Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (859 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
An anxiolytic agent and serotonin receptor agonist belonging to the azaspirodecanedione class of compounds. Its structure is unrelated to those of the benzodiazapines, but it has an efficacy comparable to diazepam.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: N-(4-(4-(2-pyrimidinyl)-1-piperazinyl)butyl)-1-cyclopentanediacetamide; Buspar; Bespar; Buspirone Hydrochloride; Hydrochloride, Buspirone; Gen-Buspirone; Gen Buspirone; Anxut.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Spiro Compounds; Piperazines; Pyrimidines
Related concepts
- Benzodiazapines
- Diazepam
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 2,009 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Buspirone” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 105 of them (5.2%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 1,147 records.
Reviews account for 212 records (10.6%) and meta-analyses for 17. Randomized controlled trials number 236 (11.7%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 1,147 |
| 2000-2009 | 441 |
| 2010-2019 | 316 |
| 2020 onward | 105 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 212 | 10.6% |
| Meta-analyses | 17 | 0.8% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 236 | 11.7% |
Method: PubMed query "Buspirone"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals
Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
Engaging cervical spinal circuitry with non-invasive spinal stimulation and buspirone to restore hand function in chronic motor complete patients [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The combined effects of cervical electrical stimulation alone or in combination with the monoaminergic agonist buspirone on upper limb motor function were determined in six subjects with motor complete (AIS B) injury at C5 or above and more than one year from time of injury.
- Closing excerpt
- The potential impact of these findings on individuals with upper limb paralysis could be dramatic functionally, psychologically, and economically.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (177 words)
The combined effects of cervical electrical stimulation alone or in combination with the monoaminergic agonist buspirone on upper limb motor function were determined in six subjects with motor complete (AIS B) injury at C5 or above and more than one year from time of injury. Voluntary upper limb function was evaluated through measures of controlled hand contraction, handgrip force production, dexterity measures, and validated clinical assessment batteries. Repeated measure analysis of variance was used to evaluate functional metrics, EMG amplitude, and changes in mean grip strength. In aggregate, mean hand strength increased by greater than 300% with transcutaneous electrical stimulation and buspirone while a corresponding clinically significant improvement was observed in upper extremity motor scores and the action research arm test. Some functional improvements persisted for an extended period after the study interventions were discontinued. We demonstrate that, with these novel interventions, cervical spinal circuitry can be neuromodulated to improve volitional control of hand function in tetraplegic subjects. The potential impact of these findings on individuals with upper limb paralysis could be dramatic functionally, psychologically, and economically.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30341390 · DOI · PMC6195617
Buspirone alleviates anxiety, depression, and colitis; and modulates gut microbiota in mice [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Gut microbiota regulate the neurodevelopmental processes and brain functions through the regulation of the microbiota-gut interaction and gut-brain communication.
- Closing excerpt
- Future studies can help to explain the relationship, if any, in the central and peripheral effects of buspirone.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (268 words)
Gut microbiota regulate the neurodevelopmental processes and brain functions through the regulation of the microbiota-gut interaction and gut-brain communication. Buspirone, an agonist for serotonin 5-HT1A receptors, is used for the treatment of anxiety/depression. Therefore, to understand the gut microbiota-mediated mechanism of buspirone on anxiety/depression, we examined its effect on the immobilization stress (IS) or Escherichia coli K1 (EC)-induced anxiety/depression in mice. Oral or intraperitoneal administration of buspirone significantly suppressed stressor-induced anxiety/depression-like behaviors in the elevated plus maze, light/dark transition, tail suspension, and forced swimming tasks. Their treatments also reduced TNF-α expression and NF-κB+/Iba1+ cell population in the hippocampus and myeloperoxidase activity and NF-κB+/CD11c+ cell population in the colon. Buspirone treatments partially restored IS- or EC-induced gut microbiota perturbation such as β-diversity to those of normal control mice: they reduced the IS- or EC-induced gut Proteobacteria population. In particular, the anxiolytic activity of buspirone was positively correlated with the populations of Bacteroides and PAC001066_g in EC- or IS-exposed mice, while the populations of Lachnospiraceae, KE159660_g, LLKB_g, Helicobacter, and PAC001228_g were negatively correlated. The anti-depressant effect of buspirone was positively correlated with the Roseburia population. The fecal microbiota transplantations from buspirone-treated mice with IS-induced anxiety/depression or normal control mice suppressed IS-induced anxiety/depression-like behaviors and reduced hippocampal NF-κB+/Iba1+ and colonic NF-κB+/CD11c+ cell populations in the transplanted mice. Furthermore, they modified IS-induced perturbation of gut microbiota composition, particularly Proteobacteria, in the transplanted mice. In conclusion, buspirone alleviates IS as well as EC-induced anxiety/depression and colitis. It also suppresses associated neuroinflammation and modulates gut microbiota. Future studies can help to explain the relationship, if any, in the central and peripheral effects of buspirone.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33731795 · DOI · PMC7969772
The 5-HT1A receptor agonist buspirone improves esophageal motor function and symptoms in systemic sclerosis: a 4-week, open-label trial [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundAcute administration of the oral 5-HT1A receptor agonist buspirone, which is commonly used as an anxiolytic drug, may improve compromised lower esophageal sphincter function.
- Closing excerpt
- gov Identifier: NCT02363478 Registered: 21-02-2014.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (268 words)
BackgroundAcute administration of the oral 5-HT1A receptor agonist buspirone, which is commonly used as an anxiolytic drug, may improve compromised lower esophageal sphincter function. In an open-label trial we assessed the effects of buspirone on esophageal motor function and symptoms in patients with esophageal involvement associated with systemic sclerosis (SSc).MethodsThirty consecutive patients with SSc and symptomatic esophageal involvement, despite treatment with proton pump inhibitors, underwent high resolution manometry and chest computed tomography for assessment of motor function and esophageal dilatation, respectively. Regurgitation, heartburn, dysphagia, and chest pain severity was subjectively scored by visual analog scales. Manometric parameters (primary endpoint) and symptom severity (secondary endpoint) were re-examined after 4-week daily administration of 20 mg buspirone. Other medications remained unchanged.ResultsEight patients did not complete the trial because of buspirone-associated dizziness (n = 2), or nausea (n = 2), or reluctancy to undergo final manometry. In the remaining 22 patients lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure increased from 7.7 ± 3.9 to 12.2 ± 4.6 mmHg (p = 0.00002) after buspirone administration; other manometric parameters did not change. Statistical analysis revealed negative correlation between individual increases in resting LES pressure and supra-aortic esophageal diameter (r = -0.589, p = 0.017), suggesting a more beneficial effect in patients with less severely affected esophageal function. Heartburn and regurgitation scores decreased at 4 weeks compared to baseline (p = 0.001, and p = 0.022, respectively).ConclusionOur findings warrant more conclusive evaluation with a double-blind controlled study; however, buspirone could potentially be given under observation for objective improvement in all patients with SSc who report reflux symptoms despite undergoing standard treatment.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02363478 Registered: 21-02-2014.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 27586891 · DOI · PMC5009650
The behavioural effects of the serotonin 1A receptor agonist buspirone on reward processing in healthy volunteers: A randomised, placebo-controlled study [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundThe 5-HT1A receptor is widely expressed throughout the brain and is implicated in reward processing; however, the acute effects of 5-HT1A receptor agonism on reward and aversive processing in humans remain unclear.
- Closing excerpt
- gov, Serotonin-receptor Agonism in Reward Processing, NCT05357547).
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (146 words)
BackgroundThe 5-HT1A receptor is widely expressed throughout the brain and is implicated in reward processing; however, the acute effects of 5-HT1A receptor agonism on reward and aversive processing in humans remain unclear.AimsWe investigate whether acute 5-HT1A receptor agonism influences various stages of reward and aversive processing, specifically consummation, motivation and learning.MethodsIn a double-blind, placebo-controlled study using a single 20 mg dose of buspirone, a serotonin 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist, 62 healthy volunteers underwent 3 tasks: a taste task, an effort-expenditure decision task and a probabilistic instrumental learning task (PILT).ResultsIn healthy volunteers, acute buspirone increases the aversiveness of bitter tastes, non-significantly reduces willingness to exert effort and increases optimal choice during loss trials in the PILT.ConclusionsSpeculatively, this could indicate that acute 5-HT1A agonism may worsen several stages of aversive processing, with minimal effect on reward processing. The study was pre-registered (clinicaltrials.gov, Serotonin-receptor Agonism in Reward Processing, NCT05357547).
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41902663 · DOI · PMC13490652
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Buspirone: what is it all about? [5]
- Research article Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of buspirone, an anxiolytic drug [6]
- Research article Buspirone, a new approach to the treatment of anxiety [7]
- Research article Molecular basis of buspirone's anxiolytic action [8]
- Research article Neurochemistry and neurophysiology of buspirone and gepirone: interactions at presynaptic and postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors [9]
- Research article Use of buspirone in patients with generalized anxiety disorder and coexisting depressive symptoms. A meta-analysis of eight randomized, controlled studies [10]
References
- Freyvert Y, Yong NA, Morikawa E, Zdunowski S, Sarino ME, Gerasimenko Y, et al.. Engaging cervical spinal circuitry with non-invasive spinal stimulation and buspirone to restore hand function in chronic motor complete patients. . 2018. PMID 30341390 · DOI · PMC6195617
- Kim JK, Han SK, Joo MK, Kim DH. Buspirone alleviates anxiety, depression, and colitis; and modulates gut microbiota in mice. . 2021. PMID 33731795 · DOI · PMC7969772
- Karamanolis GP, Panopoulos S, Denaxas K, Karlaftis A, Zorbala A, Kamberoglou D, et al.. The 5-HT1A receptor agonist buspirone improves esophageal motor function and symptoms in systemic sclerosis: a 4-week, open-label trial. . 2016. PMID 27586891 · DOI · PMC5009650
- Smith ALW, Hamilton S, Murphy SE, Cowen PJ, Harmer CJ. The behavioural effects of the serotonin 1A receptor agonist buspirone on reward processing in healthy volunteers: A randomised, placebo-controlled study. . 2026. PMID 41902663 · DOI · PMC13490652
- Loane C, Politis M. Buspirone: what is it all about?. Brain Res. 2012. PMID 22608068 · DOI
- Mahmood I, Sahajwalla C. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of buspirone, an anxiolytic drug. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1999. PMID 10320950 · DOI
- Taylor DP. Buspirone, a new approach to the treatment of anxiety. FASEB J. 1988. PMID 2836252 · DOI
- Tunnicliff G. Molecular basis of buspirone's anxiolytic action. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1991. PMID 1796057 · DOI
- Yocca FD. Neurochemistry and neurophysiology of buspirone and gepirone: interactions at presynaptic and postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990. PMID 1973941 · DOI
- Gammans RE, Stringfellow JC, Hvizdos AJ, Seidehamel RJ, Cohn JB, Wilcox CS, et al.. Use of buspirone in patients with generalized anxiety disorder and coexisting depressive symptoms. A meta-analysis of eight randomized, controlled studies. Neuropsychobiology. 1992. PMID 1454160 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.