Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Autografts
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Autografts

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 3 min read

Transplant comprised of an individual's own tissue, transferred from one part of the body to another.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (676 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Transplant comprised of an individual's own tissue, transferred from one part of the body to another.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Autograft; Autologous Transplants; Autologous Transplant; Transplant, Autologous; Transplants, Autologous; Autotransplants; Autotransplant.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Transplants
See also
Transplantation, Autologous

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 4,776 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Autografts” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 1,802 of them (37.7%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 2,732 records.

Reviews account for 647 records (13.5%) and meta-analyses for 156. Randomized controlled trials number 244 (5.1%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 240 records; 2000-2009: 2 records; 2010-2019: 2,732 records; 2020 onward: 1,802 records240through 199922000-20092,7322010-20191,8022020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 1999240
2000-20092
2010-20192,732
2020 onward1,802
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 13.5 percent; Meta-analyses: 3.3 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 5.1 percentReviews13.5% (647)Meta-analyses3.3% (156)Randomized controlled trials5.1% (244)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 4,776 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews64713.5%
Meta-analyses1563.3%
Randomized controlled trials2445.1%

Method: PubMed query "Autografts"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a rabbit model using silk-collagen scaffold and comparison with autograft
Bi F, Shi Z, Liu A, Guo P, Yan S
2015Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
55cc by
PMID 25938408 · DOI · PMC4418759
Regional grafting of autologous adipose tissue is effective in inducing prompt healing of indolent digital ulcers in patients with systemic sclerosis: results of a monocentric randomized controlled study
Del Papa N, Di Luca G, Andracco R, Zaccara E, Maglione W, Pignataro F, et al.
2019Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
47cc by
PMID 30616671 · DOI · PMC6322261
Autograft or allograft for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: a health economics perspective
Mistry H, Metcalfe A, Colquitt J, Loveman E, Smith NA, Royle P, et al.
2019Systematic review
Design not recorded in structured metadata
46cc by
PMID 30874836 · DOI · PMC6541574
Preoperative MRI-based prediction of autograft diameter in ACL reconstruction using hamstring and peroneus longus tendons
Pande AP, Hegde AS, Suprasanna K, Shetty CB, Mane PP, Hebsur MN
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 42071240 · DOI · PMC13343710

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a rabbit model using silk-collagen scaffold and comparison with autograft [1]

Research article Bi F, Shi Z, Liu A, Guo P, Yan S · · 2015 · cited 55 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The objective of the present study was to perform an in vivo assessment of a novel silk-collagen scaffold for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
Closing excerpt
The results indicate that the silk-collagen scaffold has considerable potential for clinical application.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (208 words)

The objective of the present study was to perform an in vivo assessment of a novel silk-collagen scaffold for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. First, a silk-collagen scaffold was fabricated by combining sericin-extracted knitted silk fibroin mesh and type I collagen to mimic the components of the ligament. Scaffolds were electron-beam sterilized and rolled up to replace the ACL in 20 rabbits in the scaffold group, and autologous semitendinosus tendons were used to reconstruct the ACL in the autograft control group. At 4 and 16 weeks after surgery, grafts were retrieved and analyzed for neoligament regeneration and tendon-bone healing. To evaluate neoligament regeneration, H&E and immunohistochemical staining was performed, and to assess tendon-bone healing, micro-CT, biomechanical test, H&E and Russell-Movat pentachrome staining were performed. Cell infiltration increased over time in the scaffold group, and abundant fibroblast-like cells were found in the core of the scaffold graft at 16 weeks postoperatively. Tenascin-C was strongly positive in newly regenerated tissue at 4 and 16 weeks postoperatively in the scaffold group, similar to observations in the autograft group. Compared with the autograft group, tendon-bone healing was better in the scaffold group with trabecular bone growth into the scaffold. The results indicate that the silk-collagen scaffold has considerable potential for clinical application.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 25938408 · DOI · PMC4418759

Regional grafting of autologous adipose tissue is effective in inducing prompt healing of indolent digital ulcers in patients with systemic sclerosis: results of a monocentric randomized controlled study [2]

Randomized controlled trial Del Papa N, Di Luca G, Andracco R, Zaccara E, Maglione W, Pignataro F, et al. · · 2019 · cited 47 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundA randomized controlled trial (RCT) was performed to confirm preliminary uncontrolled data indicating that regional adipose tissue (AT) grafting (G) is effective in inducing ischemic digital ulcer (IDU) healing in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).
Closing excerpt
Registered retrospectively on 25 January 2018.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (174 words)

BackgroundA randomized controlled trial (RCT) was performed to confirm preliminary uncontrolled data indicating that regional adipose tissue (AT) grafting (G) is effective in inducing ischemic digital ulcer (IDU) healing in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).Patients and methodsSSc patients with IDUs were randomized to be blindly treated with AT-G or a sham procedure (SP). AT-G consisted of injection, at the base of the finger with the IDU, of 0.5-1 ml AT after centrifugation of fat aspirate. The SP consisted of false liposuction and local injection of saline solution. The primary endpoint was to compare the cumulative prevalence of healed IDUs in the two groups within the following 8 weeks.ResultsAT-G and the SP were carried out in 25 and 13 patients, respectively. The two groups were comparable for age, gender, disease duration, and SSc subtypes. IDU healing was observed in 23/25 and 1/13 patients treated with AT-G and the SP, respectively (p ConclusionThis RCT strongly confirms that AT-G is effective in inducing IDU healing in SSc patients.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03406988 . Registered retrospectively on 25 January 2018.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30616671 · DOI · PMC6322261

Autograft or allograft for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: a health economics perspective [3]

Systematic review Mistry H, Metcalfe A, Colquitt J, Loveman E, Smith NA, Royle P, et al. · · 2019 · cited 46 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
PurposeTo assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of allografts versus autografts in the reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligaments.
Closing excerpt
Level of evidenceII.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (121 words)

PurposeTo assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of allografts versus autografts in the reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligaments.MethodsSystematic review of comparative clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis.ResultsBoth autograft and allograft reconstruction are highly effective. Recent studies show little difference in failure rates between autografts and allografts (about 6% and 7%, respectively). In cost-effectiveness analysis, the price differential is the main factor, making autografts the first choice. However, there will be situations, particularly in revision ACL reconstruction, where an allograft may be preferred, or may be the only reasonable option available.ConclusionIn ACL reconstruction, clinical results with autografts are as good as or slightly better than with allografts. Allografts cost more, indicating that autografts are more cost-effective and should usually be first choice.Level of evidenceII.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30874836 · DOI · PMC6541574

Preoperative MRI-based prediction of autograft diameter in ACL reconstruction using hamstring and peroneus longus tendons [4]

Research article Pande AP, Hegde AS, Suprasanna K, Shetty CB, Mane PP, Hebsur MN · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundTo evaluate the predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived cross-sectional area (CSA) measurements of hamstring and peroneus longus tendons in estimating intraoperative autograft diameter during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, and to identify clinically useful CSA cut-offs for achieving graft diameters ≥ 8 mm.
Closing excerpt
This study establishes clinically relevant CSA thresholds for HT and PLT tendons and is the first to report such values for PLT, aiding preoperative graft selection in ACL reconstruction.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (173 words)

BackgroundTo evaluate the predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived cross-sectional area (CSA) measurements of hamstring and peroneus longus tendons in estimating intraoperative autograft diameter during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, and to identify clinically useful CSA cut-offs for achieving graft diameters ≥ 8 mm.MethodsFifty-two patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction were included in this prospective observational study, with 26 each in the hamstring tendon (HT) and peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autograft groups. Preoperative CSA was measured on axial MRI at specific anatomical levels. Intraoperative graft diameters were recorded post- harvest. Correlation analysis and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess predictive value and determine CSA thresholds for adequate graft size.ResultsFor the HT group, CSA measured at the medial femoral condyle showed the strongest correlation with intraoperative diameter (r = 0.782; p ConclusionMRI-based CSA measurement provides a reliable, non-invasive method for predicting autograft adequacy. This study establishes clinically relevant CSA thresholds for HT and PLT tendons and is the first to report such values for PLT, aiding preoperative graft selection in ACL reconstruction.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42071240 · DOI · PMC13343710

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft in outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of 5182 patients [5]
    Kraeutler MJ, Bravman JT, McCarty EC · Am J Sports Med · 2013 · cited 164 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Ross Procedure in Adults for Cardiologists and Cardiac Surgeons: JACC State-of-the-Art Review [6]
    Mazine A, El-Hamamsy I, Verma S, Peterson MD, Bonow RO, Yacoub MH, et al. · J Am Coll Cardiol · 2018 · cited 146 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Autogenous bone harvesting and grafting in advanced jaw resorption: morbidity, resorption and implant survival [7]
    Nkenke E, Neukam FW · Eur J Oral Implantol · 2014 · cited 145 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Synthetic bone graft versus autograft or allograft for spinal fusion: a systematic review [8]
    Buser Z, Brodke DS, Youssef JA, Meisel HJ, Myhre SL, Hashimoto R, et al. · J Neurosurg Spine · 2016 · cited 127 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Outcomes of autotransplanted teeth with complete root formation: a systematic review and meta-analysis [9]
    Chung WC, Tu YK, Lin YH, Lu HK · J Clin Periodontol · 2014 · cited 121 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Conjunctival autograft for pterygium [10]
    Clearfield E, Muthappan V, Wang X, Kuo IC · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2016 · cited 83 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Bi F, Shi Z, Liu A, Guo P, Yan S. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a rabbit model using silk-collagen scaffold and comparison with autograft. . 2015. PMID 25938408 · DOI · PMC4418759
  2. Del Papa N, Di Luca G, Andracco R, Zaccara E, Maglione W, Pignataro F, et al.. Regional grafting of autologous adipose tissue is effective in inducing prompt healing of indolent digital ulcers in patients with systemic sclerosis: results of a monocentric randomized controlled study. . 2019. PMID 30616671 · DOI · PMC6322261
  3. Mistry H, Metcalfe A, Colquitt J, Loveman E, Smith NA, Royle P, et al.. Autograft or allograft for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: a health economics perspective. . 2019. PMID 30874836 · DOI · PMC6541574
  4. Pande AP, Hegde AS, Suprasanna K, Shetty CB, Mane PP, Hebsur MN. Preoperative MRI-based prediction of autograft diameter in ACL reconstruction using hamstring and peroneus longus tendons. . 2026. PMID 42071240 · DOI · PMC13343710
  5. Kraeutler MJ, Bravman JT, McCarty EC. Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft in outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of 5182 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2013. PMID 23585484 · DOI
  6. Mazine A, El-Hamamsy I, Verma S, Peterson MD, Bonow RO, Yacoub MH, et al.. Ross Procedure in Adults for Cardiologists and Cardiac Surgeons: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018. PMID 30497563 · DOI
  7. Nkenke E, Neukam FW. Autogenous bone harvesting and grafting in advanced jaw resorption: morbidity, resorption and implant survival. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014. PMID 24977256
  8. Buser Z, Brodke DS, Youssef JA, Meisel HJ, Myhre SL, Hashimoto R, et al.. Synthetic bone graft versus autograft or allograft for spinal fusion: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016. PMID 27231812 · DOI
  9. Chung WC, Tu YK, Lin YH, Lu HK. Outcomes of autotransplanted teeth with complete root formation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2014. PMID 24393101 · DOI
  10. Clearfield E, Muthappan V, Wang X, Kuo IC. Conjunctival autograft for pterygium. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID 26867004 · DOI · PMC5032146

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • TransplantsAnatomy and Physiology
  • Graft RejectionImmunology
  • Abdominal CavityAnatomy and Physiology
  • Abdominal FatAnatomy and Physiology
  • Abdominal WallAnatomy and Physiology
  • AcetabulumAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

4,776
PubMed records on this heading
38%
published since 2020
647
review articles
244
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • TransplantsAnatomy and Physiology
  • Graft RejectionImmunology
  • Abdominal CavityAnatomy and Physiology
  • Abdominal FatAnatomy and Physiology
  • Abdominal WallAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support