Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (941 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
The property of antibodies which enables them to react with some antigenic determinants and not with others. Specificity is dependent on chemical composition, physical forces, and molecular structure at the binding site.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Antibody Specificities; Specificities, Antibody; Specificity, Antibody.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Immune System Phenomena
- See also
- Antibodies, Bispecific; T-Cell Antigen Receptor Specificity
Related concepts
- Antigenic Determinants
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 44,616 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Antibody Specificity” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 840 of them (1.9%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 29,944 records.
Reviews account for 2,097 records (4.7%) and meta-analyses for 9. Randomized controlled trials number 179 (0.4%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 29,944 |
| 2000-2009 | 8,793 |
| 2010-2019 | 5,039 |
| 2020 onward | 840 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 2,097 | 4.7% |
| Meta-analyses | 9 | 0.0% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 179 | 0.4% |
Method: PubMed query "Antibody Specificity"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in immunology
Immune responses are studied in model organisms, in cells from donors and in patients, and the same pathway can behave differently across these settings. Mouse immune systems differ from human ones in important ways, and blood measurements may not reflect what happens in tissues. Clinical conclusions about immune-mediated disease or immunotherapy come mainly from controlled trials and long-term cohorts. Check the species and tissue studied, whether markers were linked to outcomes patients notice, and the follow-up time.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antibody targeting of E3 ubiquitin ligases for receptor degradation | 2022 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 227 | cc by PMID 36131013 · DOI · PMC9534761 |
| Autoantibody Specificities in Myasthenia Gravis; Implications for Improved Diagnostics and Therapeutics | 2020 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 188 | cc by PMID 32117321 · DOI · PMC7033452 |
| Enhanced tumor-targeting selectivity by modulating bispecific antibody binding affinity and format valence | 2017 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 115 | cc by PMID 28067257 · DOI · PMC5220356 |
| Construction and Evaluation of Guanylyl Cyclase C-Specific Antibody for Noninvasive Diagnosis and Targeted Therapy of Colorectal Cancer | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 0 | cc by PMID 41469159 · DOI · PMC12955545 |
Antibody targeting of E3 ubiquitin ligases for receptor degradation [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Most current therapies that target plasma membrane receptors function by antagonizing ligand binding or enzymatic activities.
- Closing excerpt
- In summary, this work describes a strategy for the rapid development of potent, bioavailable and tissue-selective degraders of cell-surface proteins.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (191 words)
Most current therapies that target plasma membrane receptors function by antagonizing ligand binding or enzymatic activities. However, typical mammalian proteins comprise multiple domains that execute discrete but coordinated activities. Thus, inhibition of one domain often incompletely suppresses the function of a protein. Indeed, targeted protein degradation technologies, including proteolysis-targeting chimeras1 (PROTACs), have highlighted clinically important advantages of target degradation over inhibition2. However, the generation of heterobifunctional compounds binding to two targets with high affinity is complex, particularly when oral bioavailability is required3. Here we describe the development of proteolysis-targeting antibodies (PROTABs) that tether cell-surface E3 ubiquitin ligases to transmembrane proteins, resulting in target degradation both in vitro and in vivo. Focusing on zinc- and ring finger 3 (ZNRF3), a Wnt-responsive ligase, we show that this approach can enable colorectal cancer-specific degradation. Notably, by examining a matrix of additional cell-surface E3 ubiquitin ligases and transmembrane receptors, we demonstrate that this technology is amendable for 'on-demand' degradation. Furthermore, we offer insights on the ground rules governing target degradation by engineering optimized antibody formats. In summary, this work describes a strategy for the rapid development of potent, bioavailable and tissue-selective degraders of cell-surface proteins.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 36131013 · DOI · PMC9534761
Autoantibody Specificities in Myasthenia Gravis; Implications for Improved Diagnostics and Therapeutics [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease characterized by muscle weakness and fatiguability of skeletal muscles.
- Closing excerpt
- Overall, the development of novel autoantibody assays is aiding in the more accurate diagnosis and classification of MG patients, supporting the development of advanced therapeutics and ultimately the improvement of disease management and patient quality of life.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (349 words)
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease characterized by muscle weakness and fatiguability of skeletal muscles. It is an antibody-mediated disease, caused by autoantibodies targeting neuromuscular junction proteins. In the majority of patients (~85%) antibodies against the muscle acetylcholine receptor (AChR) are detected, while in 6% antibodies against the muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) are detected. In ~10% of MG patients no autoantibodies can be found with the classical diagnostics for AChR and MuSK antibodies (seronegative MG, SN-MG), making the improvement of methods for the detection of known autoantibodies or the discovery of novel antigenic targets imperative. Over the past years, using cell-based assays or improved highly sensitive immunoprecipitation assays, it has been possible to detect autoantibodies in previously SN-MG patients, including the identification of the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4) as a third MG autoantigen, as well as AChR and MuSK antibodies undetectable by conventional methods. Furthermore, antibodies against other extracellular or intracellular targets, such as titin, the ryanodine receptor, agrin, collagen Q, Kv1.4 potassium channels and cortactin have been found in some MG patients, which can be useful biomarkers. In addition to the improvement of diagnosis, the identification of the patients' autoantibody specificity is important for their stratification into respective subgroups, which can differ in terms of clinical manifestations, prognosis and most importantly their response to therapies. The knowledge of the autoantibody profile of MG patients would allow for a therapeutic strategy tailored to their MG subgroup. This is becoming especially relevant as there is increasing progress toward the development of antigen-specific therapies, targeting only the specific autoantibodies or immune cells involved in the autoimmune response, such as antigen-specific immunoadsorption, which have shown promising results. We will herein review the advances made by us and others toward development of more sensitive detection methods and the identification of new antibody targets in MG, and discuss their significance in MG diagnosis and therapy. Overall, the development of novel autoantibody assays is aiding in the more accurate diagnosis and classification of MG patients, supporting the development of advanced therapeutics and ultimately the improvement of disease management and patient quality of life.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32117321 · DOI · PMC7033452
Enhanced tumor-targeting selectivity by modulating bispecific antibody binding affinity and format valence [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Bispecific antibodies are considered attractive bio-therapeutic agents owing to their ability to target two distinct disease mediators.
- Closing excerpt
- Affinity-reduced monovalent bispecific variants, but not their bivalent bispecific counterparts, mediated a greater degree of tumor targeting selectivity, while the overall efficacy against the targeted tumor was not substantially affected.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (196 words)
Bispecific antibodies are considered attractive bio-therapeutic agents owing to their ability to target two distinct disease mediators. Cross-arm avidity targeting of antigen double-positive cancer cells over single-positive normal tissue is believed to enhance the therapeutic efficacy, restrict major escape mechanisms and increase tumor-targeting selectivity, leading to reduced systemic toxicity and improved therapeutic index. However, the interplay of factors regulating target selectivity is not well understood and often overlooked when developing clinically relevant bispecific therapeutics. We show in vivo that dual targeting alone is not sufficient to endow selective tumor-targeting, and report the pivotal roles played by the affinity of the individual arms, overall avidity and format valence. Specifically, a series of monovalent and bivalent bispecific IgGs composed of the anti-HER2 trastuzumab moiety paired with affinity-modulated VH and VL regions of the anti-EGFR GA201 mAb were tested for selective targeting and eradication of double-positive human NCI-H358 non-small cell lung cancer target tumors over single-positive, non-target NCI-H358-HER2 CRISPR knock out tumors in nude mice bearing dual-flank tumor xenografts. Affinity-reduced monovalent bispecific variants, but not their bivalent bispecific counterparts, mediated a greater degree of tumor targeting selectivity, while the overall efficacy against the targeted tumor was not substantially affected.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28067257 · DOI · PMC5220356
Construction and Evaluation of Guanylyl Cyclase C-Specific Antibody for Noninvasive Diagnosis and Targeted Therapy of Colorectal Cancer [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide despite therapeutic advances.
- Closing excerpt
- Conclusion: We have established both optical and radionuclide probes with PR15-7 as a versatile therapeutic strategy, providing valuable insights into targeted therapy for CRC.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (205 words)
Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide despite therapeutic advances. Guanylyl cyclase C (GUCY2C), an intestinal epithelial receptor, is emerging as a promising diagnostic and therapeutic target for CRC. Thus, we are interested in developing a monoclonal antibody probe targeting GUCY2C for both in vitro and in vivo diagnosis and treatment of CRC. Methods: The GUCY2C-specific monoclonal antibody, PR15-7, was generated by hybridoma fusion. We developed [89Zr]Zr-DFO-PR15-7 for PET imaging, Cy5-PR15-7 for near-infrared fluorescence I (NIR-I) detection, and ICG-PR15-7 for NIR-II-guided surgical navigation. The therapeutic potential was evaluated using [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-PR15-7 for targeted radiotherapy. Biologic properties and antitumor activity of PR15-7 probes were evaluated in vitro and in vivo. Results: PR15-7 showed strong GUCY2C binding affinity and tumor selectivity. PR15-7 probes in antibody-based PET and NIR imaging revealed 3 times higher signal intensity in GUCY2C-positive tumors compared with controls. The NIR-II probe ICG-PR15-7 enabled precise intraoperative tumor visualization and complete resection in orthotopic models. Therapeutic administration of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-PR15-7 significantly inhibited tumor growth, with standardized tumor volumes at 16 d being markedly smaller than those in the control groups. Conclusion: We have established both optical and radionuclide probes with PR15-7 as a versatile therapeutic strategy, providing valuable insights into targeted therapy for CRC.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41469159 · DOI · PMC12955545
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Xenogeneic monoclonal antibodies to mouse lymphoid differentiation antigens [5]
- Research article Site-specific antibody drug conjugates for cancer therapy [6]
- Research article CD5+ B lymphocytes, polyreactive antibodies and the human B-cell repertoire [7]
- Research article Intrinsic and extrinsic factors in protein antigenic structure [8]
- Research article Estimating the protective concentration of anti-pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide antibodies [9]
- Research article Autoantibody systems in rheumatoid arthritis: specificity, sensitivity and diagnostic value [10]
References
- Marei H, Tsai WK, Kee YS, Ruiz K, He J, Cox C, et al.. Antibody targeting of E3 ubiquitin ligases for receptor degradation. . 2022. PMID 36131013 · DOI · PMC9534761
- Lazaridis K, Tzartos SJ. Autoantibody Specificities in Myasthenia Gravis; Implications for Improved Diagnostics and Therapeutics. . 2020. PMID 32117321 · DOI · PMC7033452
- Mazor Y, Sachsenmeier KF, Yang C, Hansen A, Filderman J, Mulgrew K, et al.. Enhanced tumor-targeting selectivity by modulating bispecific antibody binding affinity and format valence. . 2017. PMID 28067257 · DOI · PMC5220356
- Rong Z, Liu H, Teng X, Chen L, Gu Y, Dong B, et al.. Construction and Evaluation of Guanylyl Cyclase C-Specific Antibody for Noninvasive Diagnosis and Targeted Therapy of Colorectal Cancer. . 2026. PMID 41469159 · DOI · PMC12955545
- Ledbetter JA, Herzenberg LA. Xenogeneic monoclonal antibodies to mouse lymphoid differentiation antigens. Immunol Rev. 1979. PMID 398327 · DOI
- Panowski S, Bhakta S, Raab H, Polakis P, Junutula JR. Site-specific antibody drug conjugates for cancer therapy. MAbs. 2014. PMID 24423619 · DOI · PMC3929453
- Casali P, Notkins AL. CD5+ B lymphocytes, polyreactive antibodies and the human B-cell repertoire. Immunol Today. 1989. PMID 2482031 · DOI
- Berzofsky JA. Intrinsic and extrinsic factors in protein antigenic structure. Science. 1985. PMID 2410982 · DOI
- Siber GR, Chang I, Baker S, Fernsten P, O'Brien KL, Santosham M, et al.. Estimating the protective concentration of anti-pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide antibodies. Vaccine. 2007. PMID 17368878 · DOI
- van Boekel MA, Vossenaar ER, van den Hoogen FH, van Venrooij WJ. Autoantibody systems in rheumatoid arthritis: specificity, sensitivity and diagnostic value. Arthritis Res. 2002. PMID 11879544 · DOI · PMC128920
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.