Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Drugs and Chemicals›Caffeine
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Caffeine

Drugs and Chemicals · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

A methylxanthine naturally occurring in some beverages and also used as a pharmacological agent.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (788 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A methylxanthine naturally occurring in some beverages and also used as a pharmacological agent. Caffeine's most notable pharmacological effect is as a central nervous system stimulant, increasing alertness and producing agitation. It also relaxes smooth muscle, stimulates cardiac muscle, stimulates diuresis, and appears to be useful in the treatment of some types of headache. Several cellular actions of caffeine have been observed, but it is not entirely clear how each contributes to its pharmacological profile. Among the most important are inhibition of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases, antagonism of adenosine receptors, and modulation of intracellular calcium handling.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: 1,3,7-Trimethylxanthine; No Doz; Caffedrine; Coffeinum N; Coffeinum Purrum; Dexitac; Durvitan; Percoffedrinol N.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Xanthines

Related concepts

  • Smooth Muscle
  • Myocardium
  • Diuresis
  • Phosphodiesterases
  • Adenosine Receptors

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 27,085 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Caffeine” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 3,788 of them (14.0%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 12,694 records.

Reviews account for 2,083 records (7.7%) and meta-analyses for 270. Randomized controlled trials number 1,897 (7.0%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 12,694 records; 2000-2009: 5,041 records; 2010-2019: 5,562 records; 2020 onward: 3,788 records12,694through 19995,0412000-20095,5622010-20193,7882020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199912,694
2000-20095,041
2010-20195,562
2020 onward3,788
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 7.7 percent; Meta-analyses: 1.0 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 7.0 percentReviews7.7% (2,083)Meta-analyses1.0% (270)Randomized controlled trials7.0% (1,897)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 27,085 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews2,0837.7%
Meta-analyses2701.0%
Randomized controlled trials1,8977.0%

Method: PubMed query "Caffeine"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals

Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Association of Coffee Consumption and Prediagnostic Caffeine Metabolites With Incident Parkinson Disease in a Population-Based Cohort
Zhao Y, Lai Y, Konijnenberg H, Huerta JM, Vinagre-Aragon A, Sabin JA, et al.
2024Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
32cc by
PMID 38513162 · DOI · PMC11175631
Dose and timing effects of caffeine on subsequent sleep: a randomized clinical crossover trial
Gardiner CL, Weakley J, Burke LM, Fernandez F, Johnston RD, Leota J, et al.
2025Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
30cc by
PMID 39377163 · DOI · PMC11985402
Caffeine for apnea and prevention of neurodevelopmental impairment in preterm infants: systematic review and meta-analysis
Oliphant EA, Hanning SM, McKinlay CJD, Alsweiler JM
2024Meta-analysis
Design not recorded in structured metadata
28cc by
PMID 38553606 · DOI · PMC11161406
Caffeine inhibits nonhomologous end joining by impairing ligase IV/XRCC4 function
Kumari S, Sathees D, Rai PK, Sahu LR, Raghavan SC
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 41773020 · DOI · PMC12956356

Association of Coffee Consumption and Prediagnostic Caffeine Metabolites With Incident Parkinson Disease in a Population-Based Cohort [1]

Research article Zhao Y, Lai Y, Konijnenberg H, Huerta JM, Vinagre-Aragon A, Sabin JA, et al. · · 2024 · cited 32 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Background and objectivesInverse associations between caffeine intake and Parkinson disease (PD) have been frequently implicated in human studies.
Closing excerpt
DiscussionThis study demonstrates that the neuroprotection of coffee on PD is attributed to caffeine and its metabolites by detailed quantification of plasma caffeine and its metabolites years before diagnosis.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (282 words)

Background and objectivesInverse associations between caffeine intake and Parkinson disease (PD) have been frequently implicated in human studies. However, no studies have quantified biomarkers of caffeine intake years before PD onset and investigated whether and which caffeine metabolites are related to PD.MethodsAssociations between self-reported total coffee consumption and future PD risk were examined in the EPIC4PD study, a prospective population-based cohort including 6 European countries. Cases with PD were identified through medical records and reviewed by expert neurologists. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for coffee consumption and PD incidence were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. A case-control study nested within the EPIC4PD was conducted, recruiting cases with incident PD and matching each case with a control by age, sex, study center, and fasting status at blood collection. Caffeine metabolites were quantified by high-resolution mass spectrometry in baseline collected plasma samples. Using conditional logistic regression models, odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were estimated for caffeine metabolites and PD risk.ResultsIn the EPIC4PD cohort (comprising 184,024 individuals), the multivariable-adjusted HR comparing the highest coffee intake with nonconsumers was 0.63 (95% CI 0.46-0.88, p = 0.006). In the nested case-control study, which included 351 cases with incident PD and 351 matched controls, prediagnostic caffeine and its primary metabolites, paraxanthine and theophylline, were inversely associated with PD risk. The ORs were 0.80 (95% CI 0.67-0.95, p = 0.009), 0.82 (95% CI 0.69-0.96, p = 0.015), and 0.78 (95% CI 0.65-0.93, p = 0.005), respectively. Adjusting for smoking and alcohol consumption did not substantially change these results.DiscussionThis study demonstrates that the neuroprotection of coffee on PD is attributed to caffeine and its metabolites by detailed quantification of plasma caffeine and its metabolites years before diagnosis.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38513162 · DOI · PMC11175631

Dose and timing effects of caffeine on subsequent sleep: a randomized clinical crossover trial [2]

Randomized controlled trial Gardiner CL, Weakley J, Burke LM, Fernandez F, Johnston RD, Leota J, et al. · · 2025 · cited 30 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Study objectivesTo investigate the effect of a typical dose of caffeine and a high dose of caffeine consumed in the morning, afternoon, and evening on subsequent sleep.
Closing excerpt
ACTRN=12621001625864.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (159 words)

Study objectivesTo investigate the effect of a typical dose of caffeine and a high dose of caffeine consumed in the morning, afternoon, and evening on subsequent sleep.MethodsUsing a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized crossover design, 23 males (25.3 ± 5.0 years) with a moderate habitual caffeine intake (ResultsNo significant effect on objective or subjective sleep occurred with the 100 mg dose of caffeine compared with the placebo (p > .05), but significant effects occurred with the 400 mg dose (p ConclusionsA 100 mg dose of caffeine can be consumed up to 4 hours prior to bedtime, but 400 mg may negatively impact sleep when consumed as one dose within 12 hours of bedtime, with the adverse influence on sleep increasing the closer consumption occurs to bedtime. The discrepancy between objective and subjective sleep quality suggests that individuals may have difficulty accurately perceiving the influence of caffeine on sleep quality.Clinical trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, registration number: ACTRN12621001625864, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12621001625864.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39377163 · DOI · PMC11985402

Caffeine for apnea and prevention of neurodevelopmental impairment in preterm infants: systematic review and meta-analysis [3]

Meta-analysis Oliphant EA, Hanning SM, McKinlay CJD, Alsweiler JM · · 2024 · cited 28 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the evidence for dose and effectiveness of caffeine in preterm infants.
Closing excerpt
The optimal dose remains unknown; further long-term studies, are needed.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (153 words)

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the evidence for dose and effectiveness of caffeine in preterm infants. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL Plus, CENTRAL, and trial databases were searched to July 2022 for trials randomizing preterm infants to caffeine vs. placebo/no treatment, or low (≤10 mg·kg-1) vs. high dose (>10 mg·kg-1 caffeine citrate equivalent). Two researchers extracted data and assessed risk of bias using RoB; GRADE evaluation was completed by all authors. Meta-analysis of 15 studies (3530 infants) was performed in REVMAN across four epochs: neonatal/infant (birth-1 year), early childhood (1-5 years), middle childhood (6-11 years) and adolescence (12-19 years). Caffeine reduced apnea (RR 0.59; 95%CI 0.46,0.75; very low certainty) and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (0.77; 0.69,0.86; moderate certainty), with higher doses more effective. Caffeine had no effect on neurocognitive impairment in early childhood but possible benefit on motor function in middle childhood (0.72; 0.57,0.91; moderate certainty). The optimal dose remains unknown; further long-term studies, are needed.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38553606 · DOI · PMC11161406

Caffeine inhibits nonhomologous end joining by impairing ligase IV/XRCC4 function [4]

Research article Kumari S, Sathees D, Rai PK, Sahu LR, Raghavan SC · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), the most lethal DNA lesions, are repaired primarily by homologous recombination (HR) or nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ).
Closing excerpt
Thus, caffeine suppresses NHEJ by directly inhibiting ligase IV/XRCC4-mediated DNA end joining.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (194 words)

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), the most lethal DNA lesions, are repaired primarily by homologous recombination (HR) or nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). Caffeine is known to inhibit HR by displacing Rad51 from single-stranded DNA, but its impact on NHEJ was unclear. Here, we show that caffeine inhibits NHEJ in a concentration-dependent manner using biochemical and cellular assays. Increased 53BP1 and γ-H2AX foci upon caffeine exposure indicate inhibition of chromosomal NHEJ, leading to accumulation of DSBs. γ-H2AX immunofluorescence, neutral comet, and TUNEL assays revealed persistent DNA breaks and reduced repair. Mechanistically, in silico, biophysical, and biochemical analyses demonstrate that caffeine directly binds to XRCC4, disrupting its interaction with DNA ligase IV and thereby inhibiting repair. Biolayer interferometry confirmed caffeine-XRCC4 binding, with mutation of Thr133 reducing caffeine affinity and impairing XRCC4 recruitment to γ-H2AX-marked DSBs. Disruption of the predicted caffeine interaction site in XRCC4 (T133A) partially restored end joining in the presence of caffeine. Clonogenic survival assays showed decreased survival after caffeine treatment, more prominently in wild-type than in ligase IV-deficient cells. Immunodepletion and reconstitution experiments confirmed that caffeine specifically targets the ligase IV/XRCC4 complex. Thus, caffeine suppresses NHEJ by directly inhibiting ligase IV/XRCC4-mediated DNA end joining.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41773020 · DOI · PMC12956356

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Coffee consumption and health: umbrella review of meta-analyses of multiple health outcomes [5]
    Poole R, Kennedy OJ, Roderick P, Fallowfield JA, Hayes PC, Parkes J · BMJ · 2017 · cited 530 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article International society of sports nutrition position stand: caffeine and exercise performance [6]
    Guest NS, VanDusseldorp TA, Nelson MT, Grgic J, Schoenfeld BJ, Jenkins NDM, et al. · J Int Soc Sports Nutr · 2021 · cited 415 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Interindividual Differences in Caffeine Metabolism and Factors Driving Caffeine Consumption [7]
    Nehlig A · Pharmacol Rev · 2018 · cited 387 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Coffee, Caffeine, and Health Outcomes: An Umbrella Review [8]
    Grosso G, Godos J, Galvano F, Giovannucci EL · Annu Rev Nutr · 2017 · cited 344 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Coffee, Caffeine, and Health [9]
    van Dam RM, Hu FB, Willett WC · N Engl J Med · 2020 · cited 317 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Effects of caffeine ingestion on rating of perceived exertion during and after exercise: a meta-analysis [10]
    Doherty M, Smith PM · Scand J Med Sci Sports · 2005 · cited 289 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Zhao Y, Lai Y, Konijnenberg H, Huerta JM, Vinagre-Aragon A, Sabin JA, et al.. Association of Coffee Consumption and Prediagnostic Caffeine Metabolites With Incident Parkinson Disease in a Population-Based Cohort. . 2024. PMID 38513162 · DOI · PMC11175631
  2. Gardiner CL, Weakley J, Burke LM, Fernandez F, Johnston RD, Leota J, et al.. Dose and timing effects of caffeine on subsequent sleep: a randomized clinical crossover trial. . 2025. PMID 39377163 · DOI · PMC11985402
  3. Oliphant EA, Hanning SM, McKinlay CJD, Alsweiler JM. Caffeine for apnea and prevention of neurodevelopmental impairment in preterm infants: systematic review and meta-analysis. . 2024. PMID 38553606 · DOI · PMC11161406
  4. Kumari S, Sathees D, Rai PK, Sahu LR, Raghavan SC. Caffeine inhibits nonhomologous end joining by impairing ligase IV/XRCC4 function. . 2026. PMID 41773020 · DOI · PMC12956356
  5. Poole R, Kennedy OJ, Roderick P, Fallowfield JA, Hayes PC, Parkes J. Coffee consumption and health: umbrella review of meta-analyses of multiple health outcomes. BMJ. 2017. PMID 29167102 · DOI · PMC5696634
  6. Guest NS, VanDusseldorp TA, Nelson MT, Grgic J, Schoenfeld BJ, Jenkins NDM, et al.. International society of sports nutrition position stand: caffeine and exercise performance. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2021. PMID 33388079 · DOI · PMC7777221
  7. Nehlig A. Interindividual Differences in Caffeine Metabolism and Factors Driving Caffeine Consumption. Pharmacol Rev. 2018. PMID 29514871 · DOI
  8. Grosso G, Godos J, Galvano F, Giovannucci EL. Coffee, Caffeine, and Health Outcomes: An Umbrella Review. Annu Rev Nutr. 2017. PMID 28826374 · DOI
  9. van Dam RM, Hu FB, Willett WC. Coffee, Caffeine, and Health. N Engl J Med. 2020. PMID 32706535 · DOI
  10. Doherty M, Smith PM. Effects of caffeine ingestion on rating of perceived exertion during and after exercise: a meta-analysis. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2005. PMID 15773860 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • TheophyllineDrugs and Chemicals
  • Uric AcidDrugs and Chemicals
  • XanthineDrugs and Chemicals
  • PuromycinDrugs and Chemicals
  • AripiprazoleDrugs and Chemicals
  • CarvedilolDrugs and Chemicals

All 546 articles in Drugs and Chemicals →

At a glance

27,085
PubMed records on this heading
14%
published since 2020
2,083
review articles
1,897
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • TheophyllineDrugs and Chemicals
  • Uric AcidDrugs and Chemicals
  • XanthineDrugs and Chemicals
  • PuromycinDrugs and Chemicals
  • AripiprazoleDrugs and Chemicals

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support