Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Cardiovascular Medicine›Atrial Fibrillation
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Atrial Fibrillation

Cardiovascular Medicine · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed9 referencesApproximately 4 min read

Abnormal cardiac rhythm that is characterized by rapid, uncoordinated firing of electrical impulses in the upper chambers of the heart (heart atria).

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 3 complete abstracts (654 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Abnormal cardiac rhythm that is characterized by rapid, uncoordinated firing of electrical impulses in the upper chambers of the heart (heart atria). In such case, blood cannot be effectively pumped into the lower chambers of the heart (heart ventricles). It is caused by abnormal impulse generation.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Atrial Fibrillations; Fibrillation, Atrial; Fibrillations, Atrial; Auricular Fibrillation; Auricular Fibrillations; Fibrillation, Auricular; Fibrillations, Auricular; Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Arrhythmias, Cardiac

Related concepts

  • Heart Atria
  • Heart Ventricles

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 82,582 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Atrial Fibrillation” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 26,982 of them (32.7%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 31,457 records.

Reviews account for 12,739 records (15.4%) and meta-analyses for 2,615. Randomized controlled trials number 4,093 (5.0%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 10,078 records; 2000-2009: 14,065 records; 2010-2019: 31,457 records; 2020 onward: 26,982 records10,078through 199914,0652000-200931,4572010-201926,9822020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199910,078
2000-200914,065
2010-201931,457
2020 onward26,982
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 15.4 percent; Meta-analyses: 3.2 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 5.0 percentReviews15.4% (12,739)Meta-analyses3.2% (2,615)Randomized controlled trials5.0% (4,093)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 82,582 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews12,73915.4%
Meta-analyses2,6153.2%
Randomized controlled trials4,0935.0%

Method: PubMed query "Atrial Fibrillation"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in cardiovascular medicine

Cardiovascular medicine has an unusually large body of randomized trials, so the type of outcome matters: hard clinical events such as death, heart attack and stroke carry more weight than changes in blood pressure, cholesterol or imaging markers that only predict risk. Observational studies can show associations but are confounded by age, lifestyle and other illness. Check whether a result is about prevention or treatment, the baseline risk of participants, and the absolute rather than only the relative size of any benefit.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Bleeding risk assessment in patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation after coronary surgery: a proof-of-concept study
Rezk M, Taha A, Martinsson A, Nielsen SJ, Gudbjartsson T, Bergfeldt L, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
5cc by
PMID 42299626 · DOI · PMC13588634
Deep learning prediction of left atrial structure and function from 12-lead electrocardiograms
Brody JA, Yogeswaran V, Wiggins KL, Sitlani CM, Bis JC, Chen LY, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
3cc by
PMID 42669665 · DOI · PMC13527101
Inpatient Outcomes and Complications After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Rural Versus Urban Hospitals in the United States
Nguyen A, Khan MZ, Neely J, Alruwaili W, Naveed MA, Devera JL, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 42363838 · DOI · PMC13309940

Bleeding risk assessment in patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation after coronary surgery: a proof-of-concept study [1]

Research article Rezk M, Taha A, Martinsson A, Nielsen SJ, Gudbjartsson T, Bergfeldt L, et al. · · 2026 · cited 5 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
AimsCurrent guidelines recommend considering long-term oral anticoagulation in patients with new-onset post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery, balancing stroke and bleeding risk.
Closing excerpt
Further studies are necessary to identify the optimal risk score and its role in oral anticoagulation decision pathway to improve clinical outcomes.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (258 words)

AimsCurrent guidelines recommend considering long-term oral anticoagulation in patients with new-onset post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery, balancing stroke and bleeding risk. However, no specific approach to bleeding risk assessment is provided. We explored in a proof-of-concept study whether a bleeding risk score can identify patients with POAF after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with increased risk of post-discharge major bleeding.Methods and resultsThis observational cohort study included 4436 patients with POAF after CABG in 2009-2020 without oral anticoagulation. The four-item PRECISE-DAPT score (based on age, creatinine clearance, preoperative haemoglobin concentration, and previous bleeding) was calculated for all patients. Bleeding risk was defined as high (≥25 points), medium (16-24 points), or low (≤15 points). Associations between bleeding risk and major bleeding events during the first post-operative year were assessed by Cox regression. Discrimination was evaluated with C-statistics, and calibration was assessed by comparing expected and observed bleeding rates. Major bleeding occurred in 2.1% of patients during the first year. The score classified 36.0% of patients as high bleeding risk. The hazard ratio for high vs. low bleeding risk was 4.81 (95% CI 2.59-8.96). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.68 (95% CI 0.63-0.73). Calibration showed good agreement between expected and observed bleeding events in patients with an annual bleeding risk up to 7%.ConclusionA bleeding risk score can be used to stratify patients with POAF after CABG into groups with different post-discharge bleeding risk. Further studies are necessary to identify the optimal risk score and its role in oral anticoagulation decision pathway to improve clinical outcomes.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42299626 · DOI · PMC13588634

Deep learning prediction of left atrial structure and function from 12-lead electrocardiograms [2]

Research article Brody JA, Yogeswaran V, Wiggins KL, Sitlani CM, Bis JC, Chen LY, et al. · · 2026 · cited 3 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Abnormal cardiac atrial structure and function, termed atrial cardiopathy, typically precedes atrial fibrillation and downstream cardiovascular complications, yet detection is limited by the cost and accessibility of high-quality cardiac imaging.
Closing excerpt
This model is an inexpensive, accessible tool that identifies individuals at high-risk for atrial fibrillation and related complications.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (163 words)

Abnormal cardiac atrial structure and function, termed atrial cardiopathy, typically precedes atrial fibrillation and downstream cardiovascular complications, yet detection is limited by the cost and accessibility of high-quality cardiac imaging. Here we show that a deep learning model trained on 12-lead electrocardiograms paired with 21,749 cardiac magnetic resonance scans from the UK Biobank predicts left atrial structure and function. Model-derived measures of atrial cardiopathy are strongly associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and ischemic stroke after adjustment for clinical risk factors and biomarkers in two external cohorts, with magnitudes comparable to or greater than those for direct imaging measures and clinical risk factors. The risk of cardioembolic stroke, the hallmark complication of atrial fibrillation, increases 66% per standard deviation of left atrial volume. In exploratory analyses, model measures predict cardiac monitor-detected atrial fibrillation more accurately than a clinical risk prediction tool and NT-proBNP levels. This model is an inexpensive, accessible tool that identifies individuals at high-risk for atrial fibrillation and related complications.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42669665 · DOI · PMC13527101

Inpatient Outcomes and Complications After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Rural Versus Urban Hospitals in the United States [3]

Research article Nguyen A, Khan MZ, Neely J, Alruwaili W, Naveed MA, Devera JL, et al. · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundDisparities in management of atrial fibrillation in rural and urban hospitals across the U.
Closing excerpt
Further investigation into the specific factors driving these inequities is encouraged to promote improved access to and outcomes of cardiovascular care for rural residents.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (233 words)

BackgroundDisparities in management of atrial fibrillation in rural and urban hospitals across the U.S. have been reported. However, studies investigating disparities regarding outcomes and complications after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) based on hospital location are lacking.ObjectiveTo evaluate differences in outcomes and complications related to LAAO among rural and urban hospitals.MethodsThe National Inpatient Sample was used to identify patients who underwent LAAO implantations in the U.S. from 2016-2020. Study endpoints assessed included inpatient complications, outcomes, and resource utilization after LAAO procedures among rural and urban hospitals.ResultsFrom 2016-2020, there were a total of 87 315 and 1985 LAAO device placements in urban and rural hospitals, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar among both groups, with a few exceptions. After multivariable adjustment for confounders, odds of inpatient complications and mortality were similar among both groups. However, rural LAAO recipients experienced greater rates of discharge to an acute care facility (3.3% vs 2.4%, p = 0.01), as well as lower costs (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.49-0.69) and length of stay (aOR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.81-0.98).ConclusionsA majority of LAAO implantations occurred in urban hospitals in the U.S. Baseline characteristics and adjusted odds of inpatient complications and mortality were similar in rural and urban recipients. However, important differences were described regarding resource utilization and disposition. Further investigation into the specific factors driving these inequities is encouraged to promote improved access to and outcomes of cardiovascular care for rural residents.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42363838 · DOI · PMC13309940

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Risk factors for cognitive impairment and dementia after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis [4]
    Filler J, Georgakis MK, Dichgans M · Lancet Healthy Longev · 2024 · cited 114 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Assessing the association between triglyceride-glucose index and atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis [5]
    Azarboo A, Behnoush AH, Vaziri Z, Daneshvar MS, Taghvaei A, Jalali A, et al. · Eur J Med Res · 2024 · cited 68 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Residual leaks following percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion and outcomes: a meta-analysis [6]
    Samaras A, Papazoglou AS, Balomenakis C, Bekiaridou A, Moysidis DV, Patsiou V, et al. · Eur Heart J · 2024 · cited 67 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Meta-analysis of genome-wide associations and polygenic risk prediction for atrial fibrillation in more than 180,000 cases [7]
    Roselli C, Surakka I, Olesen MS, Sveinbjornsson G, Marston NA, Choi SH, et al. · Nat Genet · 2025 · cited 57 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists on Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [8]
    Karakasis P, Fragakis N, Patoulias D, Theofilis P, Kassimis G, Karamitsos T, et al. · Adv Ther · 2024 · cited 48 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist semaglutide reduces atrial fibrillation incidence: A systematic review and meta-analysis [9]
    Saglietto A, Falasconi G, Penela D, Francia P, Sau A, Ng FS, et al. · Eur J Clin Invest · 2024 · cited 46 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Rezk M, Taha A, Martinsson A, Nielsen SJ, Gudbjartsson T, Bergfeldt L, et al.. Bleeding risk assessment in patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation after coronary surgery: a proof-of-concept study. . 2026. PMID 42299626 · DOI · PMC13588634
  2. Brody JA, Yogeswaran V, Wiggins KL, Sitlani CM, Bis JC, Chen LY, et al.. Deep learning prediction of left atrial structure and function from 12-lead electrocardiograms. . 2026. PMID 42669665 · DOI · PMC13527101
  3. Nguyen A, Khan MZ, Neely J, Alruwaili W, Naveed MA, Devera JL, et al.. Inpatient Outcomes and Complications After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Rural Versus Urban Hospitals in the United States. . 2026. PMID 42363838 · DOI · PMC13309940
  4. Filler J, Georgakis MK, Dichgans M. Risk factors for cognitive impairment and dementia after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2024. PMID 38101426 · DOI
  5. Azarboo A, Behnoush AH, Vaziri Z, Daneshvar MS, Taghvaei A, Jalali A, et al.. Assessing the association between triglyceride-glucose index and atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Med Res. 2024. PMID 38347644 · DOI · PMC10860290
  6. Samaras A, Papazoglou AS, Balomenakis C, Bekiaridou A, Moysidis DV, Patsiou V, et al.. Residual leaks following percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion and outcomes: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2024. PMID 38088437 · DOI
  7. Roselli C, Surakka I, Olesen MS, Sveinbjornsson G, Marston NA, Choi SH, et al.. Meta-analysis of genome-wide associations and polygenic risk prediction for atrial fibrillation in more than 180,000 cases. Nat Genet. 2025. PMID 40050429 · DOI · PMC12094172
  8. Karakasis P, Fragakis N, Patoulias D, Theofilis P, Kassimis G, Karamitsos T, et al.. Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists on Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Adv Ther. 2024. PMID 39141282 · DOI
  9. Saglietto A, Falasconi G, Penela D, Francia P, Sau A, Ng FS, et al.. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist semaglutide reduces atrial fibrillation incidence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Invest. 2024. PMID 39058274 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Atrial FlutterCardiovascular Medicine
  • Ventricular FibrillationCardiovascular Medicine
  • Atrioventricular BlockCardiovascular Medicine
  • Bundle-Branch BlockCardiovascular Medicine
  • Torsades de PointesCardiovascular Medicine
  • Sick Sinus SyndromeCardiovascular Medicine

All 105 articles in Cardiovascular Medicine →

At a glance

82,582
PubMed records on this heading
33%
published since 2020
12,739
review articles
4,093
randomized trials
9
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Atrial FlutterCardiovascular Medicine
  • Ventricular FibrillationCardiovascular Medicine
  • Atrioventricular BlockCardiovascular Medicine
  • Bundle-Branch BlockCardiovascular Medicine
  • Torsades de PointesCardiovascular Medicine

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support