and protein-mediated components of physiological processes; (2) formulating hypotheses and making predictions to be tested in wet-lab experiments; and (3) inferring data that are impossible to measure.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31390837 · DOI · PMC6695913

Acetazolamide inhibition of carbonic anhydrase 4 reverses opioid-induced synaptic rearrangements in nucleus accumbens and reduces drug-seeking behavior [4]

Research article Gupta SC, Taugher-Hebl RJ, Ghobbeh A, Jahnke MT, Fan R, LaLumiere RT, et al. · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Persistent vulnerability to drug-seeking is driven by enduring synaptic adaptations, yet current μ-opioid receptor-targeting pharmacotherapies provide limited efficacy against these neuroadaptations.
Closing excerpt
By targeting a pathway independent of classical opioid receptor signaling, CA4 inhibition represents a mechanistically distinct strategy that may reduce relapse vulnerability in OUD.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (250 words)

Persistent vulnerability to drug-seeking is driven by enduring synaptic adaptations, yet current μ-opioid receptor-targeting pharmacotherapies provide limited efficacy against these neuroadaptations. Thus, there is a critical need for mechanistically distinct, non-opioid interventions. We recently found that carbonic anhydrase 4 (CA4) disruption reduces cocaine-induced synaptic adaptations and drug-seeking. Building on this foundation, we sought to determine whether deleting CA4 or pharmacological inhibition with acetazolamide (AZD), a clinically employed carbonic anhydrase inhibitor-could mitigate opioid withdrawal-associated plasticity and thus might reduce relapse vulnerability. We studied synaptic and behavioral adaptations to withdrawal from oxycodone in mice and found that prolonged withdrawal from oxycodone increased the AMPAR/NMDAR ratio and promoted synaptic incorporation of Ca2+-permeable AMPARs in nucleus accumbens core (NAcC) medium spiny neurons (MSNs). We found synaptic changes after protracted withdrawal from multiple opioids, which were most pronounced in D1-expressing MSNs, and were prevented by CA4 disruption. Moreover, AZD reversed withdrawal-induced synaptic alterations both in vitro and in vivo, in a CA4- and acid-sensing ion channel 1A (ASIC1A)-dependent manner. Unlike withdrawal from cocaine, withdrawal from oxycodone did not alter dendritic spine density in NAcC MSNs, suggesting a distinct mode of plasticity. Finally, following oxycodone self-administration, both CA4 deletion and a single systemic AZD dose reduced drug-seeking after prolonged abstinence. Together, these findings identify CA4 as a regulator of opioid-induced synaptic adaptations and suggest AZD as a promising, readily translatable pharmacological intervention. By targeting a pathway independent of classical opioid receptor signaling, CA4 inhibition represents a mechanistically distinct strategy that may reduce relapse vulnerability in OUD.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41565998 · DOI · PMC13291229

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Carbonic anhydrases: novel therapeutic applications for inhibitors and activators [5]
    Supuran CT · Nat Rev Drug Discov · 2008 · cited 2,406 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors [6]
    Supuran CT, Scozzafava A, Casini A · Med Res Rev · 2003 · cited 858 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article How many carbonic anhydrase inhibition mechanisms exist? [7]
    Supuran CT · J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem · 2016 · cited 578 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors [8]
    Supuran CT · Bioorg Med Chem Lett · 2010 · cited 512 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Carbonic anhydrases as targets for medicinal chemistry [9]
    Supuran CT, Scozzafava A · Bioorg Med Chem · 2007 · cited 410 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Advances in structure-based drug discovery of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors [10]
    Supuran CT · Expert Opin Drug Discov · 2017 · cited 318 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Bayat Mokhtari R, Homayouni TS, Baluch N, Morgatskaya E, Kumar S, Das B, et al.. Combination therapy in combating cancer. . 2017. PMID 28410237 · DOI · PMC5514969
  2. Singh S, Lomelino CL, Mboge MY, Frost SC, McKenna R. Cancer Drug Development of Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors beyond the Active Site. . 2018. PMID 29710858 · DOI · PMC6099549
  3. Occhipinti R, Boron WF. Role of Carbonic Anhydrases and Inhibitors in Acid-Base Physiology: Insights from Mathematical Modeling. . 2019. PMID 31390837 · DOI · PMC6695913
  4. Gupta SC, Taugher-Hebl RJ, Ghobbeh A, Jahnke MT, Fan R, LaLumiere RT, et al.. Acetazolamide inhibition of carbonic anhydrase 4 reverses opioid-induced synaptic rearrangements in nucleus accumbens and reduces drug-seeking behavior. . 2026. PMID 41565998 · DOI · PMC13291229
  5. Supuran CT. Carbonic anhydrases: novel therapeutic applications for inhibitors and activators. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008. PMID 18167490 · DOI
  6. Supuran CT, Scozzafava A, Casini A. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Med Res Rev. 2003. PMID 12500287 · DOI
  7. Supuran CT. How many carbonic anhydrase inhibition mechanisms exist?. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2016. PMID 26619898 · DOI
  8. Supuran CT. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2010. PMID 20529676 · DOI
  9. Supuran CT, Scozzafava A. Carbonic anhydrases as targets for medicinal chemistry. Bioorg Med Chem. 2007. PMID 17475500 · DOI
  10. Supuran CT. Advances in structure-based drug discovery of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2017. PMID 27783541 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Enzyme InhibitorsPharmacology
  • Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsPharmacology
  • Monoamine Oxidase InhibitorsPharmacology
  • Histone Deacetylase InhibitorsPharmacology
  • Reverse Transcriptase InhibitorsPharmacology
  • Cholinesterase InhibitorsPharmacology

All 99 articles in Pharmacology →

At a glance

6,106
PubMed records on this heading
22%
published since 2020
702
review articles
311
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Enzyme InhibitorsPharmacology
  • Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsPharmacology
  • Monoamine Oxidase InhibitorsPharmacology
  • Histone Deacetylase InhibitorsPharmacology
  • Reverse Transcriptase InhibitorsPharmacology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support