Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Amelogenesis
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Amelogenesis

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

The elaboration of dental enamel by ameloblasts, beginning with its participation in the formation of the dentino-enamel junction to the production of the matrix for the enamel prisms and interprismatic substance.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (802 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The elaboration of dental enamel by ameloblasts, beginning with its participation in the formation of the dentino-enamel junction to the production of the matrix for the enamel prisms and interprismatic substance. (Jablonski, Dictionary of Dentistry, 1992).

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Amelogeneses.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Odontogenesis

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 1,269 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Amelogenesis” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 119 of them (9.4%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 727 records.

Reviews account for 121 records (9.5%) and meta-analyses for 1. Randomized controlled trials number 1 (0.1%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 727 records; 2000-2009: 173 records; 2010-2019: 250 records; 2020 onward: 119 records727through 19991732000-20092502010-20191192020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 1999727
2000-2009173
2010-2019250
2020 onward119
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 9.5 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.1 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.1 percentReviews9.5% (121)Meta-analyses0.1% (1)Randomized controlled trials0.1% (1)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 1,269 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1219.5%
Meta-analyses10.1%
Randomized controlled trials10.1%

Method: PubMed query "Amelogenesis"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
The hidden structure of human enamel
Beniash E, Stifler CA, Sun CY, Jung GS, Qin Z, Buehler MJ, et al.
2019Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
162cc by
PMID 31558712 · DOI · PMC6763454
Enamel formation genes influence enamel microhardness before and after cariogenic challenge
Shimizu T, Ho B, Deeley K, Briseño-Ruiz J, Faraco IM, Schupack BI, et al.
2012Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
63cc by
PMID 23028741 · DOI · PMC3454391
Mutant Runx2 regulates amelogenesis and osteogenesis through a miR-185-5p-Dlx2 axis
Chang H, Wang Y, Liu H, Nan X, Wong S, Peng S, et al.
2017Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
38cc by
PMID 29242628 · DOI · PMC5870583
Effects of fluoride and lead on enamel composition during the maturation stage of amelogenesis in rat mandibular third molars
Tostes-Figueiredo J, Macedo-Ribeiro N, Santos GHL, Porto IM, Gerlach RF, de Sousa FB
2026Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
3cc by
PMID 41925862 · DOI · PMC13046661

The hidden structure of human enamel [1]

Research article Beniash E, Stifler CA, Sun CY, Jung GS, Qin Z, Buehler MJ, et al. · · 2019 · cited 162 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Enamel is the hardest and most resilient tissue in the human body.
Closing excerpt
This toughening mechanism contributes to the unique resilience of enamel, which lasts a lifetime under extreme physical and chemical challenges.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (150 words)

Enamel is the hardest and most resilient tissue in the human body. Enamel includes morphologically aligned, parallel, ∼50 nm wide, microns-long nanocrystals, bundled either into 5-μm-wide rods or their space-filling interrod. The orientation of enamel crystals, however, is poorly understood. Here we show that the crystalline c-axes are homogenously oriented in interrod crystals across most of the enamel layer thickness. Within each rod crystals are not co-oriented with one another or with the long axis of the rod, as previously assumed: the c-axes of adjacent nanocrystals are most frequently mis-oriented by 1°-30°, and this orientation within each rod gradually changes, with an overall angle spread that is never zero, but varies between 30°-90° within one rod. Molecular dynamics simulations demonstrate that the observed mis-orientations of adjacent crystals induce crack deflection. This toughening mechanism contributes to the unique resilience of enamel, which lasts a lifetime under extreme physical and chemical challenges.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31558712 · DOI · PMC6763454

Enamel formation genes influence enamel microhardness before and after cariogenic challenge [2]

Research article Shimizu T, Ho B, Deeley K, Briseño-Ruiz J, Faraco IM, Schupack BI, et al. · · 2012 · cited 63 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
There is evidence for a genetic component in caries susceptibility, and studies in humans have suggested that variation in enamel formation genes may contribute to caries.
Closing excerpt
Our results suggest that the influence of genetic variation of enamel formation genes may influence the dynamic interactions between the enamel surface and the oral cavity.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (178 words)

There is evidence for a genetic component in caries susceptibility, and studies in humans have suggested that variation in enamel formation genes may contribute to caries. For the present study, we used DNA samples collected from 1,831 individuals from various population data sets. Single nucleotide polymorphism markers were genotyped in selected genes (ameloblastin, amelogenin, enamelin, tuftelin, and tuftelin interacting protein 11) that influence enamel formation. Allele and genotype frequencies were compared between groups with distinct caries experience. Associations with caries experience can be detected but they are not necessarily replicated in all population groups and the most expressive results was for a marker in AMELX (p=0.0007). To help interpret these results, we evaluated if enamel microhardness changes under simulated cariogenic challenges are associated with genetic variations in these same genes. After creating an artificial caries lesion, associations could be seen between genetic variation in TUFT1 (p=0.006) and TUIP11 (p=0.0006) with enamel microhardness. Our results suggest that the influence of genetic variation of enamel formation genes may influence the dynamic interactions between the enamel surface and the oral cavity.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 23028741 · DOI · PMC3454391

Mutant Runx2 regulates amelogenesis and osteogenesis through a miR-185-5p-Dlx2 axis [3]

Research article Chang H, Wang Y, Liu H, Nan X, Wong S, Peng S, et al. · · 2017 · cited 38 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Regulation of microRNAs (miRNA) has been extensively investigated in diseases; however, little is known about the roles of miRNAs in cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD).
Closing excerpt
This study highlights the molecular etiology and significance of miR-185-5p in CCD, and suggests that targeting miR-185-5p may represent a new therapeutic strategy in prevention or intervention of CCD.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (215 words)

Regulation of microRNAs (miRNA) has been extensively investigated in diseases; however, little is known about the roles of miRNAs in cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD). The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential involvement of miRNAs in CCD. In vitro site-directed mutagenesis was performed to construct three mutant Runx2 expression vectors, which were then transfected into LS8 cells and MC3T3-E1 cells, to determine the impact on amelogenesis and osteogenesis, respectively. miRCURY LNA miRNA microarray identify miR-185-5p as a miRNA target commonly induced by all three Runx2 mutants. Real-time quantitative PCR was applied to determine the expression of miR-185-5p and Dlx2 in samples. Dual-luciferase reporter assays were conducted to confirm Dlx2 as a legitimate target of miR-185-5p. The suppressive effect of miR-185-5p on amelogenesis and osteogenesis of miR-185-5p was evaluated by RT-PCR and western blot examination of Amelx, Enam, Klk4, and Mmp20 gene and protein expression, and by Alizarin Red stain. We found that mutant Runx2 suppressed amelogenesis and osteogenesis. miR-185-5p, induced by Runx2, suppressed amelogenesis and osteogenesis. Furthermore, we identified Dlx2 as direct target of miR-185-5p. Consistently, Dlx2 expression was inversely correlated with miR-185-5p levels. This study highlights the molecular etiology and significance of miR-185-5p in CCD, and suggests that targeting miR-185-5p may represent a new therapeutic strategy in prevention or intervention of CCD.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29242628 · DOI · PMC5870583

Effects of fluoride and lead on enamel composition during the maturation stage of amelogenesis in rat mandibular third molars [4]

Review article Tostes-Figueiredo J, Macedo-Ribeiro N, Santos GHL, Porto IM, Gerlach RF, de Sousa FB · · 2026 · cited 3 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Dental enamel formation depends on tightly regulated mineral deposition and organic matrix removal during the maturation stage.
Closing excerpt
These findings demonstrate that Pb co-exposure exacerbates fluoride-induced enamel hypomineralization and disrupts the normal spatial pattern of enamel maturation, emphasizing the importance of combined environmental exposures for understanding mechanisms governing the development and maturation of mineralized tissues.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (259 words)

Dental enamel formation depends on tightly regulated mineral deposition and organic matrix removal during the maturation stage. Fluoride (F) adversely affects the maturation stage of amelogenesis, causing hypomineralized enamel defects. However, hypomineralized enamel defects have increased worldwide in recent years, making it urgent to understand how co-exposure to other environmental contaminants affects fluorosis and maturation-stage amelogenesis at fluoride levels sufficient to induce defects during early-life exposure conditions in experimental models. This study aimed to determine whether lead (Pb) co-exposure amplifies fluoride-induced disturbances in the enamel maturation stage by mapping depth-dependent changes in mineral, organic, and water components across the enamel layer. Pregnant Wistar rats and their offspring were exposed to F (50 ppm), Pb (30 ppm), or both in drinking water from gestation to postnatal day 30. Mandibular third molars were evaluated using a modified Thylstrup–Fejerskov index and analyzed by quantitative microradiography and polarized light microscopy to obtain depth-resolved compositional data. Mean defect scores were 0.0 (Control), 2.6 (F), and 3.2 (Pb + F). Entire enamel thickness mineral volume decreased from 71.0% (Control) to 41.1% (F) and to 35.2% (Pb + F), accompanied by a marked increase in organic matrix volume (9.3% to > 30%) (p < 0.0001). Spatial analyses showed minimal disturbances and smaller effect sizes at the superficial region, with progressively larger effects toward the central and inner enamel regions. These findings demonstrate that Pb co-exposure exacerbates fluoride-induced enamel hypomineralization and disrupts the normal spatial pattern of enamel maturation, emphasizing the importance of combined environmental exposures for understanding mechanisms governing the development and maturation of mineralized tissues.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41925862 · DOI · PMC13046661

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Cellular and chemical events during enamel maturation [5]
    Smith CE · Crit Rev Oral Biol Med · 1998 · cited 503 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article DENTAL ENAMEL FORMATION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ORAL HEALTH AND DISEASE [6]
    Lacruz RS, Habelitz S, Wright JT, Paine ML · Physiol Rev · 2017 · cited 400 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Molecular mechanisms of dental enamel formation [7]
    Simmer JP, Fincham AG · Crit Rev Oral Biol Med · 1995 · cited 310 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Fluoride's effects on the formation of teeth and bones, and the influence of genetics [8]
    Everett ET · J Dent Res · 2011 · cited 230 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Proteinases in developing dental enamel [9]
    Bartlett JD, Simmer JP · Crit Rev Oral Biol Med · 1999 · cited 213 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Role of macromolecular assembly of enamel matrix proteins in enamel formation [10]
    Margolis HC, Beniash E, Fowler CE · J Dent Res · 2006 · cited 195 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Beniash E, Stifler CA, Sun CY, Jung GS, Qin Z, Buehler MJ, et al.. The hidden structure of human enamel. . 2019. PMID 31558712 · DOI · PMC6763454
  2. Shimizu T, Ho B, Deeley K, Briseño-Ruiz J, Faraco IM, Schupack BI, et al.. Enamel formation genes influence enamel microhardness before and after cariogenic challenge. . 2012. PMID 23028741 · DOI · PMC3454391
  3. Chang H, Wang Y, Liu H, Nan X, Wong S, Peng S, et al.. Mutant Runx2 regulates amelogenesis and osteogenesis through a miR-185-5p-Dlx2 axis. . 2017. PMID 29242628 · DOI · PMC5870583
  4. Tostes-Figueiredo J, Macedo-Ribeiro N, Santos GHL, Porto IM, Gerlach RF, de Sousa FB. Effects of fluoride and lead on enamel composition during the maturation stage of amelogenesis in rat mandibular third molars. . 2026. PMID 41925862 · DOI · PMC13046661
  5. Smith CE. Cellular and chemical events during enamel maturation. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1998. PMID 9603233 · DOI
  6. Lacruz RS, Habelitz S, Wright JT, Paine ML. DENTAL ENAMEL FORMATION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ORAL HEALTH AND DISEASE. Physiol Rev. 2017. PMID 28468833 · DOI · PMC6151498
  7. Simmer JP, Fincham AG. Molecular mechanisms of dental enamel formation. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1995. PMID 7548623 · DOI
  8. Everett ET. Fluoride's effects on the formation of teeth and bones, and the influence of genetics. J Dent Res. 2011. PMID 20929720 · DOI · PMC3144112
  9. Bartlett JD, Simmer JP. Proteinases in developing dental enamel. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1999. PMID 10634581 · DOI
  10. Margolis HC, Beniash E, Fowler CE. Role of macromolecular assembly of enamel matrix proteins in enamel formation. J Dent Res. 2006. PMID 16931858 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Bone DevelopmentAnatomy and Physiology
  • ChondrogenesisAnatomy and Physiology
  • DiapauseAnatomy and Physiology
  • GastrulationAnatomy and Physiology
  • Gestational AgeAnatomy and Physiology
  • LarvaAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

1,269
PubMed records on this heading
9%
published since 2020
121
review articles
1
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Bone DevelopmentAnatomy and Physiology
  • ChondrogenesisAnatomy and Physiology
  • DiapauseAnatomy and Physiology
  • GastrulationAnatomy and Physiology
  • Gestational AgeAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support