Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Drugs and Chemicals›Busulfan
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Busulfan

Drugs and Chemicals · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

An alkylating agent having a selective immunosuppressive effect on bone marrow.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (968 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

An alkylating agent having a selective immunosuppressive effect on bone marrow. It has been used in the palliative treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (myeloid leukemia, chronic), but although symptomatic relief is provided, no permanent remission is brought about. According to the Fourth Annual Report on Carcinogens (NTP 85-002, 1985), busulfan is listed as a known carcinogen.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Busulphan; n-Butane-1,3-di(methylsulfonate); Myleran; Myléran; Mylecytan; Myelosan; Glyzophrol; Busulfan Wellcome.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Butylene Glycols; Mesylates

Related concepts

  • Bone Marrow
  • Myeloid Leukemia
  • Chronic

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 5,329 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Busulfan” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 798 of them (15.0%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 2,505 records.

Reviews account for 317 records (5.9%) and meta-analyses for 25. Randomized controlled trials number 143 (2.7%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 2,505 records; 2000-2009: 888 records; 2010-2019: 1,138 records; 2020 onward: 798 records2,505through 19998882000-20091,1382010-20197982020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19992,505
2000-2009888
2010-20191,138
2020 onward798
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 5.9 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.5 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 2.7 percentReviews5.9% (317)Meta-analyses0.5% (25)Randomized controlled trials2.7% (143)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 5,329 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews3175.9%
Meta-analyses250.5%
Randomized controlled trials1432.7%

Method: PubMed query "Busulfan"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals

Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Paracrine effects of human amniotic epithelial cells protect against chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage
Zhang Q, Bu S, Sun J, Xu M, Yao X, He K, et al.
2017Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
93cc by
PMID 29179771 · DOI · PMC5704397
CNS-wide repopulation by hematopoietic-derived microglia-like cells corrects progranulin deficiency in mice
Colella P, Sayana R, Suarez-Nieto MV, Sarno J, Nyame K, Xiong J, et al.
2024Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
56cc by
PMID 38969669 · DOI · PMC11226701
The in vitro effect of gefitinib ('Iressa') alone and in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy on human solid tumours
Knight LA, Di Nicolantonio F, Whitehouse P, Mercer S, Sharma S, Glaysher S, et al.
2004Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
43cc by
PMID 15560844 · DOI · PMC535559
Busulfan damages spermatogenic function by inducing orchitis
Zhao L, Wu K, Xu S, Liu S, Yuan K, Wang D
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
6cc by
PMID 40694571 · DOI · PMC12282903

Paracrine effects of human amniotic epithelial cells protect against chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage [1]

Research article Zhang Q, Bu S, Sun J, Xu M, Yao X, He K, et al. · · 2017 · cited 93 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundHuman amniotic epithelial cells (hAECs) are attractive candidates for regenerative medical therapy, with the potential to replace deficient cells and improve functional recovery after injury.
Closing excerpt
ConclusionsThese findings demonstrated that paracrine might be a key pathway in the process of hAECs-mediating ovarian function recovery in animal models of premature ovarian failure/insufficiency (POF/POI).
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (304 words)

BackgroundHuman amniotic epithelial cells (hAECs) are attractive candidates for regenerative medical therapy, with the potential to replace deficient cells and improve functional recovery after injury. Previous studies have demonstrated that transplantation of hAECs effectively alleviate chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage via inhibiting granulose cells apoptosis in animal models of premature ovarian failure/insufficiency (POF/POI). However, the underlying molecular mechanism accounting for hAECs-mediated ovarian function recovery is not fully understood.MethodsTo investigate whether hAECs-secreting cytokines act as molecular basis to attenuate chemotherapy-induced ovarian injury, hAECs or hAEC-conditioned medium (hAEC-CM) was injected into the unilateral ovary of POF/POI mouse. Follicle development was evaluated by H&E staining at 1, 2 months after hAECs or hAEC-CM treatment. In addition, we performed a cytokine array containing 507 human cytokines on hAECs-derived serum-free conditioned medium. Finally, we further investigated whether hAECs could affect chemotherapy-induced apoptosis in primary human granulosa-lutein (hGL) cells and the tube formation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (hUVECs) via a co-culture system in vitro.ResultsWe observed the existence of healthy and mature follicles in ovaries treated with hAECs or hAEC-CM, whereas seriously fibrosis and many atretic follicles were found in the contralateral untreated ovaries of the same mouse. To distinguish cytokines involved in the process of hAECs-restored ovarian function, hAEC-CM was analyzed with a human cytokines array. Results revealed that 109 cytokines in hAEC-CM might participate in a variety of biological processes including apoptosis, angiogenesis, cell cycle and immune response. In vitro experiments, hAECs significantly inhibited chemotherapy-induced apoptosis and activated TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway within primary granulosa-lutein cells in paracrine manner. Furthermore, hAEC-CM was shown to promote angiogenesis in the injured ovaries and enhance the tube formation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (hUVECs) in co-culture system.ConclusionsThese findings demonstrated that paracrine might be a key pathway in the process of hAECs-mediating ovarian function recovery in animal models of premature ovarian failure/insufficiency (POF/POI).

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29179771 · DOI · PMC5704397

CNS-wide repopulation by hematopoietic-derived microglia-like cells corrects progranulin deficiency in mice [2]

Research article Colella P, Sayana R, Suarez-Nieto MV, Sarno J, Nyame K, Xiong J, et al. · · 2024 · cited 56 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation can deliver therapeutic proteins to the central nervous system (CNS) through transplant-derived microglia-like cells.
Closing excerpt
This study advances our understanding of CNS repopulation by hematopoietic-derived cells and demonstrates its therapeutic potential for treating progranulin-dependent neurodegeneration.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (160 words)

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation can deliver therapeutic proteins to the central nervous system (CNS) through transplant-derived microglia-like cells. However, current conditioning approaches result in low and slow engraftment of transplanted cells in the CNS. Here we optimized a brain conditioning regimen that leads to rapid, robust, and persistent microglia replacement without adverse effects on neurobehavior or hematopoiesis. This regimen combines busulfan myeloablation and six days of Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibitor PLX3397. Single-cell analyses revealed unappreciated heterogeneity of microglia-like cells with most cells expressing genes characteristic of homeostatic microglia, brain-border-associated macrophages, and unique markers. Cytokine analysis in the CNS showed transient inductions of myeloproliferative and chemoattractant cytokines that help repopulate the microglia niche. Bone marrow transplant of progranulin-deficient mice conditioned with busulfan and PLX3397 restored progranulin in the brain and eyes and normalized brain lipofuscin storage, proteostasis, and lipid metabolism. This study advances our understanding of CNS repopulation by hematopoietic-derived cells and demonstrates its therapeutic potential for treating progranulin-dependent neurodegeneration.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38969669 · DOI · PMC11226701

The in vitro effect of gefitinib ('Iressa') alone and in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy on human solid tumours [3]

Research article Knight LA, Di Nicolantonio F, Whitehouse P, Mercer S, Sharma S, Glaysher S, et al. · · 2004 · cited 43 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundActivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) triggers downstream signaling pathways that regulate many cellular processes involved in tumour survival and growth.
Closing excerpt
The mechanism involved may relate to the effect of TKIs on growth rate versus their effect on the ability of the cell to survive the stimulus to apoptosis produced by chemotherapy.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (350 words)

BackgroundActivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) triggers downstream signaling pathways that regulate many cellular processes involved in tumour survival and growth. Gefitinib ('Iressa') is an orally active tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeted to the ATP-binding domain of EGFR (HER1; erbB1).MethodsIn this study we have used a standardised ATP-based tumour chemosensitivity assay (ATP-TCA) to measure the activity of gefitinib alone or in combination with different cytotoxic drugs (cisplatin, gemcitabine, oxaliplatin and treosulfan) against a variety of solid tumours (n = 86), including breast, colorectal, oesophageal and ovarian cancer, carcinoma of unknown primary site, cutaneous and uveal melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and sarcoma. The IC50 and IC90 were calculated for each single agent or combination. To allow comparison between samples the IndexSUM was calculated based on the percentage tumour growth inhibition (TGI) at each test drug concentration (TDC). Gefitinib was tested at concentrations ranging from 0.0625-2 microM (TDC = 0.446 microg/ml). This study represents the first use of a TKI in the assay.ResultsThere was heterogeneity in the degree of TGI observed when tumours were tested against single agent gefitinib. 7% (6/86) of tumours exhibited considerable inhibition, but most showed a more modest response resulting in a low TGI. The median IC50 value for single agent gefitinib in all tumours tested was 3.98 microM. Interestingly, gefitinib had both positive and negative effects when used in combination with different cytotoxics. In 59% (45/76) of tumours tested, the addition of gefitinib appeared to potentiate the effect of the cytotoxic agent or combination (of these, 11% (5/45) had a >50% decrease in their IndexSUM). In 38% of tumours (29/76), the TGI was decreased when the combination of gefitinib + cytotoxic was used in comparison to the cytotoxic alone. In the remaining 3% (2/76) there was no change observed.ConclusionThe in vitro model suggests that gefitinib may have differential effects in response to concomitant cytotoxic chemotherapy with the agents tested during this study. The mechanism involved may relate to the effect of TKIs on growth rate versus their effect on the ability of the cell to survive the stimulus to apoptosis produced by chemotherapy.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 15560844 · DOI · PMC535559

Busulfan damages spermatogenic function by inducing orchitis [4]

Research article Zhao L, Wu K, Xu S, Liu S, Yuan K, Wang D · · 2025 · cited 6 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
In order to clarify injure mechanism of busulfan to spermatogenic function, we treated mice with busulfan, the testicular and epididymal weights and sperm concentration significantly decreased and the sperm malformation rate increased over time.
Closing excerpt
The study result will improve the efficiency and safety in spermatogonial stem cell transplant recipients.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (154 words)

In order to clarify injure mechanism of busulfan to spermatogenic function, we treated mice with busulfan, the testicular and epididymal weights and sperm concentration significantly decreased and the sperm malformation rate increased over time. Moreover, testicular interstitial cell infiltration, a smaller seminiferous tubule, and disorganized and shed spermatogenic cells were also observed by immunohistochemical, immunofluorescence detection after the busulfan treatment. Furthermore, the enzyme-linked absorbance assays showed serum interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, and tumor necrosis factor-apha levels (inflammatory factors) were significantly upregulated; blood-testis barrier (BTB)-related protein levels (e.g., N-Cadherin, occludin, and connexin 43) and vimentine gradually decreased. So we infer busulfan treatment induced orchitis, further disrupted the BTB and disrupted the spermatogenic microenvironment, then decreased vimentine and gradually damaged the cytoskeleton, which cause spermatogenic cells losing their supporting from sertoli cells, androgen regulation was also affected, which was detrimental to spermatogenesis. The study result will improve the efficiency and safety in spermatogonial stem cell transplant recipients.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40694571 · DOI · PMC12282903

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: 2021 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management [5]
    Tefferi A, Barbui T · Am J Hematol · 2020 · cited 268 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Busulfan in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation [6]
    Ciurea SO, Andersson BS · Biol Blood Marrow Transplant · 2009 · cited 173 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Personalizing Busulfan-Based Conditioning: Considerations from the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Practice Guidelines Committee [7]
    Palmer J, McCune JS, Perales MA, Marks D, Bubalo J, Mohty M, et al. · Biol Blood Marrow Transplant · 2016 · cited 126 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Body weight-dependent pharmacokinetics of busulfan in paediatric haematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients: towards individualized dosing [8]
    Bartelink IH, Boelens JJ, Bredius RG, Egberts AC, Wang C, Bierings MB, et al. · Clin Pharmacokinet · 2012 · cited 120 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Plasma concentration monitoring of busulfan: does it improve clinical outcome? [9]
    McCune JS, Gibbs JP, Slattery JT · Clin Pharmacokinet · 2000 · cited 114 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Survival, disease-free survival and adverse effects of conditioning for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation with busulfan/cyclophosphamide vs total body irradiation: a meta-analysis [10]
    Hartman AR, Williams SF, Dillon JJ · Bone Marrow Transplant · 1998 · cited 101 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Zhang Q, Bu S, Sun J, Xu M, Yao X, He K, et al.. Paracrine effects of human amniotic epithelial cells protect against chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage. . 2017. PMID 29179771 · DOI · PMC5704397
  2. Colella P, Sayana R, Suarez-Nieto MV, Sarno J, Nyame K, Xiong J, et al.. CNS-wide repopulation by hematopoietic-derived microglia-like cells corrects progranulin deficiency in mice. . 2024. PMID 38969669 · DOI · PMC11226701
  3. Knight LA, Di Nicolantonio F, Whitehouse P, Mercer S, Sharma S, Glaysher S, et al.. The in vitro effect of gefitinib ('Iressa') alone and in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy on human solid tumours. . 2004. PMID 15560844 · DOI · PMC535559
  4. Zhao L, Wu K, Xu S, Liu S, Yuan K, Wang D. Busulfan damages spermatogenic function by inducing orchitis. . 2025. PMID 40694571 · DOI · PMC12282903
  5. Tefferi A, Barbui T. Polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: 2021 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management. Am J Hematol. 2020. PMID 32974939 · DOI
  6. Ciurea SO, Andersson BS. Busulfan in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009. PMID 19361744 · DOI · PMC4261695
  7. Palmer J, McCune JS, Perales MA, Marks D, Bubalo J, Mohty M, et al.. Personalizing Busulfan-Based Conditioning: Considerations from the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Practice Guidelines Committee. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016. PMID 27481448 · DOI
  8. Bartelink IH, Boelens JJ, Bredius RG, Egberts AC, Wang C, Bierings MB, et al.. Body weight-dependent pharmacokinetics of busulfan in paediatric haematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients: towards individualized dosing. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2012. PMID 22455797 · DOI
  9. McCune JS, Gibbs JP, Slattery JT. Plasma concentration monitoring of busulfan: does it improve clinical outcome?. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2000. PMID 10976660 · DOI
  10. Hartman AR, Williams SF, Dillon JJ. Survival, disease-free survival and adverse effects of conditioning for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation with busulfan/cyclophosphamide vs total body irradiation: a meta-analysis. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998. PMID 9733266 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • ChloraloseDrugs and Chemicals
  • ChloramphenicolDrugs and Chemicals
  • Congo RedDrugs and Chemicals
  • Ethylene GlycolDrugs and Chemicals
  • Evans BlueDrugs and Chemicals
  • PoloxamerDrugs and Chemicals

All 546 articles in Drugs and Chemicals →

At a glance

5,329
PubMed records on this heading
15%
published since 2020
317
review articles
143
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • ChloraloseDrugs and Chemicals
  • ChloramphenicolDrugs and Chemicals
  • Congo RedDrugs and Chemicals
  • Ethylene GlycolDrugs and Chemicals
  • Evans BlueDrugs and Chemicals

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support