Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Neuroscience›Amblyopia
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Amblyopia

Neuroscience · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

A nonspecific term referring to impaired vision.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (974 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A nonspecific term referring to impaired vision. Major subcategories include stimulus deprivation-induced amblyopia and toxic amblyopia. Stimulus deprivation-induced amblyopia is a developmental disorder of the visual cortex. A discrepancy between visual information received by the visual cortex from each eye results in abnormal cortical development. strabismus and refractive errors may cause this condition. Toxic amblyopia is a disorder of the optic nerve which is associated with alcoholism, tobacco smoking, and other toxins and as an adverse effect of the use of some medications.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Amblyopias; Anisometropic Amblyopia; Amblyopia, Anisometropic; Amblyopias, Anisometropic; Anisometropic Amblyopias; Amblyopia, Developmental; Amblyopias, Developmental; Developmental Amblyopia.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Brain Diseases; Vision Disorders

Related concepts

  • Strabismus
  • Refractive Errors
  • Optic Nerve
  • Alcoholism
  • Smoking

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 7,772 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Amblyopia” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 1,078 of them (13.9%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 4,022 records.

Reviews account for 588 records (7.6%) and meta-analyses for 45. Randomized controlled trials number 217 (2.8%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 4,022 records; 2000-2009: 1,189 records; 2010-2019: 1,483 records; 2020 onward: 1,078 records4,022through 19991,1892000-20091,4832010-20191,0782020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19994,022
2000-20091,189
2010-20191,483
2020 onward1,078
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 7.6 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.6 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 2.8 percentReviews7.6% (588)Meta-analyses0.6% (45)Randomized controlled trials2.8% (217)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 7,772 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews5887.6%
Meta-analyses450.6%
Randomized controlled trials2172.8%

Method: PubMed query "Amblyopia"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in neuroscience

Neuroscience draws on tools with different strengths: cellular and animal work can manipulate circuits directly, while human imaging and electrophysiology observe the living brain at lower resolution. Small imaging studies are prone to false positives, and findings in animals do not always carry over to people. Clinical neurology and psychiatry rely on trials and cohort studies whose outcomes are often symptom scales. Check the species, the sample size, how the outcome was measured and whether results were replicated.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Randomized clinical trial of streaming dichoptic movies versus patching for treatment of amblyopia in children aged 3 to 7 years
Jost RM, Hudgins LA, Dao LM, Stager DR, Luu B, Beauchamp CL, et al.
2022Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
38cc by
PMID 35264692 · DOI · PMC8905014
Crowding changes appearance systematically in peripheral, amblyopic, and developing vision
Kalpadakis-Smith AV, Tailor VK, Dahlmann-Noor AH, Greenwood JA
2022Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
36cc by
PMID 35506917 · DOI · PMC9078053
Correction of amblyopia in cats and mice after the critical period
Fong MF, Duffy KR, Leet MP, Candler CT, Bear MF
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
29cc by
PMID 34464258 · DOI · PMC8456712
Virtual Reality-Based Program for Pediatric Patients With Amblyopia: Protocol for a Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Two-Arm Study
Nagino K, Okumura Y, Hirota M, Matsumura S, Matsumoto T, Negishi T, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 41564298 · DOI · PMC12822861

Randomized clinical trial of streaming dichoptic movies versus patching for treatment of amblyopia in children aged 3 to 7 years [1]

Randomized controlled trial Jost RM, Hudgins LA, Dao LM, Stager DR, Luu B, Beauchamp CL, et al. · · 2022 · cited 38 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Contrast-rebalanced dichoptic movies have been shown to be an effective binocular treatment for amblyopia in the laboratory.
Closing excerpt
gov identifier: NCT03825107 (31/01/2019).
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (196 words)

Contrast-rebalanced dichoptic movies have been shown to be an effective binocular treatment for amblyopia in the laboratory. Yet, at-home therapy is a more practical approach. In a randomized clinical trial, we compared dichoptic movies, streamed at-home on a handheld 3D-enabled game console, versus patching as amblyopia treatment. Sixty-five amblyopic children (3-7 years; 20/32-125) were randomly assigned to one of two parallel arms, binocular treatment (3 movies/week) or patching (14 h/week). The primary outcome, change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the 2-week visit was completed by 28 and 30, respectively. After the primary outcome, both groups of children had the option to complete up to 6 weeks of binocular treatment. At the 2-week primary outcome visit, BCVA had improved in the movie (0.07 ± 0.02 logMAR; p 95%: - 0.02 to 0.04; p = .48). Visual acuity improved in both groups with binocular treatment up to 6 weeks (0.15 and 0.18 logMAR improvement, respectively). This novel, at-home, binocular movie treatment improved amblyopic eye BCVA after 2 weeks (similar to patching), with additional improvement up to 6 weeks. Repeated binocular visual experience with contrast-rebalanced binocular movies provides an additional treatment option for amblyopia.Clincaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03825107 (31/01/2019).

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35264692 · DOI · PMC8905014

Crowding changes appearance systematically in peripheral, amblyopic, and developing vision [2]

Research article Kalpadakis-Smith AV, Tailor VK, Dahlmann-Noor AH, Greenwood JA · · 2022 · cited 36 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Visual crowding is the disruptive effect of clutter on object recognition.
Closing excerpt
We conclude that the perceptual effects of amblyopic and developing crowding are systematic and resemble the near periphery in adults, suggesting a common underlying mechanism.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (221 words)

Visual crowding is the disruptive effect of clutter on object recognition. Although most prominent in adult peripheral vision, crowding also disrupts foveal vision in typically developing children and those with strabismic amblyopia. Do these crowding effects share the same mechanism? Here we exploit observations that crowded errors in peripheral vision are not random: Target objects appear either averaged with the flankers (assimilation) or replaced by them (substitution). If amblyopic and developmental crowding share the same mechanism, then their errors should be similarly systematic. We tested foveal vision in children aged 3 to 8 years with typical vision or strabismic amblyopia and peripheral vision in typical adults. The perceptual effects of crowding were measured by requiring observers to adjust a reference stimulus to match the perceived orientation of a target "Vac-Man" element. When the target was surrounded by flankers that differed by ± 30°, all three groups (adults and children with typical or amblyopic vision) reported orientations between the target and flankers (assimilation). Errors were reduced with ± 90° differences but primarily matched the flanker orientation (substitution) when they did occur. A population pooling model of crowding successfully simulated this pattern of errors in all three groups. We conclude that the perceptual effects of amblyopic and developing crowding are systematic and resemble the near periphery in adults, suggesting a common underlying mechanism.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35506917 · DOI · PMC9078053

Correction of amblyopia in cats and mice after the critical period [3]

Research article Fong MF, Duffy KR, Leet MP, Candler CT, Bear MF · · 2021 · cited 29 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Monocular deprivation early in development causes amblyopia, a severe visual impairment.
Closing excerpt
Thus, connections serving the amblyopic eye are capable of substantial plasticity beyond the critical period, and this potential is unleashed by reversibly silencing the fellow eye.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (178 words)

Monocular deprivation early in development causes amblyopia, a severe visual impairment. Prognosis is poor if therapy is initiated after an early critical period. However, clinical observations have shown that recovery from amblyopia can occur later in life when the non-deprived (fellow) eye is removed. The traditional interpretation of this finding is that vision is improved simply by the elimination of interocular suppression in primary visual cortex, revealing responses to previously subthreshold input. However, an alternative explanation is that silencing activity in the fellow eye establishes conditions in visual cortex that enable the weak connections from the amblyopic eye to gain strength, in which case the recovery would persist even if vision is restored in the fellow eye. Consistent with this idea, we show here in cats and mice that temporary inactivation of the fellow eye is sufficient to promote a full and enduring recovery from amblyopia at ages when conventional treatments fail. Thus, connections serving the amblyopic eye are capable of substantial plasticity beyond the critical period, and this potential is unleashed by reversibly silencing the fellow eye.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34464258 · DOI · PMC8456712

Virtual Reality-Based Program for Pediatric Patients With Amblyopia: Protocol for a Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Two-Arm Study [4]

Research article Nagino K, Okumura Y, Hirota M, Matsumura S, Matsumoto T, Negishi T, et al. · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundConventional amblyopia treatment involves the occlusion of the fellow eye using an eye patch.
Closing excerpt
By addressing the limitations of conventional occlusion therapy and providing a potentially more efficacious and acceptable treatment option, the VR app may enhance clinical outcomes and represent a paradigm shift in the treatment of pediatric amblyopia.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (379 words)

BackgroundConventional amblyopia treatment involves the occlusion of the fellow eye using an eye patch. However, this approach imposes a substantial psychological and physical burden on pediatric patients with amblyopia, resulting in low adherence and suboptimal visual outcomes. As responsiveness to therapy declines beyond early childhood, treatments that can enhance adherence and improve efficacy are needed. We developed a virtual reality dichoptic training app (VR app) that integrates gamification and hand-eye coordination training in pediatric patients with amblyopia.ObjectiveThis study investigated the effect of a VR app on visual acuity improvement in pediatric patients with amblyopia compared with conventional occlusion therapy using an eye patch.MethodsThis is a multicenter, open-label, prospective, randomized controlled trial that will be conducted at 3 centers in Tokyo, Japan. Pediatric patients aged 3-10 years with anisometropic, strabismic, or refractive amblyopia will be enrolled. Participants will be assigned 1:1 to a VR app group or a control group. The VR app group will use the VR app at home for 1 hour per day for 6 months. The control group will undergo conventional occlusion therapy with an eye patch for 6 months. Each group will comprise 15 participants (30 participants in total). Ophthalmologic examinations will be performed at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. The primary endpoint will be the change in the best-corrected visual acuity in the amblyopic eye from baseline to week 12. Secondary endpoints will include changes in best-corrected visual acuity, stereopsis, and ocular deviation through week 24. We will also assess treatment adherence, defined as the ratio of the cumulative actual treatment time to the cumulative prescribed time; record adverse events, and evaluate usability in the VR app group. Longitudinal changes in outcome measures will be analyzed using a mixed-effects model.ResultsParticipant enrollment will start from January 1, 2026, to September 30, 2026. The data analysis will begin on October 1, 2026, and the results will be reported by March 31, 2027.ConclusionsThis study will clarify the effectiveness of the newly developed VR app in improving treatment outcomes and adherence among pediatric patients with amblyopia. By addressing the limitations of conventional occlusion therapy and providing a potentially more efficacious and acceptable treatment option, the VR app may enhance clinical outcomes and represent a paradigm shift in the treatment of pediatric amblyopia.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41564298 · DOI · PMC12822861

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Amblyopia and binocular vision [5]
    Birch EE · Prog Retin Eye Res · 2013 · cited 397 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Amblyopia [6]
    Holmes JM, Clarke MP · Lancet · 2006 · cited 318 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Stereopsis and amblyopia: A mini-review [7]
    Levi DM, Knill DC, Bavelier D · Vision Res · 2015 · cited 303 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Effect of age on response to amblyopia treatment in children [8]
    Holmes JM, Lazar EL, Melia BM, Astle WF, Dagi LR, Donahue SP, et al. · Arch Ophthalmol · 2011 · cited 242 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Amblyopia and the binocular approach to its therapy [9]
    Hess RF, Thompson B · Vision Res · 2015 · cited 186 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Critical periods and amblyopia [10]
    Daw NW · Arch Ophthalmol · 1998 · cited 170 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Jost RM, Hudgins LA, Dao LM, Stager DR, Luu B, Beauchamp CL, et al.. Randomized clinical trial of streaming dichoptic movies versus patching for treatment of amblyopia in children aged 3 to 7 years. . 2022. PMID 35264692 · DOI · PMC8905014
  2. Kalpadakis-Smith AV, Tailor VK, Dahlmann-Noor AH, Greenwood JA. Crowding changes appearance systematically in peripheral, amblyopic, and developing vision. . 2022. PMID 35506917 · DOI · PMC9078053
  3. Fong MF, Duffy KR, Leet MP, Candler CT, Bear MF. Correction of amblyopia in cats and mice after the critical period. . 2021. PMID 34464258 · DOI · PMC8456712
  4. Nagino K, Okumura Y, Hirota M, Matsumura S, Matsumoto T, Negishi T, et al.. Virtual Reality-Based Program for Pediatric Patients With Amblyopia: Protocol for a Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Two-Arm Study. . 2026. PMID 41564298 · DOI · PMC12822861
  5. Birch EE. Amblyopia and binocular vision. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2013. PMID 23201436 · DOI · PMC3577063
  6. Holmes JM, Clarke MP. Amblyopia. Lancet. 2006. PMID 16631913 · DOI
  7. Levi DM, Knill DC, Bavelier D. Stereopsis and amblyopia: A mini-review. Vision Res. 2015. PMID 25637854 · DOI · PMC4519435
  8. Holmes JM, Lazar EL, Melia BM, Astle WF, Dagi LR, Donahue SP, et al.. Effect of age on response to amblyopia treatment in children. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011. PMID 21746970 · DOI · PMC3217111
  9. Hess RF, Thompson B. Amblyopia and the binocular approach to its therapy. Vision Res. 2015. PMID 25906685 · DOI
  10. Daw NW. Critical periods and amblyopia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998. PMID 9565050 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Cerebellar AtaxiaNeuroscience
  • NeuralgiaNeuroscience
  • PainNeuroscience
  • AcromegalyNeuroscience
  • Acute PainNeuroscience
  • Alzheimer DiseaseNeuroscience

All 110 articles in Neuroscience →

At a glance

7,772
PubMed records on this heading
14%
published since 2020
588
review articles
217
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Cerebellar AtaxiaNeuroscience
  • NeuralgiaNeuroscience
  • PainNeuroscience
  • AcromegalyNeuroscience
  • Acute PainNeuroscience

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support