Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Immunology›Antigen Presentation
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Antigen Presentation

Immunology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

The process by which antigen is presented to lymphocytes in a form they can recognize.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (646 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The process by which antigen is presented to lymphocytes in a form they can recognize. This is performed by antigen presenting cells (APCs). Some antigens require processing before they can be recognized. Antigen processing consists of ingestion and partial digestion of the antigen by the APC, followed by presentation of fragments on the cell surface. (From Rosen et al., Dictionary of Immunology, 1989)

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Antigen Presentations; Antigen Processing; Antigen Processings.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Immune System Phenomena; Immunity, Cellular
See also
Immunological Synapses

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 16,502 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Antigen Presentation” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 2,185 of them (13.2%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2000-2009 with 6,669 records.

Reviews account for 3,998 records (24.2%) and meta-analyses for 5. Randomized controlled trials number 20 (0.1%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 2,954 records; 2000-2009: 6,669 records; 2010-2019: 4,694 records; 2020 onward: 2,185 records2,954through 19996,6692000-20094,6942010-20192,1852020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19992,954
2000-20096,669
2010-20194,694
2020 onward2,185
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 24.2 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.0 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.1 percentReviews24.2% (3,998)Meta-analyses0.0% (5)Randomized controlled trials0.1% (20)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 16,502 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews3,99824.2%
Meta-analyses50.0%
Randomized controlled trials200.1%

Method: PubMed query "Antigen Presentation"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in immunology

Immune responses are studied in model organisms, in cells from donors and in patients, and the same pathway can behave differently across these settings. Mouse immune systems differ from human ones in important ways, and blood measurements may not reflect what happens in tissues. Clinical conclusions about immune-mediated disease or immunotherapy come mainly from controlled trials and long-term cohorts. Check the species and tissue studied, whether markers were linked to outcomes patients notice, and the follow-up time.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Cancer Immune Evasion Through Loss of MHC Class I Antigen Presentation
Dhatchinamoorthy K, Colbert JD, Rock KL
2021Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
896cc by
PMID 33767702 · DOI · PMC7986854
Identification of a Kupffer cell subset capable of reverting the T cell dysfunction induced by hepatocellular priming
De Simone G, Andreata F, Bleriot C, Fumagalli V, Laura C, Garcia-Manteiga JM, et al.
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
142cc by
PMID 34469774 · DOI · PMC8459394
Antigen presentation by lung epithelial cells directs CD4+ TRM cell function and regulates barrier immunity
Shenoy AT, Lyon De Ana C, Arafa EI, Salwig I, Barker KA, Korkmaz FT, et al.
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
132cc by
PMID 34611166 · DOI · PMC8492657
The antigen-presenting molecule MR1 binds host-generated riboflavin catabolites
Abdelaal MR, Deng J, McInerney MP, Ito E, Purcell AW, Yamasaki S, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
6cc by
PMID 41295949 · DOI · PMC12650265

Cancer Immune Evasion Through Loss of MHC Class I Antigen Presentation [1]

Review article Dhatchinamoorthy K, Colbert JD, Rock KL · · 2021 · cited 896 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Major histocompatibility class I (MHC I) molecules bind peptides derived from a cell's expressed genes and then transport and display this antigenic information on the cell surface.
Closing excerpt
We discuss new insights into some common underlying mechanisms through which some cancers inactivate the MHC I pathway and consider some possible strategies to overcome this limitation in ways that could restore immune control of tumors and improve immunotherapy.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (187 words)

Major histocompatibility class I (MHC I) molecules bind peptides derived from a cell's expressed genes and then transport and display this antigenic information on the cell surface. This allows CD8 T cells to identify pathological cells that are synthesizing abnormal proteins, such as cancers that are expressing mutated proteins. In order for many cancers to arise and progress, they need to evolve mechanisms to avoid elimination by CD8 T cells. MHC I molecules are not essential for cell survival and therefore one mechanism by which cancers can evade immune control is by losing MHC I antigen presentation machinery (APM). Not only will this impair the ability of natural immune responses to control cancers, but also frustrate immunotherapies that work by re-invigorating anti-tumor CD8 T cells, such as checkpoint blockade. Here we review the evidence that loss of MHC I antigen presentation is a frequent occurrence in many cancers. We discuss new insights into some common underlying mechanisms through which some cancers inactivate the MHC I pathway and consider some possible strategies to overcome this limitation in ways that could restore immune control of tumors and improve immunotherapy.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33767702 · DOI · PMC7986854

Identification of a Kupffer cell subset capable of reverting the T cell dysfunction induced by hepatocellular priming [2]

Research article De Simone G, Andreata F, Bleriot C, Fumagalli V, Laura C, Garcia-Manteiga JM, et al. · · 2021 · cited 142 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Kupffer cells (KCs) are highly abundant, intravascular, liver-resident macrophages known for their scavenger and phagocytic functions.
Closing excerpt
In summary, by sensing IL-2 and cross-presenting hepatocellular antigens, KC2 overcome the tolerogenic potential of the hepatic microenvironment, suggesting new strategies for boosting hepatic T cell immunity.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (151 words)

Kupffer cells (KCs) are highly abundant, intravascular, liver-resident macrophages known for their scavenger and phagocytic functions. KCs can also present antigens to CD8+ T cells and promote either tolerance or effector differentiation, but the mechanisms underlying these discrepant outcomes are poorly understood. Here, we used a mouse model of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, in which HBV-specific naive CD8+ T cells recognizing hepatocellular antigens are driven into a state of immune dysfunction, to identify a subset of KCs (referred to as KC2) that cross-presents hepatocellular antigens upon interleukin-2 (IL-2) administration, thus improving the antiviral function of T cells. Removing MHC-I from all KCs, including KC2, or selectively depleting KC2 impaired the capacity of IL-2 to revert the T cell dysfunction induced by intrahepatic priming. In summary, by sensing IL-2 and cross-presenting hepatocellular antigens, KC2 overcome the tolerogenic potential of the hepatic microenvironment, suggesting new strategies for boosting hepatic T cell immunity.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34469774 · DOI · PMC8459394

Antigen presentation by lung epithelial cells directs CD4+ TRM cell function and regulates barrier immunity [3]

Research article Shenoy AT, Lyon De Ana C, Arafa EI, Salwig I, Barker KA, Korkmaz FT, et al. · · 2021 · cited 132 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Barrier tissues are populated by functionally plastic CD4+ resident memory T (TRM) cells.
Closing excerpt
Thus, we establish epithelial antigen presentation as a critical regulator of CD4+ TRM cell function and identify epithelial-CD4+ TRM cell immune interactions as core elements of barrier immunity.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (150 words)

Barrier tissues are populated by functionally plastic CD4+ resident memory T (TRM) cells. Whether the barrier epithelium regulates CD4+ TRM cell locations, plasticity and activities remains unclear. Here we report that lung epithelial cells, including distinct surfactant protein C (SPC)lowMHChigh epithelial cells, function as anatomically-segregated and temporally-dynamic antigen presenting cells. In vivo ablation of lung epithelial MHC-II results in altered localization of CD4+ TRM cells. Recurrent encounters with cognate antigen in the absence of epithelial MHC-II leads CD4+ TRM cells to co-express several classically antagonistic lineage-defining transcription factors, changes their cytokine profiles, and results in dysregulated barrier immunity. In addition, lung epithelial MHC-II is needed for surface expression of PD-L1, which engages its ligand PD-1 to constrain lung CD4+ TRM cell phenotypes. Thus, we establish epithelial antigen presentation as a critical regulator of CD4+ TRM cell function and identify epithelial-CD4+ TRM cell immune interactions as core elements of barrier immunity.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34611166 · DOI · PMC8492657

The antigen-presenting molecule MR1 binds host-generated riboflavin catabolites [4]

Research article Abdelaal MR, Deng J, McInerney MP, Ito E, Purcell AW, Yamasaki S, et al. · · 2026 · cited 6 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
MHC class I-related protein (MR1) presents vitamin B-based antigens (Ags) to mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells.
Closing excerpt
Collectively, we identified three-ringed isoalloxazines that bind MR1 and reduce surface levels, suggesting a potential role in dampening MAIT cell immunity.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (158 words)

MHC class I-related protein (MR1) presents vitamin B-based antigens (Ags) to mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells. While microbial riboflavin (RF) precursors are well-documented MR1 ligands, it is unclear whether host-generated RF catabolites influence MR1 immunity. Here, we report that RF catabolites, including 10-formylmethylflavin (FMF), lumichrome, lumiflavin, and alloxazine, bind to MR1 with moderate affinity, while RF itself binds weakly. In contrast to the MR1-upregulating microbial RF precursors, RF catabolites reduced the surface level of MR1 by inducing its retention in the endoplasmic reticulum and inhibiting exit. These RF catabolites weakly competed with vitamin B-based Ags for MR1 binding, thereby selectively inhibiting MAIT activation. The crystal structures of MR1 with RF, FMF, lumiflavin, and lumichrome show binding in the A'-pocket of MR1. Here, lumichrome formed a "flavin bond" covalent interaction with MR1-Lys43 differing from the typical Schiff base. Collectively, we identified three-ringed isoalloxazines that bind MR1 and reduce surface levels, suggesting a potential role in dampening MAIT cell immunity.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41295949 · DOI · PMC12650265

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Antigen presentation in cancer: insights into tumour immunogenicity and immune evasion [5]
    Jhunjhunwala S, Hammer C, Delamarre L · Nat Rev Cancer · 2021 · cited 1,295 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Pathways of antigen processing [6]
    Blum JS, Wearsch PA, Cresswell P · Annu Rev Immunol · 2013 · cited 1,185 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The ins and outs of MHC class II-mediated antigen processing and presentation [7]
    Roche PA, Furuta K · Nat Rev Immunol · 2015 · cited 939 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Monocyte differentiation and antigen-presenting functions [8]
    Jakubzick CV, Randolph GJ, Henson PM · Nat Rev Immunol · 2017 · cited 791 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article A guide to antigen processing and presentation [9]
    Pishesha N, Harmand TJ, Ploegh HL · Nat Rev Immunol · 2022 · cited 711 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Present Yourself! By MHC Class I and MHC Class II Molecules [10]
    Rock KL, Reits E, Neefjes J · Trends Immunol · 2016 · cited 682 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Dhatchinamoorthy K, Colbert JD, Rock KL. Cancer Immune Evasion Through Loss of MHC Class I Antigen Presentation. . 2021. PMID 33767702 · DOI · PMC7986854
  2. De Simone G, Andreata F, Bleriot C, Fumagalli V, Laura C, Garcia-Manteiga JM, et al.. Identification of a Kupffer cell subset capable of reverting the T cell dysfunction induced by hepatocellular priming. . 2021. PMID 34469774 · DOI · PMC8459394
  3. Shenoy AT, Lyon De Ana C, Arafa EI, Salwig I, Barker KA, Korkmaz FT, et al.. Antigen presentation by lung epithelial cells directs CD4+ TRM cell function and regulates barrier immunity. . 2021. PMID 34611166 · DOI · PMC8492657
  4. Abdelaal MR, Deng J, McInerney MP, Ito E, Purcell AW, Yamasaki S, et al.. The antigen-presenting molecule MR1 binds host-generated riboflavin catabolites. . 2026. PMID 41295949 · DOI · PMC12650265
  5. Jhunjhunwala S, Hammer C, Delamarre L. Antigen presentation in cancer: insights into tumour immunogenicity and immune evasion. Nat Rev Cancer. 2021. PMID 33750922 · DOI
  6. Blum JS, Wearsch PA, Cresswell P. Pathways of antigen processing. Annu Rev Immunol. 2013. PMID 23298205 · DOI · PMC4026165
  7. Roche PA, Furuta K. The ins and outs of MHC class II-mediated antigen processing and presentation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015. PMID 25720354 · DOI · PMC6314495
  8. Jakubzick CV, Randolph GJ, Henson PM. Monocyte differentiation and antigen-presenting functions. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017. PMID 28436425 · DOI
  9. Pishesha N, Harmand TJ, Ploegh HL. A guide to antigen processing and presentation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2022. PMID 35418563 · DOI
  10. Rock KL, Reits E, Neefjes J. Present Yourself! By MHC Class I and MHC Class II Molecules. Trends Immunol. 2016. PMID 27614798 · DOI · PMC5159193

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Cross-PrimingImmunology
  • Adaptive ImmunityImmunology
  • Immunologic MemoryImmunology
  • Lymphocyte ActivationImmunology
  • AnaphylaxisImmunology
  • Graft vs Host ReactionImmunology

All 90 articles in Immunology →

At a glance

16,502
PubMed records on this heading
13%
published since 2020
3,998
review articles
20
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Cross-PrimingImmunology
  • Adaptive ImmunityImmunology
  • Immunologic MemoryImmunology
  • Lymphocyte ActivationImmunology
  • AnaphylaxisImmunology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support