Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (802 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
The elaboration of dental enamel by ameloblasts, beginning with its participation in the formation of the dentino-enamel junction to the production of the matrix for the enamel prisms and interprismatic substance. (Jablonski, Dictionary of Dentistry, 1992).
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Amelogeneses.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Odontogenesis
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 1,269 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Amelogenesis” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 119 of them (9.4%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 727 records.
Reviews account for 121 records (9.5%) and meta-analyses for 1. Randomized controlled trials number 1 (0.1%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 727 |
| 2000-2009 | 173 |
| 2010-2019 | 250 |
| 2020 onward | 119 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 121 | 9.5% |
| Meta-analyses | 1 | 0.1% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 1 | 0.1% |
Method: PubMed query "Amelogenesis"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology
Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The hidden structure of human enamel | 2019 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 162 | cc by PMID 31558712 · DOI · PMC6763454 |
| Enamel formation genes influence enamel microhardness before and after cariogenic challenge | 2012 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 63 | cc by PMID 23028741 · DOI · PMC3454391 |
| Mutant Runx2 regulates amelogenesis and osteogenesis through a miR-185-5p-Dlx2 axis | 2017 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 38 | cc by PMID 29242628 · DOI · PMC5870583 |
| Effects of fluoride and lead on enamel composition during the maturation stage of amelogenesis in rat mandibular third molars | 2026 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 3 | cc by PMID 41925862 · DOI · PMC13046661 |
The hidden structure of human enamel [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Enamel is the hardest and most resilient tissue in the human body.
- Closing excerpt
- This toughening mechanism contributes to the unique resilience of enamel, which lasts a lifetime under extreme physical and chemical challenges.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (150 words)
Enamel is the hardest and most resilient tissue in the human body. Enamel includes morphologically aligned, parallel, ∼50 nm wide, microns-long nanocrystals, bundled either into 5-μm-wide rods or their space-filling interrod. The orientation of enamel crystals, however, is poorly understood. Here we show that the crystalline c-axes are homogenously oriented in interrod crystals across most of the enamel layer thickness. Within each rod crystals are not co-oriented with one another or with the long axis of the rod, as previously assumed: the c-axes of adjacent nanocrystals are most frequently mis-oriented by 1°-30°, and this orientation within each rod gradually changes, with an overall angle spread that is never zero, but varies between 30°-90° within one rod. Molecular dynamics simulations demonstrate that the observed mis-orientations of adjacent crystals induce crack deflection. This toughening mechanism contributes to the unique resilience of enamel, which lasts a lifetime under extreme physical and chemical challenges.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31558712 · DOI · PMC6763454
Enamel formation genes influence enamel microhardness before and after cariogenic challenge [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- There is evidence for a genetic component in caries susceptibility, and studies in humans have suggested that variation in enamel formation genes may contribute to caries.
- Closing excerpt
- Our results suggest that the influence of genetic variation of enamel formation genes may influence the dynamic interactions between the enamel surface and the oral cavity.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (178 words)
There is evidence for a genetic component in caries susceptibility, and studies in humans have suggested that variation in enamel formation genes may contribute to caries. For the present study, we used DNA samples collected from 1,831 individuals from various population data sets. Single nucleotide polymorphism markers were genotyped in selected genes (ameloblastin, amelogenin, enamelin, tuftelin, and tuftelin interacting protein 11) that influence enamel formation. Allele and genotype frequencies were compared between groups with distinct caries experience. Associations with caries experience can be detected but they are not necessarily replicated in all population groups and the most expressive results was for a marker in AMELX (p=0.0007). To help interpret these results, we evaluated if enamel microhardness changes under simulated cariogenic challenges are associated with genetic variations in these same genes. After creating an artificial caries lesion, associations could be seen between genetic variation in TUFT1 (p=0.006) and TUIP11 (p=0.0006) with enamel microhardness. Our results suggest that the influence of genetic variation of enamel formation genes may influence the dynamic interactions between the enamel surface and the oral cavity.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 23028741 · DOI · PMC3454391
Mutant Runx2 regulates amelogenesis and osteogenesis through a miR-185-5p-Dlx2 axis [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Regulation of microRNAs (miRNA) has been extensively investigated in diseases; however, little is known about the roles of miRNAs in cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD).
- Closing excerpt
- This study highlights the molecular etiology and significance of miR-185-5p in CCD, and suggests that targeting miR-185-5p may represent a new therapeutic strategy in prevention or intervention of CCD.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (215 words)
Regulation of microRNAs (miRNA) has been extensively investigated in diseases; however, little is known about the roles of miRNAs in cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD). The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential involvement of miRNAs in CCD. In vitro site-directed mutagenesis was performed to construct three mutant Runx2 expression vectors, which were then transfected into LS8 cells and MC3T3-E1 cells, to determine the impact on amelogenesis and osteogenesis, respectively. miRCURY LNA miRNA microarray identify miR-185-5p as a miRNA target commonly induced by all three Runx2 mutants. Real-time quantitative PCR was applied to determine the expression of miR-185-5p and Dlx2 in samples. Dual-luciferase reporter assays were conducted to confirm Dlx2 as a legitimate target of miR-185-5p. The suppressive effect of miR-185-5p on amelogenesis and osteogenesis of miR-185-5p was evaluated by RT-PCR and western blot examination of Amelx, Enam, Klk4, and Mmp20 gene and protein expression, and by Alizarin Red stain. We found that mutant Runx2 suppressed amelogenesis and osteogenesis. miR-185-5p, induced by Runx2, suppressed amelogenesis and osteogenesis. Furthermore, we identified Dlx2 as direct target of miR-185-5p. Consistently, Dlx2 expression was inversely correlated with miR-185-5p levels. This study highlights the molecular etiology and significance of miR-185-5p in CCD, and suggests that targeting miR-185-5p may represent a new therapeutic strategy in prevention or intervention of CCD.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29242628 · DOI · PMC5870583
Effects of fluoride and lead on enamel composition during the maturation stage of amelogenesis in rat mandibular third molars [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Dental enamel formation depends on tightly regulated mineral deposition and organic matrix removal during the maturation stage.
- Closing excerpt
- These findings demonstrate that Pb co-exposure exacerbates fluoride-induced enamel hypomineralization and disrupts the normal spatial pattern of enamel maturation, emphasizing the importance of combined environmental exposures for understanding mechanisms governing the development and maturation of mineralized tissues.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (259 words)
Dental enamel formation depends on tightly regulated mineral deposition and organic matrix removal during the maturation stage. Fluoride (F) adversely affects the maturation stage of amelogenesis, causing hypomineralized enamel defects. However, hypomineralized enamel defects have increased worldwide in recent years, making it urgent to understand how co-exposure to other environmental contaminants affects fluorosis and maturation-stage amelogenesis at fluoride levels sufficient to induce defects during early-life exposure conditions in experimental models. This study aimed to determine whether lead (Pb) co-exposure amplifies fluoride-induced disturbances in the enamel maturation stage by mapping depth-dependent changes in mineral, organic, and water components across the enamel layer. Pregnant Wistar rats and their offspring were exposed to F (50 ppm), Pb (30 ppm), or both in drinking water from gestation to postnatal day 30. Mandibular third molars were evaluated using a modified Thylstrup–Fejerskov index and analyzed by quantitative microradiography and polarized light microscopy to obtain depth-resolved compositional data. Mean defect scores were 0.0 (Control), 2.6 (F), and 3.2 (Pb + F). Entire enamel thickness mineral volume decreased from 71.0% (Control) to 41.1% (F) and to 35.2% (Pb + F), accompanied by a marked increase in organic matrix volume (9.3% to > 30%) (p < 0.0001). Spatial analyses showed minimal disturbances and smaller effect sizes at the superficial region, with progressively larger effects toward the central and inner enamel regions. These findings demonstrate that Pb co-exposure exacerbates fluoride-induced enamel hypomineralization and disrupts the normal spatial pattern of enamel maturation, emphasizing the importance of combined environmental exposures for understanding mechanisms governing the development and maturation of mineralized tissues.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41925862 · DOI · PMC13046661
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Cellular and chemical events during enamel maturation [5]
- Research article DENTAL ENAMEL FORMATION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ORAL HEALTH AND DISEASE [6]
- Research article Molecular mechanisms of dental enamel formation [7]
- Research article Fluoride's effects on the formation of teeth and bones, and the influence of genetics [8]
- Research article Proteinases in developing dental enamel [9]
- Research article Role of macromolecular assembly of enamel matrix proteins in enamel formation [10]
References
- Beniash E, Stifler CA, Sun CY, Jung GS, Qin Z, Buehler MJ, et al.. The hidden structure of human enamel. . 2019. PMID 31558712 · DOI · PMC6763454
- Shimizu T, Ho B, Deeley K, Briseño-Ruiz J, Faraco IM, Schupack BI, et al.. Enamel formation genes influence enamel microhardness before and after cariogenic challenge. . 2012. PMID 23028741 · DOI · PMC3454391
- Chang H, Wang Y, Liu H, Nan X, Wong S, Peng S, et al.. Mutant Runx2 regulates amelogenesis and osteogenesis through a miR-185-5p-Dlx2 axis. . 2017. PMID 29242628 · DOI · PMC5870583
- Tostes-Figueiredo J, Macedo-Ribeiro N, Santos GHL, Porto IM, Gerlach RF, de Sousa FB. Effects of fluoride and lead on enamel composition during the maturation stage of amelogenesis in rat mandibular third molars. . 2026. PMID 41925862 · DOI · PMC13046661
- Smith CE. Cellular and chemical events during enamel maturation. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1998. PMID 9603233 · DOI
- Lacruz RS, Habelitz S, Wright JT, Paine ML. DENTAL ENAMEL FORMATION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ORAL HEALTH AND DISEASE. Physiol Rev. 2017. PMID 28468833 · DOI · PMC6151498
- Simmer JP, Fincham AG. Molecular mechanisms of dental enamel formation. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1995. PMID 7548623 · DOI
- Everett ET. Fluoride's effects on the formation of teeth and bones, and the influence of genetics. J Dent Res. 2011. PMID 20929720 · DOI · PMC3144112
- Bartlett JD, Simmer JP. Proteinases in developing dental enamel. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1999. PMID 10634581 · DOI
- Margolis HC, Beniash E, Fowler CE. Role of macromolecular assembly of enamel matrix proteins in enamel formation. J Dent Res. 2006. PMID 16931858 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.